Not yet medically reviewed, information on this site is in preparation and has not been verified by a medical reviewer.
Legality · DXM

Is DXM legal in New Zealand?

Also known as: robo, dextromethorphan

Confirmed against a primary sourceVerified September 21, 2026
Legal status
Not a controlled drug on the text cited, and the absence was tested rather than assumed. DXM, the morphinan cough suppressant dextromethorphan, has no exact entry in Schedules 1 to 3 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, and the closed schedules were read together with the open section 2 analogue limb, whose definition excludes substances that are approved medicines or that lack substantial structural similarity to a controlled drug. That is why this is recorded as a positive closed-list absence and not as an unresolved question. PCP and ketamine both have their own rows in this table and are named as controlled drugs, so a dissociative effect profile does not by itself predict a schedule entry. One route stays open: sale of an unapproved psychoactive product can engage the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 even where no controlled drug classification attaches. The consolidation read was the one current at 20 September 2026, with the Order of 2025 commenced on 27 November 2025 as the latest instrument actually in force.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. New Zealand has no death penalty. No Misuse of Drugs Act ceiling attaches to DXM either, because it is not established as a controlled drug on the cited text, so neither the section 6 dealing maximum nor the section 7 possession maximum has anything to fasten on. The exposure that does exist sits in the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013, on the route for unlawful sale of an unapproved psychoactive product, whose penalties are statutory and non-capital. That route reaches supply rather than a person carrying the substance. Diversion of cough preparations is a medicines and product question, and no Misuse of Drugs Act ceiling attaches to it on this finding.
If prescribed or medical
Not established for a traveller. This dossier carries no country-level rule for entering New Zealand with a prescribed medicine: it records that medicines status has to be checked alongside the analogue exclusions and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 route, and that a court-grade conclusion can turn on the medicine exclusions, but it states no declaration requirement, no permit, no quantity allowance and no carry limit at the border, and none was researched for this cell. What is established is the placement a traveller would be read against: DXM is not established as a controlled drug on the text cited, so the Misuse of Drugs Act placement is a negative one and neither section 6 nor section 7 attaches to it. It is sold over the counter in many countries, which is a reason someone may be carrying it without thinking of it as a medicine at all. Do not read that placement as a ruling on a lawfully prescribed and lawfully carried supply, which is a different question this cell does not answer. Settle the border question with the Ministry of Health, whose classification order implementation page this dossier cites, and with the New Zealand border authority, before travelling.
Documentation
Carry the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 consolidation current at 20 September 2026 and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 together, because the finding for DXM needs both: the first for the negative and the second for the route that remains. Read this row with the medicines question in mind, because the dossier records that medicines status is a separate check it did not resolve into a border rule. Carry the reasoning and not only the result, because a negative is worth no more than the limb it was tested against, and here that limb is the section 2 exclusion for approved medicines and for substances lacking substantial structural similarity. Carry the classification chain this finding was read against as well: the 2022 and 2025 Classification and Presumption of Supply Orders with their commencement orders, the 2024 pseudoephedrine amendment, and the 2026 Order, which was made but is not treated as law in this dossier because its own section 2 leaves commencement to the Governor-General and no commencement instrument was located by the horizon. Carry the date as well, 20 September 2026, because in New Zealand a classification order can move a substance between classes without a word of the Act changing.
Primary sources
  • health.govt.nz
  • The power that moves this list is section 4 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, under which the Governor General by Order in Council amends Schedules 1 to 3 subject to approval and commencement machinery. As those schedules stand after the Misuse of Drugs (Classification and Presumption of Supply) Order 2025, effective 27 November 2025, which this project's New Zealand substance dossier checked on 20 September 2026 records as the latest commenced classification instrument located, a 2026 Order was made and no commencement instrument for it was located. That does not rule out a later amendment made or commenced since.

Court records

We have not yet assessed whether court records are publicly available for this jurisdiction.

DXM in related jurisdictions

Other substances confirmed in New Zealand

Same substance, other countries