Not yet medically reviewed, information on this site is in preparation and has not been verified by a medical reviewer.
Legality · Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice)

Are Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice) legal in Dominica?

Confirmed against a primary sourceVerified September 21, 2026
Legal status
Synthetic cannabinoids is a market label covering many chemically distinct compounds, and the Act reaches a compound only through a printed entry or a printed definition. The only definition that could bear on the label is Part IV's, which defines «cannabinol derivatives» as tetrahydro derivatives of cannabinol and 3-alkyl homologues of cannabinol or of its tetrahydro derivatives. That is a closed description of the cannabinol skeleton. The indazole and indole carboxamides sold under this label are not built on that skeleton and are not reached by it, and no generic clause covering compounds by receptor activity appears anywhere in Parts I to III. So the label is answered compound by compound, and for the carboxamide families the answer from this instrument is that nothing places them. The compilation recorded «CANNABINOIDES SINTÉTICOS» as the printed entry for this row. That string does not appear anywhere in this Act; the Act is written in English and that record's quotation column is largely in another language, which is a property of the record rather than of the instrument, so it is reported here and is not offered as a quotation from the Act. The reading is stated as at the revision note «L.R.O. 1/1991» printed in the footer of those pages; section 4(3) lets the Minister amend Parts I to III by Order and this consolidation reproduces none made after that note.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The word death appears nowhere in this Act, counted across the whole 64 page chapter. The ceiling, however, is not in the Fourth Schedule: every limb of that Schedule stops at fourteen years and $200,000, and section 16 sits outside it carrying imprisonment for life. What a sample of this label attracts depends on what it is shown to contain, and the Fourth Schedule sets every maximum by the class of drug involved. For a Class A constituent, possession under section 7(2) carries eighteen months and $50,000 on summary conviction and three years and $100,000 on indictment and possession with intent to supply under section 7(3) carries three years and $100,000 on summary conviction and fourteen years and $200,000 on indictment. For a Class B constituent the possession figures are twelve months and $10,000 on summary conviction and two years and $20,000 on indictment, and for a Class C constituent six months and $10,000 on summary conviction and two years and $20,000 on indictment. Section 7(4) carries the only quantity figures in the Act and it names five substances: more than two grammes of diacetylmorphine, one gramme of cocaine, fifty-five grammes of opium, three grammes of morphine, and for cannabis or cannabis resin twenty-eight grammes, a figure the 1991 consolidation prints as fifteen and which Act No. 16 of 2020 raised, so a quantity presumption attaches only where a sample is shown to be one of those five. Section 29 makes the analyst's certificate admissible in evidence and it is the step that decides which column applies. Section 16 is where the real maximum lives and it is not among the offences the Fourth Schedule prosecutes. Section 16(2) reaches a drug trafficking offence, or possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of drug trafficking, committed in any school, prison or military premises; section 16(5) reaches the same two offences where the person uses violence, corrupts or attempts to corrupt an official of the State, or uses a child as carrier. Each carries on summary conviction a fine of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, or three times the street value of the drug where there is evidence of it and that is greater, together with imprisonment which may extend to fifteen years but shall not be less than seven; and on conviction on indictment, imprisonment for life. Section 16(3) adds that a person found in possession of a controlled drug in any school premises is deemed to have it for the purpose of drug trafficking unless the contrary is proved, with the burden on the accused, and section 16(4) extends school premises to playing fields and other premises maintained for pupils whether or not within the curtilage of the school. Section 17(4) separately punishes handling the proceeds of drug trafficking with fourteen years and fifty thousand dollars on indictment. These figures are the ones the Fourth Schedule carries in the consolidation read, whose Schedule pages are authorised to «L.R.O. 1/1991». They are stated as at that authorisation and not as a claim about today: an amendment can lower or remove a penalty as readily as an Order under section 4(3) can add a substance, and one such amendment has been found and read. One later amendment was found, read in full and is relied on here: the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 16 of 2020, assented to and gazetted on 30 October 2020. It amends section 7(4), inserts new sections 7A and 7B and amends section 8, and it does not touch the Third Schedule, so it moves the cannabis possession rules without moving any substance between the Parts. Its existence is the measured proof that the consolidation held here is not current, which is why an absence from that consolidation is not published as a finding.
If prescribed or medical
Section 7(1) makes it unlawful to have a controlled drug in your possession except as allowed by Regulations made under the Act, and the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Regulations printed as subsidiary legislation to this Chapter carry the general authority to possess in regulation 5 and the prescription rules in regulations 14 and 15. That machinery is keyed to the Third Schedule, so it reaches this row only so far as a constituent is placed there. Where a sample contains a listed constituent the authorisation question is asked about that constituent and not about the label.
Documentation
Ask the Ministry of Health or the nearest Dominican mission before you travel rather than on arrival, and ask specifically whether an Order under section 4(3) has amended the Third Schedule since the revision note the Schedule pages carry, and whether any instrument outside this Act bears on this row. Because this is a label and not a substance, the only reliable answer about a particular sample comes from analysis, which section 29 makes admissible in evidence. The instrument was read on 22 September 2026.
Primary sources
  • Dominica, the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, Act 20 of 1988 as amended by Act 15 of 1989 and Act 15 of 1990, revised edition Chapter 40:07, sections 4, 7, 27 and 29 and the Third and Fourth Schedules
  • read from the 64 page scanned chapter held in this repository at research/instruments/dominica/dm-drugs-prevention-of-misuse-1988.pdf, sha256 30ca6c954678725f8bd4ea81de7b081e5b3ef5ef9015d05e357de1992c62ab30, with its text layer at dm-drugs-prevention-of-misuse-1988.txt, sha256 d47a9b795cabe1a1250ebd6ec3e13e4ccb6367708b69fded78a8eb22b7ab1465. The complete Part I, Part II and Part III lists on printed pages 30, 31 and 32 were read as page images rendered from the scan and not by searching the text layer, which drops the «Part II» and «Part III» headings and one numbered paragraph in each of those Parts. Those pages carry the footer «L.R.O. 1/1991». This citation is document level and not per substance: the compilation's links column for this row holds the constructed text «synthetic-cannabinoids national source» rather than an address. The compilation recorded «CANNABINOIDES SINTÉTICOS» as the printed entry for this row. That string does not appear anywhere in this Act
  • the Act is written in English and that record's quotation column is largely in another language, which is a property of the record rather than of the instrument, so it is reported here and is not offered as a quotation from the Act. The Part and Class placement stated for this row is not printed in the quotation column of the compilation read alongside the Act: measured across that compilation, not one of its 88 rows carries a Part, a Class or a Schedule marker of any kind, and its instrument column says only that there is a controlled-drug schedule without naming which of the four Schedules that is. Every division named in this cell is therefore taken from the printed Third Schedule pages of the Act itself. Second instrument relied on: Dominica, the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 16 of 2020, assented to and gazetted 30 October 2020 and passed in the House of Assembly on 26 October 2020, a four page Act read in full from the Government of Dominica laws site at https://dominica.gov.dm/laws/2020/Drug%20Prevention%20(Amendment)%20Act%202020.pdf, sha256 c5f6a5b47cee1ffce3f88993d72163a1f0ba6a1f3cf68c31f8bfed89e1c5af01. It amends section 7(4), inserts sections 7A and 7B, amends section 8 and makes no amendment to the Third Schedule. Read as at 22 September 2026.

Court records

We have not yet assessed whether court records are publicly available for this jurisdiction.

Other substances confirmed in Dominica