Not yet medically reviewed, information on this site is in preparation and has not been verified by a medical reviewer.
Legality · Delta-8-THC

Is Delta-8-THC legal in Malaysia?

Also known as: d8

Confirmed against a primary sourceVerified September 21, 2026
Legal status
Delta-8-THC is named in Part III of the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 in terms, as «delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol», immediately before «delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol». Its hydroxy metabolites are named too, as «8-beta-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol» and «11-hydroxy-delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol». There is no threshold, no hemp carve-out and no exemption. Malaysia therefore does not have the delta-8 loophole that exists in some other jurisdictions: the isomer is named in the Act rather than left to argument.
Consequences if caught
Malaysia closed the delta-8 argument by naming the isomer. Part III of the First Schedule carries «delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol» on the line immediately before «delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol», so section 2 makes it a dangerous drug on its own terms and section 39B(2) answers trafficking in it with death or imprisonment for life. The chain is short and it passes through no weight at any point. Section 2 defines a «dangerous drug» as «any drug or substance which is for the time being comprised in the First Schedule», section 39B(1) prohibits trafficking in «a dangerous drug», whether on your own behalf or on behalf of any other person, and section 39B(2) sets the penalty. And the word «trafficking» is itself defined in section 2, far wider than selling: it «includes the doing of any of the following acts, that is to say, manufacturing, importing, exporting, keeping, concealing, buying, selling, giving, receiving, storing, administering, transporting, carrying, sending, delivering, procuring, supplying or distributing any dangerous drug otherwise than under the authority of this Act or the regulations made under the Act». Keeping, carrying and storing are on that list, so nothing commercial has to be shown. It has no section 37(da) presumption weight of its own. The 200 gramme cannabis figures at subparagraphs (vi) to (viii) attach to cannabis and cannabis resin, not to a named cannabinoid, so a delta-8 preparation that is not plant material has no figure at all and the prosecution proves trafficking without a presumption. So there is no presumption to rebut and no threshold to stay under, and section 39B(2) applies in the same terms as it would to a weighed substance. The other presumption is still there. Section 37(d) provides that any person found to have had in his custody or under his control anything whatsoever containing a dangerous drug «shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to have been in possession of such drug and shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to have known the nature of such drug». The words «until the contrary is proved» put the defendant to proof on both limbs, on the possession and on the knowledge. Death is available and it is no longer mandatory, and the change has a date. Section 39B(2) once read simply «on conviction with death». The Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017, Act A1558, in force 15 March 2018, opened a narrow gate out of that, a date carried forward from the earlier reading and not re-derived in this pass. The Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, came into operation on 4 July 2023, and section 54 of it is the whole of what it did to the Dangerous Drugs Act: it substituted «be punished with whipping of not less than twelve strokes» for fifteen strokes in subsection (2), and it deleted subsections (2A) and (2B), which were the mandatory death machinery. Section 39B(2) now reads, in full: «Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence against this Act and shall be punished on conviction with death or imprisonment for life and shall, if he is not sentenced to death, be punished with whipping of not less than twelve strokes.» So the court chooses between death and imprisonment for life with no precondition, and at least twelve strokes follow any sentence that is not death. Act 846 is widely described as replacing life with a term of thirty to forty years. It did that in the Penal Code, the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971, the Arms Act 1960, the Kidnapping Act 1961, the Strategic Trade Act 2010 and the Criminal Procedure Code. It did not do it here: the words «imprisonment for life» in section 39B(2) are untouched and no definition of that phrase appears anywhere in the Dangerous Drugs Act, so no year figure is stated in this cell. Section 55 of Act 846 applies the amended section to anyone sentenced after it came into operation even where the offence was committed before. Below trafficking, the possession offence is section 12. Section 11(1) provides that «This Part applies to dangerous drugs listed in Parts III, IV and V of the First Schedule», which is what brings a Part III substance inside Part IV of the Act. Section 12(2) then prohibits having such a drug in your possession, custody or control «unless he is authorized to be in possession, custody or control of such drug or is deemed to be so authorized under this Act or the regulations made thereunder», and section 12(3) punishes a contravention with «a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both». Self-administration is section 15(1), at a fine not exceeding five thousand ringgit or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, and section 38B(1) then requires supervision for not less than two and not more than three years after the sentence has been served. Three procedural consequences follow automatically. Section 41(1) removes a section 39B charge from the Sessions Court and the Magistrates' Court, so it is tried in the High Court, and section 41A(3) has it tried by a judge sitting alone. Section 41B(1) provides that bail «shall not be granted» where the offence is punishable with death, and also where it is punishable with imprisonment for more than five years. Section 38A, which lets a court deal with a drug dependant under eighteen under the Drug Dependants (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act 1983 rather than punish him, is expressly unavailable for a section 39B offence. Section 39C separately escalates a repeat offender under the consumption and possession provisions to not less than five and not more than seven years with not more than three strokes. Part III also names the hydroxy metabolites, as «11-hydroxy-delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol» and «8-beta-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydroxycannabinol», spelling as printed. There is no hemp carve-out, no percentage and no exemption anywhere in the Act. The list can move under all of this. Section 45A is headed «Power of the Minister to vary First Schedule» and it operates either on a decision of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs or of the United Nations Organization altering the Schedules to the Single Convention, or simply where the Minister «considers it expedient to add a substance to, or remove a substance from, or vary the First Schedule, he may by order make the requisite modifications». An order takes effect on gazetting and there is no notice period. He has used it twice since the text read here, by P.U. (A) 97 gazetted 2 April 2024 and P.U. (A) 416 gazetted 25 November 2025, both carried forward from the earlier reading and neither re-read in this pass. The text read for this cell is the Attorney General's Chambers updated text headed «As at 4 July 2023», and a later order is not ruled out.
If prescribed or medical
There is no prescription route for Delta-8-THC in Malaysia, and this cell states that rather than leaving a reader to infer it. Every prohibition in the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, and the definition of trafficking in section 2, is qualified by the words «otherwise than under the authority of this Act or the regulations made under the Act», so a lawful holding is one that sits inside an authority granted under the Act. The authority the Act contemplates is a licence or a regulation made under it, and here there is nothing for one to attach to. It is reached at Part III of the First Schedule: it is named in terms, immediately before «delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol». Neither Act evidences a registered product containing it. There is no threshold and no hemp carve-out, so the isomer that is treated as a gap in some other jurisdictions is named on the face of the Malaysian Schedule and there is nothing to argue about and nothing to license.
Documentation
There is no document to carry, because there is no lawful holding for a document to evidence. This cell says so plainly rather than leave a traveller looking for paperwork that does not exist for Delta-8-THC. The entry that forecloses the question is «delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol», reached at Part III of the First Schedule. Section 25 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, the traveller provision, turns on a medicinal preparation supplied by or on the prescription of a medical practitioner residing outside Malaysia, so it has nothing to attach to here. It is also confined to Part V of the Act, the external trade Part, and would not answer a possession charge even if it did apply. Getting the paperwork wrong is not a paperwork penalty. Section 37(d) provides that «any person who is found to have had in his custody or under his control anything whatsoever containing any dangerous drug shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to have been in possession of such drug and shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed to have known the nature of such drug», and section 37(da) can then presume trafficking from the weight of the material alone. A foreign prescription, a licence issued in another country, and religious or traditional use are none of them provided for anywhere in the Act. The entry the document has to answer to, in the First Schedule itself, is «delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol» at Part III. If the document does not answer the entry, the charge is section 12(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, possession of a dangerous drug without authority, and section 12(3) sets «a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both». Section 12(4) adds whipping of not more than three strokes where the person convicted is a public officer employed at a prison, rehabilitation centre, police lock-up or place of detention.
Primary sources
  • Malaysia, Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, Act 234, first enacted as Ordinance No. 30 of 1952 and revised in 1980 with effect from 17 July 1980
  • read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text headed «As at 4 July 2023», latest Act amendment being the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, in force 4 July 2023
  • Poisons Act 1952, Act 366, revised 1989, read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text as at 1 January 2022, latest amendment P.U. (A) 412/2021 in force 3 November 2021
  • read for this substance: the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 in all five Parts, the entry found at Part III of the First Schedule as «delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol»
  • sections 2, 6, 6B, 8, 9, 11(1), 16, 25, 37(d), 37(da), 39A, 39B and 45A of that Act
  • the Poisons Act 1952 Poisons List and Third Schedule both read
  • the Poisons Act 1952 Third Schedule read in full
  • the First Schedule has since been amended twice under section 45A, by the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment of First Schedule) Order 2024, P.U. (A) 97, gazetted 2 April 2024, which inserts Etazene, Etonitazepyne, 2-Methyl-AP-237 and Protonitazene into Part III and substitutes Proheptazine for Propheptazine, and by the Order 2025, P.U. (A) 416, gazetted 25 November 2025, which inserts Butonitazene into Part III
  • both orders were read in full and neither touches this substance
  • the publisher's own disclaimer is carried forward: this is only an updated text and not an authentic text until it is reprinted under subsection 14(1) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968
  • read as at 2026-09-17 from https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1840725_BI/22.11.2023%20-%20Act%20234.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1714451_BI/ACT%20366_MUKTAMAD_1%20JANUARY%202022.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1826840_BI/Akta%20846%20BI.pdf
  • re-derived in this pass, from the on-disk Attorney General's Chambers online updated text of Act 234 whose own header reads «As at 4 July 2023»: sections 2, 5, 6, 6B, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25, 30, 37, 38A, 38B, 39, 39A, 39B, 39C, 41, 41A, 41B, 45A and 46, and the First Schedule read line by line in all five Parts
  • and from the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, sections 1(2), 2, 54 and 55
  • the First Schedule has five Parts and not three: Part I and Part II are the plant and prepared-opium lists, Part III the long alphabetical chemical list, Part IV a shorter codeine group carrying its own isomer clause and its own salt clause, with Part III's ester and ether clause running across the whole Schedule and not only that Part because it reads «of the drugs in this Schedule» where the other two read «this Part», and Part V is headed «PREPARATION FOR THE EXPORT OF WHICH EXPORT AUTHORIZATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED» and is an exemption list rather than a control list
  • section 39B carries no quantity table of its own, the weights being in section 37(da), which is a rebuttable presumption of trafficking, and in section 39A, which applies only where the offence is not punishable with death
  • the file the Act 234 text is served from is dated 22 November 2023 in its name while the text's own header reads «As at 4 July 2023», and the header is the version stated here
  • all Poisons Act 1952 material in this cell, including every Poisons List and Third Schedule entry and every figure drawn from that Act, is carried forward from the earlier reading recorded above and was not re-derived in this pass
  • so is every other fact in this cell that is not derivable from the two texts named above, which includes the two section 45A orders of 2024 and 2025, the commencement of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 on 15 March 2018, and any statement here about the Single Convention or the 1971 Convention and their schedules

Court records

We have not yet assessed whether court records are publicly available for this jurisdiction.

Delta-8-THC in related jurisdictions

Other substances confirmed in Malaysia

Same substance, other countries