Not yet medically reviewed, information on this site is in preparation and has not been verified by a medical reviewer.
Legality · Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice)

Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice) in Hungary: not individually verified

Not individually verified

We have not confirmed that Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice) specifically is scheduled in Hungary, so this page gives no legal status. Publishing a guess here would be worse than publishing nothing. What we do know is the governing national drug law, below.

What is on record
Not confirmed for Hungary. Synthetic cannabinoids could not be settled from the instruments read, and this cell states what was read rather than an answer. The class name is not an entry, and the decree reaches this family three different ways at once. Named rows sit in the P1 jegyzék at 65 to 69, «JWH-018**», «JWH-073***», «JWH-081***», «JWH-122***» and «JWH-210***». Further named rows sit in the P2 jegyzék, among them «AB-CHMINACA» at row 11, then «AB-FUBINACA» at row 12, then «AB-PINACA» at row 13, and «MDMB-4en-PINACA» at row 33. Beyond those, point 1 of the 3. melléklet describes the family by structure across twenty two numbered sub points, covering the indolyl, indazolyl and pyrrolyl ketones, carboxylates and carboxamides and the substitutions each of them may carry. What was not established is which of those three routes a given material takes, and that decides the figure: section 461(1)(d)(db) prints a list of six named compounds at 0.05 gramm, section 461(4)(a) sets a dose multiple for the P1 and P2 rows, and section 461(5)(a) sets 0.5 gramm for the point 1 compound group. A compound outside all three, such as a cyclohexylphenol, would not be reached by point 1 at all. Hungary carries the list outside the Act: the Criminal Code names no substance and the delegated rendelet carries the jegyzékek, which is the outward reference model and the second of the three. Section 459(1a) of the Criminal Code, 2012. évi C. törvény, inserted by section 26 of 2025. évi XIX. törvény, reads «E törvény alkalmazásában kábítószer a 78/2022. (XII. 28.) BM rendelet 1. mellékletében a kábítószerek 1. vagy 2. jegyzékén szereplő anyag, 2. mellékletében a pszichotróp anyagok 1. vagy 2. jegyzékén szereplő anyag, valamint 3. mellékletében meghatározott anyag.», so the K1 and K2 jegyzékek of the 1. melléklet, the P1 and P2 jegyzékek of the 2. melléklet and the whole of the 3. melléklet are inside the Criminal Code definition and the P3 and P4 jegyzékek are not. The P3 and P4 jegyzékek remain controlled schedules of the rendelet, and an entry there alone does not place a substance in the ordinary section 176 trafficking lane. A search that did not settle the question is not a finding that the substance is outside the jegyzékek, and it is not a finding that it is inside them. Treat this row as unresolved and put the question to the Hungarian National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition before relying on anything. This is read from the consolidated text of the rendelet as in force on 29 June 2026, as those lists stand after the amendment made by 1/2026. (VI. 19.) EÜM rendelet, which is the last amendment reflected in the text that was read.

Confirm directly with Hungary’s national drug authority or your own embassy before you rely on anything.

What Hungary HAS confirmed for related substances

This page is deliberately excluded from search indexing and from our sitemap. Only confirmed, individually verified statuses are published as indexable pages.