Legal status in Montenegro

Per-substance legal status for Montenegro, from sourced statutes where available. Legal information, not legal advice; drug laws change, so confirm with the destination’s embassy or drug authority before you travel.

60 confirmed substances28 not individually verifiedLast updated September 21, 2026

Confirmed legal status

2C-B

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 66142-81-2 and was reached by the exact name locator «2C-B; Brolamfetamin». The entry was accepted under the schedule's own brolamfetamine synonym rather than under the street code, so the row is found by the international name. It is also one of the two constituent rows the pink cocaine label was resolved through in this reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «2C-B; Brolamfetamin | CAS 66142-81-2».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 66142-81-2, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 66142-81-2, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

2C-B in Montenegro, full detail →

2C-T-7

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9», read with Član 1. The row carries the locator 207740-26-9 and was reached by the exact name locator «2C-T-7». This row is transcribed with its systematic name and a bare row locator rather than a CAS prefix, and it is one of the three rows the dossier ran its own anti-template check on. Two members of the 2C series are printed here and the others in this table are not, so the series is named member by member and not as a family. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «2C-T-7 | 2,5-dimetoksi-4-(propiltio)fenetilamin | 207740-26-9» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

2C-T-7 in Montenegro, full detail →

Adderall

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 300-62-9 and was reached by the exact name locator «Amfetamin». The mixed salt product was resolved through the amphetamine active moiety row rather than through any brand entry. The brand name is not the printed row. The mixed salt product is resolved through the amphetamine active moiety, and the row read is the same one the amphetamine slug rests on, which means this cell asserts nothing about the brand as a brand. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the brand product, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed active moiety row.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the brand product, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed active moiety row.
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the brand product, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed active moiety row.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the brand product, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed active moiety row · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Adderall in Montenegro, full detail →

Alcohol

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, where the dossier records its legal category as excise and food regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «alkoholna pića; etanol» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane. The placement is an excise and food one and not a drug one, so the fifteen year drug offence ceiling this dossier prints on every row does not attach here. That ceiling is a single value repeated down the dossier's own column and it is not this row's exposure. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is excise and food regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «alkoholna pića; etanol» and the placement under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category excise and food regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «alkoholna pića; etanol» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «alkoholna pića; etanol» and the placement under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category excise and food regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «alkoholna pića; etanol» and on Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «alkoholna pića; etanol» and the placement under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category excise and food regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for alkoholna pića and etanol with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category excise and food regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for alkoholna pića and etanol and the placement under Zakon o akcizama and Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category excise and food regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Alcohol in Montenegro, full detail →

Amphetamine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 300-62-9 and was reached by the exact name locator «Amfetamin». This is the active moiety row that the mixed salt brand product in this table also resolves to, so one printed entry carries two slugs and neither adds a second control. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed active moiety entry itself, which a mixed salt brand product in this table also resolves to.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed active moiety entry itself, which a mixed salt brand product in this table also resolves to.
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed active moiety entry itself, which a mixed salt brand product in this table also resolves to.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Amfetamin | CAS 300-62-9», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed active moiety entry itself, which a mixed salt brand product in this table also resolves to · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Amphetamine in Montenegro, full detail →

Benzodiazepines

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro member by member, and Montenegro's own Prilog names the members, so this is a finding rather than a deferral. The member by member check was run against the Montenegrin schedule and not merely against the substances this table happens to carry, and it returned six printed names: «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1» and «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8». The class word itself has no printed row, so what carries the control is the molecule and never the family label, and the specific product has to be identified before any answer is given. One thing in this document argues against itself and is recorded rather than smoothed over: the class row's own search record says a search for «benzodiazepini; alprazolam; diazepam» returned no accepted entry, while six rows in the same table quote printed Prilog entries, two of them for those very names. A printed entry is evidence of a schedule and a search record is evidence that somebody looked, so the printed entries govern here and the search record is reported as the contradiction it is. One further caution: the etizolam entry is a thieno analogue printed in its own right rather than a true benzodiazepine, and the zolpidem entry in this table is an imidazopyridine, so neither is authority for the family as a family. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. Beyond that the exposure is member specific and no member is resolved by this cell, because six molecules with six different locators sit behind the label. A proved member with a printed Prilog row meets Article 300 in the ordinary way, and which member is in front of you is the whole of the question. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is six printed Prilog rows and no printed row for the class word.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not one placement but six printed entries, so the medicine has to be identified by its active ingredient before the traveller rule can be applied to it, and the class name will not do that work. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is six printed Prilog rows and no printed row for the class word.
Documentation: Carry no document on the strength of the class name. Identify the molecule printed on the dispensing label and read it against the Prilog entry that names it: the six read here were «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1» and «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8», on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is six printed Prilog rows and no printed row for the class word.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, read member by member for the class rather than for the class word, returning the six printed rows «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1» and «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8» · the class label itself has no printed row, and the class row's own search record in the source dossier reports the opposite result, which is why the printed entries are what this citation supports. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision and Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik carries the fifteen year ceiling. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is six printed Prilog rows and no printed row for the class word · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Benzodiazepines in Montenegro, full detail →

Buprenorphine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 52485-79-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Buprenorfin». The dossier records no preparation, strength or product limb attached to this entry, so nothing in this reading takes a finished medicine containing it out of the schedule on strength alone. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Buprenorfin | CAS 52485-79-7» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Buprenorphine in Montenegro, full detail →

Caffeine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, where the dossier records its legal category as food and labelling regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «kofein» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane. The placement is a food safety and labelling one. The dossier opened no maximum level, no energy drink limit and no labelling threshold, so nothing quantitative is established for it here. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is food and labelling regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kofein» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category food and labelling regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «kofein» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «kofein» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category food and labelling regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «kofein» and on Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kofein» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category food and labelling regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «kofein» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category food and labelling regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kofein» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane, legal category food and labelling regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Caffeine in Montenegro, full detail →

Cannabis / THC

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 8063-14-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa)». The entry is the plant itself, printed under the Montenegrin name for hemp with the botanical name beside it. The dossier records it as a substance row keyed by a CAS number rather than placing it in a plant table, and it is the only botanical name printed anywhere in this reading, which is worth holding against the five plant and fungus rows in this set that returned nothing. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa) | CAS 8063-14-7» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Cannabis / THC in Montenegro, full detail →

Cathinone

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 71031-15-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Katinon». The printed Montenegrin form of this entry is the same word the khat row searched and recorded as not accepted. This cell rests on the printed entry, and that contradiction is named rather than smoothed over. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Katinon | CAS 71031-15-7» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Cathinone in Montenegro, full detail →

Clonazepam

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 1622-61-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «Klonazepam». One of the six printed benzodiazepine entries in this table. Its placement is its own and does not travel to the class label, which the schedule does not print. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Klonazepam | CAS 1622-61-3» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Clonazepam in Montenegro, full detail →

Cocaine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 50-36-2 and was reached by the exact name locator «Kokain». This single printed entry carries three slugs in this table: the alkaloid itself, the free base street form, and one of the two constituents the pink cocaine label was resolved through. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed alkaloid entry, which the free base street form and one street label in this table also resolve to.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed alkaloid entry, which the free base street form and one street label in this table also resolve to.
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed alkaloid entry, which the free base street form and one street label in this table also resolve to.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed alkaloid entry, which the free base street form and one street label in this table also resolve to · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Cocaine in Montenegro, full detail →

Codeine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 76-57-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «Kodein». The dossier records no low strength or compounded preparation limb for this entry, so this reading does not establish that any over the counter combination sits outside the schedule. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Kodein | CAS 76-57-3» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Codeine in Montenegro, full detail →

Crack Cocaine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 50-36-2 and was reached by the exact name locator «Kokain». The free base street form was resolved through the cocaine row rather than through any entry of its own. The street form has no printed row of its own. It is resolved to the cocaine entry at the same locator, so what is controlled is the alkaloid and not the preparation name. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the free base street form, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed alkaloid row.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the free base street form, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed alkaloid row.
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the free base street form, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed alkaloid row.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Kokain | CAS 50-36-2», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the free base street form, which has no entry of its own and resolves to the printed alkaloid row · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Crack Cocaine in Montenegro, full detail →

Delta-8-THC

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 5957-75-5 and was reached by the exact name locator «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol». The schedule prints this isomer by name. That is a narrow finding and not a cannabinoid family rule: three other cannabinoid slugs in this table returned no accepted entry against the same list. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «delta-8-tetrahidrokanabinol | CAS 5957-75-5» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Delta-8-THC in Montenegro, full detail →

Diazepam

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 439-14-5 and was reached by the exact name locator «Diazepam». One of the six printed benzodiazepine entries. The class row searched this very name and recorded nothing accepted, which the class cell in this set resolves against the printed entries rather than against the search record. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Diazepam | CAS 439-14-5» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Diazepam in Montenegro, full detail →

DMT

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 61-50-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT». The schedule prints this tryptamine under both the Montenegrin systematic name and the three letter code. The ayahuasca row in this table searched the same code and recorded no accepted entry, and that tension is named in both cells. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Dimetiltriptamin; DMT | CAS 61-50-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 61-50-7, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 61-50-7, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

DMT in Montenegro, full detail →

DOM

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 15588-95-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «STP; DOM». The entry is printed under two synonyms, the older laboratory code and the ring substituted name, and the row is found under either. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «STP; DOM | CAS 15588-95-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 15588-95-1, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 15588-95-1, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

DOM in Montenegro, full detail →

DXM

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «dekstrometorfan» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient. Whether a preparation containing it is a pharmacy or a prescription product was not established, and the narcotics list is not what decides that. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «dekstrometorfan» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «dekstrometorfan» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «dekstrometorfan» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «dekstrometorfan» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «dekstrometorfan» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «dekstrometorfan» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «dekstrometorfan» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

DXM in Montenegro, full detail →

Ephedrine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, where the dossier records its legal category as drug-precursor regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «efedrin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge. This is the only row in this reading placed in the precursor control regime rather than in the narcotics list or the medicines Act. The controlling Pravilnik's own title also covers plants usable for producing drugs, which is a different limb from the precursor statute, and the dossier did not establish how the two meet. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is drug-precursor regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «efedrin» and the placement under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, legal category drug-precursor regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «efedrin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «efedrin» and the placement under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, legal category drug-precursor regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «efedrin» and on Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «efedrin» and the placement under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, legal category drug-precursor regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «efedrin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, legal category drug-precursor regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «efedrin» and the placement under Zakon o kontroli prekursora za droge, legal category drug-precursor regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Ephedrine in Montenegro, full detail →

Etizolam

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 40054-69-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «Etizolam». This is printed in its own right. It is a thieno analogue rather than a true benzodiazepine, so its placement rests on the printed entry and not on any class reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Etizolam | CAS 40054-69-1» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Etizolam in Montenegro, full detail →

Fentanyl

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 437-38-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Fentanil». The dossier records no analogue or derivative limb attached to this entry, so this reading reaches the named molecule and does not establish that a structural analogue is caught. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Fentanil | CAS 437-38-7» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Fentanyl in Montenegro, full detail →

Gabapentin

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «gabapentin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient. No monitoring, special prescription or reporting limb was established for it in this reading, and the other gabapentinoid row in this table is answered identically. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient, with no monitoring or special prescription limb established.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «gabapentin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient, with no monitoring or special prescription limb established.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «gabapentin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient, with no monitoring or special prescription limb established.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «gabapentin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient, with no monitoring or special prescription limb established · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Gabapentin in Montenegro, full detail →

GHB

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 591-81-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «GHB». The schedule prints this entry by its three letter code. Its lactone precursor has its own slug in this table and returned no accepted entry, so the two are not answered together. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «GHB | CAS 591-81-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «GHB | CAS 591-81-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «GHB | CAS 591-81-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «GHB | CAS 591-81-1» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

GHB in Montenegro, full detail →

Heroin

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 561-27-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «Heroin; Diamorfin». The entry is printed under both the common name and the international non proprietary name, so a document naming either finds the same row. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Heroin; Diamorfin | CAS 561-27-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 561-27-3, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 561-27-3, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Heroin in Montenegro, full detail →

Hydrocodone

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 125-29-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «Hidrokodon». A printed opioid entry read at its own locator, with no preparation limb recorded in this reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Hidrokodon | CAS 125-29-1» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Hydrocodone in Montenegro, full detail →

Ketamine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «ketamin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. This placement rests on a recorded negative search of the named list version and nothing more. It is worth reading against the tramadol row in the same dossier, which is printed in the schedule, and against the two arylcyclohexylamine analogue rows here that returned no accepted entry. What the document establishes is that the list was searched for one Montenegrin spelling and returned nothing, not that the substance was considered and released, so treat it as the dossier's finding rather than as a settled one. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ketamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «ketamin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «ketamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «ketamin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ketamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «ketamin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ketamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Ketamine in Montenegro, full detail →

Lorazepam

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 846-49-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «Lorazepam». One of the six printed benzodiazepine entries. It is not among the three terms the class row's own search record lists, so the class label's negative rests on a search that never reached this member while the schedule prints it anyway. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Lorazepam | CAS 846-49-1» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Lorazepam in Montenegro, full detail →

LSD

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 50-37-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «Lizergid; LSD». The schedule prints this under the Montenegrin form of the lysergide name with the three letter code beside it. Two related lysergamide slugs in this table returned no accepted entry against the same list. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Lizergid; LSD | CAS 50-37-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 50-37-3, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 50-37-3, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

LSD in Montenegro, full detail →

MDA

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 4764-17-4 and was reached by the exact name locator «Tenamfetamin; MDA». The entry is printed under the international non proprietary name with the three letter code beside it, which is why a search on the code alone still reaches it. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Tenamfetamin; MDA | CAS 4764-17-4».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 4764-17-4, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 4764-17-4, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

MDA in Montenegro, full detail →

MDMA

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 42542-10-9 and was reached by the exact name locator «MDMA; Ekstazi». The entry is printed with the street synonym alongside the chemical abbreviation, which is unusual in this schedule and makes the row findable from either. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «MDMA; Ekstazi | CAS 42542-10-9».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 42542-10-9, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 42542-10-9, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

MDMA in Montenegro, full detail →

MDPV

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3», read with Član 1. The row carries the locator 687603-66-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «MDPV». This row is transcribed with its systematic name and a bare row locator. It is a synthetic cathinone printed by name, while another cathinone slug in this table returned no accepted entry, so the schedule names this group member by member. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «MDPV | 3,4-metilendioksipirovaleron | 687603-66-3» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

MDPV in Montenegro, full detail →

Memantine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «memantin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient, and nothing in this reading attaches a controlled drug limb to it. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «memantin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «memantin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «memantin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «memantin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «memantin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «memantin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «memantin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Memantine in Montenegro, full detail →

Mephedrone (4-MMC)

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6», read with Član 1. The row carries the locator 1189805-46-6 and was reached by the exact name locator «Mefedron (4-MMC)». One of the three rows the dossier ran its own anti-template check on, printed with the ring methylated position in the name. A positional isomer of it has its own slug in this table and returned no accepted entry. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Mefedron (4-MMC) | 2-metilamino-1-(4-metilfenil)propan-1-on | 1189805-46-6» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Mephedrone (4-MMC) in Montenegro, full detail →

Mescaline

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 54-04-6 and was reached by the exact name locator «Meskalin». The printed Montenegrin form of this entry is the same word the peyote row searched and recorded as not accepted. This cell rests on the printed entry, and the contradiction is named on both rows. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Meskalin | CAS 54-04-6» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Mescaline in Montenegro, full detail →

Methadone

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 76-99-3 and was reached by the exact name locator «Metadon». A printed synthetic opioid entry, read at its own locator, with no maintenance or treatment programme limb recorded in this reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metadon | CAS 76-99-3» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Methadone in Montenegro, full detail →

Methamphetamine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 537-46-2 and was reached by the exact name locator «Metamfetamin». A printed entry in its own right and not a derivative of the amphetamine row, which is printed separately at a different locator. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metamfetamin | CAS 537-46-2» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Methamphetamine in Montenegro, full detail →

Methaqualone (Quaaludes)

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 72-44-6 and was reached by the exact name locator «Metakvalon». This is the nearest sedative hypnotic in this table that is actually printed. It is a quinazolinone and not a barbiturate, so its placement does not answer the barbiturate class row, and this cell is not authority for that class. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metakvalon | CAS 72-44-6» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Methaqualone (Quaaludes) in Montenegro, full detail →

Methylone

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5», read with Član 1. The row carries the locator 186028-79-5 and was reached by the exact name locator «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA)». The entry is printed with two synonyms and the systematic cathinone name, which is why a search on the ketone analogue abbreviation reaches it. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilon (M1, bk-MDMA) | 3,4-metilendioksi-N-metilkatinon | 186028-79-5» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Methylone in Montenegro, full detail →

Methylphenidate

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 113-45-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «Metilfenidat». A printed stimulant entry read at its own locator. The dossier records no prescribing or treatment limb attached to it in the schedule itself. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Metilfenidat | CAS 113-45-1» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Methylphenidate in Montenegro, full detail →

Modafinil

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «modafinil» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient. What the document records is a negative search against the Montenegrin list and no positive exclusion, so what is established is that the list was searched and not that the substance was considered and released. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is a negative search against the Montenegrin list with the placement recorded as a medicinal active ingredient and no positive exclusion.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «modafinil» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is a negative search against the Montenegrin list with the placement recorded as a medicinal active ingredient and no positive exclusion.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «modafinil» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is a negative search against the Montenegrin list with the placement recorded as a medicinal active ingredient and no positive exclusion.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «modafinil» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is a negative search against the Montenegrin list with the placement recorded as a medicinal active ingredient and no positive exclusion · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Modafinil in Montenegro, full detail →

Morphine

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 57-27-2 and was reached by the exact name locator «Morfin». A printed entry in its own right, sitting alongside a separately printed opium entry at a different locator, so the alkaloid and the crude preparation are two rows and not one. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Morfin | CAS 57-27-2» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Morphine in Montenegro, full detail →

Nicotine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, where the dossier records its legal category as tobacco and nicotine-product regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «nikotin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda. The placement is in the tobacco and nicotine product regime, alongside the separate tobacco row in this table. The dossier did not establish how that regime treats a nicotine product that is not a tobacco product. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is tobacco and nicotine-product regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «nikotin» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, legal category tobacco and nicotine-product regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «nikotin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «nikotin» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, legal category tobacco and nicotine-product regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «nikotin» and on Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «nikotin» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, legal category tobacco and nicotine-product regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «nikotin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, legal category tobacco and nicotine-product regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «nikotin» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda, legal category tobacco and nicotine-product regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Nicotine in Montenegro, full detail →

Nimetazepam

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 2011-67-8 and was reached by the exact name locator «Nimetazepam». One of the six printed benzodiazepine entries, and the one that shows the class is named member by member rather than by family, since the class word itself is not printed. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Nimetazepam | CAS 2011-67-8» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Nimetazepam in Montenegro, full detail →

Nitrous Oxide

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as food-additive or medicinal-use regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «azot-suboksid; E942» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima. Two regimes are named for this row and the dossier chooses between them by use rather than by substance, recording both a food additive identity and a medicinal one. Which of the two reaches a traveller carrying it was not established, and that is the open question on this row. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is food-additive or medicinal-use regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «azot-suboksid; E942» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, legal category food-additive or medicinal-use regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «azot-suboksid; E942» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «azot-suboksid; E942» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, legal category food-additive or medicinal-use regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «azot-suboksid; E942» and on Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «azot-suboksid; E942» and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, legal category food-additive or medicinal-use regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for azot-suboksid and E942 with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, legal category food-additive or medicinal-use regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for azot-suboksid and E942 and the placement under Zakon o bezbjednosti hrane and Zakon o ljekovima, legal category food-additive or medicinal-use regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Nitrous Oxide in Montenegro, full detail →

Opium

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 8008-60-4 and was reached by the exact name locator «Opijum». The entry is the crude preparation of the poppy, printed at its own locator, with the principal alkaloid printed separately elsewhere in the same list. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Opijum | CAS 8008-60-4» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Opium in Montenegro, full detail →

Oxycodone

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 76-42-5 and was reached by the exact name locator «Oksikodon». A printed opioid entry at its own locator. No preparation or strength limb is recorded for it in this reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Oksikodon | CAS 76-42-5» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Oxycodone in Montenegro, full detail →

PCP

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 77-10-1 and was reached by the exact name locator «Fenciklidin; PCP». The entry is printed under the Montenegrin systematic name with the three letter code beside it. Another arylcyclohexylamine slug in this table returned no accepted entry against the same list. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Fenciklidin; PCP | CAS 77-10-1».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row identified by CAS 77-10-1, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status, with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row identified by CAS 77-10-1, with the printed row quoted in full in this cell's legal status · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

PCP in Montenegro, full detail →

Pink Cocaine / Tusi

Legal status: Not applicable as a single status. Montenegro's own reason on this row is that the label was stopped as a variable street mixture rather than treated as an unsearched molecule: the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was opened for «ružičasti kokain; tusi; 2C-B» as a label resolution check and the label was not accepted as one molecule level entry. The dossier records one further step on this row: cocaine and 2C-B constituent rows checked separately. Both constituents the label was resolved through have printed entries of their own in this schedule, at two different locators, so the label collapses into two answered rows and not into one. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling reaches a proved constituent and not the label, because Article 300 depends on a placement and a label with no fixed composition has none of its own. What is in the packet decides the exposure, and the label does not disclose it. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and whether it reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this row's exposure. What this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable street mixture.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. There is no single placement to attach on this row, because the label was resolved as a variable street mixture and each detected constituent has to be classified on its own printed entry or its own absence. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable street mixture.
Documentation: Carry nothing on the strength of this label and expect any analysis to name constituents rather than the label: the terms opened here were «ružičasti kokain; tusi; 2C-B» and the list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable street mixture.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, opened as a label resolution check for ružičasti kokain, tusi and 2C-B and stopped as a variable street mixture rather than accepted as a molecule level entry · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision and Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik carries the fifteen year drug offence ceiling that a proved constituent would meet. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable street mixture · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Pink Cocaine / Tusi in Montenegro, full detail →

Poppers

Legal status: Not applicable as a single status. Montenegro's own reason on this row is that the label was stopped as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category rather than treated as an unsearched molecule: the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was opened for «poppers; amil-nitrit; alkil-nitriti» as a label resolution check and the label was not accepted as one molecule level entry. The constituent row this label points at is itself unresolved in this table, so the label points at a row that does not settle it and the pair has to be read together. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling reaches a proved constituent and not the label, because Article 300 depends on a placement and a label with no fixed composition has none of its own. What is in the packet decides the exposure, and the label does not disclose it. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and whether it reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this row's exposure. What this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. There is no single placement to attach on this row, because the label was resolved as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category and each detected constituent has to be classified on its own printed entry or its own absence. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category.
Documentation: Carry nothing on the strength of this label and expect any analysis to name constituents rather than the label: the terms opened here were «poppers; amil-nitrit; alkil-nitriti» and the list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, opened as a label resolution check for poppers, amil-nitrit and alkil-nitriti and stopped as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category rather than accepted as a molecule level entry · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision and Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik carries the fifteen year drug offence ceiling that a proved constituent would meet. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a variable alkyl-nitrite product category · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Poppers in Montenegro, full detail →

Pregabalin

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «pregabalin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient, on the same instrument and the same category as the other gabapentinoid row in this table, and the dossier records no fact that separates the two. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient on the same instrument and category as the other gabapentinoid row in this table.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «pregabalin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient on the same instrument and category as the other gabapentinoid row in this table.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «pregabalin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient on the same instrument and category as the other gabapentinoid row in this table.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «pregabalin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is a gabapentinoid placed as a medicinal active ingredient on the same instrument and category as the other gabapentinoid row in this table · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Pregabalin in Montenegro, full detail →

Psilocybin

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 520-52-5 and was reached by the exact name locator «Psilocibin». The schedule prints this alkaloid. Two substituted tryptamine slugs in this table returned no accepted entry, and one of them was searched as the acetyl ester of psilocin rather than of this molecule, so the printed row is not a parent entry for either of them. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Psilocibin | CAS 520-52-5» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Psilocybin in Montenegro, full detail →

Quetiapine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «kvetiapin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient, with no controlled drug limb established in this reading. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kvetiapin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «kvetiapin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «kvetiapin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «kvetiapin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kvetiapin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «kvetiapin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «kvetiapin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Quetiapine in Montenegro, full detail →

Scopolamine (Devil's Breath)

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «skopolamin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ljekovima. The placement is as a medicinal active ingredient. The row searched a single Montenegrin term and nothing else, so what is recorded is a negative on that one spelling and not a search of the plant sources this alkaloid comes from, which were never searched here. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «skopolamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «skopolamin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «skopolamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «skopolamin» and on Zakon o ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «skopolamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «skopolamin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «skopolamin» and the placement under Zakon o ljekovima, legal category medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Scopolamine (Devil's Breath) in Montenegro, full detail →

Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice)

Legal status: Not applicable as a class status. Montenegro's own reason on this row is that the label was stopped as a family label rather than treated as an unsearched molecule: the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was opened for «sintetički kanabinoidi; JWH-018; AM-2201» as a label resolution check and the label was not accepted as one molecule level entry. The dossier records one further step on this row: individual cannabinoid rows checked separately. The two compounds the label was resolved through have no rows at all in this set of 88, so the pointer to individual cannabinoid rows reaches nothing here. Of the cannabinoid rows that do exist, one is printed in the schedule and three returned no accepted entry, which is the same individual naming pattern. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling reaches a proved constituent and not the label, because Article 300 depends on a placement and a label with no fixed composition has none of its own. What is in the packet decides the exposure, and the label does not disclose it. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and whether it reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this row's exposure. What this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a family label.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. There is no single placement to attach on this row, because the label was resolved as a family label and each detected constituent has to be classified on its own printed entry or its own absence. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the label resolution check that stopped it as a family label.
Documentation: Carry nothing on the strength of this label and expect any analysis to name constituents rather than the label: the terms opened here were «sintetički kanabinoidi; JWH-018; AM-2201» and the list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a family label.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, opened as a label resolution check for sintetički kanabinoidi, JWH-018 and AM-2201 and stopped as a family label rather than accepted as a molecule level entry · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision and Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik carries the fifteen year drug offence ceiling that a proved constituent would meet. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the label resolution check that stopped it as a family label · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice) in Montenegro, full detail →

Tobacco

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, where the dossier records its legal category as tobacco and excise regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «duvan» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama. The placement is in the tobacco control and excise regime, alongside the separate nicotine row in this table, so the drug offence ceiling printed down the dossier's own column does not attach here. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is tobacco and excise regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «duvan» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «duvan» and on Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «duvan» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Tobacco in Montenegro, full detail →

Tramadol

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8», read with Član 1. The row carries the locator 46941-76-8 and was reached by the exact name locator «Tramadol». One of the three rows the dossier ran its own anti-template check on, printed with its systematic name and a bare row locator. It is worth reading against the ketamine row in this table, which the same dossier places outside this schedule entirely. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Tramadol | 2-[(dimetilamino)metil]-1-(3-metoksifenil)cikloheksanol | 46941-76-8» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Tramadol in Montenegro, full detail →

Xanax (Alprazolam)

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 28981-97-7 and was reached by the exact name locator «Alprazolam». This is one of the six printed entries the benzodiazepine class row in this table is resolved from, and the class label itself is not printed, so the molecule and not the class is what carries the placement. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Alprazolam | CAS 28981-97-7» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Xanax (Alprazolam) in Montenegro, full detail →

Xylazine

Legal status: Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, where the dossier records its legal category as veterinary medicinal active ingredient. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «ksilazin» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima. The dossier is internally inconsistent on this row. Its instrument column names the veterinary medicines statute and its own explanation names the human medicines statute, and the document does not settle which governs a human exposure. Both are recorded here rather than one being chosen. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is veterinary medicinal active ingredient. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ksilazin» and the placement under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, legal category veterinary medicinal active ingredient.
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «ksilazin» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «ksilazin» and the placement under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, legal category veterinary medicinal active ingredient.
Documentation: Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «ksilazin» and on Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ksilazin» and the placement under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, legal category veterinary medicinal active ingredient.

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «ksilazin» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, legal category veterinary medicinal active ingredient · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «ksilazin» and the placement under Zakon o veterinarskim ljekovima, legal category veterinary medicinal active ingredient · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Xylazine in Montenegro, full detail →

Zolpidem

Legal status: Controlled in Montenegro. The operative list is the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, published at 56/2012 and amended at 54/2015, and its Prilog prints the row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0», read with Član 1. The row is keyed by CAS 82626-48-0 and was reached by the exact name locator «Zolpidem». A printed entry in its own right. It is an imidazopyridine and not a benzodiazepine, so the class reading in this table neither reaches it nor is needed for it. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling attaches to conduct with the substance as the Prilog prints it at «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0», because this row has a placement in the list and Article 300 is a drug offence that depends on one. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 offence that this row's placement in the list brings into play. What this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0».
If prescribed / medical: Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach to that rule on this row is the printed Prilog entry «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0», so a preparation containing it is a scheduled medicine question and not an unscheduled one. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the printed Prilog row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0».
Documentation: Carry the medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and expect the active ingredient rather than the brand to decide the question, because the entry this row rests on is «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0» and it was read in the Prilog on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the printed Prilog row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0».

Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, printed row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0», with Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga behind it as the empowering provision · the criminal ceiling cited is Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik at fifteen years and the dossier records no death penalty. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the printed Prilog row «Zolpidem | CAS 82626-48-0» · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026

Zolpidem in Montenegro, full detail →

Not individually verified

28 substances are not individually verified for Montenegro

For these the governing national drug law is cited, but we have not verified that the substance specifically is scheduled under it. Treat them as unanswered, not as legal. Confirm with Montenegro’s drug authority or your embassy.

Substance	What we found
1P-LSD	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
2-FDCK	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
25I-NBOMe	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
2C-E	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
2C-I	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
3-MMC	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
4-AcO-DMT	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
4-HO-MET	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
5-MeO-DMT (Bufo / Toad)	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
6-APB	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH)	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Amanita muscaria	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Amyl Nitrite	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Ayahuasca	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Barbiturates	Not confirmed, and the honest reason is that this table carries no barbiturate to resolve the class from....
Cannabinol	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
CBD	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
GBL	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
HHC	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Khat	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Kratom	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
LSA (Morning Glory)	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Mitragynine	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
MXE	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Peyote	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Phenibut	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
Salvia divinorum	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...
THC-P	Not confirmed. What was not established is whether this substance has any placement at all in the Montenegrin list...

Drug laws and enforcement change and vary by country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with the destination’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling; penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.

Before you travel

Verify current rules with the destination country’s official drug authority and your own country’s embassy before traveling. Find the destination’s U.S. embassy & official country guidance →
Non-U.S. travelers: check your own government’s travel advisory and embassy.

If you’re detained or arrested abroad

Contact your own country’s embassy or consulate in the destination immediately, not the destination’s authorities. U.S. citizens: contact the nearest U.S. embassy/consulate and the U.S. State Department at +1-202-501-4444 (from abroad). If a U.S. citizen is arrested or detained abroad →

← All countries Drug index