Legal status in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Per-substance legal status for Bosnia and Herzegovina, from sourced statutes where available. Legal information, not legal advice; drug laws change, so confirm with the destination’s embassy or drug authority before you travel.

48 confirmed substances40 not individually verifiedLast updated September 21, 2026

Confirmed legal status

2-FDCK

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «2-fluorodeshlorketamin». The entry is a systematic chemical name rather than the street code, so the identity that has to be proved is the molecule and not the abbreviation used to sell it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A laboratory report that returns the systematic name matches the entry directly; one that returns only the trade abbreviation has to be tied to it first. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the list prints the systematic name of this molecule, so a preparation whose stated active ingredient is that molecule is a controlled medicine, while the entry says nothing about salts or about a finished dosage form. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Carry nothing on the assumption that an unusual abbreviation puts a substance outside a list that schedules by systematic name. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «2-fluorodeshlorketamin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

2-FDCK in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

25I-NBOMe

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «25I-NBOMe». The entry prints the research code alone, with no series limb, so the twenty-five series compounds that are not printed are not reached through this entry. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The charge rests on identifying this exact compound; a neighbouring member of the same series is a separate question the list does not answer here. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the compound is printed by code in the list's Tables I to III and has no recognised medical form, so the placement settles the drug status and leaves no medical route to describe. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: There is no dosage form of this compound to document; the placement is what a traveller is exposed to. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «25I-NBOMe» · the entry as printed is a research code with no series limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

25I-NBOMe in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

2C-B

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «2C-B». The entry prints one code and nothing else, so it fixes this compound and does not open onto the rest of the two carbon series. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the site's own subject substance and the list reaches it by its own code, which is the shortest route a charge can take. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the code is printed in the list's Tables I to III, so any product whose active ingredient is this compound is controlled; the entry prints no salt, isomer or preparation limb, so those remain open. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Nothing in the material read describes a lawful medical form of this compound in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «2C-B» · the entry as printed is a research code with no series limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

2C-B in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

3-MMC

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «3-metil metkatinon». The entry is the Bosnian rendering of the chemical name, not the three letter code, so a reader searching the list for the code alone would pass over it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Identification runs through the chemical name the list prints, and the position of the methyl group is what separates this entry from the mephedrone entry that names the four position. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the list prints this substance under its Bosnian chemical name, so a medicine containing it would be controlled; no medical form of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Search the list under its Bosnian chemical name rather than the code if you are checking this yourself. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «3-metil metkatinon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

3-MMC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Alcohol

Legal status: Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; the governing regime recorded instead is the entity and Brčko District alcohol, food and excise rules. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Nothing in the drug offences reaches this substance, so the twenty year ceiling described below for listed drugs is not the frame that applies to it; the excise and public order rules are, and their penalties are not set out. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list at all, so nothing here makes an alcoholic product a controlled medicine; the regimes named instead are excise, food and public order rules whose traveller conditions it does not state. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Duty and quantity rules on alcohol are excise rules and they are not in the material read; do not take this as describing them. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier alcohol on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is entity and Brčko District alcohol, food and excise rules, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Alcohol in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Amphetamine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «amfetamin». The printed entry is the Bosnian spelling of the international name, close enough to read but not identical to the English form a visitor would search for. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The trafficking article attaches to the substance the list names; a branded stimulant preparation built on it is a separate question the entry does not decide. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the base substance is printed by name, while the entry prints no salts or preparations limb, so a finished stimulant medicine built from its salts is not resolved by this entry alone. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A prescription for a branded amphetamine product does not by itself answer whether the product is the listed substance; the entry names the base. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «amfetamin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Amphetamine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Buprenorphine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «buprenorfin». The entry is the Bosnian spelling of the international name and prints no formulation limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Opioid substitution treatment is the ordinary reason a visitor carries this substance, and the list controls it by name whatever the reason. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a substitution treatment preparation containing it is a controlled medicine; no route by which a visitor may bring one in is stated, so that route is deferred rather than described. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Treatment continuity for a substitution patient is exactly the case the missing traveller rule leaves unanswered, and it should be settled with the authorities before travel rather than at the border. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «buprenorfin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Buprenorphine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Caffeine

Legal status: Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; food legislation and labelling rules are recorded as the governing regime instead. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The drug trafficking article does not reach this substance at all, and the labelling regime named for it carries no criminal exposure of the kind described below. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list, so a high dose caffeine product is not a controlled medicine; food and labelling law is named instead and nothing is stated about what a traveller may carry under it. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: High dose caffeine products are a food law question in the material read, not a drug law one. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier caffeine on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is food legislation and labelling rules, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Caffeine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Cannabis / THC

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa L.), njene smole, ekstrakti i tinkture». This entry is not a bare name. It reaches the plant, and in its own words its resins, extracts and tinctures, so preparations are inside the entry rather than argued into it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Because the derivatives limb is printed, a resin or an extract does not need a separate entry to be caught, and the argument that a processed product is a different thing from the plant is closed off by the text. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the printed entry reaches extracts and tinctures as well as the plant, so a finished preparation made from it is within the entry; that makes the placement unusually wide and the absent traveller rule correspondingly costly. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The width of this entry is the practical point: a product does not escape it by being an extract rather than plant material. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «Konoplja (Cannabis sativa L.), njene smole, ekstrakti i tinkture» · the entry as printed is a plant name with a derivatives limb reaching resins, extracts and tinctures · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Cannabis / THC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Cathinone

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «katinon». The entry names the isolated alkaloid. It does not name the plant that contains it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A charge on the alkaloid is straightforward; a charge on plant material containing it has to cross the gap the entry leaves open. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by name, so a preparation of it is controlled, while plant material is a separate question this entry does not settle. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The distance between this entry and the plant it comes from is the thing to check before assuming either answer. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «katinon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Cathinone in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Clonazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «klonazepam». The Bosnian spelling replaces the initial letter of the international name, which is enough to defeat an exact text search made in English. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is a second individually named benzodiazepine, prescribed for seizure control, and the list reaches it by name rather than through any class rule. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so an anticonvulsant prescription containing it is a controlled medicine; the material read states no procedure for bringing one in. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A patient who cannot interrupt anticonvulsant treatment has the strongest reason to settle the entry conditions in advance. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «klonazepam» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Clonazepam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Cocaine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «kokain». The entry prints the substance name alone, with no limb for the base form, for salts or for coca material. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The base form sold as crack was checked separately and did not return a match, so the two forms are not on the same footing in the material read. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name; a topical or surgical preparation containing it would be a controlled medicine, and no route for carrying one is stated anywhere in what was read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Do not read the bare entry as settling every physical form of this substance. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «kokain» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Cocaine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Codeine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «kodein». The entry prints the alkaloid name with no strength threshold and no exemption for low dose preparations. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Many countries exempt weak codeine preparations by concentration; nothing in the entry read here does that, so a low dose cough or analgesic preparation is not visibly outside it. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by name with no concentration limb, so an over the counter combination product bought lawfully elsewhere is not shown to be outside the list. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: This is the most likely substance among those checked for a traveller to carry without thinking of it as a controlled drug. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «kodein» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Codeine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Delta-8-THC

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «tetrahidro-kanabinol, pripadajući izomeri». The entry reaches tetrahydrocannabinol together with the isomers belonging to it, and this substance is inside those printed words twice over: it is a tetrahydrocannabinol under its own full name, delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol, and it is an isomer of the delta-9 form, sharing its molecular formula and differing only in the position of one double bond. Neither route needs an inference beyond the text. The source recorded this substance as not verified; that outcome rested on rejecting an English paraphrase of the entry rather than the Bosnian words the list prints, and it gave the same standard reason it gave for every other rejected route. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the only entry in the list as printed that carries an isomer limb, and this is the substance that limb most plainly reaches, so the offence framework attaches without an identity argument. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the printed entry reaches tetrahydrocannabinol and the isomers belonging to it, and this substance is a tetrahydrocannabinol under its own name, so a preparation standardised on it is a controlled medicine; no medical preparation of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Products sold openly elsewhere as a lawful alternative to cannabis are reached here by the parent name printed in the entry, which is the reverse of how they are usually marketed. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «tetrahidro-kanabinol, pripadajući izomeri» · the entry as printed carries an isomer limb, the only one in the list as printed, and this substance is also a tetrahydrocannabinol under its own full name · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Delta-8-THC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Diazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «diazepam». The printed entry and the international name are identical. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A third individually named benzodiazepine, and the one most often carried for short term anxiety or muscle spasm. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so an ordinary prescription for it is a prescription for a controlled medicine here; the traveller conditions are not stated in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: An ordinary repeat prescription is not, on this material, enough to know what to carry. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «diazepam» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Diazepam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

DMT

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «DMT». The entry prints the initialism, not the systematic name and not any plant that contains the alkaloid. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Because the entry stops at the isolated alkaloid, a brewed plant preparation containing it is not reached by the text as printed. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by its initialism; there is no medical preparation of it described in the material read, so nothing here creates a medical route. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The gap between the alkaloid and a plant preparation containing it is the point of exposure, not the entry itself. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «DMT» · the entry as printed is an initialism with no analogue or preparation limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

DMT in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Etizolam

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «etizolam». The printed entry matches the international name exactly. This compound is a thienodiazepine rather than a true benzodiazepine, and the list reaches it on its own name rather than through a class. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Individual naming is what makes this answer hold: a class rule for benzodiazepines would arguably not have reached it at all. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a preparation containing it is controlled; it is prescribed in few countries and is often bought without one, which makes the placement easy to miss. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A product bought without a prescription abroad is still the listed substance here. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «etizolam» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Etizolam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Fentanyl

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «fentanil». The Bosnian spelling drops the final letter of the international name. The entry prints no analogue limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Because there is no analogue limb printed, each fentanyl analogue is its own question, and the potency that makes this substance dangerous is not what the list keys on. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a transdermal patch or injectable preparation containing it is a controlled medicine; no route for carrying one is stated in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A patch worn on the body is still a controlled medicine being carried across a border. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «fentanil» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Fentanyl in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

GHB

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «GHB». The entry prints the initialism alone. There is no precursor or conversion limb printed with it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The industrial precursor that converts to this substance was checked separately and did not return a match, so the conversion route is unaddressed in the material read. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by its initialism; a narcolepsy preparation containing it would be a controlled medicine, and no way to bring one in is stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The absence of a conversion limb is what makes the precursor question matter, and neither is settled by this entry. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «GHB» · the entry as printed is an initialism with no precursor or conversion limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

GHB in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Heroin

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «heroin». This is one of two entries transcribed in ordinary lower case rather than capitals, which is a property of the transcription and not of the law. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The name is the same in both languages, so nothing is lost in the search, and the trafficking article attaches without an identity argument. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name and has no lawful prescribing route described anywhere in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Nothing here describes a medical form of this substance in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «heroin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Heroin in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Hydrocodone

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «hidrokodon». The Bosnian spelling changes the first syllable of the international name. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A combination analgesic built on this opioid is the ordinary form it is carried in, and the entry names the opioid rather than the combination. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the opioid is printed by name with no combination limb, so a compound analgesic containing it is caught through its active ingredient rather than by its own entry. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Check the active ingredient list of a combination analgesic rather than its brand name. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «hidrokodon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Hydrocodone in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Ketamine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «ketamin». The Bosnian spelling drops the final letter. The entry prints the parent compound and no analogue limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Two of its analogues were checked here, one matched and one not, so the parent entry is not carrying the class. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so an anaesthetic or a treatment preparation containing it is a controlled medicine; there is no stated route for carrying one. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Veterinary and anaesthetic supply are the ordinary lawful contexts, and neither is a traveller route. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «ketamin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Ketamine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

LSD

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «lizergid». The list prints the Bosnian pharmacological name and not the three letter abbreviation, so an exact search for the abbreviation returns nothing while the substance is plainly controlled. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the clearest demonstration in the source that a search made in English can miss an entry that exists, which bears directly on every substance left unresolved on this pass. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under its pharmacological name in the list's Tables I to III; there is no medical preparation of it described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: If you are checking this list yourself, search it in Bosnian. This entry is the proof that the English term is not enough. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «lizergid» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

LSD in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

MDA

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «MDA, tenamfetamin». The entry prints two names for one substance, the initialism and the international non proprietary name, so identity is fixed across both. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A laboratory report or a package that uses either name lands on the same entry, which removes the identity argument from the case. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under two names, so a preparation described by either is controlled; no medical form of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Either name on a report reaches the same entry. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «MDA, tenamfetamin» · the entry as printed is a cluster of two names for one substance · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

MDA in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

MDMA

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «MDMA». The entry prints the initialism alone, without the systematic name and without any ring substituted analogue limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Analogues of this substance were checked here and appear on their own entries, which confirms that the list works compound by compound rather than by family. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the initialism is printed in the list's Tables I to III; therapeutic use is not described anywhere in the material read, so no medical route is stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Research or therapeutic authorisation elsewhere is not a Bosnian authorisation and no Bosnian one is described. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «MDMA» · the entry as printed is an initialism with no analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

MDMA in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

MDPV

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «MDPV, 3,4-metilenedioksipirovaleron». The entry prints the initialism together with the full Bosnian chemical name, so both routes of identification reach the same entry. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The pairing removes the usual defence that a research code and a chemical name are different things. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under both its code and its chemical name; there is no medical preparation of it described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Both identifiers reach the same entry, so neither one is a way around it. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «MDPV, 3,4-metilenedioksipirovaleron» · the entry as printed is a cluster of two names for one substance, a code and a chemical name · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

MDPV in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Mephedrone (4-MMC)

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «mefedron (4-metilmetkatinon, 4-MMC, 4-metilefedron)». This is the widest synonym cluster in the list as printed: a principal name and three alternates, including one that describes the molecule as an ephedrine derivative. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Four names in one entry means a package, a laboratory report and a street term all converge on the same schedule position, and there is no identity gap to argue. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under four names, so a preparation described by any of them is controlled; no medical form of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Any of the four names on a report reaches this entry. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «mefedron (4-metilmetkatinon, 4-MMC, 4-metilefedron)» · the entry as printed is a cluster of four names for one substance, the widest in the list as printed · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Mephedrone (4-MMC) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Mescaline

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «meskalin». The entry names the isolated alkaloid and prints no limb for the cacti that contain it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The cactus that contains it was checked separately and did not return a match, so plant material is not settled by this entry. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by name; no medical preparation of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The gap between the alkaloid and the plant is where the risk actually sits. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «meskalin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Mescaline in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Methadone

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metadon». The Bosnian spelling changes the middle of the international name. The entry prints the substance alone. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the second substitution treatment medicine checked here, and like the first it is reached by name with no treatment exemption printed. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a maintenance dose carried by a patient is a controlled medicine being carried; no route for that is stated anywhere in what was read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A treatment programme abroad is not an entry permission here, and nothing read says what would be. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metadon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Methadone in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Methamphetamine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metamfetamin». The Bosnian spelling matches the amphetamine entry's pattern, and like it prints no salts or isomer limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Because there is no isomer limb, the distinction between the two optical forms of this molecule is not one the entry draws. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name; a prescribed preparation containing it exists in some countries and nothing in the material read describes one here. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A prescription written abroad for this substance is the hardest case among those checked to carry safely, and the route is not described. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metamfetamin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Methamphetamine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Methaqualone (Quaaludes)

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metakvalon». The Bosnian spelling replaces the qu with kv. The entry prints the substance alone. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is a withdrawn sedative with no current prescribing anywhere in the material read, so the entry operates only on the illicit side. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name and no current medical use is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: No lawful supply of this substance is described in the material read. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metakvalon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Methaqualone (Quaaludes) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Methylone

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metilon, beta-keto-MDMA». The entry prints the short name together with a structural description tying the compound to another entry in the same list. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The structural alternate is unusual: it identifies the compound by its relationship to a second listed substance rather than by an independent name. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under a short name and a structural description of it, and no medical preparation of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The structural alternate is the useful identifier if a report describes the compound by relationship rather than by name. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metilon, beta-keto-MDMA» · the entry as printed is a cluster of two identifiers, one of them a structural description referring to another listed substance · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Methylone in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Methylphenidate

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metilfenidat». The Bosnian spelling drops the final letter of the international name; the entry prints no formulation limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the substance among those checked that a visiting patient is most likely to be carrying under a long standing prescription for a condition of attention. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a modified release stimulant prescription containing it is a controlled medicine; no conditions for bringing one in are stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A long standing prescription for a child or an adult patient is the ordinary case here, and the entry conditions are exactly what is not stated. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metilfenidat» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Methylphenidate in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Morphine

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «morfin». The Bosnian spelling drops the final letter. The entry prints the alkaloid with no preparation or concentration limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Palliative and post surgical supply is the ordinary lawful context, and the entry does not carve it out. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by name with no concentration limb, so a low strength oral preparation is not shown to be outside the list either. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Palliative treatment carried across a border is the case this missing traveller rule most needs to answer. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «morfin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Morphine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

MXE

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «metoksetamin, MXE». The entry prints the Bosnian chemical name first and the three letter code second, which is the reverse of the order a visitor would search in. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This compound is an analogue of a second listed substance, and it is reached by its own entry rather than through that one, which shows again that the list works compound by compound. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under a Bosnian chemical name and a three letter code, and no medical preparation of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Search the chemical name first if you are checking the list yourself. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «metoksetamin, MXE» · the entry as printed is a cluster of two identifiers, a chemical name followed by a code · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

MXE in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Nicotine

Legal status: Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; entity and Brčko District tobacco control legislation is recorded as the governing regime instead. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The drug offences do not reach this substance; the tobacco control regime named for it is a separate framework whose penalties are not set out. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list, so a nicotine replacement or vaping product is not a controlled medicine; tobacco control law governs it and its import conditions are not stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Vaping and nicotine replacement products are governed by tobacco control rules that are not in the material read. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier nicotine on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is entity and Brčko District tobacco control legislation, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Nicotine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Nimetazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «nimetazepam». The printed entry and the international name are identical, and the entry carries no strength or formulation limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is a fourth individually named benzodiazepine and one that is prescribed in very few countries, which makes its individual naming a deliberate act rather than a side effect of a class rule. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a sedative preparation containing it is controlled; no route for carrying one is described. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Rarity of prescribing does not change the placement. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «nimetazepam» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Nimetazepam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Opium

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «opijum». The entry names the plant preparation itself, which makes this one of only two entries in the list as printed that operate on plant material rather than on an isolated molecule. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Because the entry is the preparation rather than an alkaloid, a charge does not need to isolate a constituent first. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the preparation is printed by name; traditional or herbal products containing it are reached as the preparation rather than through any alkaloid entry. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A product sold as a traditional preparation is not outside an entry that names the preparation. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «opijum» · the entry as printed names a plant preparation rather than an isolated constituent · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Opium in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Oxycodone

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «oksikodon». The Bosnian spelling replaces the initial two letters of the international name. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the opioid checked here most often dispensed in modified release form for chronic pain, and the entry names the substance without reference to the formulation. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the opioid is printed by name, so a modified release analgesic containing it is a controlled medicine; no route for carrying one is stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A chronic pain prescription is the ordinary case, and the missing traveller rule is what leaves it unresolved. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «oksikodon» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Oxycodone in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

PCP

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «fenciklidin». The list prints the Bosnian chemical name, which shares no leading letters with the three letter abbreviation used in English. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Like the lysergide entry, this shows that an English language search of the list would report an absence where an entry plainly exists. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed under its Bosnian chemical name; no medical or veterinary preparation of it is described in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: This is a second worked example of why an English search of this list cannot be trusted to find what is there. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «fenciklidin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

PCP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Pink Cocaine / Tusi

Legal status: Not applicable as a single status. The label names no fixed composition. Each constituent that a laboratory actually finds has to be classified on its own against the list, and that is what the record establishes and nothing more. The constituent or compound question has to be answered against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, which was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Exposure follows whatever is in the powder, which in practice is usually one or more substances that were checked here in their own right, so the answer is the constituent's answer and not the label's. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the label has no fixed composition, so no single placement attaches to it and no medicine question arises; what is carried is whatever the constituents are. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Nothing can be documented against a street label; the constituents are what any assessment has to work from. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no single entry can carry this term · a near entry was recorded for this substance and rejected, and no printed entry was found · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Pink Cocaine / Tusi in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Poppers

Legal status: Not applicable as a class status. This is a product category that may contain any of several alkyl nitrites, and the category term is recorded as returning no entry of its own. The constituent or compound question has to be answered against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, which was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The one alkyl nitrite checked here in its own right also returned nothing, so neither the category nor its named member is resolved in the material read, and the exposure is unsettled rather than absent. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the category has no single placement, so no medicine question attaches to it; a specific nitrite would have to be identified before anything could be said. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A bottle sold under this label does not have a single legal identity; the nitrite inside it is what would matter. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no single entry can carry this term · no printed entry and no near entry were recorded for this substance · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Poppers in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Psilocybin

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «psilocibin». The Bosnian spelling replaces the y with an i. The entry names the alkaloid and prints no limb for the fungi that produce it. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. Fungal material containing the alkaloid is not reached by the text as printed, which leaves the most common physical form of this substance on the wrong side of the entry. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the alkaloid is printed by name; no medical preparation of it is described in the material read, and therapeutic authorisation elsewhere is not an authorisation here. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: The distance between the alkaloid and the fungus is the practical question and the entry does not close it. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «psilocibin» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-06-27, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Psilocybin in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Quetiapine

Legal status: Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; the Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Medicines and Medical Devices is recorded as the governing regime instead. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is the only prescription medicine checked here that was resolved as outside the drug list rather than left open, and nine comparable medicines checked alongside it were left unresolved on what looks like the same facts. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list, so a prescription for it is an ordinary medicines prescription rather than a controlled drugs one; the medicines law named for it governs instead and none of its import conditions are stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Carry the prescription and the dispensing label as you would for any prescription medicine; the drug list is not what governs this one. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier quetiapine on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is the Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Medicines and Medical Devices, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Quetiapine in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice)

Legal status: Not applicable as a class status. This is a family label covering many unrelated structures. One named compound from the family is recorded in the list, AM-2201, and a second identifier is printed beside it that does not correspond to any compound that could be matched here, so the second is not reproduced here as schedule text. The constituent or compound question has to be answered against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, which was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. A family label cannot carry one outcome: the compound in a given product has to be identified first, and the record shows the list working compound by compound rather than by family. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: no single placement attaches to the family label, so no medicine question arises; a specific compound would have to be named before anything could be said about it. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Products sold under this label change composition between batches, and nothing that is documented about the label carries over to the compound. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no single entry can carry this term · one matchable compound code was recorded beside a second identifier that could not be matched to a known compound and is therefore not reproduced here · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Tobacco

Legal status: Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; entity and Brčko District tobacco control and excise legislation is recorded as the governing regime instead. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The drug offences do not reach tobacco, and the excise regime named for it carries a different kind of exposure that is not described. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list, so nothing here makes a tobacco product a controlled medicine; excise and tobacco control law govern it and their traveller allowances are not in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: Personal import allowances for tobacco are excise rules and they are not in the material read. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier tobacco on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is entity and Brčko District tobacco control and excise legislation, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Tobacco in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Xanax (Alprazolam)

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «alprazolam». The international name and the printed entry are the same word, so nothing is lost between the label on a box and the text of the list. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is one of five benzodiazepines checked here that the list names individually, and the individual naming is what makes the exposure concrete rather than inferred from a class. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so a prescribed benzodiazepine containing it is a controlled medicine at the border; no traveller rule is stated at all, so what a visitor must hold is not settled here. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: This is a commonly prescribed medicine that the list controls by name, which is the combination most likely to catch a traveller who is carrying an ordinary prescription. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «alprazolam» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-13, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Xanax (Alprazolam) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Zolpidem

Legal status: Controlled. The list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26 carries an entry for this substance in its Tables I to III, printed as «zolpidem». The printed entry and the international name are identical. The entry prints no formulation limb. Which of the three tables the entry sits in is not recorded in the source, so anything that turns on the table rather than on the listing is not pinned here. The list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. This is a very widely prescribed hypnotic and it is reached by name, without a class rule and without a strength threshold. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
If prescribed / medical: No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the substance is printed by name, so an ordinary sleeping tablet prescription is a prescription for a controlled medicine here; no traveller conditions are stated. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation: A common sleeping tablet carried without thought is the likeliest quiet exposure among the substances checked. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · entry read for this substance: «zolpidem» · the entry as printed is a bare substance name with no salt, isomer, preparation or analogue limb · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026

Zolpidem in Bosnia and Herzegovina, full detail →

Not individually verified

40 substances are not individually verified for Bosnia and Herzegovina

For these the governing national drug law is cited, but we have not verified that the substance specifically is scheduled under it. Treat them as unanswered, not as legal. Confirm with Bosnia and Herzegovina’s drug authority or your embassy.

Substance	What we found
1P-LSD	Not confirmed. The search made here used the Latin identifier 1p-lsd and returned no entry and no near entry. The...
2C-E	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 2c-e and returned no entry and no near entry. The list...
2C-I	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 2c-i and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a second...
2C-T-7	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 2c-t-7 and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
4-AcO-DMT	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 4-aco-dmt and returned no entry and no near entry. The list...
4-HO-MET	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 4-ho-met and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
5-MeO-DMT (Bufo / Toad)	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 5-meo-dmt and returned no entry and no near entry. The list...
6-APB	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier 6-apb and returned no entry and no near entry. The list...
7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH)	Not confirmed. The search made here used that identifier and returned no entry and no near entry. The kratom check...
Adderall	Not confirmed. This is the one unresolved substance whose recorded near entry points at a real printed entry: a...
Amanita muscaria	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier amanita-muscaria and returned no entry and no near entry....
Amyl Nitrite	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier amyl-nitrite and returned no entry and no near entry. The...
Ayahuasca	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through a DMT containing preparation. The list does print DMT as a...
Barbiturates	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through individually named barbiturates, which is a description and...
Benzodiazepines	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through individually named benzodiazepines, which is a description...
Cannabinol	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through a cannabinoid entry and isomer rules, which is a...
CBD	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier cbd and returned no entry and no near entry, and two routes...
Crack Cocaine	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through cocaine, which the list does print as kokain, and recorded...
DOM	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier dom and returned no entry and no near entry. The substituted...
DXM	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier dxm and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a widely...
Ephedrine	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier ephedrine and returned no entry and no near entry. This...
Gabapentin	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier gabapentin and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
GBL	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through a GHB precursor or conversion rule, which is a description...
HHC	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through a cannabinoid structural or analogue clause, which is a...
Khat	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier khat and returned no entry and no near entry. The list does...
Kratom	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine. Both of those...
Lorazepam	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier lorazepam and returned no entry and no near entry. It is the...
LSA (Morning Glory)	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier lsa and returned no entry and no near entry. The list prints...
Memantine	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier memantine and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
Mitragynine	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier mitragynine and returned no entry and no near entry. The...
Modafinil	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier modafinil and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
Nitrous Oxide	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier nitrous-oxide and returned no entry and no near entry. This...
Peyote	Not confirmed. A route was recorded and rejected through a mescaline containing preparation, which is a description...
Phenibut	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier phenibut and returned no entry and no near entry. It is sold...
Pregabalin	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier pregabalin and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
Salvia divinorum	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier salvia-divinorum and returned no entry and no near entry....
Scopolamine (Devil's Breath)	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier scopolamine and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...
THC-P	Not confirmed. The only isomer limb in the list was relied on for this substance, but the printed words are...
Tramadol	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier tramadol and returned no entry and no near entry. Seven...
Xylazine	Not confirmed. The search made here used the identifier xylazine and returned no entry and no near entry. It is a...

Drug laws and enforcement change and vary by country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with the destination’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling; penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.

Before you travel

Verify current rules with the destination country’s official drug authority and your own country’s embassy before traveling. Find the destination’s U.S. embassy & official country guidance →
Non-U.S. travelers: check your own government’s travel advisory and embassy.

If you’re detained or arrested abroad

Contact your own country’s embassy or consulate in the destination immediately, not the destination’s authorities. U.S. citizens: contact the nearest U.S. embassy/consulate and the U.S. State Department at +1-202-501-4444 (from abroad). If a U.S. citizen is arrested or detained abroad →

← All countries Drug index