Legal status in Bolivia

Per-substance legal status for Bolivia, from sourced statutes where available. Legal information, not legal advice; drug laws change, so confirm with the destination’s embassy or drug authority before you travel.

37 confirmed substances51 not individually verifiedLast updated October 3, 2026

Confirmed legal status

Adderall

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Lista II names ANFETAMINA and, on the line after it, DEXANFETAMINA, which between them are the amphetamine salts this product is made of. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Lista II names ANFETAMINA and, on the line after it, DEXANFETAMINA, which between them are the amphetamine salts this product is made of. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. No brand name appears anywhere in the Anexo, so the row resolves through its constituents and not through a named entry of its own. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for adderall through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Adderall in Bolivia, full detail →

Alcohol

Legal status: Controlled as a chemical. Lista V of the Anexo to Ley 913 is the list of sustancias químicas controladas, and it carries the entry Alcohol Etílico Absoluto (Etanol Absoluto). Ley 913 article 5(c) defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V, so on the face of that definition a Lista V chemical is a sustancia controlada, and that much is established. What is not established, and is a separate question from the placement, is whether Ley 1008 article 48 reaches ethanol in a drink. The word the entry turns on is Absoluto. What Lista V names at item 4.21 is anhydrous ethanol, listed among the solvents and diluents used to extract cocaine, and a beverage is not that article of commerce. [Certain] on the placement in Lista V. No tag is claimed for the reach of article 48, because the reach is open.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry. Whether any of that reaches this row is the open question. Lista V exists to control industrial chemicals that can be used to make cocaine, and Ley 913 articles 18 I and 22 regulate their import, production, transport and sale through the Ministry of Government by administrative authorisation. Those are Bolivia's published penalties. They are the country's penalties and not this row's exposure, because whether the offence reaches this substance is exactly what was not established.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry sits in Lista V, which article 20 does not mention at all, because Lista V is the industrial chemicals list and not a medicines list. Article 18 I sends it to the Ministry of Government instead, by prior registration and administrative authorisation. No prescription route attaches and none is invented here.
Documentation: The reading. Resolución Ministerial 0223 of 9 March 1992, printed inside the Anexo itself, added Alcohol Etílico (Etanol) to Lista V as item 17, and the unified list that follows carries it at 4.21 among the solvents and diluents. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista V, entry Alcohol Etílico Absoluto (Etanol Absoluto) for alcohol · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Alcohol in Bolivia, full detail →

Amphetamine

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry ANFETAMINA in Lista II under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry ANFETAMINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry ANFETAMINA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The match was anchored at the start of the entry name. The names dexanfetamina, levanfetamina, metanfetamina and etilanfetamina, all printed in capitals in the Anexo, each contain the same string and each is a separate entry for a separate substance. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry ANFETAMINA for amphetamine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Amphetamine in Bolivia, full detail →

Ayahuasca

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Lista I names DMT among the psicotrópicos. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Lista I names DMT among the psicotrópicos. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. No plant is named in the Anexo. Neither the brew nor Banisteriopsis caapi nor Psychotria viridis appears in any of the five lists, and the Anexo carries no preparation clause that would reach a plant because it contains a listed alkaloid. So the alkaloid is placed and the preparation is not. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for ayahuasca through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Ayahuasca in Bolivia, full detail →

Barbiturates

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 has no generic entry for the class and no salts, esters or derivatives clause, but it prints twelve barbiturates by name. Lista III, under the heading «PSICOTRÓPICOS», prints «BUTALBITAL», «AMOBARBITAL», «CICLOBARBITAL», «PENTOBARBITAL» and «SECOBARBITAL». Lista IV, under the same heading, prints «ALOBARBITAL», «BARBITAL», «BUTOBARBITAL», «FENOBARBITAL», «METILFENOBARBITAL», «SECUTABARBITAL» and «VINILVITAL», the last two being the Anexo's own spellings of secbutabarbital and vinylbital. Article 5(c) of that Law makes each of those twelve a sustancia controlada, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. A barbiturate whose name the Anexo does not print, thiopental or methohexital for example, falls outside this resolution and this cell gives no answer for it. [Certain] on the twelve names.
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 of the 2009 Constitution reads «No existe la pena de muerte», and no article of Ley 1008 Título III, articles 46 to 79, prints a sentence of death. The nearest provision is article 57, which treats a homicide caused by the deliberate use of sustancias controladas as poisoning and so as asesinato «conforme al artículo 17 de la Constitución Política del Estado y al inciso 5) del artículo 252 del Código Penal». Article 252 of the Código Penal, in the text Ley 1768 of 10 March 1997 gave it, punishes asesinato with «presidio de treinta años, sin derecho a indulto», and the constitution article 57 names is the earlier one that the 2009 Constitution replaced. Article 78 sends a death caused by a person who uses arms in committing a drug offence, or to resist the authorities, to the same asesinato penalty. Article 48 reaches each of the twelve barbiturates printed in Listas III and IV, because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Título III draws no distinction between Listas, so a Lista IV barbiturate carries the same bands as any other controlled substance. It reaches no barbiturate that the Anexo, as read, does not print. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with «presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días de multa», ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country, transacting under any title and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 54, inducing another to misuse, five to ten years, and ten to twenty where the inducer is an ascendant of or holds authority over the person induced, where that person is a minor or incapable, or where the act is done in or near an educational, care, military, police or prison establishment. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. Article 56, instigating any offence of the title, four to six years, and five to ten where the person instigated is a minor or incapable. Article 58, which bears directly on a barbiturate medicine, punishes altering or forging a medical prescription in order to obtain sustancias controladas with three to five years, and forging permits or import papers to bring them into the country with eight to fifteen years. Articles 59 to 77 and 79 reach importers, landowners, venue operators, prescribers, pharmacies, stockholders, officials, escape and release from custody, accessories and public apology for the offence, and were read but are not set out here. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only «mediante receta médica o en formularios del Ministerio de Salud, según corresponda de acuerdo a reglamento». Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation. Article 21 I, headed «RESPONSABILIDAD DE LAS EMPRESAS DE TRANSPORTE INTERNACIONAL DE CARGA», obliges international freight carriers to require from «los consignatarios de las mercancías» a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory; it is a duty on freight and not a rule about a passenger's own medicine. Attached to this row: all twelve named barbiturates sit in Lista III or Lista IV, so a medicine containing phenobarbital, butalbital or any of the other ten falls within the Listas II, III and IV limb of article 20. Which of the two dispensing routes the reglamento assigns to each Lista was not read for this cell, and no provision read governs a traveller carrying a personal supply.
Documentation: The reading. The class is represented by name only. Five barbiturates sit in Lista III and seven in Lista IV. The Anexo's own headings tie its Lista III to list II of the narcotics convention and list III of the 1971 psychotropics convention, and its Lista IV to list III of the 1961 narcotics convention and list IV of the 1971 convention, in each case with the 1971 convention's amendments «vigentes desde el 19 de septiembre de 1987». Horizon. The version read is the Anexo in the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo and in the copy the Ministerio de Gobierno uploaded in September 2025, read on 3 October 2026; compared entry by entry, the two carry the same names. Article 5(c) closes with «y las que sean incorporadas por Ley», so the list moves by Law, and the fourth final disposition only obliges the Ministries of Health and Government to propose changes. The one amending Law found, Ley 1358 of 6 January 2021, renames a section and changes articles 38, 39, 40 and 63 and no list. On 14 June 2023 the Chamber of Deputies approved Proyecto de Ley N° 155/2022-2023, which «modifica la lista V del anexo», and no enactment of it was found; Lista V is the chemicals list and does not bear on this row. On 14 May 2026 the chair of the Deputies' anti narcotics committee said «Estamos haciendo la modificación de la ley 913». This reading does not rule out a later Law that was not found. Which instrument governs. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, so Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 79, was left standing; Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty. The copy of Ley 1008 read prints no article 73. Article 33(a), the inciso that pointed at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately derogates articles 1 to 31 of Ley 1008, the coca provisions, and its article 16 defines the authorised coca zones; article 384 of the Constitution protects the coca leaf in its natural state. Neither bears on this row. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads «plantas o partes de plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33°», and that inciso no longer exists.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, articles 5(c), 18, 20 and 21, its final and derogatory dispositions and its Anexo, Listas III and IV, read at https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf and at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Ley-N%C2%B0-913-DE-LUCHA-CONTRA-EL-TRAFICO-ILICITO.pdf on 3 October 2026 · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 79 and article 33(m), read at https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-1008.html on 3 October 2026 · Código Penal article 252 as modified by Ley 1768 of 10 March 1997, read at https://bolivia.infoleyes.com/articulo/32838 on 3 October 2026 · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384, read at https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-CPE-20090207.html on 3 October 2026 · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017, article 16 and its derogatory disposition, read at https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-N906.html on 3 October 2026 · Ley 1358 of 6 January 2021, read at https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-N1358.html on 3 October 2026 · Cámara de Diputados notice of 14 June 2023 at https://diputados.gob.bo/noticias/camara-de-diputados-aprueba-proyecto-de-ley-en-el-marco-de-la-lucha-contra-el-narcotrafico/ · La Patria of 14 May 2026 at https://lapatria.bo/actualidad/modificacion-de-la-ley-913-busca-actualizar-sustancias-controladas/ · Updated October 3, 2026

Barbiturates in Bolivia, full detail →

Benzodiazepines

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Resolved member by member against the six benzodiazepine rows in this corpus. Lista IV names alprazolam, clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam and nimetazepam, each as its own entry. Etizolam is named nowhere in the Anexo. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Resolved member by member against the six benzodiazepine rows in this corpus. Lista IV names alprazolam, clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam and nimetazepam, each as its own entry. Etizolam is named nowhere in the Anexo. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. Lista IV carries more than thirty benzodiazepines in all, from bromazepam to triazolam, so the class is heavily represented, but it is represented by name and there is no generic class entry to fall back on. Five of the six members in this corpus are listed and the sixth is not. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for benzodiazepines through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Benzodiazepines in Bolivia, full detail →

Cannabis / THC

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry CANNABIS y su resina in Lista I under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry CANNABIS y su resina. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry CANNABIS y su resina sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I also carries TETRAHIDROCANABINOLES (Todos los isómeros) among the psicotrópicos, so the plant, its resin and every tetrahydrocannabinol isomer are separately named. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry CANNABIS y su resina for cannabis · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Cannabis / THC in Bolivia, full detail →

Clonazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry CLONAZEPAM in Lista IV under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista IV of the Anexo carries the entry CLONAZEPAM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry CLONAZEPAM sits in Lista IV, so the Lista IV limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is printed between the clobazam line, which the text layer sets as LOBAZAM with its opening letter lost, and CLORAZEPATO. Lista II separately carries CLONITACENO, an opioid sharing this entry's first four letters and an entirely different substance, so the match was carried through to the full name before it became a placement. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista IV, entry CLONAZEPAM for clonazepam · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Clonazepam in Bolivia, full detail →

Cocaine

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry COCAINA in Lista I under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry COCAINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry COCAINA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The Anexo also carries ECGONINA in Lista II, the coca alkaloid from which cocaine is obtained, and it does not carry the coca leaf as an entry at all. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] The coca finding, which is a separate question from this substance and is not assimilated to it. Article 384 of the 2009 Constitution reads, El Estado protege a la coca originaria y ancestral como patrimonio cultural, recurso natural renovable de la biodiversidad de Bolivia, y como factor de cohesión social; en su estado natural no es estupefaciente. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017, the Ley General de la Coca, took over the coca title of Ley 1008, and its article 16 V sets the authorised and delimited coca production zones at up to 22,000 hectares, 14,300 in La Paz and 7,700 in Cochabamba, with article 17 prohibiting production outside them and subjecting it to eradication. Bolivia denounced the 1961 Single Convention and re acceded in 2013 with a reservation preserving the traditional chewing of the leaf. None of that reaches cocaine. The leaf in its natural state is protected and is not an entry in the Anexo at all; cocaine is an entry in Lista I in its own right. The two are different things and the protection of one says nothing about the other. Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry COCAINA for cocaine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Cocaine in Bolivia, full detail →

Codeine

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry CODEINA in Lista III under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista III of the Anexo carries the entry CODEINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry CODEINA sits in Lista III, so the Lista III limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista IV repeats the name under the heading Preparados de, so preparations of codeine sit one band lower than the substance. The match was anchored at the start of the entry name. The names acetildihidrocodeina, dihidrocodeina, nicocodina and norcodeina, printed in capitals in the Anexo, are separate entries for separate substances. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista III, entry CODEINA for codeine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Codeine in Bolivia, full detail →

Crack Cocaine

Legal status: Controlled through the entry for the substance, not through an entry of its own. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry COCAINA in Lista I and names no form of it, so crack, freebase and powder all sit on that one entry and Ley 1008 article 48 grades by volume rather than by form. Article 5(c) of Ley 913 is what makes an Anexo entry a sustancia controlada, and the offence articles stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry COCAINA. The Anexo names the substance and not the form, so the same entry carries the smokable form, and article 48 grades by volume rather than by form. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry COCAINA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The Anexo names no separate entry for crack, freebase or pasta base. The placement relied on is the entry COCAINA, which is the substance crack is a smokable form of, and the Anexo is silent on the form. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] The coca finding, which is a separate question from this substance and is not assimilated to it. Article 384 of the 2009 Constitution reads, El Estado protege a la coca originaria y ancestral como patrimonio cultural, recurso natural renovable de la biodiversidad de Bolivia, y como factor de cohesión social; en su estado natural no es estupefaciente. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017, the Ley General de la Coca, took over the coca title of Ley 1008, and its article 16 V sets the authorised and delimited coca production zones at up to 22,000 hectares, 14,300 in La Paz and 7,700 in Cochabamba, with article 17 prohibiting production outside them and subjecting it to eradication. Bolivia denounced the 1961 Single Convention and re acceded in 2013 with a reservation preserving the traditional chewing of the leaf. None of that reaches cocaine. The leaf in its natural state is protected and is not an entry in the Anexo at all; cocaine is an entry in Lista I in its own right. The two are different things and the protection of one says nothing about the other. One thing follows for this row in particular. Because the Anexo names the substance and not the form, the same entry carries powder, freebase and crack alike, and nothing in Ley 1008 Título III grades the penalty by the form either. The only grading article 48 offers is volume. Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry COCAINA for crack-cocaine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Crack Cocaine in Bolivia, full detail →

Delta-8-THC

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry TETRAHIDROCANABINOLES (Todos los isómeros) in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry TETRAHIDROCANABINOLES (Todos los isómeros). Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry TETRAHIDROCANABINOLES (Todos los isómeros) sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Delta 8 tetrahydrocannabinol is an isomer of tetrahydrocannabinol, so the parenthesis in the entry is what places it. No entry names delta 8 by that name. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry TETRAHIDROCANABINOLES (Todos los isómeros) for delta-8-thc · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Delta-8-THC in Bolivia, full detail →

Diazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry DIAZEPAM in Lista IV under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The entry is printed DlAZEPAM in the text layer of both copies, which is the capital letter I set as a lowercase letter l, and the reading is DIAZEPAM. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista IV of the Anexo carries the entry DIAZEPAM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry DIAZEPAM sits in Lista IV, so the Lista IV limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista IV also carries NORDAZEPAM, MEDAZEPAM and FLUDIAZEPAM, which are separate entries for separate substances. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista IV, entry DIAZEPAM for diazepam · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Diazepam in Bolivia, full detail →

DMT

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry DMT in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry DMT. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry DMT sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I also carries DET, a different tryptamine, so the match was taken on the exact three letter entry. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry DMT for dmt · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

DMT in Bolivia, full detail →

DOM

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry STP, DOM in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry STP, DOM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry STP, DOM sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry prints both designations of the one substance on a single line. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry STP, DOM for dom · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

DOM in Bolivia, full detail →

Fentanyl

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry FENTANIL in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry FENTANIL. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry FENTANIL sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista II also carries SUFENTANIL, a separate entry for a separate substance. No fentanyl analogue beyond sufentanil appears anywhere in the Anexo. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry FENTANIL for fentanyl · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Fentanyl in Bolivia, full detail →

Heroin

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry HEROINA in Lista I under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The entry is printed HEROÍNA in the text layer of both copies, which is the capital letter I set as a lowercase letter l, and the reading is HEROINA. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry HEROINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry HEROINA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista II separately carries ACETOMORFINA, which is acetylmorphine and a different substance from diacetylmorphine, so the placement relied on is the Lista I entry and not that one. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry HEROINA for heroin · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Heroin in Bolivia, full detail →

Hydrocodone

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry HIDROCODONA in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry HIDROCODONA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry HIDROCODONA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is printed between FURETIDINA and HIDROMORFINOL. Three further entries in the same list share its opening letters and are different substances, hidromorfinol, hidromorfona and hidroxipetidina, printed in capitals in the Anexo, so the anchored match was carried through to the full name. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry HIDROCODONA for hydrocodone · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Hydrocodone in Bolivia, full detail →

Khat

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Of the two khat alkaloids, Lista III names CATINA, which is cathine. Cathinone is named nowhere in the Anexo and neither is the leaf itself. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Of the two khat alkaloids, Lista III names CATINA, which is cathine. Cathinone is named nowhere in the Anexo and neither is the leaf itself. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. The two similar names were separated by reading the entry rather than by matching the string. CATINA is cathine, norpseudoephedrine. It is not catinona, cathinone, which does not appear anywhere in the Anexo. Catha edulis, the leaf itself, is not named either. So one of the two khat alkaloids is listed, the other is not, and the leaf is not. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for khat through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Khat in Bolivia, full detail →

Lorazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry LORAZEPAM in Lista IV under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista IV of the Anexo carries the entry LORAZEPAM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry LORAZEPAM sits in Lista IV, so the Lista IV limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista IV also carries LORMETAZEPAM on the following line, a separate entry for a separate substance. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista IV, entry LORAZEPAM for lorazepam · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Lorazepam in Bolivia, full detail →

LSD

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry (+) -LISERGIDA (LSD, LSD-25) in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry (+) -LISERGIDA (LSD, LSD-25). Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry (+) -LISERGIDA (LSD, LSD-25) sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry names the substance and both of its common designations inside its own parenthesis. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry (+) -LISERGIDA (LSD, LSD-25) for lsd · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

LSD in Bolivia, full detail →

MDA

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry MDA in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry MDA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry MDA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I prints this entry as a bare designation with no chemical name beside it, on the line after the lysergide entry and on the line before MDMA. The same list separately carries DMA and DMT as their own bare entries, and both are different substances whose few letters overlap with this one, so the placement was taken on the exact designation and not on a substring. This is also the entry the 6-APB row was measured against and rejected. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry MDA for mda · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

MDA in Bolivia, full detail →

MDMA

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry MDMA in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry MDMA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry MDMA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I prints this entry as a bare designation with no chemical name beside it, on the line after MDA and on the line before MESCALINA. Those are two separate entries for two separate substances and neither carries the other. The beta keto analogue, methylone, is named nowhere in the Anexo and the Anexo carries no analogue clause, so nothing extends this entry past the four letters printed. It is also the entry the pink-cocaine row resolves part of its label through. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry MDMA for mdma · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

MDMA in Bolivia, full detail →

Mescaline

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry MESCALINA in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry MESCALINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry MESCALINA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is the alkaloid. No cactus is named anywhere in the Anexo. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry MESCALINA for mescaline · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Mescaline in Bolivia, full detail →

Methadone

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry METADONA in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry METADONA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry METADONA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista II carries a second line for the methadone intermediate, printed as metadona, intermediario de la metazozina, which is the intermediate and not the drug. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry METADONA for methadone · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Methadone in Bolivia, full detail →

Methamphetamine

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry METANFETAMINA in Lista II under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry METANFETAMINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry METANFETAMINA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is printed between MECLOCUALONA and METACUALONA among the psicotrópicos of Lista II. Three entries share its opening letters and are different substances, metacualona, metadona and the methadone intermediate line, printed in capitals in the Anexo. It is also the entry that the anchored search for anfetamina correctly did not return, because the anchor sits at the start of the name. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry METANFETAMINA for methamphetamine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Methamphetamine in Bolivia, full detail →

Methaqualone (Quaaludes)

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry METACUALONA in Lista II under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry METACUALONA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry METACUALONA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista II also carries MECLOCUALONA, which is mecloqualone and a different substance, and it was not used for this placement. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry METACUALONA for methaqualone · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Methaqualone (Quaaludes) in Bolivia, full detail →

Methylphenidate

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry METILFENIDATO in Lista II under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry METILFENIDATO. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry METILFENIDATO sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is printed after METACUALONA and is the last psicotrópico of Lista II before the phencyclidine line. Four entries share its opening letters and are different substances, metildesorfina, metildihidromorfina, metilfenobarbital and metiprilona, printed in capitals in the Anexo, and the closest of them is the barbiturate metilfenobarbital, which sits a band lower in Lista IV. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry METILFENIDATO for methylphenidate · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Methylphenidate in Bolivia, full detail →

Morphine

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry MORFINA in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry MORFINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry MORFINA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The match was anchored at the start of the entry name. The names nicomorfina, normorfina, bencilmorfina and dihidromorfina, printed in capitals in the Anexo, are separate entries for separate substances and none was used. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry MORFINA for morphine · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Morphine in Bolivia, full detail →

Nimetazepam

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry NIMETAZEPAM in Lista IV under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The entry is printed NlMETAZEPAM in the text layer of both copies, which is the capital letter I set as a lowercase letter l, and the reading is NIMETAZEPAM. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista IV of the Anexo carries the entry NIMETAZEPAM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry NIMETAZEPAM sits in Lista IV, so the Lista IV limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista IV also carries NITRAZEPAM and FLUNITRAZEPAM, which are separate entries for separate substances. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista IV, entry NIMETAZEPAM for nimetazepam · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Nimetazepam in Bolivia, full detail →

Opium

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry OPIO in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry OPIO. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry OPIO sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista II also carries an entry for poppy straw concentrate, printed as concentrado de paja de adormidera in the Ley 1008 annex and, in the Ley 913 text layer, with the letters PMA in place of the word paja. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry OPIO for opium · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Opium in Bolivia, full detail →

Oxycodone

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry OXICODONA in Lista II under the heading estupefacientes, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry OXICODONA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry OXICODONA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is printed immediately after OPIO and immediately before OXIMORFONA, which is a different substance. No other entry in the Anexo begins with its first four letters. Note the band: this sits in Lista II while the codeine entries sit one band lower in Lista III, so an opioid being listed says nothing about which band it is listed in. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry OXICODONA for oxycodone · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Oxycodone in Bolivia, full detail →

PCP

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry FENCICLIDINA in Lista II under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista II of the Anexo carries the entry FENCICLIDINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry FENCICLIDINA sits in Lista II, so the Lista II limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I separately carries PCE, TCP and the line PHP, PCPY, which are eticyclidine, tenocyclidine and two other analogues rather than phencyclidine itself. The anchored match on PCP hit PCPY, and reading the entry is what rejected it. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista II, entry FENCICLIDINA for pcp · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

PCP in Bolivia, full detail →

Peyote

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Lista I names MESCALINA among the psicotrópicos. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Lista I names MESCALINA among the psicotrópicos. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. No cactus is named in the Anexo. Lophophora williamsii does not appear in any of the five lists and no botanical name appears anywhere in them. So the alkaloid is placed and the plant is not. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for peyote through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Peyote in Bolivia, full detail →

Pink Cocaine / Tusi

Legal status: Resolved through its constituents rather than through an entry of its own. Of the substances commonly sold under this label, Lista I names MDMA and Lista I names COCAINA, while 2C-B and ketamine are named nowhere in the Anexo. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 is the operative list, made so by article 5(c) of that Law, and the offences stayed in Ley 1008 Título III. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Of the substances commonly sold under this label, Lista I names MDMA and Lista I names COCAINA, while 2C-B and ketamine are named nowhere in the Anexo. Article 48 reaches a constituent the Anexo names. It does not reach this row as a label, because the label is not an entry in the Anexo. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the constituents named above carry their own bands, and this row has no band of its own because it is not an entry.
Documentation: The reading. This is a street label and not a substance. The Anexo has no entry for it under any of its names, so what a sample contains decides what article 48 reaches, and the label decides nothing. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, read for pink-cocaine through its constituents · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Pink Cocaine / Tusi in Bolivia, full detail →

Psilocybin

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry PSILOCIBINA in Lista I under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The entry is printed PSILOClBlNA in the text layer of both copies, which is the capital letter I set as a lowercase letter l, and the reading is PSILOCIBINA. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista I of the Anexo carries the entry PSILOCIBINA. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry PSILOCIBINA sits in Lista I, so the Lista I limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. Lista I separately carries PSILOCINA, the active metabolite, on the line above. No mushroom is named anywhere in the Anexo, so the placement is on the alkaloid and not on the fungus. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista I, entry PSILOCIBINA for psilocybin · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Psilocybin in Bolivia, full detail →

Xanax (Alprazolam)

Legal status: Controlled. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017 carries the entry ALPRAZOLAM in Lista IV under the heading psicotrópicos, and article 5(c) of that Law defines sustancias controladas as the substances named in Listas I, II, III, IV and V of the Anexo. The offence articles are not in Ley 913 at all. They stayed in Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, which Ley 913 left standing, and trafficking is article 48. [Certain]
Consequences if caught: Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Article 48 reaches this row because Ley 913 article 5(c) makes a substance named in the Anexo a sustancia controlada, and Lista IV of the Anexo carries the entry ALPRAZOLAM. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry.
If prescribed / medical: The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20. Medicines containing sustancias controladas of Listas II, III and IV, and where applicable those of Lista I, may be made or divided only by laboratories the Ministry of Health has authorised, and they are dispensed to the public only in authorised establishments and pharmacies and only on a doctor's prescription or on Ministry of Health forms. Article 18 II puts the import, export, commercialisation and production of medicinal controlled substances of Listas I to IV behind a prior Ministry of Health authorisation, and article 21 I obliges carriers to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before a controlled substance of the Anexo lists is brought into, carried through or taken out of the national customs territory. Attached to this row: the entry ALPRAZOLAM sits in Lista IV, so the Lista IV limb of article 20 is the one that applies.
Documentation: The reading. The entry is the second line of Lista IV, printed between ALOBARBITAL and AMFEPRAMONA, as a single name with nothing bracketed beside it. No other entry anywhere in the Anexo begins with its first four letters, so the anchored match had no sibling to reject. Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.

Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, Lista IV, entry ALPRAZOLAM for alprazolam · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026

Xanax (Alprazolam) in Bolivia, full detail →

Not individually verified

51 substances are not individually verified for Bolivia

For these the governing national drug law is cited, but we have not verified that the substance specifically is scheduled under it. Treat them as unanswered, not as legal. Confirm with Bolivia’s drug authority or your embassy.

Substance	What we found
1P-LSD	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
2-FDCK	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
25I-NBOMe	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
2C-B	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
2C-E	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
2C-I	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
2C-T-7	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
3-MMC	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
4-AcO-DMT	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
4-HO-MET	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
5-MeO-DMT (Bufo / Toad)	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
6-APB	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH)	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Amanita muscaria	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Amyl Nitrite	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Buprenorphine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Caffeine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Cannabinol	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Cathinone	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
CBD	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
DXM	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Ephedrine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Etizolam	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Gabapentin	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
GBL	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
GHB	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
HHC	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Ketamine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Kratom	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
LSA (Morning Glory)	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
MDPV	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Memantine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Mephedrone (4-MMC)	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Methylone	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Mitragynine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Modafinil	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
MXE	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Nicotine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Nitrous Oxide	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Phenibut	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Poppers	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Pregabalin	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Quetiapine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Salvia divinorum	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Scopolamine (Devil's Breath)	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2 / Spice)	Not confirmed. This class does not resolve to one placement from this list, so no single status is stated for it....
THC-P	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Tobacco	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Tramadol	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Xylazine	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...
Zolpidem	Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list...

Drug laws and enforcement change and vary by country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with the destination’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling; penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.

Before you travel

Verify current rules with the destination country’s official drug authority and your own country’s embassy before traveling. Find the destination’s U.S. embassy & official country guidance →
Non-U.S. travelers: check your own government’s travel advisory and embassy.

If you’re detained or arrested abroad

Contact your own country’s embassy or consulate in the destination immediately, not the destination’s authorities. U.S. citizens: contact the nearest U.S. embassy/consulate and the U.S. State Department at +1-202-501-4444 (from abroad). If a U.S. citizen is arrested or detained abroad →

← All countries Drug index