Is Xanax (Alprazolam) legal in Malaysia?
- Legal status
- Alprazolam is not named in either Act by its own name. It is caught by class, in the Poisons List under the Poisons Act 1952: «Diazepam and other substances structurally derived from 1, 4-benzodiazepine; their salts, unless specified elsewhere», and again in the Third Schedule as «Diazepam and other subtances structurally derivated from 1,4-benzodiazepine except flumazenil and pirenzepine». Alprazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine and is structurally derived from 1,4-benzodiazepine, which is a fact of chemistry rather than a resemblance judgment. It is NOT in the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. Two benzodiazepines are, which is why a single answer for the whole family would be wrong: see the benzodiazepines entry.
- Consequences if caught
- Capital exposure: none. Alprazolam is not in the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. Two benzodiazepines are, «Flunitrazepam» and «Nimetazepam», both in Part III, and alprazolam is neither of them nor an isomer, ester, ether or salt of either. Section 39B is the only capital provision in Malaysian drug law, and section 39B(1) prohibits trafficking in «a dangerous drug», which section 2 defines as «any drug or substance which is for the time being comprised in the First Schedule». A substance outside that Schedule cannot be trafficked within the meaning of section 39B however much of it there is, the section 37(da) presumption weights do not reach it, and neither do the section 39A enhanced penalties. What applies instead is section 30 of the Poisons Act 1952, which provides at subsection (3) that «no person shall import, export, manufacture, compound, mix, dispense, sell, supply, administer, possess or use any psychotropic substance otherwise than in accordance with any regulations applicable thereto», and at subsection (5) that a contravention is punishable «to a fine not exceeding ten thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding four years or both». Section 30(4) carries a possession presumption of its own: a person found with the substance in his custody or control «shall be deemed to have been in possession of the substance and to have known the nature of the substance, until he proves to the contrary». Four years and ten thousand ringgit against death. That is the single largest cliff in Malaysian drug law and it turns entirely on which of two schedules a substance sits in. And the ground can move under it: section 45A of the Dangerous Drugs Act lets the Minister add a substance to the First Schedule by order, and section 30(2) of the Poisons Act lets him amend the Third Schedule the same way.
- If prescribed or medical
- This is a prescription-supply question and not a trafficking one. Alprazolam is a psychotropic substance under the Poisons Act 1952, reached by class and not by name, alprazolam being a triazolobenzodiazepine structurally derived from 1,4-benzodiazepine, appearing in the Third Schedule as «Diazepam and other subtances structurally derivated from 1,4-benzodiazepine except flumazenil and pirenzepine» and in the Poisons List as «Diazepam and other substances structurally derived from 1, 4-benzodiazepine; their salts, unless specified elsewhere». Section 30(1) provides that «In this section, “psychotropic substance” means any of the substances specified in the Third Schedule», and section 30(3) then prohibits importing, exporting, manufacturing, compounding, mixing, dispensing, selling, supplying, administering, possessing or using such a substance «otherwise than in accordance with any regulations applicable thereto made under this Act». Those regulations are the Poisons (Psychotropic Substances) Regulations 1989, and regulation 3 is the one a patient stands on: possession is prohibited unless «he is authorised to be in possession of such psychotropic substance under these Regulations» and the substance is for a lawful purpose and obtained under them. Regulation 3(2)(l) places a person lawfully supplied «in accordance with a prescription lawfully given by a registered medical practitioner, registered dentist Division I of a veterinary surgeon» inside that authority, the wording of that paragraph being the publisher's. The two spellings in that Third Schedule entry are the publisher's and are reproduced as printed. Because the substance is caught by a class formula rather than an entry, the authority to hold it attaches to the class.
- Documentation
- Carry the prescription and the dispensing label with the medicine, in its original packaging. The entry the prescription has to answer to is «Diazepam and other subtances structurally derivated from 1,4-benzodiazepine except flumazenil and pirenzepine» in the Third Schedule, with «Diazepam and other substances structurally derived from 1, 4-benzodiazepine; their salts, unless specified elsewhere» in the Poisons List beside it. Regulation 4(2)(a) of the Poisons (Psychotropic Substances) Regulations 1989 is the traveller provision and it fixes a figure the Dangerous Drugs Act never does: a person arriving in or leaving Malaysia who carries, as part of personal luggage and solely for personal or family use, a prepared or packaged medicine containing a psychotropic substance is outside the import authorisation requirement, provided the quantity is «not exceeding such quantities as may be reasonably required for one month's use by one person» and it has been lawfully supplied by or on the prescription of a qualified medical practitioner. Section 30(4) presumes possession and knowledge from custody or control: a person found with the substance «shall be deemed to have been in possession of the substance and to have known the nature of the substance, until he proves to the contrary». The prescription is what rebuts it. The penalty under section 30(5) is «a fine not exceeding ten thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding four years or both». The control is the Poisons Act 1952 and its regulations rather than the Dangerous Drugs Act, so the trafficking regime and its presumptions are not in play for alprazolam.
- Malaysia, Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, Act 234, first enacted as Ordinance No. 30 of 1952 and revised in 1980 with effect from 17 July 1980
- read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text headed «As at 4 July 2023», latest Act amendment being the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, in force 4 July 2023
- Poisons Act 1952, Act 366, revised 1989, read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text as at 1 January 2022, latest amendment P.U. (A) 412/2021 in force 3 November 2021
- read for this substance: the Poisons Act 1952 Third Schedule, the entry found as «Diazepam and other subtances structurally derivated from 1,4-benzodiazepine except flumazenil and pirenzepine», reached by class and not by name, alprazolam being a triazolobenzodiazepine structurally derived from 1,4-benzodiazepine
- the Poisons List, whose printed class formula anchored on diazepam is reproduced in full in this cell's status field
- sections 30(1) to 30(5) and 32(2) of that Act
- the Poisons (Psychotropic Substances) Regulations 1989 incorporating P.U. (A) 405/2018, regulations 3, 4 and 9 and the Second Schedule to those Regulations, in which this substance is not named
- and the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 read in all five Parts, and alprazolam under its own name not found in any of them
- the First Schedule has since been amended twice under section 45A, by the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment of First Schedule) Order 2024, P.U. (A) 97, gazetted 2 April 2024, which inserts Etazene, Etonitazepyne, 2-Methyl-AP-237 and Protonitazene into Part III and substitutes Proheptazine for Propheptazine, and by the Order 2025, P.U. (A) 416, gazetted 25 November 2025, which inserts Butonitazene into Part III
- both orders were read in full and neither touches this substance
- the publisher's own disclaimer is carried forward: this is only an updated text and not an authentic text until it is reprinted under subsection 14(1) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968
- read as at 2026-09-17 from https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1840725_BI/22.11.2023%20-%20Act%20234.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1714451_BI/ACT%20366_MUKTAMAD_1%20JANUARY%202022.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1826840_BI/Akta%20846%20BI.pdf
- re-derived in this pass, from the on-disk Attorney General's Chambers online updated text of Act 234 whose own header reads «As at 4 July 2023»: sections 2, 5, 6, 6B, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25, 30, 37, 38A, 38B, 39, 39A, 39B, 39C, 41, 41A, 41B, 45A and 46, and the First Schedule read line by line in all five Parts
- and from the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, sections 1(2), 2, 54 and 55
- the First Schedule has five Parts and not three: Part I and Part II are the plant and prepared-opium lists, Part III the long alphabetical chemical list, Part IV a shorter codeine group carrying its own isomer clause and its own salt clause, with Part III's ester and ether clause running across the whole Schedule and not only that Part because it reads «of the drugs in this Schedule» where the other two read «this Part», and Part V is headed «PREPARATION FOR THE EXPORT OF WHICH EXPORT AUTHORIZATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED» and is an exemption list rather than a control list
- section 39B carries no quantity table of its own, the weights being in section 37(da), which is a rebuttable presumption of trafficking, and in section 39A, which applies only where the offence is not punishable with death
- the file the Act 234 text is served from is dated 22 November 2023 in its name while the text's own header reads «As at 4 July 2023», and the header is the version stated here
- all Poisons Act 1952 material in this cell, including every Poisons List and Third Schedule entry and every figure drawn from that Act, is carried forward from the earlier reading recorded above and was not re-derived in this pass
- so is every other fact in this cell that is not derivable from the two texts named above, which includes the two section 45A orders of 2024 and 2025, the commencement of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 on 15 March 2018, and any statement here about the Single Convention or the 1971 Convention and their schedules
Want to know if Malaysia changes its law on Xanax (Alprazolam)?
Drug-law changes, court decisions and research, once a month.
Free. We email you once to confirm. Unsubscribe with one click.
Court records
We have not yet assessed whether court records are publicly available for this jurisdiction.
Xanax (Alprazolam) in related jurisdictions
Other substances confirmed in Malaysia
Same substance, other countries
Drug laws and enforcement change and vary within a country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with Malaysia’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling; penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.
Before you travel
Verify current rules with the destination country’s official drug authority and your own country’s embassy before traveling. Find the destination’s U.S. embassy & official country guidance →
Non-U.S. travelers: check your own government’s travel advisory and embassy.
If you’re detained or arrested abroad
Contact your own country’s embassy or consulate in the destination immediately, not the destination’s authorities. U.S. citizens: contact the nearest U.S. embassy/consulate and the U.S. State Department at +1-202-501-4444 (from abroad). If a U.S. citizen is arrested or detained abroad →
