Is Pink Cocaine / Tusi legal in Dominica?

Legal status

Pink cocaine is a market label for a dyed powder whose contents vary between samples, and the Act answers a label only through what a sample is analytically shown to contain. The printed entry «Cocaine» is Class A, so a sample containing cocaine is a Class A case and carries the section 7(4)(b) figure of more than one gramme. Samples of this label are more often found to contain ketamine, MDMA or a cathinone, and none of those three is printed anywhere in Parts I to III on a reading of the complete lists at the revision note «L.R.O. 1/1991» printed in the footer of those pages. So the label splits: one constituent is squarely placed and the commoner ones are not established, and section 29 makes the analyst's certificate the step that decides which. The compilation recorded «COCAÍNA ROSA» as the printed entry for this row. That string does not appear anywhere in this Act; the Act is written in English and that record's quotation column is largely in another language, which is a property of the record rather than of the instrument, so it is reported here and is not offered as a quotation from the Act. The reading is stated as at the revision note «L.R.O. 1/1991» printed in the footer of those pages; section 4(3) lets the Minister amend Parts I to III by Order and this consolidation reproduces none made after that note.

Consequences if caught

Capital exposure: none. The word death appears nowhere in this Act, counted across the whole 64 page chapter. The ceiling, however, is not in the Fourth Schedule: every limb of that Schedule stops at fourteen years and $200,000, and section 16 sits outside it carrying imprisonment for life. What a sample of this label attracts depends on what it is shown to contain, and the Fourth Schedule sets every maximum by the class of drug involved. For a Class A constituent, possession under section 7(2) carries eighteen months and $50,000 on summary conviction and three years and $100,000 on indictment and possession with intent to supply under section 7(3) carries three years and $100,000 on summary conviction and fourteen years and $200,000 on indictment. For a Class B constituent the possession figures are twelve months and $10,000 on summary conviction and two years and $20,000 on indictment, and for a Class C constituent six months and $10,000 on summary conviction and two years and $20,000 on indictment. Section 7(4) carries the only quantity figures in the Act and it names five substances: more than two grammes of diacetylmorphine, one gramme of cocaine, fifty-five grammes of opium, three grammes of morphine, and for cannabis or cannabis resin twenty-eight grammes, a figure the 1991 consolidation prints as fifteen and which Act No. 16 of 2020 raised, so a quantity presumption attaches only where a sample is shown to be one of those five. Section 29 makes the analyst's certificate admissible in evidence and it is the step that decides which column applies. Section 16 is where the real maximum lives and it is not among the offences the Fourth Schedule prosecutes. Section 16(2) reaches a drug trafficking offence, or possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of drug trafficking, committed in any school, prison or military premises; section 16(5) reaches the same two offences where the person uses violence, corrupts or attempts to corrupt an official of the State, or uses a child as carrier. Each carries on summary conviction a fine of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, or three times the street value of the drug where there is evidence of it and that is greater, together with imprisonment which may extend to fifteen years but shall not be less than seven; and on conviction on indictment, imprisonment for life. Section 16(3) adds that a person found in possession of a controlled drug in any school premises is deemed to have it for the purpose of drug trafficking unless the contrary is proved, with the burden on the accused, and section 16(4) extends school premises to playing fields and other premises maintained for pupils whether or not within the curtilage of the school. Section 17(4) separately punishes handling the proceeds of drug trafficking with fourteen years and fifty thousand dollars on indictment. These figures are the ones the Fourth Schedule carries in the consolidation read, whose Schedule pages are authorised to «L.R.O. 1/1991». They are stated as at that authorisation and not as a claim about today: an amendment can lower or remove a penalty as readily as an Order under section 4(3) can add a substance, and one such amendment has been found and read. One later amendment was found, read in full and is relied on here: the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 16 of 2020, assented to and gazetted on 30 October 2020. It amends section 7(4), inserts new sections 7A and 7B and amends section 8, and it does not touch the Third Schedule, so it moves the cannabis possession rules without moving any substance between the Parts. Its existence is the measured proof that the consolidation held here is not current, which is why an absence from that consolidation is not published as a finding.

If prescribed or medical

Section 7(1) makes it unlawful to have a controlled drug in your possession except as allowed by Regulations made under the Act, and the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Regulations printed as subsidiary legislation to this Chapter carry the general authority to possess in regulation 5 and the prescription rules in regulations 14 and 15. That machinery is keyed to the Third Schedule, so it reaches this row only so far as a constituent is placed there. Where a sample contains a listed constituent the authorisation question is asked about that constituent and not about the label.

Documentation

Ask the Ministry of Health or the nearest Dominican mission before you travel rather than on arrival, and ask specifically whether an Order under section 4(3) has amended the Third Schedule since the revision note the Schedule pages carry, and whether any instrument outside this Act bears on this row. Because this is a label and not a substance, the only reliable answer about a particular sample comes from analysis, which section 29 makes admissible in evidence. The instrument was read on 22 September 2026.

Drug laws and enforcement change and vary within a country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with Dominica’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling; penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.