Tobacco delivers nicotine, one of the most addictive substances known, through cigarettes, cigars, smokeless products, and vapes. It is legal and FDA-regulated with a federal minimum purchase age of 21, but it is the leading cause of preventable death in the US — the deadliest substance in this library by a wide margin, killing through cancer, heart disease, and lung disease rather than acute overdose.
⏳Pending medical review. This page has not yet been checked by a clinician, so read it as general information, not medical advice.
Overview
Tobacco is a plant whose leaves are dried and consumed for their nicotine content, primarily by smoking (cigarettes, cigars, pipes, hookah), by smokeless use (chewing tobacco, snus, dip), or via electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes/vapes). Legal and heavily commercialized, it is nonetheless the single largest cause of preventable illness and death in the United States. Its harm comes not from acute intoxication but from the long-term consequences of chronic use and from nicotine's powerful hold on the user.
Source: FDA; CDC; peer-reviewed literature (NIH/PMC)
Chemistry & mechanism of action
Nicotine, tobacco's main active compound, binds nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain, triggering release of dopamine and other neurotransmitters that produce a brief sense of alertness, relaxation, and reward. This reward signaling drives one of the fastest and strongest dependence patterns of any drug. The health damage, however, comes largely from the thousands of other chemicals in tobacco smoke — including dozens of known carcinogens — and from combustion products, not from nicotine alone.
Source: CDC; peer-reviewed literature (NIH/PMC); FDA
Effects
Nicotine produces a short-lived lift in mood, alertness, and concentration, plus reduced appetite, alongside increased heart rate and blood pressure. Tolerance and dependence develop quickly, so much of ongoing use is driven by relieving withdrawal (irritability, anxiety, cravings, difficulty concentrating) rather than positive effect. Smoke and aerosol also cause immediate airway irritation, coughing, and reduced lung function.
Source: CDC; peer-reviewed literature (NIH/PMC)
Risks & harms
Tobacco is the deadliest substance in this library, but its harm works differently from most drugs here: not acute overdose, but cumulative disease. Smoking is a leading cause of lung cancer and is linked to cancers of the mouth, throat, esophagus, bladder, pancreas, and more; it drives heart disease, stroke, COPD and emphysema, and it damages nearly every organ system. In the US it accounts for hundreds of thousands of deaths a year — more than alcohol, illicit drugs, and firearms combined. Nicotine itself is intensely addictive, making cessation hard, and nicotine is also a poison: liquid nicotine (vape refills) can be fatal to children who swallow it, and high exposure causes nausea, vomiting, and, at extreme doses, seizures. Smokeless tobacco causes oral cancers and gum disease. Vaping is not harmless: while likely less dangerous than combustible cigarettes for adults who fully switch, it delivers highly addictive nicotine, has driven youth addiction, and has been linked to lung injury (notably from illicit THC vapes containing vitamin E acetate). Secondhand smoke harms non-users. If a child swallows liquid nicotine, or anyone has severe vomiting, seizures, or trouble breathing after a high nicotine exposure, call 911, and Poison Control at 1-800-222-1222 can advise. Quitting sharply reduces these risks over time; evidence-based cessation support exists. This page has not yet been medically reviewed.
Source: CDC; FDA; peer-reviewed literature (NIH/PMC)
Legal status (US)
In the United States, tobacco is legal but regulated, not a controlled substance. Under 'Tobacco 21' (effective December 20, 2019), the federal minimum age to purchase any tobacco or nicotine product — cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, hookah, e-cigarettes, and liquid nicotine — is 21, with no exceptions (including for military). In April 2022, Congress closed a loophole so the rules cover nicotine from any source, including synthetic nicotine. The FDA regulates the manufacture, marketing, and sale of tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and new products require FDA premarket authorization. States and localities may impose additional restrictions (flavor bans, higher taxes, licensing). Follow local law; consult FDA resources for specifics. This page has not yet been medically reviewed.
Source: FDA (Tobacco 21; Tobacco Control Act); US federal law; CDC
Loading international legality & penalties…
Drug laws and enforcement change and vary by country. This is not legal advice. Always confirm with the destination’s embassy or official drug authority before traveling — penalties can be severe, including imprisonment.
Before you travel
Verify current rules with the destination country’s official drug authority and your own country’s embassy before traveling. Find the destination’s U.S. embassy & official country guidance → Non-U.S. travelers: check your own government’s travel advisory and embassy.
If you’re detained or arrested abroad
Contact your own country’s embassy or consulate in the destination immediately, not the destination’s authorities. U.S. citizens: contact the nearest U.S. embassy/consulate and the U.S. State Department at +1-202-501-4444 (from abroad). If a U.S. citizen is arrested or detained abroad →
If an experience becomes overwhelming, the goal is to stay safe and let it pass, most difficult experiences ease as the drug wears off.
Get to a calm, safe space with someone you trust who is sober and can stay with you.
Cool down if you’re overheating, move somewhere cool, remove extra layers, rest. Overheating is especially a risk with stimulants and MDMA.
Sip water to thirst, but don’t over-hydrate. Drinking large amounts of plain water (especially after MDMA) can dangerously dilute your blood sodium (hyponatremia). Electrolytes help more than volume.
Slow your breathing, long, slow exhales help settle a racing heart and anxiety.
A sugary drink, fruit juice, or a snack can ease shakiness and the anxiety that comes with low blood sugar.
Do not take more, and do not add another substance to manage it. Redosing or adding something else (including a sedative like a benzodiazepine) can make things worse, not better.
With stimulants, overheating and a racing heart are the main concerns, get somewhere cool, stop any physical activity, and don't take more.
Call 911 (or Poison Control, 1-800-222-1222) right away for chest pain, a very high body temperature, a seizure, unconsciousness, or severe confusion. These are medical emergencies, not something to wait out.
Source: general harm-reduction guidance from SAMHSA, NIH/NIDA, and MedlinePlus, in our own words. Draft, not yet medically reviewed.
Forensic dossier
Draft · every field is source-cited or marked “Unknown, pending review”
Identity
PubChem CID
N/A — no single PubChem compound (mixture/class/plant/concept)
IUPAC name
N/A — no single PubChem compound (mixture/class/plant/concept)
Molecular formula
N/A — no single PubChem compound (mixture/class/plant/concept)
SMILES
N/A — no single PubChem compound (mixture/class/plant/concept)
InChIKey
N/A — no single PubChem compound (mixture/class/plant/concept)
Synonyms / aliases
cigarettes, smoking
Composition
Composition
Unknown — pending review (no single compound; needs an epidemiology / composition source)
Unknown — pending review (verify tablet imprint/shape against NLM Pillbox/DailyMed; N/A if not an oral tablet)
Color
Unknown — pending review (verify tablet imprint/shape against NLM Pillbox/DailyMed; N/A if not an oral tablet)
Imprint
Unknown — pending review (verify tablet imprint/shape against NLM Pillbox/DailyMed; N/A if not an oral tablet)
Score
Unknown — pending review (verify tablet imprint/shape against NLM Pillbox/DailyMed; N/A if not an oral tablet)
Scheduling & legal status
US schedule
Unknown — pending review
International
Unknown, pending review
Effects, risks & interactions
Effects
Tobacco is the plant product (from *Nicotiana* species) whose smoke or processed forms deliver nicotine, the addictive stimulant responsible for its psychoactive pull (see the nicotine dossier). Smoked, its felt effect is nicotine's — a brief lift and sense of relaxation — but tobacco as a product is defined far less by that mild effect than by the harms of how it is used, above all combustion.PubChem nicotine CID 89594 ↗ · retrieved 2026-06-18
Risks
Tobacco is among the most lethal consumer products in history — its disease burden comes not chiefly from nicotine's direct effects but from the thousands of other chemicals and combustion products inhaled when it is smoked. Long-term smoking causes lung and many other cancers, heart disease and stroke, and chronic lung disease (COPD/emphysema), and it harms nearly every organ; secondhand smoke harms others nearby. Smokeless tobacco carries oral-cancer and cardiovascular risk. Underlying all of it is nicotine addiction, which is what makes the exposure chronic and so hard to stop.PubChem nicotine CID 89594 ↗ · retrieved 2026-06-18
Tobacco is not a controlled substance in Japan and is not governed by drug law at all. It is governed by the たばこ事業法, whose 第二条第三号 defines 製造たばこ as tobacco leaf products 「葉たばこを原料の全部又は一部とし、喫煙用、かみ用又はかぎ用に供し得る状態に製造されたものをいう。」, and by the 二十歳未満ノ者ノ喫煙ノ禁止ニ関スル法律, whose 第一条 provides 「二十歳未満ノ者ハ煙草ヲ喫スルコトヲ得ス」. Search record for this cell, run mechanically over the control lists (the e-Gov text of the narcotics Act, its Cabinet Order, enforcement order and rules, the Stimulants Control Act and its raw material order, the designated substances ordinance, the あへん法, the cultivation Act and the 麻薬特例法, and the MHLW and Narcotics Control Department list PDFs) on 2 October 2026: たばこ, 煙草, tobacco, ニコチン. None of those terms appears anywhere in them. Japan has no analogue statute. The only structural catch-alls in force are the designated substances ordinance's 第三百六十号 and 第三百六十一号 (naphthoylindole synthetic cannabinoids), 第三百六十二号 (cathinones built on 2-amino-1-phenylpropan-1-one), 第三百六十三号 to 第三百六十五号 (dibenzopyran cannabinoids with a 3 to 8 carbon side chain) and the deemed narcotics of 麻薬及び向精神薬取締法第二条第二項, which the Cabinet Order's 第六条 confines to two tetrahydrocannabinolic acids. Tables searched, each as at its own status date: the MHLW designation tables, narcotics tables status 6 September 2026 (麻薬の指定状況 令和8年9月6日現在: the Act's 別表第一 with 76 substances and the Cabinet Order's 第一条 with 171, counts that match the e-Gov text read on 2 October 2026); the MHLW designation tables, psychotropics tables status 3 October 2025 (向精神薬の指定状況 令和7年10月3日現在: the Act's 別表第三 with 10 substances and the Cabinet Order's 第四条 with 80, counts that match the e-Gov text read on 2 October 2026); the MHLW designated substances list status 6 September 2026 (the English list headed as of September 6, 2026, 2,484 substances; the Japanese index dates its own copy 令和8年8月27日現在 and gives the same total); and, as at 2 October 2026 on e-Gov, the 覚醒剤取締法 第二条 and its 別表 with the stimulant raw material Cabinet Order (平成八年政令第二十三号), the あへん法 and the 大麻草の栽培の規制に関する法律. Each of those lists can move by Cabinet Order or ministerial ordinance without an Act of the Diet, and the narcotics and designated substances lists moved as recently as 6 September 2026, so this absence is stated as at those dates and does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No Japanese drug statute provides a death sentence: 死刑 appears in the main provisions of none of the 麻薬及び向精神薬取締法 (the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act), the 覚醒剤取締法 (the Stimulants Control Act), the あへん法 (the Opium Act), the 大麻草の栽培の規制に関する法律 (the Cannabis Plant Cultivation Act), the pharmaceuticals Act (the PMD Act) or the 麻薬特例法 (the Narcotics Special Provisions Act), each read on e-Gov on 2 October 2026. Japan has not abolished capital punishment: 刑法第九条 lists it among the principal punishments, 「死刑、拘禁刑、罰金、拘留及び科料を主刑とし、没収を付加刑とする。」, and 第百九十九条 provides it for murder. No drug offence attaches to tobacco. A person under 20 who smokes commits no offence; the penalty falls on the seller, 第五条 「二十歳未満ノ者ニ其ノ自用ニ供スルモノナルコトヲ知リテ煙草又ハ器具ヲ販売シタル者ハ五十万円以下ノ罰金ニ処ス」, a fine of up to five hundred thousand yen. The たばこ事業法 regulates manufacture, wholesale and retail by licence and registration; those penalties fall on the trade and were not needed for this cell.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco has no prescription route and needs none.
Documentation
A foreign prescription does not make a medicine importable into Japan, and none bears on tobacco; no drug law permission does either. Bringing it into Japan is a customs and tobacco tax matter; the customs allowance was not read for this cell and nothing here states it. Tables relied on for the absence: narcotics tables status 6 September 2026, psychotropics tables status 3 October 2025 and designated substances list status 6 September 2026.
Japan · e-Gov law data API (Digital Agency), XML fetched 2 October 2026 · the e-Gov web pages are JavaScript shells, so the API text was cached and read · 麻薬及び向精神薬取締法 昭和二十八年法律第十四号 別表第一 to 別表第四, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/328AC0000000014 · 麻薬、麻薬原料植物、向精神薬、麻薬向精神薬原料等を指定する政令 平成二年政令第二百三十八号, last amended by 令和八年政令第二百五十八号 (in force 2026-09-06), https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/402CO0000000238 · 覚醒剤取締法 昭和二十六年法律第二百五十二号, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/326AC0100000252 · 覚醒剤原料を指定する政令 平成八年政令第二十三号, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/408CO0000000023 · 指定薬物省令 平成十九年厚生労働省令第十四号, last amended by 令和八年厚生労働省令第百三十五号 (in force 2026-09-06), https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/419M60000100014 · あへん法 昭和二十九年法律第七十一号, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/329AC0000000071 · 大麻草の栽培の規制に関する法律 昭和二十三年法律第百二十四号, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/323AC0000000124 · pharmaceuticals Act 昭和三十五年法律第百四十五号 第二条第一項 第二十四条第一項 第五十五条第二項 第八十四条, https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/335AC0000000145 · MHLW narcotics tables status 6 September 2026, https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11120000/001685509.pdf · mhlw.go.jp · MHLW psychotropics tables status 3 October 2025, https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11120000/001597636.pdf · mhlw.go.jp · MHLW designated substances list status 6 September 2026, https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11120000/001743042.pdf · MHLW personal import guidance, read 2 October 2026, https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iyakuhin/kojinyunyu/topics/tp010401-1_00001.html · Updated October 2, 2026
Singapore
Legal status
Not a controlled drug and not a psychoactive substance under this Act. It is not in any Part of the First Schedule, and the Fifth Schedule, Part 1 (Excluded Substances) names "Any tobacco, tobacco product or tobacco substitute" at item 15, which takes it outside the Part 2A psychoactive substance offences.
Consequences if caught
Second Schedule reach: none. The Second Schedule carries 20 rows imposing "Death" and they name exactly eight terms: opium, morphine, diamorphine, cocaine, cannabis, cannabis mixture, cannabis resin and methamphetamine. This substance is none of those eight, is not a controlled drug, and is an excluded substance for the psychoactive substance regime, so the Misuse of Drugs Act reaches it with no penalty at all, capital or otherwise. Any restriction on it comes from a different statute.
If prescribed / medical
Not applicable under this Act. Any control is under the separate statute that governs it.
Documentation
VERIFIED against the instrument. Instrument: Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 (Singapore). Sections: First Schedule (absent from all three Parts) and Fifth Schedule, Part 1, item 15. URL: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/MDA1973. The Fifth Schedule was read in full, all 17 items and the Part 2 interpretation.
Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 (Singapore), First Schedule, Second Schedule, Third Schedule and Fifth Schedule, on Singapore Statutes Online at https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/MDA1973, read as at the version the page marks "Current version as at 17 Sep 2026", the most recent amendment shown on its own timeline being S 321/2026 with effect from 1 June 2026 · Updated September 16, 2026
United Arab Emirates
Legal status
Tobacco is not a narcotic or psychotropic substance under the federal drug schedules. The dossier ran a completed non reach search across Schedules 1 to 9 of Decision No. 158 of 2025 for «التبغ» and recorded no entry, with a separate tobacco control framework governing instead. This row is the leaf and the products made from it, where the nicotine row in the same table is the alkaloid, and both fall outside the drug schedules for the same reason: neither is a scheduled narcotic or psychotropic. The dossier does not record the terms of the tobacco control framework, so nothing here is said about age limits, product standards, taxation or where smoking is permitted. The search was run on 20 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Decision No. 158 of 2025 Schedules 1 to 8 do not reach tobacco, so Articles 57 and 58 do not attach and no narcotics quantity applies. Whatever the tobacco control framework provides is a separate regime and not a narcotics capital provision, and the dossier does not record what it provides. The distinction worth keeping is that a control framework of that kind typically regulates sale, advertising and place of use rather than criminalising possession, which is a structurally different thing from the schedule placements that govern the rest of this table.
If prescribed / medical
No narcotics prescription question arises for tobacco, because it is outside Decision No. 158 of 2025 and there is no drug authorisation to obtain. The dossier records at the modafinil row that a 268 entry ministry travellers list was checked and expressly not used as a schedule, which does not affect this row. Anything a traveller needs here belongs to customs and tobacco control rules rather than to the drug law, and the dossier records neither.
Documentation
No drug law documentation applies to tobacco. Provenance: the completed Schedules 1 to 9 non reach search on «التبغ» was run on 20 September 2026. Duty free allowances and product restrictions are the live questions for a traveller and they sit with customs and the tobacco control framework, which the dossier does not describe, so they should be checked against a current official source rather than inferred from this cell.
United Arab Emirates, Decision No. 158 of 2025, completed Schedules 1 to 9 non reach search for «التبغ», tobacco, returning no narcotic or psychotropic entry, with a separate federal tobacco control framework governing instead and its terms not recorded in the dossier · the schedules were read at https://sha.shj.ae/#:~:text=%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%84%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%81%D9%82%D8%A9 and the federal instrument at https://uaelegislation.gov.ae/ar/legislations/1540#:~:text=%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%BA, the federal legislation portal · Updated September 21, 2026
China
Legal status
Not confirmed, verify with Chinese embassy
Consequences if caught
Zero-tolerance regime: under Criminal Law Article 347, smuggling, selling, transporting, or manufacturing drugs is punished regardless of quantity. Importing narcotics/psychotropics requires an Import/Export License from the State Council's drug regulatory department. This specific substance was not named by a reachable source.
If prescribed / medical
Not confirmed, verify with the Chinese embassy before travel.
Documentation
Written documentation from a medical institution proving the medicine is necessary; customs verifies the amount against the original prescription and retains a copy (one prescription = one inspection). Psychotropic-drug allowances can be as short as a 3-7 day supply.
Not confirmed. The dossier records no entry for tobacco in the Decree 681 lists as amended up to Government Decree No. 880 of 11 June 2025, checked on 18 September 2026, but it quotes only the title of the list, not an entry or a closing line, Russia's lists are amended by government decree, and the dossier describes a closed list plus analogue model whose analogue route this row does not resolve. So the absence is recorded as a search result, not published as an answer. Search record from the dossier for this row: instruments checked, Федеральный закон № 15-ФЗ; Decree 681 and Decree 1002 checked; text quoted, «Перечень наркотических средств, психотропных веществ и их прекурсоров» / “List of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors”; checked 18 Sep 2026; finding, “Tobacco is regulated separately; Decree 1002 gives no amount.”
Consequences if caught
Not confirmed. The dossier assigns no Decree 1002 amount and no article 228 or 228.1 ceiling to tobacco on this record. No penalty is stated here, because the substance's position under the drug lists is not settled from the dossier.
If prescribed / medical
Not confirmed. The dossier names Federal Law No. 15-FZ as the separate regime for tobacco, but quotes no text from that law, so no prescription or medical rule is stated here.
Documentation
Not confirmed. The dossier states no traveller documentation rule for tobacco.
Tobacco is not named in Thailand's criminal drug schedules. A substance specific sweep, run in Thai and by chemical name, found no entry for it in the Thai FDA table of controlled narcotic drugs updated 15 September 2025 and none in the B.E. 2565 psychotropic naming notifications, and no generic analogue clause was identified in the naming model that would reach it without naming it. Tobacco is regulated by its own control law and not by the narcotics notifications, and only the second half of that is established here. That is a positive finding on a closed list rather than an unresolved search: Thai control is delegated to notifications that name substances one by one, so what the notifications do not name sits outside the Narcotics Code's categories until one names it. It is not a finding that Tobacco is uncontrolled in Thailand. Two instruments were searched, the Thai FDA Table of Controlled Narcotic Drugs updated 15 September 2025 and the Ministry of Public Health psychotropic naming notifications of B.E. 2565, and Thailand also controls medicines through the Drug Act B.E. 2510, which this reading did not open. Which tier of that Act, if any, reaches Tobacco is not established here.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No death penalty and no life term arises for Tobacco under the Narcotics Code, and the reason is structural rather than lenient: the Narcotics Code's penalties attach to a scheduled category, the sweep placed this substance in none of them, and with no Category I, II, IV, V or psychotropic entry there is no section 145, 146, 148 or 149 ceiling to state at all. No capital or life exposure under that Code attaches to a closed list negative finding. The sweep that produced this ran across two instruments and no others, the Thai FDA Table of Controlled Narcotic Drugs updated 15 September 2025 and the Ministry of Public Health psychotropic naming notifications of B.E. 2565, so it is an absence from those two and not a finding that Tobacco is uncontrolled in Thailand. What it does not cover is the Drug Act B.E. 2510, the separate medicines statute with its own tiers and its own penalties, which this reading did not open, so which tier of that Act reaches Tobacco, if any, is not established here. Tobacco is regulated by its own control law and not by the narcotics notifications, and only the second half of that is established here, so the missing Code figure says very little.
If prescribed / medical
No entry for Tobacco was found in either of the two instruments that were searched, the Thai FDA Table of Controlled Narcotic Drugs updated 15 September 2025 and the Ministry of Public Health psychotropic naming notifications of B.E. 2565, so no narcotic or psychotropic schedule places it and none can carry a prescription route. That is an absence from those two instruments and it is not a finding that Tobacco is uncontrolled in Thailand. Thailand's country level traveller rule for personal medication was not established by this reading. The sources opened were the Narcotics Code B.E. 2564, the Thai FDA narcotics table updated 15 September 2025 and the B.E. 2565 psychotropic naming notices in the Royal Gazette, and the dossier is explicit that its findings come from those naming instruments and not from a traveller permit label, so no import permit route, no personal supply quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement can be stated here for Tobacco. Thailand controls medicines separately under the Drug Act B.E. 2510, and that Act and its tiers were not opened by this reading, so whether Tobacco is a prescription only medicine, a restricted import or freely carried under it is not established here. What is missing from this row is the permission, not the classification, and the gap is in what was read rather than a finding that no lawful route exists. No prescription route is in question, and what this row leaves unanswered is the tobacco control, excise and import side.
Indonesia
Legal status
Not a narkotika and not a psikotropika under Indonesia's Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika or Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika: named in none of the seven current golongan: Narkotika Golongan I, II and III of Permenkes No. 15 Tahun 2025, and Psikotropika Golongan I, II, III and IV of Permenkes No. 14 Tahun 2025. Tobacco is in none of the seven current golongan. Searches for tembakau and Nicotiana return nothing in any region. The model: each Act carries its own list for the first time only, and every change since is a Ministerial regulation. Pasal 6(1) of Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika divides narcotics into Golongan I, II and III. Pasal 6(2) then provides that 「Penggolongan Narkotika sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) untuk pertama kali ditetapkan sebagaimana tercantum dalam Lampiran I dan merupakan bagian yang tak terpisahkan dari Undang-Undang ini」, so the Act's own annex governs only the first classification. The empowering article is Pasal 6(3): 「Ketentuan mengenai perubahan penggolongan Narkotika sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) diatur dengan Peraturan Menteri」. The psychotropics Act is built the same way: Pasal 2(3) of Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika sets the four golongan 「untuk pertamakali」 in its annex and Pasal 2(4) provides that 「Ketentuan lebih lanjut untuk penetapan dan perubahan jenis-jenis psikotropika sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (3) diatur oleh Menteri」. So neither Act's annex is the operative list today. The narcotics list in force is the Lampiran to Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 15 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika, ditetapkan 21 November 2025, diundangkan 28 November 2025, Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 989, which revoked Permenkes Nomor 7 Tahun 2025. The psychotropics list in force is the Lampiran to Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 14 Tahun 2025 tentang Penetapan dan Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika, Berita Negara Tahun 2025 Nomor 988, which revoked Permenkes Nomor 6 Tahun 2025. The Act itself was last amended by Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023. One part of the scheme is still in the Act and not in any regulation: the Prekursor Narkotika in Lampiran II, Tabel I and Tabel II, which neither Permenkes restates.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Neither Act creates an offence for this substance, so neither the narcotics ladder in Pasal 111 to 127 nor the psychotropics offences in Pasal 59 and following can engage on any facts. What governs it instead is named in the status above. It is not a narcotic or a psychotropic under Indonesian law. Tobacco is governed by health law and by a substantial excise regime, and Indonesia is one of the largest tobacco markets in the world with a domestic kretek industry. There is no drug control exposure for it at all. Neither reaches this substance, and not because the penalty is low but because no offence under either Act engages at all. The capital provisions are Pasal 113(2), 114(2) and 116(2) for Golongan I narcotics, Pasal 118(2), 119(2) and 121(2) for Golongan II, and Pasal 59(2) of the psychotropics Act for Golongan I psychotropics. Every one of them operates on a substance in a named Golongan, and this substance is in none of the seven lists: Narkotika Golongan I, II and III, and Psikotropika Golongan I, II, III and IV. Golongan III narcotics carry no death penalty in any event. The precursor tables in Lampiran II of the Act were also read and this substance is in neither of them, so Pasal 129 does not apply either. No quantity and no conduct reaches a capital or life sentence for it under these two Acts. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass: Permenkes 15/2025 and 14/2025 were read and no entry for this substance was located under the names searched. That is an unresolved search and not a finding of absence: the lists print chemical names and a name not searched for is a name not found.
Saudi Arabia
Legal status
Tobacco is not a controlled substance under the Saudi narcotics law. The schedules attached to the Law of Combating Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, Royal Decree M/39 of 1426 AH, in the version issued on 4 September 2026, were searched and the record reads «بحث الجداول عن التبغ: لا يوجد قيد مطابق في الجداول من الأول إلى الرابع.», the schedule search for tobacco, there is no matching entry in the schedules from the first to the fourth. Tobacco is governed instead by the Anti-Smoking Law, Royal Decree M/56 of 1436 AH, Articles 1 to 3 and the implementing rules made under it. That statute defines the products it covers and sets the restrictions on them, and it is a public health instrument rather than a narcotics one. The finding is about which law applies: tobacco is regulated in the Kingdom, and it is regulated somewhere other than in these schedules.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Tobacco is not in the narcotics schedules, so Article 37 does not reach it, its capital route is not engaged and no drug quantity threshold applies. The Anti-Smoking Law and its implementing regulations are what apply, through restrictions on where smoking is permitted, on sale to minors, on advertising and on packaging, enforced by administrative penalties rather than by the narcotics articles. The dossier's columns identify that statute and its executive regulations for this row but do not carry the individual penalty provisions, so no figure is stated here. Enforcement of no smoking areas in the Kingdom is active and fines are issued in practice, which is a different matter from the criminal exposure the rest of this table describes.
If prescribed / medical
The SFDA controlled medicine clearance regime described elsewhere in this table does not reach tobacco, because tobacco is not in the schedules that regime is built on, and tobacco is not a medicine in any event. Nicotine replacement products are dealt with on the nicotine row and are treated as medicines or consumer products rather than as controlled substances. No prescription question arises for tobacco itself.
Documentation
No narcotics clearance is needed for tobacco. Personal import quantities are a customs matter and duty applies, so declare more than a personal allowance rather than assuming the absence of a schedule entry settles it. The Anti-Smoking Law restrictions apply on arrival, including where a product may be used. The failed narcotics schedule search for tobacco was run against the 4 September 2026 schedules on 17 September 2026.
Saudi Arabia, the Anti-Smoking Law, Royal Decree M/56 of 1436 AH, Articles 1 to 3, with its executive regulations read at https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Rules/Documents/Executive-Regulations-of-Anti-Smoking-Law-Ar.pdf, the Ministry of Health copy · Updated September 20, 2026
Malaysia
Legal status
Tobacco is not a drug question in Malaysia and neither of the two drug statutes reaches it. It is named nowhere in the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, so it is not a dangerous drug and section 39B cannot apply to it, and it is not a Third Schedule psychotropic substance under the Poisons Act 1952. Nicotine on its own is a Poisons List poison. Tobacco products, smoking areas and vape are governed by a separate tobacco control statute, and this cell does not name it or state its rules because none of it was read.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Tobacco is in neither list. It is named in none of the five Parts of the First Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, and neither is nicotine. Section 39B is the only capital provision in Malaysian drug law, and section 39B(1) prohibits trafficking in «a dangerous drug», which section 2 defines as «any drug or substance which is for the time being comprised in the First Schedule». A substance outside that Schedule cannot be trafficked within the meaning of section 39B however much of it there is, the section 37(da) presumption weights do not reach it, and neither do the section 39A enhanced penalties. It is not in the Third Schedule to the Poisons Act 1952 either, so the section 30 psychotropic offence does not reach it. Do not read that as permission. The Dangerous Drugs Act carries no analogue clause at all, measured across the whole Act, so a substance is in or out on the naming; but section 45A provides that where the Minister «considers it expedient to add a substance to, or remove a substance from, or vary the First Schedule, he may by order make the requisite modifications», and he has used it twice since the consolidated text, by P.U. (A) 97 gazetted 2 April 2024 and P.U. (A) 416 gazetted 25 November 2025. An order takes effect on gazetting and there is no notice period. Customs may also treat an unlisted substance as a prohibited import under a separate order that was not read for this cell.
If prescribed / medical
Neither drug statute reaches tobacco, so neither supplies a prescription route for it and neither requires one. Tobacco is named in neither Act as a controlled substance. Where it does appear is in the exempt column of the Poisons List row for «Nicotine», so the Poisons List reaches the alkaloid and expressly stands back from the leaf. Tobacco products, smoking areas and vape are governed by a separate tobacco control statute, and this cell does not name it or state its rules because none of it was read. What this cell does not state is whether it is a registered product, an unregistered product or a prohibited import under the medicines and customs instruments, because none of those instruments was read for it.
Documentation
No documentation requirement arises under either drug statute, because neither reaches tobacco. There is no entry for a document to answer to. The only place tobacco appears in either Act is the exempt column of the «Nicotine» row in the Poisons List, which is the list standing back from it rather than reaching it. That is not the same as saying it may be brought in freely. Product registration with the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency and the customs prohibited imports orders are separate regimes, neither was read for this cell, and nothing is stated here about either. Carry any prescription and the original packaging as a matter of course, and expect the question at the border to be settled by those other regimes rather than by the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 or the Poisons Act 1952.
South Korea
Legal status
Not confirmed, verify with Korea's MFDS / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named by a reachable South Korean source. South Korea controls 478 substances under the Narcotics Control Act, with a minimum of 1 year's imprisonment for possession/use of narcotics/psychotropics. Distinctively, South Korea prosecutes its own citizens for drug use committed abroad even where it was legal there (hair-follicle testing on return, up to 5 years); foreign nationals face deportation and a re-entry ban.
If prescribed / medical
Controlled-substance medicines require MFDS advance approval before travel; verify this substance's status with the MFDS / your embassy.
Documentation
MFDS advance approval is required for controlled-substance medicines (including CBD/THC oil, amphetamines, opiates, and benzodiazepines), apply online before travel (email narcotics@korea.kr). Non-controlled medicines are allowed up to 6 bottles / a 3-month supply with a prescription and a doctor's letter.
Not a controlled drug. Tobacco is not named in Schedule 2 to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 as in force on 2 October 2026, and no generic paragraph reaches it: Schedule 2 has no entry for the leaf, and its alkaloid nicotine, a pyridine linked to a methylpyrrolidine, fits no generic paragraph. The Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 does not reach it, because Schedule 1 to that Act exempts «Tobacco products.» The Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026, which received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, provides in section 1 that «It is an offence to sell any of the following to a person born on or after 1 January 2009», and section 175(3) brings that section, with the other age of sale provisions it lists, into force on 1 January 2027, so on 2 October 2026 it is enacted and not yet in force. Section 1 sits in Part 1, and section 174(2) provides «Part 1 extends to England and Wales only;» Part 2 of the Act extends to Scotland and Part 3 to Northern Ireland. The text read is the legislation.gov.uk revised text of the Act as in force on 2 October 2026, whose Schedule 2 page states «There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, SCHEDULE 2.» The last amendment that text incorporates is the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2024, S.I. 2024/1361, in force 15 January 2025; a title search of the same site for 2025 and 2026 found no later amending Order, and the draft Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2026 is marked «This is a draft item of legislation and has not yet been made as a UK Statutory Instrument.» Schedule 2 moves by Order in Council under section 2(2), which reads «Her Majesty may by Order in Council make such amendments in Schedule 2 to this Act as may be requisite for the purpose of adding any substance or product to, or removing any substance or product from, any of Parts I to III of that Schedule», so this does not rule out a later amendment. Section 2(1)(a) also makes a controlled drug of anything specified «in a temporary class drug order as a drug subject to temporary control (but this is subject to section 2A(6));» the only such Order found in force, the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Temporary Class Drug) Order 2026, S.I. 2026/613, in force from 11 June 2026 for one year, lists seven synthetic opioids of the orphine type, from cychlorphine to 5,6-dichlorobrorphine, and this row is not among them.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No provision of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 or of the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 provides a death sentence; the highest punishment in Schedule 4 to the 1971 Act is imprisonment for life. Buying, possessing or smoking tobacco is not an offence for the person concerned. From 1 January 2027 the section 1 offence of selling to a person born on or after 1 January 2009 is punishable on summary conviction by a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale, and it binds the seller, not the buyer. There is no drugs offence, quantity threshold or trafficking offence; customs duty rules govern imports.
Canada
Legal status
Not a controlled drug. Tobacco is not named in any schedule of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and is not cannabis under the Cannabis Act. It is regulated as a food, a consumer product or a tobacco product, and those regimes were not read here.
Consequences if caught
All schedules of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act were searched and there is no entry. Canada has no separate new psychoactive substances act, so there is no second instrument either. There is therefore no possession offence under section 4 and no trafficking offence under section 5. Age limits, advertising rules, labelling and the places where use is allowed are set by other legislation, federal and provincial, which this cell does not state. Section 60 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act lets the Governor in Council by order amend any of Schedules I to IV, VI and IX by adding or deleting an item, if the Governor in Council considers the amendment necessary in the public interest. The consolidation read states on its face that it is current to 21 July 2026. An absence is only ever an absence as at the version read, and this cell does not rule out a later amendment.
If prescribed / medical
No controlled drug prescription is involved.
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation is required. Customs allowances are not stated here.
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (S.C. 1996, c. 19), ss. 4 and 5 and Schedules I to IV · laws-lois.justice.gc.ca · consulted 16 September 2026 · Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19, s. 60 and Schedules I to V, Justice Laws consolidation current to 2026-07-21 · laws-lois.justice.gc.ca · consulted 16 September 2026 · Updated September 16, 2026
Australia
Legal status
Legal for adults and regulated; not a scheduled poison in smoking form and not a Commonwealth drug. F2026L01327 excludes tobacco from each nicotine entry, for example Schedule 7 «NICOTINE except: (a) when included in Schedule 3 or 4; or (b) in preparations for oromucosal or transdermal administration for human therapeutic use when included in the Register as an aid in withdrawal either from tobacco smoking or nicotine vaping; or (c) in tobacco prepared and packed for smoking.». Its drug constituent, nicotine, is not a Criminal Code drug. Nicotine is not listed in Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 of the Criminal Code Regulations 2019 (Compilation No. 6). Nearest listed drug: phendimetrazine (Schedule 1 item 222, Schedule 2 item 182), an aryl ring joined to a saturated nitrogen ring that carries an N-methyl group, as in nicotine. Limb (a) of s301.9(1) does not reach it because its molecular formula differs from phendimetrazine's and from every listed drug's, so it is no isomer, and although it is a plant alkaloid it is not an alkaloid of a listed drug; limb (c) does not, because reaching it from phendimetrazine would replace the morpholine ring, a core ring, with a pyrrolidine ring, move the aryl ring from the carbon two bonds from the nitrogen to the carbon next to it, which changes the skeleton, and replace the benzene ring with a pyridine ring; the skeleton change is none of the s301.9(1)(c) modifications; and on the method stated next limb (d) does not, because it needs a core ring replacement and a change of skeleton, which is more than one contestable change. The method used for every row is a reading, not a rule the Act states: a modification that limb (a) or limb (c) plainly describes is treated as making a drug analogue; one contestable modification (a swap within one paragraph of s301.9(2), or a core ring replaced), a single limb (d) change from the listed drug, or an express exclusion or different listing in the Regulations is treated as making the exposure conditional; anything more, including adding or removing a ring, is treated as outside s301.9. Because s301.9(1)(c) allows a modification «obtained in one or more of the following ways», the tier this gives can depend on how a change is described, and nothing read settles which description governs. No court decision applying s301.9 to nicotine was read, so this is a reading of the text. Under the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 regulation 4DA «The importation of tobacco products into Australia is prohibited under this regulation unless» a permission is granted, with an exemption for duty-free tobacco carried by passengers or crew (regulation 4DA(2)(d)), and regulation 4D separately prohibits unmanufactured tobacco without permission from the Commissioner of Taxation. Retail licensing and sales age rules are state and territory law and are not stated here. The Poisons Standard read is the Poisons Standard October 2026 (Federal Register of Legislation F2026L01327, made 28 September 2026, registered 30 September 2026, in force from 1 October 2026 under its s2, replacing the June 2026 issue; no later issue was registered when it was read). This cell states Commonwealth law only. The Poisons Standard has effect through adoption by each state and territory: its Reader's guide, which s5(1) of the instrument says is not part of it, states «The scheduling of poisons is implemented through relevant State and Territory legislation.» Most personal possession and use offences are state and territory law, which differs by jurisdiction, and Criminal Code s300.4 keeps those laws running concurrently with Part 9.1. Read as in force on 2 October 2026 against F2026L01327, the Criminal Code Act 1995 at Compilation No. 174 (compilation date 30 June 2026, C2026C00243), the Criminal Code Regulations 2019 at Compilation No. 6 (compilation date 13 December 2025, F2025C01260) and the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956 at Compilation No. 147 (compilation date 13 July 2026, F2026C00751). The Criminal Code Regulations schedules are made by the Governor-General and the Poisons Standard by a delegate of the Secretary under Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 s52D, so a later instrument can change any of this, and this reading does not rule out a later amendment.
Germany
Legal status
Tobacco is outside the German narcotics lists and is governed by its own product statute. The search ran on 20 September 2026 under „Tabak; Tobacco; Nicotiana tabacum“ across BtMG Anlagen I bis III and NpSG Anlagen 1 und 2 and returned no entry, including under the botanical name, which is the form that would have been used had the plant been scheduled as plant material in the way at least one other species in this set is. The dossier routes it instead to the tobacco products statute, which regulates „Tabakerzeugnisse und verwandte Erzeugnisse“, tobacco products and related products, and it names §§ 1, 10 and 11 as the operative provisions covering scope, ingredients and emissions, and the further requirements that follow.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Germany has no death penalty. No narcotics ceiling arises, and the dossier gives the structural reason rather than a policy one: a confirmed absence from the drug lists produces no BtMG maximum. The exposure that does exist is a product exposure, attaching to how a tobacco article is manufactured, composed and placed on the market, and to the requirements the product statute sets. Excise and age restrictions operate alongside that. None of it is a narcotics offence and the dossier does not attach a figure to any of it.
If prescribed / medical
No schedule placement exists, so the narcotics traveller rule does not arise. A traveller carrying tobacco faces customs and excise allowances rather than a drug control, and the dossier records neither those allowances nor any German traveller rule, so this cell states the absence from the schedules and defers on the border question rather than inventing a quantity.
Documentation
Nothing is required in narcotics terms. Where a quantity question arises at the border it is an excise question, and the relevant records are commercial ones rather than medical or scientific. The search and the product statute were read on 20 September 2026.
Germany, confirmed absence from Betäubungsmittelgesetz Anlagen I bis III and Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz Anlagen 1 und 2 on the terms „Tabak · Tobacco · Nicotiana tabacum“, read at the Anlage pages on https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ on 20 September 2026 · the governing regime is the Tabakerzeugnisgesetz §§ 1, 10 and 11, read at https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tabakerzg/ on 20 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
France
Legal status
Tobacco is not carried by either French closed list. The dossier's finding for this row is recorded in the order's own language as Absence de classement opératoire sous « tobacco » dans les listes examinées, and the search term it was recorded under is an English common name. France classifies through enumerated ministerial lists rather than through an open definition, so absence from both the narcotics order and the psychotropics order of 22 February 1990 is a supported proposition and not a gap in the reading. Searches were run across French names, international non-proprietary names, abbreviations and chemical family wording before absence was recorded, and express family clauses and constituent routes were checked. This finding is about drug classification only, and the dossier flags tobacco law and consumer law as the body of law that may still bear on it.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. France abolished the death penalty and no French drug provision carries one. No article 222-34 ceiling attaches either, because this row proves a negative: the finding recorded as Absence de classement opératoire sous « tobacco » dans les listes examinées puts tobacco outside both orders of 22 February 1990, and life imprisonment under that article fastens onto a scheduled narcotic rather than onto a substance the lists do not carry. The search term the finding was recorded under is an English common name, and because the French lists are closed that absence is a supported proposition rather than a gap in the reading. Article L. 3421-1 of the Code de la santé publique addresses illicit use and is engaged by listed substances rather than by this one. What can still reach this row is tobacco law and consumer law, sitting outside the narcotics orders and carrying none of their tariffs.
If prescribed / medical
The country level rule the dossier gives is that a Schengen traveller certificate or a medicines carriage list is evidential and administrative rather than the criminal schedule. Attached to this substance: tobacco has no schedule placement to attach, because the row records the absence sentence Absence de classement opératoire sous « tobacco » dans les listes examinées, so a carriage certificate has no narcotics or psychotropics entry to evidence in its case. The body of law the dossier flags as possibly still bearing on this row is tobacco law and consumer law, and any supply or carriage requirement living there is outside what this row measures and outside what the dossier sets out.
Documentation
Carry the product in its original labelled packaging, with the prescription where one exists, and with anything that identifies what tobacco actually is, because the point to evidence is composition rather than a schedule entry. Provenance: the finding relied on is the absence sentence Absence de classement opératoire sous « tobacco » dans les listes examinées, recorded against the consolidated narcotics and psychotropics orders of 22 February 1990 and read on Légifrance at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000533085 on 18 September 2026. The search was run under an English common name among the other name forms, and both consolidated orders were followed to their terminal list material before absence was recorded.
Netherlands
Legal status
Tobacco is not named in lijst I, lijst IA or lijst II, and neither is Nicotiana tabacum. Lijst II names plants only under the heading Paddo's and names no tobacco. No Opiumwet offence arises from it as such, and the instrument that governs it is named below.
Consequences if caught
Lijst IA carries four substance groups: substanties die zijn afgeleid van 2-fenethylamine, cannabimimetica en synthetische cannabinoïden, substanties afgeleid van 4-aminopiperidine, and benzimidazol opioïden, the nitazenen. None of the four definitions reaches a leaf or the alkaloid in it. The Tabaks- en rookwarenwet is the instrument that governs it, through age limits, display rules, packaging and the smoking ban, and not the Opiumwet. Article 10 carries the penalties for lijst I. Intentionally having the substance present, the limb at article 2 under C, carries imprisonment of up to 6 years. Intentionally cultivating, preparing, processing, selling, delivering, supplying, transporting or manufacturing it, article 2 under B and D, carries up to 8 years. Intentionally bringing it into or out of Netherlands territory, article 2 under A, carries up to 12 years, so the trafficking and import limbs run from 8 to 12 years. Where the presence, or the bringing into or out of the territory, concerns a small quantity intended for own use, article 10, sixth limb, lowers the ceiling to 1 year or a fine of the third category; it does not reach the article 2 under B and D acts. The fine on the serious limbs is the fifth category, which the Criminal Code prints at 67.000 euro with an editorial note recording 110.000 euro from 1 January 2026. Article 11 carries the penalties for lijst II. Acting intentionally against article 3 under B, C or D carries imprisonment of up to 2 years, and up to 6 years where the person acts in the exercise of a profession or business. Intentionally bringing it into or out of the territory, article 3 under A, carries up to 4 years. Where the offence concerns a large quantity the two year and the four year cases both rise to 6 years. Article 1 of the Opiumwetbesluit fixes that large quantity at 500 gram hennep, 200 hennepplanten or 500 units of another lijst II substance. The fine is the fifth category, printed at 67.000 euro with an editorial note recording 110.000 euro from 1 January 2026. Article 2a carries the lijst IA prohibition and article 10b its penalties. Acting intentionally against it carries imprisonment of up to 6 years. Acting without intent carries hechtenis of up to 3 months. Where intentional import, export or presence concerns a small quantity for own use the ceiling is 6 months. Article 10c adds up to 3 years for preparatory acts. The fine is the fifth category on the intentional offence and the third category on the others, printed at 67.000 euro and 6.700 euro with editorial notes recording 110.000 euro and 11.000 euro from 1 January 2026. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as the Netherlands' published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. This is stated as at the Opiumwet consolidation in force from 17 September 2026, read at wetten.overheid.nl on 22 September 2026, and it does not rule out a later amendment. The reading these cells previously rested on was the Opiumwet consolidation in force from 9 July 2026, and the 17 September 2026 consolidation read here supersedes it. Article 3a of the Opiumwet lets substances be added to lijst I or lijst II by algemene maatregel van bestuur: under the first limb when they come under the Single Convention or the Psychotropic Substances Convention or must be brought under the Act under Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA or Decision 2005/387/JHA, and under the second limb when they are shown to affect human consciousness and can harm health and society. Under the fifth limb the Minister may designate a substance by ministerial regulation, for at most a year, where a ban cannot wait for that order. The lists can therefore move without an amendment to the Act.
Spain
Legal status
Not a controlled substance on the text read: Tobacco is not named in Anexo 1 or Anexo 2 of Real Decreto 2829/1977, and it is not in the 1961 Convention lists that Ley 17/1967 article 2 incorporates. Search log: «tabaco» returned 0 whole word hits in Anexo 1, 0 in Anexo 2 and 0 in the Yellow List. Nor is it in the 1971 Convention schedules as printed in the English INCB Green List, 36th edition, 2025: «Tobacco» returned 0 whole word hits there. The psychotropic annexes are a closed enumerated list: the stems «análog» and «isómer» return 0 and 1 hits across both annexes, the one «isómer» hit being zipeprol's own entry covering its stereoisomers, so there is no analogue or generic clause. A substance enters only when a later instrument adds its name: article 1 extends the decree to substances «o bien que en futuro puedan ser incorporadas a las Listas o la Relación», ministerial orders have amended Anexo 1, and article 4 lets the Dirección General amend Anexo 2 «mediante Resolución, podrá modificar el contenido de la Lista de principios activos contenidos en el anexo dos» (may, by resolution, amend the list of active ingredients in annex two). The lists are read as at the Real Decreto 2829/1977 consolidation published 21/04/2026 and in force from 22/04/2026. Narcotic absences are decided through Ley 17/1967 article 2 against the INCB Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026; the INCB Green List, 36th edition updated December 2025, is a cross-check for psychotropics. Narcotics can also be designated nationally, «en el ámbito nacional por el procedimiento que reglamentariamente se establezca» (nationally, by the procedure set by regulation); Real Decreto 1194/2011 sets that procedure and so far names tapentadol and isotonitaceno, as consolidated to 8 June 2021. 1971 Convention decisions after December 2025 and 1961 Convention decisions after July 2026 were not read, and this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Because no list names it, Código Penal article 368 and Ley Orgánica 4/2015 article 36.16 are not reached through a list entry. Article 368 also uses the undefined term «drogas tóxicas»; whether a court could treat an unlisted substance as one is not determined in this cell, and no instance of it for this substance was read. Tobacco has its own law, Ley 28/2005, which provides «Se prohíbe vender o entregar a personas menores de dieciocho años productos del tabaco» and regulates devices that release nicotine; it is a product regime, not drug control.
If prescribed / medical
Spain runs two medicine control regimes side by side: narcotic medicines under Ley 17/1967 and psychotropic medicines under Real Decreto 2829/1977. No prescription route is stated: no drug list reaches it, and no Spanish medicine authorisation for it was read for this cell.
Documentation
No travel document regime applies to it as a drug. Customs and product rules for the goods themselves were not read for this cell.
INCB Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026, Spanish text · Updated October 3, 2026
Italy
Legal status
Not scheduled. A search of the closed tables I to IV and the table of medicinal products under article 14 of DPR 309/1990 returned no operative entry for tobacco, and the dossier records that negative in the compilation's own terms as nessuna voce operativa. Article 14 assigns substances by enumeration, so an unlisted substance stays outside the DPR 309/1990 scheme until a ministerial decree adds it. This is a proposition about one statute and it is not a clearance: the dossier states in terms that a verified result never means safe or legal in every context. Tobacco is governed in Italy by excise and tobacco product law, which the dossier names among the regimes that keep operating where the narcotics tables are silent.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Italy has no death penalty, and for tobacco there is no article 73 ceiling to state either, because what this row established is a negative: a search of the closed tables I to IV and the table of medicinal products under article 14 of DPR 309/1990 returned nessuna voce operativa. Articles 73 and 80 of DPR 309/1990 attach to table entries, and the 30 year cap in article 78 of the Penal Code only enters a calculation an entry has already started, so none of those numbers describes this substance. The administrative route in article 75 is equally inapplicable, since it too runs on the tables. Tobacco is governed in Italy by excise and tobacco product law, which the dossier names among the regimes that keep operating where the narcotics tables are silent.
If prescribed / medical
Italy's country level rule, in the dossier's own terms, is that a traveller certificate list or a prescribing summary is not a substitute for the statutory tables, and that acquisition or possession for personal use runs under article 75 of DPR 309/1990 as an administrative matter rather than under the trafficking article. Attached to tobacco, that rule meets an absence: the closed tables carry no operative entry for it, so there is no narcotics placement for a certificate or a prescription to be measured against. Any documentation requirement that does apply comes from the medicines, food or product safety rules the dossier points to, and not from DPR 309/1990. No Italian traveller procedure for tobacco was established here, and the absence of a table entry is not itself a permission.
Documentation
Carry tobacco on the footing that DPR 309/1990 is not the instrument that reaches it, and hold whatever the applicable medicines or product rules require instead, because the narcotics tables impose nothing on it. The instrument is DPR 309/1990, its enumerating provision is article 14, and the Ministry of Health compilation of the tables and its ministerial amendment index were searched on 18 September 2026 without producing a placement for this row. Classification changes by decree published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale rather than by a travel or prescribing summary, and the amendment horizon checked includes the 2026 update that added the nitazene class. The negative was established by searching the closed tables I to IV and the table of medicinal products under Italian names, international non proprietary names and abbreviations, and the search was carried through to the last section of the compilation.
Mexico
Legal status
Tobacco is not a controlled substance by name in Mexico. It is not named in article 234 of the Ley General de Salud, which prints the estupefacientes, and it is not named in any of the five groups of article 245, which prints the psychotropics. The plant is not printed in either list, although article 234 does print three other plants by name. Article 246 lets the Secretaria de Salud add further psychotropic substances by lists published in the Diario Oficial de la Federacion, and the consolidated text records one such addition with the note «Sustancia adicionada por Acuerdo DOF 24-12-2018», so the printed lists are open. Every note the Diario Oficial published between 1 January 2019 and 21 September 2026 was checked for a later such acuerdo and none adds anything to article 245. That absence is stated against the Ley General de Salud as it stands after the decree published in the Diario Oficial de la Federacion on 15 January 2026, which reforms article 234 whole and article 245 fracciones I segundo parrafo, II and IV, read together with the Orden Juridico Nacional consolidated text to 7 June 2024 for the articles that decree does not touch, read as at 21 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Where this row sits is settled by the fact that no printed entry carries it. The chapter of the Act that once carried tobacco provisions is marked as repealed in the consolidated text, the matter having moved to a separate federal statute, and the decree published on 15 January 2026 did not touch that chapter. Article 479 gives this row no line: the table names eight narcotics and this is not one of them. Articles 475, 476, 477 and 478 all run on the narcotics listed in that table, and article 474 puts a narcotic outside it with the federal authorities, «El narcótico no esté contemplado en la tabla». The eight amounts recited below therefore belong to the eight narcotics the table names and not to this row. The two Ley General de Salud penalty articles that follow are printed here because the live cell printed them for every Mexican row. They run on the narcotics the table names, and this row is not one of them. Article 477 sets ten months to three years of prison, «Se aplicará pena de diez meses a tres años de prisión y hasta ochenta días multa al que posea alguno de los narcóticos señalados en la tabla». It applies to possession below one thousand times a table amount where the circumstances do not make it possession for supply. Its fine is up to eighty dias multa. Article 475 of the Ley General de Salud sets four to eight years of prison, in the words «Se impondrá prisión de cuatro a ocho años y de doscientos a cuatrocientos días multa». It applies to commerce or supply, even free of charge, below one thousand times a table amount. Its fine is two hundred to four hundred dias multa. Its second paragraph raises the prison term to seven to fifteen years where the person supplied is a minor or cannot resist, «se aplicará una pena de siete a quince años de prisión y de doscientos a cuatrocientos días multa», and the previous version of this cell called eight years the small-scale ceiling, so that figure is carried forward and corrected here rather than dropped. The federal code articles below are printed on the same carried-forward footing. Article 193 of that code names articles 237, 245 fracciones I, II and III and 248, and this row is in none of them. Article 194 of the Codigo Penal Federal sets ten to twenty five years of prison, «Se impondrá prisión de diez a veinticinco años y de cien hasta quinientos días multa». It applies to production, transport, traffic, commerce, supply or prescription of a narcotic without the authorisation the Ley General de Salud requires. Its fine is one hundred to five hundred dias multa. Article 195 sets five to fifteen years of prison. It applies to possession with one of those purposes. Its fine is one hundred to three hundred fifty dias multa. Article 195 bis sets four years to seven years six months of prison. It applies where possession cannot be so considered. Its fine is fifty to one hundred fifty dias multa. Article 196 raises the article 194 penalties by one half in the listed cases. Article 193 of the same code defines narcoticos in its first paragraph as those the Ley General de Salud determines, and in its second names a narrower set, «son punibles las conductas que se relacionan con los estupefacientes, psicotrópicos y demás sustancias previstos en los artículos 237, 245, fracciones I, II, y III y 248 de la Ley General de Salud, que constituyen un problema grave para la salud pública». This row is outside the set that second paragraph names, and no reading of the first paragraph was adopted here to put it back inside. Article 479 is not the controlled-substance list and is routinely misreported as one. It is a short table of eight maximum amounts used by articles 477 and 478 for strict, immediate personal consumption: opium two grams, heroin fifty milligrams, cannabis five grams, cocaine five hundred milligrams, LSD fifteen thousandths of a milligram, and MDA, MDMA and methamphetamine at forty milligrams or one tablet or capsule of not more than two hundred milligrams. Mexico has no death penalty for any offence, which article 22 of the Constitucion Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos settles in the words «Quedan prohibidas las penas de muerte». Those figures are set out here because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Mexico's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Brazil
Legal status
Not confirmed. No entry of Portaria SVS/MS 344 de 12 de maio de 1998 names this substance, so this cell reports a measured absence and not a positive legal status, and it is marked as unconfirmed for that reason. The complete Anexo I was read, listas A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, D2, E and F1 to F4 together with every adendo, and no entry names this substance. Searches were run in Portuguese for tabaco and Nicotiana tabacum. Neither appears anywhere in the annex, and lista E, the list of proscribed plants, was read in full and does not contain the plant. The text read is Anexo I as published with Resolucao 1.036 de 9 de julho de 2026, Atualizacao n. 101, read as at that version, and it does not rule out a later one.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 5, XLVII, a of the 1988 Constitution provides that there shall be no penalty of death, save in the case of declared war under article 84, XIX, and article 5, XLVII, b bars any penalty of a perpetual character, so neither a death sentence nor a whole life sentence is available under the drug law. [Certain], the constitutional text was read this pass. What follows is Brazil's drug law as it stands, set out because a reader needs to see it. None of it is asserted against this row, for the reason given at the end. Personal use is article 28 of Lei 11.343/2006, the statute the live Brazilian cells name in English as the Drug Law, and it carries no prison. The three penalties are a warning about the effects of drugs, provision of services to the community, and an educational measure of attendance at a programme or course. Paragraph 3 caps the second and third at five months, paragraph 4 at ten months on a repeat, and paragraph 2 leaves the personal use question to the judge on the nature and quantity seized, the place and conditions of the act, the social and personal circumstances, and the conduct and record of the agent. The statute itself fixes no quantity figure. The Supremo Tribunal Federal decided Tema 506, leading case RE 635659, on 26 June 2024, and how far it reaches beyond cannabis is genuinely contested. Read the narrow way, item 1 of the thesis says that no criminal offence is committed by a person who acquires, keeps, has in deposit, transports or carries for personal consumption the substance cannabis sativa, naming that substance and no other, and the andamento of 24 August 2023 records the relator adjusting his vote to restrict the declaration of unconstitutionality to seizures of the narcotic substance dealt with in that appeal, cannabis sativa. Read the wide way, items 2 and 3 are not limited to cannabis on their face: item 2 says the article 28 I and III sanctions are applied by the judge in a procedure of non penal nature with no criminal repercussion for the conduct, and item 3 gives the Juizados Especiais Criminais competence over the conduct of article 28 with any penal effect of the sentence forbidden. Nor is the operative order limited on its face: the plenary declared the unconstitutionality, without reduction of text, of article 28 of Lei 11.343/2006, so as to remove from that provision each and every effect of a penal nature, keeping the measures it provides until specific legislation arrives. Which reading governs a substance other than cannabis was not settled by the documents read this pass, and nothing here decides it. [Guessing] as to the reach. What does not turn on it, and is [Certain] either way, is that article 28 has carried no custodial penalty since 2006. Supply is article 33: reclusao of 5 to 15 years and payment of 500 to 1,500 dias-multa. Article 33 paragraph 4 allows a reduction of one sixth to two thirds for a primary agent of good record who is not dedicated to criminal activity and does not belong to a criminal organisation. Article 34 puts equipment at 3 to 10 years, article 35 association at 3 to 10 years, article 36 financing at 8 to 20 years and article 37 informing at 2 to 6 years. Article 40 increases articles 33 to 37 by one sixth to two thirds on its seven listed grounds, transnationality and proximity to schools, prisons and hospitals among them. Article 40-A, inserted by Lei 15.358 de 2026, applies articles 33 to 37 in double where the agent is a member of an ultraviolent criminal organisation, a paramilitary group or a private militia. Doubling article 36 gives 16 to 40 years, and 40 years is the highest figure the statute produces on its own face. That is my derivation from the two articles as read, tagged [Certain] for each figure and [Guessing] for whether the article 40 increase then stacks on top of the doubled figure, which the text read here does not settle. Those are Brazil's published drug penalties and they are not this row's exposure. Both article 28 and article 33 operate on drogas, which article 1 sole paragraph of Lei 11.343/2006 defines as substances capable of causing dependence that are specified in law or listed in lists periodically updated by the federal executive. The listing limb is the one that can be checked against a document, and it is the one that fails here, so neither the personal use provision nor the supply ladder attaches to this row. The complete Anexo I was read and no entry in it names this substance, so it is not a droga for either provision and nothing above is a statement about this row.
India
Legal status
No Indian placement was found for it: it is not named in the Act's Schedule (list of psychotropic substances), in the NDPS Rules 1985, in the Regulation of Controlled Substances Order 2013 or in the small and commercial quantity notification. Neither tobacco nor Nicotiana appears in the Act's Schedule, the NDPS Rules, the 2013 Order or the quantity notification.
Consequences if caught
Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985, the NDPS Act, punishes a contravention in relation to psychotropic substances in three quantity bands. A small quantity carries rigorous imprisonment which may extend to 1 year. A quantity greater than small but less than commercial carries rigorous imprisonment which may extend to 10 years. A commercial quantity carries rigorous imprisonment of 10 to 20 years, and that lower figure is a statutory minimum rather than a starting point. The fine runs with the band: up to 10,000 rupees at small quantity, up to 1 lakh rupees in the middle band, and 1 lakh to 2 lakh rupees at commercial quantity, and the court may record reasons for a higher fine. Section 27 punishes consumption, with rigorous imprisonment up to 1 year and a fine up to 20,000 rupees for cocaine, morphine, diacetylmorphine and any substance notified in that behalf, and imprisonment up to 6 months and a fine up to 10,000 rupees for anything else. Every offence under the Act is cognizable, but the section 37 bail bar reaches only sections 19, 24 and 27A and offences involving a commercial quantity. Section 31 raises the ceiling to one and one half times after a previous conviction, and section 64A gives an addict charged under section 27 or with a small quantity immunity on completing recognised de-addiction treatment. No band applies to this row, because the quantity notification carries no entry against which a small or commercial quantity could be measured. Section 31A does not reach this row: its table names only opium, morphine, heroin, codeine, thebaine, cocaine, hashish, LSD, the listed THC isomers, methamphetamine, methaqualone and amphetamine, with their salts and preparations, and this row is not among them. Chewing tobacco and gutkha are prohibited outright in several Indian States under food law, which is the restriction a traveller is most likely to meet. Those figures are given because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as India's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
It is not a dispensed medicine; what governs carrying it is India's tobacco control Act and its packaging rules, and several States prohibit chewing products outright.
Documentation
Tobacco in India is governed by its own 2003 tobacco control Act and by food law for chewing products, and several States prohibit gutkha outright; none of that is the NDPS regime and none of it is read here. India's essential narcotic drugs for medical and scientific use, notified under section 2(viiia) by S.O. 1181(E) of 5 May 2015, are codeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, methadone, morphine and oxycodone; a traveller carrying one should carry the prescription with the original packaging, bring only a reasonable personal quantity and declare it at customs. Tramadol was added to the Act's psychotropic Schedule in 2018 and its commercial quantity is 250 g. This absence is stated as at the Central Bureau of Narcotics consolidation of the Act and Rules labelled updated 2026, which prints the Schedule as amended through S.O. 1730(E) of 16 April 2025, read with S.O. 906(E) of 18 February 2026, and it does not rule out a later notification.
Turkey
Legal status
Tobacco is not a controlled drug in Turkey. The dossier's search record reads «Arama kaydı: “tobacco” terimi 2313 sayılı Kanun kapsamındaki sınıflandırma kararlarında arandı; tam bir kayıt bulunmadı.», the term tobacco was searched in the classification decisions made under Law No. 2313 and no exact entry was found. It is governed by Law No. 4207 on the Prevention and Control of the Harmful Effects of Tobacco Products together with the tobacco market rules, a licensing, taxation and public health regime rather than a narcotics one. Turkey is both a producer and a heavily regulating state on this commodity, and the separation from the narcotics law is deliberate rather than accidental: article 19 of Law No. 2313 reaches a substance only when a Presidential decision names it, and none names tobacco. No permission claim is inferred from schedule absence.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No controlled drug capital or life route and no drug quantity threshold attaches, because this substance is not in the narcotics schedule; the separate regime is the Law No. 4207 tobacco legislation and the tobacco market rules, and no permission claim is inferred from schedule absence. Articles 188 and 191 of Penal Code No. 5237 do not engage, so the thirty year ceiling in article 188(1) and the two to five year use offence in article 191(1) are not in play at any quantity. The enforcement a traveller actually meets concerns smoking in prohibited places, sale to minors and, above all, the smuggling of untaxed product, which is a customs and excise matter prosecuted under its own legislation rather than under the drug articles. That distinction is worth holding, because a large quantity of tobacco can carry serious consequences that have nothing to do with this corpus.
If prescribed / medical
The prescription question does not arise for tobacco. It is not a medicine in any form and no prescription route exists, and the dossier carried no prescription instrument for this row. Nicotine replacement medicines are handled on the nicotine row and are regulated under medicines law rather than under either the tobacco regime or the narcotics regime. No per-substance medical route is asserted here.
Documentation
No narcotics documentation applies to tobacco, and the documentation that matters is the customs allowance, which the dossier did not read and which changes independently of anything in this corpus. Confirm the current personal import allowance with Turkish customs before travelling, since exceeding it is a duty and smuggling question rather than a drug question and is enforced accordingly. Nothing in the absence of a classification decision entry creates a permission to import commercially. The search record was read in the dossier on 18 September 2026 and article 19 of Law No. 2313 was read from the consolidated statute on 20 September 2026.
Turkey, Law No. 4207 on the Prevention and Control of the Harmful Effects of Tobacco Products and the tobacco market rules, identified in the dossier as the governing regime and not read here · Updated September 20, 2026
Egypt
Legal status
Not listed in any table of Egypt's Anti-Narcotics Law, Law 182/1960, as at 3 October 2026. The tobacco plant, Nicotiana, is not among the five plants of Table 5, «قنب», «Papaver Somniferum», «(All Papaver Species)», «Erythroxylum Coca» and «(Khat)» (PDF page 33, gazette page 34), and nicotine is not printed in Tables 1 to 3, on the page images of all six tables of Decision 44 and of Decision 242, read entry by entry, as at 3 October 2026, with two English OCR passes and one Arabic OCR pass over every page as a second check. The earlier citation of the Anti-Narcotics Law No. 182/1960 without a table is superseded, because Decision 44 replaced every table. This is the position under Ministry of Health and Population Decision 44 of 2026, which replaced every table annexed to Law 182/1960, published in Al-Waqa'i' al-Misriya issue 39 (continued, c) on 17 February 2026 and in force from publication, as amended by Decision 242 of 2026, in Al-Waqa'i' al-Misriya issue 179 of 17 August 2026 and in force the next day, replaced item 12 of Table 1 Section 1(b), the phenethylamine group, and added items 57 to 61 to Table 3 Section 3, four alkyl nitrites and «Cannabidiol (CBD)». Decision 44's preamble cites the Supreme Constitutional Court judgment of 16 February 2026 in case 33 of judicial year 47. The Egyptian Drug Authority laws index read on 3 October 2026 lists no amendment to the tables later than Decision 242, which does not rule out one made since.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none under Law 182/1960. Its penalty articles, from Article 33 and Article 34, which carry death, to Article 45, attach to the substances in Tables 1 and 3 and the plants in Table 5, and the tobacco plant is in none of them. Customs, pharmacy and other laws were not read for this cell. The template text this cell carried before is superseded: it cited Act 440/2018 for synthetic cannabinoids, which Decision 44's replacement of every table overtook, and gave Article 38(1) a band of three to ten years, where the article sets aggravated imprisonment, three to fifteen years under Penal Code Article 14. The death penalty articles of Law 182/1960 are Article 33 and Article 34, and they reach only what the tables list. Law 95/2003, Article 2, abolished hard labour «أينما وردت», wherever it appears, in the Penal Code or any other law, putting «السجن المؤبد», life imprisonment, in place of life hard labour and «السجن المشدد», aggravated imprisonment, in place of hard labour for a term; Article 3 of the same Law replaced Penal Code Article 14, under which aggravated imprisonment runs from three to fifteen years unless the law provides otherwise. The penalties above are named as they stand after that Law, although Law 122/1989 wrote them as hard labour.
If prescribed / medical
Schedule 1 and Schedule 3(a,b,d) medicines (e.g. amphetamine/Adderall, methylphenidate/Ritalin, methadone) cannot be imported even with a foreign prescription; verify any controlled medicine before travel (see documentation).
Documentation
Greece
Legal status
Not listed in the Greek narcotics tables. Tobacco is printed at no entry of ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ Α, Β, Γ or Δ in the Ministry of Health consolidated edition of June 2026, which is the version read for this cell. Neither tobacco nor Nicotiana is printed at any serial. The only plants the four tables name are Mitragyna speciosa and the coca leaf, and tobacco is regulated in Greece by duty and age law rather than by this list. Reading that edition does not rule out a later joint ministerial decision under article 1 paragraph 4, which is the power that moves the list.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Greece abolished the death penalty for all crimes and no offence in the narcotics code carries it, which is carried forward from the published Greece entry and was not re-derived in this pass. Tobacco is at no entry of the four tables, so the trafficking and possession articles of Law 4139/2013 do not reach it as a listed narcotic. That is not a finding that the substance is lawful, and the reason matters. Article 1 paragraph 1 of Law 4139/2013 defines «ναρκωτικά» by what a substance does, by its action on the central nervous system and its capacity to cause dependence, and article 1 paragraph 2 then says those substances «περιλαμβάνονται ιδίως στους πίνακες», are included in particular in the tables. The word «ιδίως», in particular, is not the word a closed list takes. Against that, article 20 paragraph 2 defines the trafficking offence by reference to substances «που αναφέρονται στους πίνακες», referred to in the tables. The statute points two ways at once and this cell does not resolve it. That reading of article 1 and article 20 is carried forward from the published Greece entry and was not re-derived in this pass. Conduct, not the table a substance sits in, is what sorts the Greek drug offences. Article 29 paragraph 1 punishes obtaining, holding, using or growing for the offender's own exclusive use with «φυλάκιση μέχρι πέντε (5) μηνών», imprisonment of up to five months. There is no fixed gram threshold anywhere in the law. The court weighs instead the type, the purity, the quantity, the frequency and duration of use, the daily dose and the particular needs of the user. Article 29 paragraph 2 allows the court to leave the offender «ατιμώρητος», unpunished, where the act was entirely occasional and unlikely to be repeated, and paragraph 3 keeps such a conviction off the copies of the criminal record that are issued. Article 20 paragraph 1 punishes trafficking with «κάθειρξη τουλάχιστον οκτώ (8) ετών», at least eight years. The fine that goes with that article runs up to three hundred thousand euro. Article 22 raises the custodial minimum to ten years where the offence is committed by an official, inside a school, barracks, police cell, prison or sports ground, within a criminal organisation, or by a repeat offender. The fine under article 22 is fifty thousand to five hundred thousand euro. Article 21 drops the exposure to up to three years for a dependent person trafficking small amounts to cover their own use, or for supplying a relative without profit. Article 30 paragraph 4 treats dependence as a separate track: an article 29 offence goes unpunished, an article 20 offence falls to at least one year, and an article 22 offence falls to at most ten years. The ceiling in the code is life imprisonment, and it is article 23 that carries it. Article 23 paragraph 1 opens «Με ισόβια κάθειρξη ή με πρόσκαιρη κάθειρξη τουλάχιστον δέκα ετών», life imprisonment or a determinate sentence of at least ten years. The fine under that paragraph is fifty thousand to six hundred thousand euro. It applies where the substance can cause grievous bodily harm and did cause grievous harm or death to another or endangered the health of many, or where an adult acts professionally to bring a minor into use. Article 23 paragraph 2 opens «Με ισόβια κάθειρξη, καθώς και με χρηματική ποινή από πενήντα χιλιάδες ευρώ μέχρι ένα εκατομμύριο ευρώ τιμωρείται». That paragraph states no lesser alternative, so life imprisonment is the only sentence it offers. The fine it names runs from fifty thousand euro to one million euro. It applies to professional financing or professional trafficking where the expected gain exceeds seventy five thousand euro, and to using weapons during the offence or to escape. Every article number, Greek phrase and euro figure in this recital is carried forward from the published Greece entry and was not re-derived in this pass. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Greece's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Portugal
Legal status
Not a controlled substance under Decreto-Lei n.º 15/93. Tobacco is not in tables I to IV and is governed by its own tobacco control regime.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco is not named in any table of Decreto-Lei n.º 15/93. The administrative offence created by Lei n.º 30/2000 and amended by Lei n.º 55/2023 applies to plants, substances and preparations in the tables, so it does not reach tobacco, and neither the ten day quantity nor the commissions for the dissuasion of drug addiction have anything to do with it. Tobacco is governed by Portugal's tobacco control law, which sets a minimum age for sale and restricts smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces. The tables were read in the INFARMED compilation, whose own footnotes carry amendments up to Lei n.º 77/2014, de 11 de novembro, so this absence is established against the tables as amended to 11 November 2014 and any later amending instrument was not available here.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is not a prescription medicine. Nicotine replacement therapy is a separate product class.
Documentation
No drug licence or certificate is required for tobacco. Age limits, duty rules and place restrictions apply.
Decreto-Lei n.º 15/93, de 22 de janeiro, tables I to IV · Lei n.º 30/2000, de 29 de novembro, art. 2.º · Lei n.º 55/2023, de 8 de setembro, arts. 2.º and 3.º · diariodarepublica.pt · sicad.pt · Updated September 15, 2026
Vietnam
Legal status
Not named in the danh mục. Tobacco is not a listed narcotic plant and nicotine is not a listed narcotic or precursor, so the Penal Code drug articles audited here do not attach to ordinary tobacco. Tobacco does not appear in any of the four danh mục annexed to Nghị định 28/2026/NĐ-CP as those lists stand on 19 January 2026, and an absence from the list is not a finding that it is lawful in Vietnam. This cell does not say that it is.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Tobacco is not a listed narcotic plant and nicotine is not a listed narcotic or precursor, so the Penal Code drug articles audited here do not attach to ordinary tobacco. Articles 248 to 252 of the Criminal Code are each written about a chất ma túy, and Luật Phòng, chống ma túy số 73/2021/QH14, Điều 2 khoản 1, defines that term as a substance the Government has placed in the danh mục. Tobacco is not in that list, so producing it is not article 248, possessing it is not article 249, transporting it is not article 250, trading it is not article 251 and appropriating it is not article 252. None of the five conducts engages those articles, and no quantity alters that, because the quantity ladders sit inside articles that never open. One reason for that is carried forward from the published 2cb entry and was not re-derived from the decree text in this pass: the four danh mục extend to muối, đồng phân, ester, ether and muối của đồng phân, that is salts, isomers, esters, ethers and salts of isomers, and they do not extend to analogues, because the words tương tự and đồng đẳng appear nowhere in the decree. A substance that is not printed, and is not a salt, isomer, ester or ether of something printed, is outside the definition rather than arguably inside it. Two things still qualify all of this. Điều 3 khoản 6 routes a newly identified substance through Bộ Công an to the Government, so the list moves and a substance absent today can be added tomorrow. And this is a statement about the narcotics law only: Vietnam's pharmaceutical, customs and administrative rules were not read for this cell and may reach Tobacco independently of the Criminal Code.
If prescribed / medical
The dossier this cell is written from carries no prescription column, so no medical route for Tobacco is stated here and none was derived from anything else. There is no placement to attach either: the dossier does not print Tobacco in any of the four danh mục, and the published 2cb entry records the same absence. A substance outside the danh mục has no narcotics prescription route to describe, which is a different thing from saying it may be carried freely. Whether Tobacco can lawfully be prescribed in Vietnam, in what form, and what a traveller carrying it would have to show, is deferred and not answered here. This pass did not read Vietnam's pharmaceutical, import or customs rules, and a substance outside the narcotics law can still be refused at a border.
Documentation
Where the rule for Tobacco comes from, and how far it reaches in time. Two instruments do two different jobs. The list: Luật Phòng, chống ma túy số 73/2021/QH14, Điều 2 khoản 1, provides that a chất ma túy is a substance the Government has placed in the danh mục, so the Government and not the National Assembly decides what counts, and it does so by decree. The decree in force is Nghị định 28/2026/NĐ-CP, issued and effective 19 January 2026, whose Điều 3 khoản 2 repeals Nghị định 57/2022/NĐ-CP and Nghị định 90/2024/NĐ-CP, and whose Điều 1 reads “Ban hành kèm theo Nghị định này Phụ lục các danh mục chất ma túy và tiền chất sau đây”, that is, issued with this decree is the appendix containing the following lists of narcotics and precursors. The published 2cb entry counted that appendix as four danh mục in seven parts and 694 entries, a count carried forward here and not re-made in this pass. The offence: Bộ luật Hình sự số 100/2015/QH13 as amended by Luật số 86/2025/QH15, khoản 18 Điều 1, enacted 25 June 2025 and in force 1 July 2025, which substituted the drug articles in full and is the reason this cell separates the conducts instead of saying that Vietnam has the death penalty for drugs. The consolidated Criminal Code text read for the article wording is văn bản hợp nhất số 135/VBHN-VPQH. The search behind this row. The dossier's instrument column records the terms used as: tobacco / nicotine. That is a record that somebody looked, and it is not a printed schedule entry. The published 2cb entry records the same row as not listed, which is carried forward from the published 2cb entry and not re-derived from the decree text in this pass. The published 2cb entry also recorded how the decree read at that point: regulated as tobacco, not as a narcotic substance. That wording, with any adjacent item number or CAS number inside it, is carried forward from the published 2cb entry and not re-derived from the decree text in this pass, and it is a reading of a scanned document rather than a re-reading made here. The horizon. This cell is written as those lists stand after Nghị định 28/2026/NĐ-CP, in force 19 January 2026, and the dossier behind it records its own date checked as 17 September 2026. The power that moves the list is Điều 3 khoản 6 of the decree, which reads “Khi phát hiện chất mới chưa có trong các danh mục chất ma túy và tiền chất ban hành kèm theo Nghị định này … trình Chính phủ sửa đổi, bổ sung và công bố các danh mục đó.”, that is, when a new substance not yet in the lists is discovered, the Ministry of Public Security submits it to the Government to amend, supplement and publish the lists. What the text in hand incorporates is the 2026 appendix together with the Criminal Code as it stands after 1 July 2025, and nothing here was checked against an amendment published after 19 January 2026. This cell does not rule out a later amendment made under that power. Two limits of the source, stated because they bear on how much weight this row can take. The dossier has no search log column of its own, so on a row where nothing was found there is no way to tell a blank from a row nobody searched, and where its instrument column happens to record search terms that is a record of looking rather than a schedule entry. And the decree is a scanned signed document: the published 2cb entry records that it was rendered at 600 dots per inch and read with optical character recognition in Vietnamese, and that normalisation to NFC was needed before any Vietnamese string could be searched against the cached text, because the cache mixes composed and decomposed forms and a literal search returns a false zero. That method note is carried forward from the published 2cb entry and not re-derived from the decree text in this pass.
Philippines
Legal status
Not a dangerous drug on the text read: tobacco is not listed in the Dangerous Drugs Board's Updated Lists of Scheduled Controlled Substances as at 06 July 2025, and no Board Regulation adding it appears on the Board's regulations register read on 2 October 2026. This is stated as at the Board's list of 06 July 2025 and the Board's regulations register read at https://ddb.gov.ph/board-regulations/ on 2 October 2026, whose newest entry is Board Regulation No. 5, Series of 2026 and which lists no Board Regulation No. 1, Series of 2026, and it does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
No RA 9165 penalty attaches while it is unlisted. Searched in all 24 pages of the list: "tobacco" 0 hits; "nicotine" 0 hits; "Nicotiana" 0 hits. Neither the plant nor its alkaloid is printed, and Board Regulation No. 3, Series of 2019 reaches a plant only through a listed substance found in it. Section 93 lets the Board add a drug after notice and hearing, and under section 93(c) no criminal liability arises for an added drug until fifteen days after the last publication of the notice of that hearing.
If prescribed / medical
Not a medicine question for this site.
Documentation
No dangerous drug document is needed. Tobacco tax, age and sale rules sit outside RA 9165 and were not read for this cell.
Republic Act No. 9165, the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, enrolled text as published by the Dangerous Drugs Board, sections 3(j), 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16 and 93 and its annex · ddb.gov.ph · Dangerous Drugs Board, Updated Lists of Scheduled Controlled Substances as at 06 July 2025, all 24 pages, read on 2 October 2026 · ddb.gov.ph · Republic Act No. 9346, sections 1 and 2, text read at lawphil.net on 2 October 2026 because the Official Gazette refused the request · lawphil.net · Dangerous Drugs Board regulations register · ddb.gov.ph · Updated October 2, 2026
Switzerland
Legal status
Not scheduled. The federal schedule ordinance BetmVV-EDI records no entry for tobacco. The German search term checked was „Tabak“, and nothing was found in lists a to e, nor does any article 1(2) extension for salts, esters, ethers, carbamates, stereoisomers or preparations reach it from a listed substance. Swiss control is closed, so absence from the lists is a substantive answer and not an oversight, but it is a narrow one: this row proves only that the drug schedules do not carry tobacco, and separate product, medicines, food, tobacco or poisons law may still apply. Tobacco is governed by its own product and taxation law, which this row does not touch.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Switzerland has no death penalty, and on this row there is no BetmG article 19 ceiling at all, because the negative closed list result proved for tobacco under the search term „Tabak“ means the drug act's offence articles are not engaged by the substance itself. Neither the aggravated forms in article 19(2) nor the 20 year maximum that StGB article 40 supplies for drug offences attaches here, and nothing in lists a to e nor any article 1(2) extension reaches it from a listed substance. Tobacco is governed by its own product and taxation law, which this row does not touch.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is not carried in lists a to e of BetmVV-EDI, the search under „Tabak“ having returned nothing, so there is no controlled substance authorisation to obtain for it, and the one country level rule this dossier establishes does not bite. That rule is the personal use regime: BetmG article 19a punishes unauthorised consumption of a controlled substance, article 19b makes a negligible quantity prepared for one's own consumption nonpunishable, and article 19b(2) fixes that quantity at 10 g of cannabis alone. None of those articles reaches an unscheduled substance such as tobacco. No Swiss prescription route or traveller certificate for it was established in this dossier, and any medicines law requirement attaching to the product form was outside what this build verified.
Documentation
Carry tobacco only in the form and quantity the rest of Swiss law allows, because this row settles the drug schedules and nothing else, and keep any prescribed product in its original packaging with the prescription so that the product form can be identified at a control. The provenance is the negative search of the EDI ordinance BetmVV-EDI under „Tabak“, run across lists a to e and the article 1 extensions in the German consolidation dated 13 March 2026, read at Fedlex on 18 September 2026, with the 94 page compilation read through its final page so that no further drug schedule was left unchecked.
Switzerland, Tobacco: BetmVV-EDI article 1 with Annexes 1 to 6 covering lists a to e, negative search under „Tabak“, at https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2011/363/de · Updated September 20, 2026
Czechia
Legal status
Not listed. Tobacco is not printed as an entry in any of the eight seznamy of nařízení vlády č. 463/2013 Sb. o seznamech návykových látek, nor in the annex to nařízení vlády č. 456/2025 Sb. o seznamu psychomodulačních látek, nor in the annex to nařízení vlády č. 11/2025 Sb. o seznamu zařazených psychoaktivních látek. A full text search of the consolidated nařízení vlády č. 463/2013 Sb. for tabák and for Nicotiana returns nothing in any of the eight seznamy, and the same searches return nothing in either 2025 list. The plant entries the narcotic lists do carry are the coca leaf, cannabis, cannabis resin and the poppy straw concentrate, and this plant is not among them, so the absence was tested against the places in the instrument where plants are actually named. The finding is an absence read off the printed lists rather than an inference from silence about a family. This absence is stated as those lists stand after nařízení vlády č. 107/2026 Sb. which is consolidated version 17 of nařízení vlády č. 463/2013 Sb. and consolidated version 4 of nařízení vlády č. 11/2025 Sb. both in force from 25 June 2026, and consolidated version 1 of nařízení vlády č. 456/2025 Sb. in force from 12 November 2025, each read at zakonyprolidy.cz on 21 September 2026. It does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 6(3) of the Listina základních práv a svobod, ústavní zákon č. 2/1993 Sb. reads „Trest smrti se nepřipouští“, the death penalty is not permitted, so no Czech drug provision carries one. No Czech drug ceiling attaches to this row through the seznamy of návykové látky, because the substance is not printed in them, so no ceiling article is named for it here. Nothing in the instrument stands behind this row: tabák and Nicotiana both return no hit, and the only plants the narcotic lists name are the coca leaf, cannabis, cannabis resin and poppy straw concentrate. On quantity, no greater than small figure was published for this row in the sources reachable for it, and none is invented here. The fine is separate from every custodial band above. Holding no more than a small amount for personal use is an administrative misdemeanour rather than a crime, and the live cell records the penalty for that misdemeanour as a fine of up to CZK 15,000. Read in the consolidated Criminal Code, § 283 odst. 1 sets one to five years for unlawful production, import, offer, sale or holding for another, § 283 odst. 2 sets two to ten years for the first aggravated tier and § 283 odst. 4 sets eight to eighteen years for the gravest. Possession above a small amount for one's own use is § 284, up to two years at odst. 1, six months to five years at odst. 2 and two to eight years at odst. 3. Growing or processing a plant or fungus for one's own use, and other dealing with it for one's own use, is § 285, whose odst. 2 is cannabis possession at more than 200 g in the dwelling or more than 50 g away from it, and whose bands are up to six months at odst. 1 and odst. 2, up to three years at odst. 4 and six months to five years at odst. 5. Making, obtaining or holding a precursor or other object intended for unlawful manufacture is § 286, up to five years at odst. 1 and two to ten years at odst. 2. The live cell stated these as up to one year for cannabis and up to two years for other drugs under § 284, six months to five years under § 285, and one to ten years under § 283 rising to eighteen in aggravated cases, and those live figures are carried forward here beside the bands re-derived from the consolidated text. Those bands and that fine are set out here because the live cell carried them, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Czechia's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Uruguay
Legal status
Not placed, and the finding now rests on the current list rather than a superseded one. tobacco is not named in the national list enacted by Decreto 198/025 of 25 September 2025: anchored searches on tabaco and on nicotiana across all 526 entries returned no entry, and the alkaloid the plant carries is absent from the replacement list as well. The weakness the earlier cell disclosed is now closed and the closure is stated plainly. Article 6 of Decreto 198/025 does not add to the 2020 annex, it replaces the whole consolidated list, and article 8 creates a control with no counterpart anywhere in Decreto 265/020: "Quedan sujetas a control todas aquellas sustancias que se encuadren dentro de los grupos genericos incluidos en el ANEXO II", all substances falling within the generic groups of its Anexo II. Those annexes are published only as Diario Oficial page images, and they have now been read: the edition of 3 October 2025, number 31.766, carillas 7 to 24, fetched one page image at a time from the Diario Oficial image service, read by eye off the page and checked against a Spanish optical character recognition pass, with the eye preferred wherever the two disagreed. Anexo I, Estupefacientes, carries 173 entries at carillas 7 to 12. Anexo II, Sicotropicos, carries 278 entries at carillas 12 to 21 and ends with three generic groups, Feniletilaminas and Catinonas sinteticas, each classed Sicotropicos Lista I, and Derivados de Fentanilo, classed Estupefacientes Lista I. Anexo III carries 75 entries in Tablas I and II at carillas 22 to 24. 526 entries in all. The name column was transcribed by eye and every search below was run against that transcription, not against the optical character recognition text, because the recognition text is not a sound basis for an absence: measured against the transcription, it carries only 396 of the 526 names, 9 of the 29 on carilla 22 and none of the 14 on carilla 24, where it captured the CAS and control columns and dropped the substance column altogether. A search run against it alone would return a false zero for about a quarter of the list [Certain, re-derived here; an independent count by the coordinator using a different normaliser returned 400 rather than 396, and both figures are floors because a misspelling counts as a miss]. This row was tested against each of the three generic groups in turn and is caught by none of them, being a plant, and Anexo II describes chemical nuclei rather than botanical material. [Certain as to what the annexes print.] This is a bounded, dated finding of absence and not an epistemic failure, which is why it opens positively. The b176 cell reached the same outcome but rested it on the Anexo I of Decreto 265/020, a list the same decreto has since replaced, and disclosed that the generic groups had never been read. That disclosure is discharged here. One question is not closed by it: article 6 of Decreto 198/025 extends control to the listed substances' derivatives "segun las definiciones de estos", and no such definitions are printed in any of the three annexes, whose own notes reach only isomers, salts and the products containing them [Certain as to both wordings]. Nothing listed stands close enough to this substance for that limb to bite [Likely]. The version horizon, stated outright because an absence without one expires silently and says nothing about having expired: the list read is the one enacted by Decreto 198/025 of 25 September 2025, published in the Diario Oficial of 3 October 2025, which is the current consolidated national list and replaces the Anexo I of Decreto 265/020 that the earlier cell searched. The power that moves it is article 15 of Decreto-Ley 14.294 in the wording given to it by article 2 of Ley 17.016, and article 8 of Decreto 198/025 subjects substances to control by generic group rather than by name. The annexes were read as at 25 September 2025, the date of the decreto that enacts them and the last amendment the text in hand incorporates. This does not rule out a later individual entry, a later replacement of the annexes, or a later generic group.
Argentina
Legal status
Not scheduled as an estupefaciente. Every one of the 886 numbered rows of the current Anexo I was searched by name, and all seventeen Anexo II chemical group definitions were read, and neither reaches it, so it is outside the definition article 77 of the Penal Code gives the word. This does not rule out a later decree substituting or amending either annex, and it does not rule out a placement under some instrument other than these two.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass from the consolidated text of Ley 23.737 published by InfoLEG: the words muerte and perpetua each return zero hits across the whole Act, so it carries neither a capital route nor a life route, and the heaviest term anywhere in it is the eight to twenty years of article 7. The scope of that measurement is this Act. It is not a statement about any other body of Argentine law. [Certain] Argentina places substances by delegated executive list. Article 40 of Ley 23.737 rewrote the last paragraph of article 77 of the Penal Code to read that el término estupefacientes comprende los estupefacientes, psicotrópicos y demás sustancias susceptibles de producir dependencia física o psíquica que se incluyan en las listas que se elaboren y actualicen periódicamente por decreto del Poder Ejecutivo nacional. Article 2 of Decreto 560/2019 then makes that a dual list: it considers estupefacientes las sustancias incluidas en la lista del Anexo I y las sustancias que queden incluidas en los grupos químicos de la lista del Anexo II. Anexo I was substituted by Decreto 122/2026, published 02/03/2026, and now runs to 886 numbered rows. Anexo II carries seventeen chemical groups and has not been substituted. A search of Ley 23.737 for a substance name is therefore not a scheduling result. [Certain] No entry names it. Spanish and chemical terms searched: tabaco; Nicotiana tabacum; nicotina. There was therefore no entry text to read. [Certain] The alphabetical neighbours were read: Fila 830 Sulfentanilo and Fila 831 TCPy, with no row between them, and the nicotine search is recorded on its own row. The list does name other plants, Coca at Fila 336 and Cannabis at Fila 304, so a plant row would have been possible in form. [Certain] The list read for this row is the complete Anexo I, all 886 numbered rows, taken from the text-layer PDF that the Boletín Oficial publishes and that the decree's own NOTA names as the place its annexes appear. Its sha256 is 197fce006cd7388d4eb06adae573487d2fe820976f55f242d0623e3215deca62 and a copy is kept at research/instruments/argentina/. The low resolution image served on the two normativa pages omits one page of that annex, Fila 614 to 651; the Boletín Oficial PDF does not, and every figure here was read from the PDF. [Certain] The negative above does not rest on predicting where the name would sort. Every entry name on every published page of the current Anexo I was read in this pass, Fila 1 to 613 and Fila 652 to 886, and none of the terms above appears as an entry name. A machine transcription of the same image was then searched for the same stems as a second pass; it returned matches only inside the chemical name columns of other rows and none as an entry name, which corroborates the read without replacing it. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass from the articles themselves. Article 14 first paragraph sets prisión de uno a seis años, one to six years, and a fine for anyone who holds estupefacientes. Article 14 second paragraph reduces that to un mes a dos años, one month to two years, when, por su escasa cantidad y demás circunstancias, surgiere inequívocamente que la tenencia es para uso personal. Article 5 sets prisión de cuatro (4) a quince (15) años, four to fifteen years, y multa de cuarenta y cinco (45) a novecientas (900) unidades fijas, for anyone acting sin autorización o con destino ilegítimo who sows or cultivates, produces, manufactures, extracts or prepares, trades or holds for the purposes of trade, distributes, gives in payment, stores or transports, or delivers, supplies, applies or facilitates to others for payment. A delivery free of charge is tres (3) a doce (12) años, three to twelve years. Article 5 drops to un mes a dos años, one month to two years, where the escasa cantidad sown or cultivated shows unequivocally it was to obtain estupefacientes for the person's own consumption, and to seis (6) meses a tres (3) años, six months to three years, where a free and occasional supply was plainly for the recipient's own use. Article 6 sets the same four to fifteen years for importing and then illegitimately altering the declared destination, dropping to three to twelve years where the quantity shows unequivocally the goods were not for trade. Article 7 sets prisión de ocho (8) a veinte (20) años, eight to twenty years, y multa de noventa (90) a mil ochocientas (1.800) unidades fijas for organising or financing any of the article 5 or article 6 activities. Article 11 raises the penalties in the preceding articles en un tercio del máximo a la mitad del mínimo for its six listed aggravations, among them use of a person under eighteen, violence or deceit, three or more organised participants, and commission near a school, a health centre, a place of detention or a sporting or cultural institution, and the same sentence caps the increase in its own words, sin que las mismas puedan exceder el máximo legal de la especie de pena de que se trate. Arithmetic on article 7 plus article 11 gives twenty six years and eight months, which is a derivation and not a figure the Act states, and the species cap governs it. Article 17 lets the court suspend the sentence in an article 14 second paragraph case where personal use and dependence are proved and order a curative measure instead, and a satisfactory result exempts the person from the penalty. Article 16 adds a curative measure to the sentence of any dependent person convicted of any offence. The figures in the preceding sentences are the penalties Argentina publishes for offences involving estupefacientes. They are stated here so that nothing is dropped, and they are not this row's exposure, because this substance is not on either list, so none of those offences reaches it as an estupefaciente. What a preparation containing it also contains is a separate question, and so is any regime other than Ley 23.737. [Likely] Carried from the live cell rather than re-derived here, because the ruling is not on the instrument pages read in this pass: the 2009 Corte Suprema decision in Arriola held the article 14 second paragraph penalty unconstitutional for consumption in private that harms nobody else, under article 19 of the Constitution. That ruling binds its own case. Lower courts vary, police still arrest, and the statute fixes no gram threshold, so decriminalised is not legalised and sale and purchase remain criminal.
Colombia
Legal status
Not listed. Anexo Técnico 1 of Resolución 116 de 2026 carries no entry for tabaco or Nicotiana tabacum as at 27 January 2026, and that does not rule out a later resolution. [Certain] as to this list. This row is a finding and not a deferral, and it is written to index as an answer for that reason. The absence was not merely searched for: an independent re-parse of Anexo Técnico 1 from the page geometry reproduced 469 entries numbered 1 to 469 with no gap and no duplicate, and this substance appears in neither the name column nor the chemical-name column of any of them. What the row does not say, and cannot, is that the substance is permitted: it says the current annex does not carry it, as at 27 January 2026, and article 3 of the same resolution provides for substances included in Anexo Técnico 1 for the first time, so a later resolution is not ruled out.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 11 of the Constitución Política reads, in its own words, that el derecho a la vida es inviolable and that no habrá pena de muerte, so no Colombian drug offence carries a capital penalty. [Certain] Penal Code article 376, as replaced by article 11 of Ley 1453 de 2011, punishes unauthorised import, transit, export, transport, carrying, storage, keeping, manufacture, sale, offer, acquisition, financing or supply of a narcotic, psychotropic or synthetic drug contemplated in schedules one, two, three and four of the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances, with 128 to 360 months of imprisonment and a fine of 1,334 to 50,000 monthly legal minimum wages. Its second and third paragraphs graduate that by quantity, naming marihuana, hachís, cocaine, derivados de la amapola, droga sintética, nitrato de amilo and ketamina y GHB, and this substance is not among them by name. Article 384 doubles the minimum of those figures in its listed aggravations, among them use of a minor and commission in or near a school. [Certain] Ley 30 de 1986 article 2(j) fixes the dosis para uso personal at not more than 20 g of marihuana, 5 g of marihuana hachís, 1 g of cocaine or any cocaine-based substance and 2 g of metacualona, and adds that it is not a personal dose, whatever the quantity, where the purpose is distribution or sale. Sentencia C-221 de 1994 declared article 2(j) exequible and articles 51 and 87 of Ley 30 inexequibles, resting on article 16 of the Constitution, the right to the free development of personality. The protection is judicial rather than statutory: article 11 of Ley 1453 de 2011 rewrote article 376 without the words salvo lo dispuesto sobre dosis para uso personal that the earlier text carried, and Sentencia C-491 de 2012 then upheld the rewritten article only on the understanding that it does not criminalise carrying or keeping a dose exclusively destined for personal consumption. Decriminalised is not the same as lawful: sale and supply stay criminal at any quantity. No printed figure covers this substance. [Certain] Those are Colombia's published penalties. They are the country's penalties and not this row's exposure, because article 376 defines its object as a substance contemplated in schedules one to four of the 1971 Convention and no entry for this substance was found in Anexo Técnico 1 at all. Whether the offence reaches this substance is exactly what was not established here. Anexo Técnico 1 of Resolución 116 de 27 January 2026 was read entry by entry, all 469 numbered entries, and it carries no entry for tabaco or Nicotiana tabacum. Anexo Técnico 1 numbers its 469 entries consecutively from 1 to 469 with no gap, so the absence was confirmed by reading the whole of it: a sweep of every entry name and every chemical name returns no hit for this substance.. Anexo Técnico 4, which extends each list to salts, isomers, esters, ethers, hydrates and stereoisomers, reaches nothing here either, because the rules extend a listed substance and no parent entry for this one was found. This is the list as at 27 January 2026 and it does not rule out a later resolution. [Certain] Tobacco is regulated by Ley 30 de 1986 outside the estupefacientes lists. Chapter III of that law, articles 14 to 19, carries the sale, labelling and advertising rules, article 17 requiring every packet to print the legend el tabaco es nocivo para la salud, and Ley 1335 de 2009 is the later tobacco control statute, which was not read in this pass.
Costa Rica
Legal status
Not handled through the drug control model. Article 1 of Ley 7786, as integrally reformed by Ley 8204, fixes the scope by reference to the substances included in the 1961 and 1971 Conventions and the 1988 Convention, and the Ministerio de Salud reproduces those listas in Spanish in its national fiscalizacion list and adds a short Otros agregados section of national additions. No entry for tobacco appears in any of the three sections of the national list and tobacco is in neither Convention schedule, while article 1 expressly preserves the separate operation of the Ley general de salud, N 5395, so tobacco control law is where this row sits. [Certain] for the absence as at 10 September 2026, which does not rule out a later list.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 21 of the Constitution provides "La vida humana es inviolable", the human life is inviolable, and the word "muerte" appears zero times across the 81 pages of the consolidated Act. Both of those were measured in this pass and together they are what carries the heading. Costa Rica is an abolitionist state of long standing, [Likely] on the nineteenth century date, which was not re-derived here. Costa Rica publishes penalties for drug trafficking in articles 58 and 77 of Ley 7786, eight to fifteen years and eight to twenty years on an enumerated aggravation. Those are the country's penalties for the substances the Act covers and they are not this row's exposure, because tobacco is not one of them. The second paragraph of article 58 reaches possession only "para cualquiera de los fines expresados", that is possession for one of those trafficking purposes. Ley 7786 creates no offence of consumption and no offence of simple possession for personal use. Article 79 answers a person consuming in a public place with voluntary and free treatment in a public or private health centre, not with a penalty.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is regulated as an ordinary product rather than through the psychotropic prescription form, and age, licensing and advertising rules apply instead of the controls in Ley 7786.
Documentation
Consolidation read: Ley 7786 of 30 April 1998 as integrally reformed by Ley 8204, in the Texto Completo Norma 8204 print published by the Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas, which carries its own generation date of 19 November 2018. The same ranges, ocho a quince anos in article 58 and de ocho a veinte anos in article 77, were independently read on 18 September 2026 against the later Sinalevi record of Ley 7786, version 13 of 13, so the 2018 print is corroborated rather than assumed current. Control model, re derived from the statute in this pass. Costa Rica prints no annex of controlled substances in its drug Act: across the 81 pages the only drug names anywhere are in article 96, on the disposal of seized marihuana, cocaina and heroina. Article 1 regulates "estupefacientes, psicotropicos, sustancias inhalables y demas drogas y farmacos susceptibles de producir dependencias fisicas o psiquicas, incluidos en la Convencion Unica sobre Estupefacientes... de 1961... asi como en el Convenio de Viena sobre Sustancias Psicotropicas, de 21 de febrero de 1971... asimismo, en la Convencion... de 1988". Its second paragraph is a different thing and is often misread as the control annex: it has the Ministerio de Salud and the MAG draw up and publish in La Gaceta "las listas de estupefacientes, psicotropicos y similares Licitos", the licit ones, which is the authorisation side. The incorporation is ambulatory: article 36 defines precursors as Cuadro I of the 1988 Convention "y sus anexos, asi como los que se le incorporen en el futuro", and article 100 gives the Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas a mandate framed by the conventions and by "los listados oficiales, publicados periodicamente en La Gaceta". The second limb, measured. The national list is the Lista de sustancias sometidas a fiscalizacion nacional, incluidos los medicamentos psicotropicos y estupefacientes, Direccion de Drogas y Estupefacientes of the Ministerio de Salud, updated 10 September 2026 and signed that day by Dra. Mariela Alfaro Segura. It runs to 27 pages in three sections, estupefacientes, psicotropicos and Otros agregados, and it names its own legal basis as the Reglamento para el control de drogas, estupefacientes y psicotropicas N. 45161-S, the instrument cited elsewhere as Decreto 45161-S of 17 June 2025. The two titles are the same text. A reading of 18 September 2026 records that the decree gives the competent body the function "Elaborar y actualizar la lista de sustancias oficialmente consideradas estupefacientes o psicotropicos y similares de uso regulado" and that its five annexes are forms rather than a substance schedule; that quotation is carried from that reading and was not re derived here. The whole of Otros agregados is twelve entries: metilfenidato, tapentadol and the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-073 among the estupefacientes, and ketamina, esketamina, mexazolam, zaleplon, zopiclona and the piperazines mCPP, CPP, TFMPP and 1,4 dibencilpiperazina among the psicotropicos. Amending Act in force between that list and this reading, read in the official gazette in this pass. Ley 10961 of 9 June 2026, published in Alcance 78 to La Gaceta 113 of 19 June 2026, provides "Rige tres meses a partir de su publicacion" and so took effect on 19 September 2026. It runs to four articles: it adds article 15 quater to Ley 7786 on the anti-money-laundering duties of virtual asset service providers, carries that cross reference into articles 16, 16 bis, 25, 33, 33 bis, 86 and 123, reforms the article 81 administrative fines, and allows three months for regulations. Every Ley 7786 article it touches is money laundering machinery, and it leaves articles 1, 2, 36, 58, 73, 74, 77, 77 bis and 79 untouched, so it moves no row in this batch. Method note. The 2026-09-20 Costa Rica dossier was used only as the slug list and as one of the two term list sources. Its outcome column, its instrument column and its quotation column were not treated as evidence and no placement in this batch rests on them; every placement is the entry read in the list the statute incorporates. Two of its readings were not adopted: it treated ergometrina and ergina as one row when they are separate substances on separate limbs, and it left dextrometorfano unresolved when the instrument excludes it in terms. Sibling name traps were checked rather than assumed. Anchored matching correctly did not return bencilmorfina, desomorfina, dihidromorfina, metildihidromorfina, mirofina or diacetilmorfina for the morfina row, isometadona, normetadona or the metadona intermediario for the metadona row, metcatinona or 4-metiletcatinona for the catinona row, MMDA or N-etil MDA for the MDA row, beta-ceto-MDMA for the MDMA row, levometanfetamina for the metanfetamina row, PCPY for the PCP row, brolanfetamina for the anfetamina row, or norpseudoefedrina for the efedrina row. Two extraction zeroes were false and were recovered by re interrogation: hexahidrocannabinol and 2-fluorodescloroketamina are both line wrapped in the source and a column based read missed both. Routes run for the instrument in this pass. pgrweb.go.cr/scij is a JavaScript shell: the Ley 8204 and Ley 7786 records and the sinalevi.go.cr record each returned about 25 KB that renders to 1,159 characters of site chrome and no statutory text, so a size threshold would have cleared all three. imprentanacional.go.cr served the official gazette carrying Ley 10961. The institutional reproduction at icd.go.cr served the consolidated Act, and ministeriodesalud.go.cr served the national list and the circulars. The schedule pages were checked for hidden content: the list PDF holds one image object repeated on all 27 pages, which is the ministry letterhead, and its byte size is accounted for by that banner, so no entry is carried in an image. Search run for this row: tobacco returned no entry across the estupefacientes, psicotropicos and Otros agregados sections of the national list as at 10 September 2026, and none in the Green List or the Yellow List. A later list than the one read does not rule out a change. Carry any prescription and its dispensing label, and treat the position as open rather than settled. Sourcing, re derived in this pass and not carried: the two Junta de Vigilancia de Drogas urls cited by this row are DIRECTORIES and not documents. The listing page names the national fiscalisation list but does not carry it; the list is a separate PDF behind a numbered link, and that PDF is what the placement in this row actually rests on. Both documents are now fetched and cited by their own urls: "Lista de sustancias sometidas a fiscalizacion nacional, incluidos los medicamentos psicotropicos y estupefacientes", and "Lista de Estupefacientes y Sustancias Psicotropicas Sometidas a Fiscalizacion Nacional". The first carries the Otros agregados section this row's reasoning refers to [Certain, read from the fetched PDF]. The circulars page cited alongside them exposes no document at all.
Dominican Republic
Legal status
Not listed. Tobacco has no entry. Ley 50-88 names three plants expressly, «Marihuana» under code 7360, «Peyote» under 7415 and «Hojas de coca» under 9040, and this leaf is not among them. It is not named in the five Categorías of article 8 of Ley 50-88, which are the only substance schedules the law prints and which no statute has amended since 7 June 1990, nor in the article 2 definitions, nor in the precursor table of Capítulo V of the Reglamento as that chapter was replaced by article 5 of Decreto 275-21 on 26 April 2021, as at 21 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco is an agricultural export of the Dominican Republic and is regulated as a consumer product and through excise, not through the drug schedules. Article 75 sets the prison band by the role the case is classified into: six months to two years for simple possession, three to ten years for a distributor, a seller or an intermediary, five to twenty years for a trafficker, and thirty years for a patrocinador. The quantity scales that decide which of those roles a case falls into are printed for cocaine in article 5 and for marihuana and hashish in article 6, and Ley 50-88 prints no quantity scale for any other substance. The fines run with the same roles: RD$1,500 to RD$2,500 for simple possession, RD$10,000 to RD$50,000 for a distributor or an intermediary, not less than the value of the drugs seized and never less than RD$50,000 for a trafficker, and not less than RD$1,000,000 for a patrocinador. Article 59 adds five to twenty years with a fine of not less than RD$250,000 for taking a controlled drug into or out of the national territory in international traffic, and thirty years with a fine of not less than RD$1,000,000 where the Dominican Republic is the final destination. Article 58 classifies illicit trafficking, the manufacture, distribution or possession of equipment for producing controlled drugs, and the acquisition or laundering of the proceeds, as delitos graves to be punished with the maximum of the penalties and the fines, and its párrafo calls illicit trafficking an international offence. Article 85 doubles the penalty for a reincident trafficker or patrocinador and caps the resulting prison term at thirty years, and article 87 withdraws provisional liberty on bail, conditional liberty and the conditional pardon of the sentence from every offence in this law. Those figures are set out here because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as the Dominican Republic's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. Ley 50-88 provides no death penalty for any drug offence, and the highest prison term it prints anywhere is thirty years.
If prescribed / medical
Ley 50-88 governs the substances its Categorías name, so this row's prescription position is a matter for the general medicines regime under Ley 42-01 and the Dirección General de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Productos Sanitarios rather than for the drug law. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription and the dispensing label, and confirm the requirement with your embassy before travel.
Jamaica
Legal status
Tobacco is not among the drugs to which Part IV of the Dangerous Drugs Act applies. The scope search recorded for this row, «tabaco», returned no entry, and section 10(1) names only medicinal opium, any extract or tincture of the plant cannabis sativa, morphine and its salts, diacetylmorphine and the other esters of morphine, cocaine and ecgonine with their salts and esters, the dihydrocodeinone and morphine N oxide group, and thebaine with the ethers of morphine. The term recorded for the search, TABACO, is not English language wording and it appears nowhere in this English language statute; the search record holds its terms in Spanish language and Latin binomial forms, which is a property of that record rather than of the instrument, so no part of it is offered here as a quotation from the Act. Part IIIA of the Act reaches ganja alone. The row reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty. The Dangerous Drugs Act is a narcotics statute of Geneva and Hague Convention vintage and it is not the instrument that regulates this product in Jamaica; excise, customs, food, tobacco and medicines law are reserved, and this citation does not reach them. No controlled drug offence is assigned to it here.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The words death, capital and hanging appear nowhere in the 43 page consolidated Dangerous Drugs Act, and every penalty limb in it stops at imprisonment: thirty five years on conviction before a Circuit Court under sections 7B, 8A and 8B, and five years or less on summary conviction before a Resident Magistrate. No controlled drug penalty attaches to this substance under the Dangerous Drugs Act at all, because it is not a drug to which Part IV applies and it is not ganja. The scope search recorded was «tabaco», and the row reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty. That is a statement about this Act and not a statement that the product is unregulated: excise, customs, food, tobacco, licensing and public health law sit outside this instrument and are not cited here. Section 22(5), the residual penalty for an offence against this Act for which no penalty is otherwise provided, is a fine not exceeding fifteen thousand dollars or two years, and it has nothing to bite on where no offence is created.
If prescribed / medical
There is no Jamaican controlled drug authorisation to obtain for Tobacco, because the Dangerous Drugs Act does not reach it at all. Any import restriction on it comes from customs, excise, food or tobacco law, which this Act does not supply and which this cell does not attempt to state. No schedule placement attaches to this row under this Act. The term recorded for this row in the compilation is «tabaco», and the identification question that has to be settled before any authorisation answer is given is the one this row was drawn around, which reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty.
Ireland
Legal status
Not a controlled drug in Ireland. The placement recorded for this row is: No controlled-drug schedule; 2010 Act s. 2(1)(d) exclusion. The wording relied on is “a tobacco product”, and it is an exclusion or a statutory test rather than a listing. Tobacco is outside the controlled-drug schedules and tobacco products are expressly excluded from the 2010 Act. Two separate things are recorded here, an absence from Schedules 1 to 5 and a statutory exclusion from the 2010 Act, and the exclusion is tied to the qualifying presentation rather than to the chemical in every form it might take. Read this beside the nicotine row, which relies on the same subsection and is given a wider ceiling. Section 2(1)(d) of the 2010 Act puts a tobacco product outside that Act and this row rests wholly on that. The nicotine row keeps a conditional route open because nicotine also reaches a consumer in presentations that are not tobacco products. The difference between the two rows is the presentation, not the statute.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Ireland has no death penalty, so nothing on this row can reach one. The exposure that runs is not a Misuse of Drugs Act exposure at all, because the placement recorded for this row reads: No controlled-drug schedule; 2010 Act s. 2(1)(d) exclusion. No ceiling under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 attaches to this row, because that Act reaches only a controlled drug. The 2010 Act route is blocked as well for the qualifying product, because the section 2 exclusion recorded for this row takes it outside that Act rather than merely failing to catch it. An exclusion is tied to the qualifying presentation and does not travel with the chemical into some other form. The source's own ceiling line for this row reads: No 1977 Act controlled-drug ceiling attaches to tobacco; the stated section 2 exclusion prevents the 2010 Act route for the qualifying product. Read as at 20 September 2026. These are the statutory ceilings the source records and they are not a prediction of what any court would impose.
If prescribed / medical
Not established for Ireland in the source read here, and deferred rather than guessed. The dossier this cell was authored from carries no prescription column and no traveller column, and no source for one, so nothing is asserted about whether a visitor may bring tobacco into Ireland, what a foreign prescription is worth at an Irish border, or what licence, certificate or authorisation Ireland requires for it. That was not researched and it is not inferred here. What the row does establish is its placement, which reads: No controlled-drug schedule; 2010 Act s. 2(1)(d) exclusion. Attached to this substance, the wording read for it is “a tobacco product”, and that is a scheduling record rather than anything about medicine. What this row's own words do say is that a compliant product of the kind named is outside the 2010 Act. That is an exclusion for a presentation and it is not a medical route. A scheduling fact is not a prescribing route, and the silence in this field is an absence of research rather than a permission.
Austria
Legal status
Not a designated drug in Austria, and regulated as a consumer product instead. The tobacco and non smokers protection act prohibits selling tobacco products and the related products it defines to persons who have not completed their eighteenth year. Distance selling and sales to under eighteens are regulated by §§2a and 2b, and the act carries labelling, advertising and smoking restrictions alongside the age rule. It is a consumer product regime and not a narcotics or psychotrope designation.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The ceiling on this row is a fine rather than a prison term. TNRSG §14(1) provides up to EUR 7,500, or up to EUR 15,000 on repetition, for the product, distance sale, youth sale and related violations it lists, and §§14(4) to 14(6) address premises duties, smoking and the playground prohibition with their own amounts. No SMG custodial tier reaches this row and Austria has no death penalty. Tobacco has no SMG exposure whatever, and the enforcement is the tobacco act's own fine structure aimed largely at sellers. Nothing in the tobacco regime turns on the SMG thresholds or on its diversion route, because it is not a drug offence at all. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Austria entry rather than re-derived from the Suchtmittelgesetz in this pass, the published penalties are these. Austrian practice is depenalised and not legalised, and the published entry says so in those terms. There is no legal minimum quantity, and possession of any amount for personal use is punishable under section 27, up to six months in prison or a fine. Under Therapie statt Strafe at section 35, small quantity personal use is typically provisionally suspended from prosecution on one to two years of probation where the person accepts counselling or treatment. Consumption itself is not criminalised, but the possession that precedes it is. Above the Grenzmenge, the threshold quantity, the offence becomes dealing or trafficking under sections 28 and 28a, up to one to three years, escalating to ten to fifteen years for commercial or organised cases. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty range or a fine and none of them is a quantity threshold. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Austria's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
The rule that governs every traveller in Austria is SMG §5(1). It confines the acquisition, possession, production, processing, carriage, import, export, offering, transfer and procurement of a Suchtmittel to medical, dental, veterinary and scientific purposes, and the particular travel, licensing and dispensing provisions operate inside it rather than around it. Because this is not a Suchtmittel at all, the authorized purpose rule in SMG §5(1) does not reach it, and neither the psychotrope medicine exception in SMG §30(3) nor the travel certificate fields closing the Psychotropenverordnung's Annexes 2 and 3 have anything to attach to. Tobacco is not a Suchtmittel and no prescription question arises for it at all.
Poland
Legal status
Not named in the Polish national list. Neither tobacco nor Nicotiana appears in any of the three annexes, so tobacco is not a narcotic, a psychotropic or a new psychoactive substance under the 2005 Act. It is regulated by tobacco law.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Poland has no death penalty, and no drug offence attaches to this row at all on the list as read. No article 62 or article 62b offence arises from the list as read. The annexes do name a number of whole plants on the narcotic side, including khat, kratom, salvia and several cacti, so the absence of tobacco is a deliberate line rather than a category the list never uses. This absence is stated as at the consolidated text of 17 June 2024, Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1139, as that text stands after the amending regulations of 30 April 2025, Dz.U. 2025 poz. 598, and of 7 July 2026, Dz.U. 2026 poz. 934, read at api.sejm.gov.pl on 21 September 2026. The power to move the list belongs to the Minister of Health, exercised by rozporządzenie under article 44f of the 2005 Act, and that does not rule out a later rozporządzenie made after the date of this reading.
If prescribed / medical
Nicotine replacement products are medicines. Tobacco itself is not a prescription question.
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation arises under the drug law, because no annex entry reaches it.
Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 17 sierpnia 2018 r. w sprawie wykazu substancji psychotropowych, środków odurzających oraz nowych substancji psychoaktywnych, tekst jednolity Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1139 · api.sejm.gov.pl · Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 30 kwietnia 2025 r. zmieniające to rozporządzenie, Dz.U. 2025 poz. 598, w mocy od 22 maja 2025 r. · api.sejm.gov.pl · Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 7 lipca 2026 r. zmieniające to rozporządzenie, Dz.U. 2026 poz. 934, w mocy od 28 lipca 2026 r. · api.sejm.gov.pl · Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, tekst jednolity Dz.U. 2023 poz. 1939, art. 4 pkt 25 i 26, art. 31, art. 32, art. 33, art. 44f, art. 62, art. 62a, art. 62b · Updated September 21, 2026
Croatia
Legal status
Tobacco is not named in the Popis droga, psihotropnih tvari i biljaka iz kojih se može dobiti droga te tvari koje se mogu uporabiti za izradu droga, NN 19/2023, and was not added by its amendment NN 154/2024. Searched for duhan, for Nicotiana and for nikotin across all three lists. Neither the tobacco plant nor its genus appears anywhere in the Popis, and the only hits on nikotin are inside the names of three nicotinyl opioid esters. Croatia names six botanical entries in this instrument and tobacco is not one of them. Tobacco is not covered by the 1961 or the 1971 Convention, so the convention limb of Article 2(1)(1) of the control Act does not reach it, and a lawfully traded consumer product is not a new psychoactive substance within Article 2(1)(3). Croatia regulates tobacco through its tobacco and related products legislation and its excise legislation, neither of which was read for this cell. This absence is stated as the Popis stands after its only amendment NN 154/2024, read at https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2023_02_19_331.html on 21 September 2026. It does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 21 of the Ustav Republike Hrvatske reads »U Republici Hrvatskoj nema smrtne kazne«, there is no death penalty in the Republic of Croatia, and Article 41 of the Kazneni zakon lists the only punishments as a fine, imprisonment and long term imprisonment. No entry in the Popis connects this row to Article 190 of the Kazneni zakon, whose subject is »tvari koje su propisom proglašene drogom«, substances declared a drug by regulation. The bands below are Croatia's published drug penalties, set out because the live cell carried them, and they are reproduced without being asserted of this row. Article 190 of the Kazneni zakon supplies the criminal bands, and its subject is »tvari koje su propisom proglašene drogom«, substances declared a drug by regulation, so a Popis entry is what brings a row within it. Article 190(1) sets six months to five years for unauthorised production or processing. Article 190(2) sets three to twelve years for producing, processing, transporting, exporting, importing, acquiring or possessing such substances intended for unauthorised sale, and for offering, selling or brokering them. Article 190(3) sets three to fifteen years where the sale is to a person with severe mental disturbance or to a child, or takes place at or near a school or another place serving the education, upbringing, sport or social activity of children, or in a penal institution, or where an official commits it in the course of duty. Article 190(4) sets not less than three years for organising a network of resellers or intermediaries, and Article 190(5) not less than five years where the act causes considerable damage to the health of a larger number of people or the death of the person sold to. Article 190(8) requires confiscation of the substances, the plants and fungi they come from, and the means of production, transport and consumption. Article 190(2) read one to twelve years until Article 10 of the Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Kaznenog zakona, NN 136/2025, replaced the word »jedne« with »tri«, and it has read three to twelve years since that Act came into force on the eighth day after its publication on 5 November 2025. Article 44(1) of the Kazneni zakon caps a term of imprisonment at twenty years, which is what bounds the open ended minima in Article 190(4) and Article 190(5), and Article 46 puts long term imprisonment of twenty one to forty years outside the reach of Article 190. The instrument names six botanical entries and this plant is not one of them. The live cell recorded that since 1 January 2013 personal use possession of any drug has been reclassified from a kazneno djelo, a criminal offence, to a prekršaj, a misdemeanour, and that is carried forward here. It recorded the misdemeanour fine as roughly 660 to 2,650 euro. It recorded possible short misdemeanour detention of up to 90 days, confiscation, and no arrest for possession alone. On quantity it recorded that there is no statutory personal use quantity and that courts decide case by case, and that hedge is carried forward as it stood. It recorded cultivation or production without intent to sell as six months to five years. It recorded sale, import, export or possession for sale as three to twelve years. It recorded aggravated cases, near schools, to children or organised, as up to fifteen to twenty years. It recorded that medical cannabis has been legal since October 2015 on prescription, capped at 0,75 g of THC per month and limited to residents. It recorded that claims of a 2026 reform introducing a five gram cannabis threshold are not supported by any primary source and should be disregarded. Read against the control Act, the misdemeanour the live fine belongs to is Article 54(1) point 1 of the Zakon o suzbijanju zlouporabe droga read with Article 54(3), which makes possession contrary to Article 3(1) a misdemeanour for a natural person. The fine that provision prints is 5.000,00 to 20.000,00 kuna or imprisonment of up to 90 days, because the Act's consolidation still carries the pre euro figures, and at the fixed conversion rate that range is about 663 to 2,654 euro, which reconciles with the live figure rather than replacing it. Article 190 as read carries no possession for own use offence at all, which is consistent with the live cell's 2013 reclassification but is not proof of it. The words without intent to sell are the live cell's gloss and not the statute's: Article 190(1) is unauthorised production or processing, and Article 190(7) deems unauthorised growing of a plant or fungus from which a drug can be obtained to be production. The 0,75 g monthly cap appears in nothing read for this cell; Article 13(6) to (9) of the control Act permits cannabis cultivation and production for medical purposes on an approval from the health ministry, and the monthly figure is carried forward from the live cell and was not re-derived. Those bands, that fine and those quantity words are set out here because the live cell carried them, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Croatia's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Hungary
Legal status
Not listed. Tobacco is not a named entry of the K1 or K2 jegyzék in the 1. melléklet, of the P1, P2, P3 or P4 jegyzék in the 2. melléklet, or of the új pszichoaktív anyagok jegyzéke in the 3. melléklet to 78/2022. (XII. 28.) BM rendelet az ellenőrzött anyagokról, and it is not named in any of the five structural descriptions at points 1 to 5 of that 3. melléklet either. Those five points and the numbered table at point 6 are the whole of the listing content of that melléklet: point 7 is a reading rule and not a further group, «A jegyzékbe sorolás szempontjából a 6.1. pontban foglalt táblázat A és B oszlopában található adatok irányadóak, a C és D oszlop adatai a vegyületek számítógépes kereshetőségét biztosítják.». The forms searched were dohány, tobacco, Nicotiana, in Hungarian orthography, with the accents stripped, and again over the text with every whitespace character removed so that a name broken across a line or a table cell could not read as an absence. None of those forms returns a row or a paragraph. The plant's principal alkaloid is not an entry either, and the two rows were resolved together on the same reading: the Hungarian form nikotin returns nothing and the Latin stem returns only three nicotinyl opioid esters. Hungary regulates the plant through tobacco, excise and retail law rather than through the jegyzékek, and that regime was not read here. This is silence and not an express exclusion: the decree says nothing about the substance at all. Hungary carries the list outside the Act: the Criminal Code names no substance and the delegated rendelet carries the jegyzékek, which is the outward reference model and the second of the three. Section 459(1a) of the Criminal Code, 2012. évi C. törvény, inserted by section 26 of 2025. évi XIX. törvény, reads «E törvény alkalmazásában kábítószer a 78/2022. (XII. 28.) BM rendelet 1. mellékletében a kábítószerek 1. vagy 2. jegyzékén szereplő anyag, 2. mellékletében a pszichotróp anyagok 1. vagy 2. jegyzékén szereplő anyag, valamint 3. mellékletében meghatározott anyag.», so the K1 and K2 jegyzékek of the 1. melléklet, the P1 and P2 jegyzékek of the 2. melléklet and the whole of the 3. melléklet are inside the Criminal Code definition and the P3 and P4 jegyzékek are not. The P3 and P4 jegyzékek remain controlled schedules of the rendelet, and an entry there alone does not place a substance in the ordinary section 176 trafficking lane. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment. This one is stated as those lists stand after the amendment made by 1/2026. (VI. 19.) EÜM rendelet, in the consolidated text as in force on 29 June 2026, which is the last amendment reflected in the text that was read, and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Hungary has no death penalty. It does have life imprisonment for a drug offence, and that is the ceiling here. None of the drug penalties below reaches Tobacco through the jegyzékek, because they attach to the substances those jegyzékek name and this substance is not among them. Criminal Code section 176(1) makes offering, handing over, putting into circulation or trading in a drug a bűntett punishable by two to eight years, «Aki kábítószert kínál, átad, forgalomba hoz, vagy azzal kereskedik, bűntett miatt két évtől nyolc évig terjedő szabadságvesztéssel büntetendő.». Section 176(3) raises that to five years to twenty years or life imprisonment where the offence is committed in respect of a significant quantity, «A büntetés öt évtől húsz évig terjedő vagy életfogytig tartó szabadságvesztés, ha a bűncselekményt jelentős mennyiségű kábítószerre követik el.». The live Hungary cell recorded the life ceiling under section 176(3) and this pass re-derived the same provision from the Act and adds the five to twenty year band printed beside it. Section 178(6) makes consuming a drug, and acquiring, holding or ordering for import a small quantity for consumption, a vétség punishable by up to two years, «Aki kábítószert fogyaszt, illetve csekély mennyiségű kábítószert fogyasztás céljából megszerez, tart vagy az ország területére történő behozatal céljából megrendel, ha súlyosabb bűncselekmény nem valósul meg, vétség miatt két évig terjedő szabadságvesztéssel büntetendő.». Section 180(1) is a conditional non punishment route and not a numerical decriminalisation rule: it requires the offender to admit the offence, «a bűncselekmény elkövetését beismeri,», to prove by document before the first instance decision at least six months of continuous treatment for dependence, other care for drug use or a preventive and informative service, «az elsőfokú ügydöntő határozat meghozataláig okirattal igazolja, hogy legalább hat hónapig folyamatos, kábítószer-függőséget gyógyító kezelésben, kábítószer-használatot kezelő más ellátásban részesült, vagy megelőző-felvilágosító szolgáltatáson vett részt, és», and to disclose the circumstances and enable the seller to be identified before the indictment, «a vádemelésig az elkövetés körülményeit feltárja, illetve lehetővé teszi a kábítószert értékesítő személy kilétének a megállapítását.». The live Hungary cell recorded those three conditions and this pass re-derived them from the Act. Section 180(2) closes that route where within the preceding two years the proceedings were suspended on that ground or the offender was held liable for drug trafficking or drug possession, and section 180(2a) closes it where the offender has already taken it twice, «Az (1) bekezdés nem alkalmazható akkor sem, ha az elkövető az (1) bekezdés b) pontja szerinti lehetőséget már két alkalommal igénybe vette.». Section 461 supplies the quantity definitions that grade the offence, so a quantity figure in Hungary selects the band rather than creating a lawful allowance. No section 461 quantity value is stated for this row, because section 461 grades a quantity of kábítószer as section 459(1a) defines it, and this substance is not one of the entries that definition reaches. No fine figure attaches to any of those provisions in the text read: the Criminal Code states them as custodial bands and the rendelet states no penalty of its own. Those are Criminal Code provisions rather than rendelet provisions, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Hungary's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Cambodia
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Cambodia's authorities (Law on the Control of Drugs) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Cambodian source (Law on the Control of Drugs 1996, as amended), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. Cambodia ABOLISHED the death penalty in 1989 (constitutional), there is NO death penalty for any drug offence; the maximum is LIFE imprisonment. ENFORCEMENT: a 2017 anti-drug campaign sharply increased arrests and post-2019 tourist-area enforcement tightened, foreigners are routinely jailed, and the old 'smokers' paradise' reputation is OUTDATED.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Cambodia ABOLISHED the death penalty in 1989 (constitutional); the maximum penalty for any drug offence is LIFE imprisonment. There is no medical, recreational, or industrial cannabis provision. Enforcement tightened sharply after a 2017 anti-drug campaign and post-2019 in tourist areas, foreigners are routinely jailed and the old 'smokers' paradise' reputation is OUTDATED. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law on the Control of Drugs (1996, amended 2005, 2011/2012), Arts 40/45 · UNODC and Amnesty International (corroborative) · cdc.gov.kh · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Sri Lanka
Legal status
Not a dangerous drug under Sri Lanka's Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Chapter 218): absent from Groups A, B, C, D and E of the Third Schedule. Tobacco is not in any Group of the Third Schedule and is not a dangerous drug. It is regulated under the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol Act, No. 27 of 2006. The model: the list is inside the Ordinance and the power to change it is delegated, with a parliamentary lock on the delegation. Section 48 provides that 「the drugs, substances, articles or preparations, specified for the time being in Groups A, B, C, D and E in Part I of the Third Schedule, shall be deemed to be dangerous drugs」. Section 2(1) then provides that 「regulation」 means a regulation made under this Ordinance and published in the Gazette, 「and includes the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Schedules」, so the Third Schedule is itself a regulation. The empowering section is section 80. Section 80(2)(b) lets the Minister make regulations 「for adding any item to or deleting any item from, or altering, varying or amending in any other way, any of the lists or Groups of poisons and dangerous drugs set out in the First and Third Schedules」, and section 80(3) then provides that 「No regulation so made shall have effect unless it has been approved by Parliament and notification of such approval has been published in the Gazette」. So the delegation is real but it is locked to an affirmative vote, and in practice the 2022 changes were made by primary legislation rather than by regulation. The Act was last amended by the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act, No. 7 of 2026, certified 6 March 2026. The Third Schedule was last amended by section 6 of the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act, No. 41 of 2022, certified 23 November 2022 and published as a supplement to Part II of the Gazette of 25 November 2022, which substituted Group B of Part I and the whole of Part III. Act No. 7 of 2026 does not touch the Third Schedule.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. There is no offence under the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance for tobacco. Act No. 27 of 2006 establishes the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol, prohibits sale to a person under twenty one, requires health warnings and restricts smoking in public places and advertising. Neither reaches this substance, and not because the penalty is low but because no dangerous drug offence in this Ordinance engages at all. Section 48 makes a substance a dangerous drug only if it is specified in Groups A to E of Part I of the Third Schedule, and this substance is in none of them. Section 54A(1)(a) names four drugs for the manufacture limb and Part III Column II names five substances for the quantity limbs; this is neither, so no capital or life sentence is available for it on any facts. Saying that much does not dispose of the whole Ordinance, and the corpus this cell replaces never reached the rest of it. Chapter II runs a separate poisons regime over the First Schedule, whose Parts I to V were read in full for this cell, and this substance is named nowhere in them, so sections 5, 17, 18 and 19 create no offence for it either. The instrument that does govern it is named in the status above.
Morocco
Legal status
Legal for adults, with smoking banned in listed public places and tobacco advertising banned. The product is governed by loi n° 15-91 relative à l'interdiction de fumer et de faire de la publicité et de la propagande en faveur du tabac dans certains lieux, promulgated by dahir n° 1-91-112 of 26 June 1995 and published at Bulletin officiel 4318 of 2 August 1995, pages 542 and 543. Its article 1 provides « Sont considérés comme produits du tabac, au sens de la présente loi, les produits destinés à être fumés qu'ils soient constitués entièrement ou partiellement de tabac ». Its article 4 forbids smoking in « lieux publics », among them administrative offices and meeting rooms, hospitals and clinics, public transport outside smoking areas, theatres and cinemas, and teaching rooms, and article 7 bans tobacco advertising on broadcast media, in the press published in Morocco, in cultural venues and on the fronts of tobacco shops. The law as published in 1995 sets no minimum age for buying tobacco. Its alkaloid is a different row. « Nicotine et ses sels » is printed in tableau A, produits toxiques, both in the annex of the dahir of 2 December 1922 and in arrêté n° 171-66 of 11 March 1966, as published in 1966; the leaf, the plant and the manufactured product are named in neither. Arrêté 171-66 inscribes substances « ainsi que les préparations les contenant », but its lists are section II lists, for substances intended for human or veterinary medicine, and a cigarette sold for smoking is not a medicinal preparation; so the tableau A entry governs nicotine as a medicine or poison, and the narcotics dahir, which attaches to stupéfiants, reaches neither. This is a reading of the section II lists, for human and veterinary medicine; the section I lists for commerce, industry and agriculture, which article 1 of the 1922 dahir has made by joint arrêté, were not read. This is the law as published in 1995, read from the gazette page images on 3 October 2026.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Loi 15-91, read from the page images of Bulletin officiel 4318 on 3 October 2026, provides no imprisonment at all; its penalties are fines. Conduct distinction. Buying, holding and smoking tobacco are lawful. Article 11 punishes « toute personne qui fume du tabac ou des produits du tabac dans les lieux où il est interdit de fumer » with a fine of 10 to 50 dirhams. Article 12 punishes advertising or propaganda for tobacco by the means listed in chapter III with a fine of 1.000 to 3.000 dirhams. Article 3 requires the warning « le tabac est dangereux pour la santé » on every packet and lets the administration seize a packet without it. The narcotics penalties of dahir portant loi 1-73-282 of 21 May 1974 do not reach tobacco: its articles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 attach to substances classified as stupéfiants or inscribed in tableau B, and tobacco is in no section II tableau, and is not classified as a stupéfiant in any list read. For comparison, the narcotics penalties that do not reach this row: Article 2 of dahir portant loi 1-73-282 punishes holding « les substances ou plantes classées comme stupéfiants » with five to ten years and a fine of 5.000 to 500.000 dirhams, Article 8 punishes their unlawful use with two months to one year, Article 11 requires confiscation of what was seized and Article 13 lets the court ban a foreign national for five to ten years, and all four apply only to a substance classified as a stupéfiant, which tobacco is not.
Qatar
Legal status
Tobacco is not named in Table 1, Table 2 or Table 4 of Law No. 9 of 1987, and it is on none of the three Ministry of Public Health controlled lists. It is regulated outside the narcotics scheme altogether, under Qatar's tobacco-control law, which this row did not audit. Table 4 prohibits the cultivation of five plants and Nicotiana is not among them, while the substance tables name no tobacco alkaloid. Electronic smoking devices and their liquids are handled by a separate import regime that this row did not audit. An absence from the drug schedules is not a finding that the thing is permitted. It is a finding about which regime applies. Article 1 of Law No. 9 of 1987 provides «تعتبر مواد مخدرة أو مؤثرات عقلية خطرة في تطبيق أحكام هذا القانون المواد والمؤثرات العقلية المبينة في الجدولين رقمي (1) و(2) الملحقين به. ويستثنى منها المستحضرات المبينة بالجدول رقم (3).», making the narcotic drugs and dangerous psychotropic substances for this Law those set out in attached Tables 1 and 2, and excepting from them the preparations set out in Table 3. The power to move a substance in or out is article 33, «يجوز بقرار من وزير الصحة العامة تعديل الجداول الملحقة بهذا القانون بالحذف أو الإضافة أو تغيير النسب الواردة فيها.», which lets the Minister of Public Health amend the attached tables by deletion, addition or change of the stated percentages. This reading is stated as at the annex as published in the Official Gazette and as it stands after Ministerial Decisions 22 of 2015, 6 of 2024, 2 of 2025 and 8 of 2026, the last of which took effect on 2 February 2026, read at the publisher on 22 September 2026. Those five documents are not a complete statement of the tables, and this cell says so rather than implying otherwise: the Ministry of Public Health prints on its own list of controlled narcotic and dangerous psychoactive substances a further block of entries, among them carfentanil, hydromorphone, oripavine and a long run of designer cathinones and synthetic cannabinoids, that appears in neither the Gazette annex nor any of the four located decisions, and the instruments that placed them were not found. So this reading is measured against those five documents and the three Ministry lists together, and not against a certified consolidation, because the portals publish none.
Consequences if caught
The figures below are Qatar's published drug penalties. Article 34 opens «يعاقب بالإعدام أو الحبس المؤبد وبغرامة لا تزيد على خمسمائة ألف ريال ولا تقل عن ثلاثمائة ألف ريال», punishment by death or life imprisonment, and the word or is what leaves death discretionary at the base tier. The same article then provides «وتكون العقوبة الإعدام وبغرامة لا تزيد على خمسمائة ألف ريال ولا تقل عن ثلاثمائة ألف ريال في حالة العود.», making death the punishment on recidivism, and extends that same result to an offender who is a public official charged with drug control and to one who involves a person under eighteen, an ascendant, a descendant, a spouse or a person in his charge. Article 35 opens «يُعاقب بالحبس مدة لا تزيد على عشرين سنة ولا تقل عن عشر سنوات وبغرامة لا تزيد على أربعمائة ألف ريال ولا تقل عن مائتي ألف ريال», ten to twenty years for possession, acquisition, purchase, sale, delivery, receipt, transport, cession, exchange, dispensing or brokering with intent to traffic, for supplying for consumption for consideration and for keeping a place for consumption for consideration. Article 35 then provides «وتكون العقوبة الحبس المؤبد وبغرامة لا تزيد على أربعمائة ألف ريال ولا تقل عن مائتي ألف ريال في حالة العود.», life imprisonment on recidivism, and attaches life to its stated aggravations as well. Article 37 sets six months to three years for personal use, possession for use or consumption, lets the court order treatment instead for a proved addict for not less than three months and not more than a year, and article 38 bars prosecution altogether for a user who presents for treatment of his own accord. No quantity threshold appears anywhere in articles 34, 35, 37 or 41. Weight does not select the tier and a foreign threshold table has no work to do here. The fines are stated in the same articles and are separate from the custodial terms: article 34 adds a fine of not more than five hundred thousand riyals and not less than three hundred thousand, article 35 not more than four hundred thousand and not less than two hundred thousand, its no-consideration limb and article 41 not more than two hundred thousand and not less than one hundred thousand, and article 37 not more than twenty thousand and not less than ten thousand. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Qatar's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Kuwait
Legal status
Not a controlled narcotic or psychotropic substance in Kuwait. Tobacco is in no annexed table of Decree Law 159 of 2025.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Conduct distinction. Articles 48 and 49 of Decree Law 159 of 2025 punish possession and personal use of a scheduled substance, up to ten years and up to five years respectively. Tobacco is in no annexed table, so neither article reaches it as a scheduled substance. Kuwait regulates it, if at all, under other law entirely. None. Articles 42 and 43 of Decree Law 159 of 2025, which carry death or life imprisonment, bite only on المواد أو المستحضرات المخدرة أو المؤثرة عقلياً, narcotic or psychotropic substances and preparations, which article 1 defines by reference to the annexed schedules. Tobacco is in no annexed table, so there is no scheduled substance for those articles to attach to. Articles 44 and 45, which make death mandatory, operate only on article 42 and 43 offences and so cannot attach either. That is the reason exposure is absent, not merely the fact of it. No quantity threshold arises, because no capital article is engaged.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is not handled as a narcotic or psychotropic medicine under Decree Law 159 of 2025. Prescribing and import controls for it, if any, sit outside this decree law.
Documentation
The governing instrument is Decree Law 159 of 2025 on combating narcotics and psychotropic substances and regulating their use and trade, eighty four articles in thirteen chapters, gazetted in Kuwait Al-Youm on 1 December 2025 and in force from 15 December 2025. Article 83 repealed Law 74 of 1983 and Decree Law 48 of 1987 and merged them. The schedules do not sit in the law. Article 40 reads يجوز بقرار من الوزير تعديل الجداول أو المجموعات المرفقة بهذا المرسوم بقانون، بالحذف، أو بالإضافة, so the Minister of Health amends them by decision. The last such amendment read for this cell is Decision 165 of 2026, made on 24 May 2026 and gazetted in Kuwait Al-Youm issue 1793 on 31 May 2026, whose article five annexes the complete updated schedules. The schedules are arranged as Group 1, narcotic substances, tables 1 to 6, Group 2, psychotropic substances, tables 1 to 4, Group 3, chemical precursors, and a Group 4 list of the substances article 52 names. Group 3 was not reprinted in the annex and was not read for this cell. Foreign nationals are liable to deportation after sentence. Kuwait retains and imposes the death penalty for drug trafficking. Placement for Tobacco: in no annexed table. The absence was tested five ways before it was accepted: the international name, optical character recognition variants of it, the Arabic form, the chemical name, and independently by enumerating every Latin word in the schedules that begins with the same letter and reading that list. A measured zero from a scanned table is not a finding until it has been interrogated.
Decree Law 159 of 2025, articles 40 to 53, gazetted Kuwait Al-Youm 1 December 2025, in force 15 December 2025 · Updated September 21, 2026
Peru
Legal status
Not confirmed. This substance is not carried by Peru's controlling schedule under any name the search reached. Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA runs to 244 numbered entries across Listas I A, I B, II A, II B, III A, III B, III C, IV A, IV B, V and VI, and none of them is this substance. The search was run over Anexo N. 2 under tabaco, nicotiana tabacum and nicotina. Tobacco is not among the 244 entries. The previous pass said that Peru regulates tobacco through its own tobacco control law outside the Reglamento; no such law was read in this run, so that is carried and unverified. The reading was taken from the DIGEMID Catalogo de Sustancias Controladas marked NOVIEMBRE_2024_V1 and cross read against the DIGEMID publication of the same Anexo dated 2021, which is a text only file carrying no images at all. The two publications agree on every list, on the entry at every item number and on the count, and the numbering runs continuously from 1 with no gap in any of the eleven lists, so the absence is taken from a listing read to its end rather than from a truncated one. Matching was anchored at the start of the entry name and every anchored hit was read in full before it was allowed to become a placement. The convention limb, under article 2 of the Reglamento and article 14.1 of Decreto Legislativo 1241, was run again in this run and does not reach it: the substance is named in neither the 1971 Convention schedules, read in the INCB Green List 36th edition of 2025, nor the 1961 Convention schedules, read in the INCB Yellow List 65th edition of July 2026, both searched with line breaks and hyphens collapsed so that a name split across two lines is still found. The listing read is Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA, in the Catalogo de Sustancias Controladas published by the Direccion General de Medicamentos, Insumos y Drogas and marked NOVIEMBRE_2024_V1, which is the version this row was settled against as at 21 September 2026. Article 86 of Decreto Ley 22095 and the closing provisions of that Decreto Ley let the annexed lists be altered by Resolucion Suprema, so reading that version does not rule out a later list. Article 2 of the Reglamento states three limbs: it comprises the substances in the Listas of Decreto Ley 22095, the connected lists of the international conventions incorporated into domestic law, and the substances that may be included under article 86 of that Decreto Ley and article 61 of the Ley General de Salud, and it then says that los listados correspondientes aparecen en el Anexo N. 2. The rule applied across this country set follows those words: where Anexo N. 2 carries an entry its band governs and supersedes the older one, and where Anexo N. 2 is silent the Decreto Ley 22095 annex and the incorporated convention lists can still bring a substance within article 2, so silence in the published catalogue is a gap in it rather than a de-control. Because Anexo N. 2 does not reach this substance and no other Peruvian instrument read in the 21 September 2026 pass places it, the row is unresolved rather than permitted. Absence from the sanitary schedule is not a statement that the substance may be carried or used, and the position under customs, medicines registration and consumer law was not examined here. This run, on 3 October 2026, searched an instrument the previous pass did not reach. Article 14.3 of Decreto Legislativo 1241, as replaced by article 2 of Decreto Legislativo 1592 published on 14 December 2023, provides that "La lista de Nuevas Sustancias Psicoactivas se aprueba mediante Resolución Ministerial del Ministerio del Interior" and that "Las actividades ilegales relacionadas con las citadas sustancias, se encuentran sancionadas". Resolucion Ministerial 0804-2026-IN of 17 June 2026, published in El Peruano on 18 June 2026, approves the "Lista de Nuevas Sustancias Psicoactivas (NSP)" as its annex, which runs to 736 numbered items followed by three named groups: alkyl nitrites, the genera of hallucinogenic mushrooms, and three plant species. Section I of the annex provides that the list "incluye sus análogos, sales, isómeros, ésteres, éteres, precursores, mezclas entre ellas o con otro tipo de sustancias, incluyendo los compuestos derivados", and it calls its detailed list its own Anexo 2; that is not Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento, which is what Anexo N. 2 means everywhere in this cell. Its 736 numbered items and its closing groups were searched in Spanish, against the page images where the extracted text was doubtful, under tabaco and Nicotiana, and none of them is this substance. The annex also defines a nueva sustancia psicoactiva as any substance that produces a psychoactive effect by stimulating or depressing the central nervous system; that definition names no substance, and applying it to place this row would be an inference rather than a placement, so it is not applied. Both the Anexo N. 2 catalogue and the list of nuevas sustancias psicoactivas are read as at 3 October 2026, and article 14.3 of Decreto Legislativo 1241 lets the latter be updated by the same procedure that approved it, so this reading does not rule out a later list.
Chile
Legal status
Not a controlled drug in Chile. Tabaco is not named in Decreto 867, as its listas stand in the leychile version in force from 16 September 2023, read on 3 October 2026, and that does not rule out a later decreto. It is regulated by Ley 19.419, read in the leychile version of 4 January 2024, which restricts sale, advertising and where it may be smoked, and fines breaches.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Ley 19.734 of 2001 replaced the word «Muerte» with «Presidio perpetuo calificado» in the escala general of artículo 21 of the Código Penal, read in this pass from the Justia reproduction of the text leychile publishes as idNorma 186161 [Likely], and artículo 21 as consolidated on leychile, read on 3 October 2026, opens its penas de crímenes at «Presidio perpetuo calificado» and names no death penalty [Certain]. Ley 19.419 does not contain the word muerte, and the consolidated Ley 20.000 of 23 May 2026 does not contain the word muerte, so no provision of it carries a death penalty [Certain]. Ley 20.000 splits substances in two. Artículo 1 inciso primero reaches those «capaces de provocar graves efectos tóxicos o daños considerables a la salud», and inciso segundo reaches «otras drogas o sustancias de esta índole que no produzcan los efectos indicados en el inciso anterior». Decreto 867 puts the first group in its artículo 1 and the second in its artículo 2, so which artículo an entry sits in is what fixes the penalty range [Certain]. Artículo 63 of the law provides that «Un reglamento señalará las sustancias» to which artículos 1, 2, 5 bis and 8 refer, and Decreto 867 is that reglamento [Certain]. So a substance Decreto 867 does not list is outside those offences on the reading this cell takes, which is the reading the law's own artículo 63 sets up [Likely]. Placement: not a drug under Ley 20.000. Searched Decreto 867, the Reglamento de Productos Psicotrópicos and the Reglamento de Estupefacientes for tabaco and nicotiana with no hit, so neither artículo 4 nor artículo 5 of Decreto 867 names the plant [Certain]. Ley 19.419 defines «Productos de tabaco» as «Los productos preparados totalmente o en parte utilizando como materia prima hojas de tabaco» for smoking, sucking, chewing, inhaling or snuff [Certain]. Artículo 4 forbids selling, offering, distributing or giving tobacco products, electronic nicotine systems and their liquids to anyone under eighteen, and forbids selling cigarettes singly or in packs of fewer than ten [Certain]. Artículos 10 and 11 forbid smoking or inhaling tobacco products or electronic systems in enclosed places open to the public, schools, public transport, beaches within eighty metres of the high water line, and, except in their open air areas, airports, restaurants, bars and health establishments [Certain]. Under artículo 16 a person who smokes or vapes where artículos 10 and 11 forbid it is fined «2 unidades tributarias mensuales», and selling or giving these products to a minor is fined «4 unidades tributarias mensuales» under number 13 and from three to fifty unidades under number 6, with confiscation [Certain]. Enforcement is by sumario sanitario under Libro X of the Código Sanitario, under artículo 15 [Certain]. The customs allowance for bringing tobacco into Chile was not read for this cell. This reads Decreto 867 in the leychile version in force from 16 September 2023, which leychile marks as its última versión, read on 3 October 2026 together with the four list images embedded in that text, and it does not rule out a later decreto. That version date is not a review of the listas. It records Decreto Supremo 180 de 2023, published in Diario Oficial 43.655 on 16 September 2023, whose artículo único replaces «5°» with «5 bis» in artículo 4 because Ley 21.575 of 23 May 2023 moved the inhalant supply offence into a new artículo 5 bis of Ley 20.000 [Certain, read in the Diario Oficial original]. The version before it opened on 13 September 2022, consistent with the Decreto 220 de 2022 the live cell named, and one artículo 1 image is filed under the name dto220; three others are filed under the name 512, consistent with Decreto 512 [Likely]. A later decreto is in fact mandated: the artículo transitorio of Ley 21.817, published on 23 May 2026, orders the Ministerio de Seguridad Pública to amend Decreto 867 within six months, so by 23 November 2026, «para incorporar una nueva calificación» of substances harmful «aun con consumo en bajas cantidades», and the version read carries no such classification [Certain].
New Zealand
Legal status
Not a controlled drug on the text cited, and the absence was tested rather than assumed. Tobacco, the cured leaf of Nicotiana, has no exact entry in Schedules 1 to 3 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, and the closed schedules were read together with the open section 2 analogue limb, whose definition excludes substances that are approved medicines or that lack substantial structural similarity to a controlled drug. That is why this is recorded as a positive closed-list absence and not as an unresolved question. Nicotine has its own row in this table and carries the same negative finding, so leaf and alkaloid agree. One route stays open: sale of an unapproved psychoactive product can engage the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 even where no controlled drug classification attaches. This was read against the consolidation current at 20 September 2026; the 2026 Classification and Presumption of Supply Order was made but no commencement instrument was located by that horizon, so nothing it proposes is treated as law here.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. New Zealand has no death penalty. No Misuse of Drugs Act ceiling attaches to tobacco either, because it is not established as a controlled drug on the cited text, so neither the section 6 dealing maximum nor the section 7 possession maximum has anything to fasten on. The exposure that does exist sits in the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013, on the route for unlawful sale of an unapproved psychoactive product, whose penalties are statutory and non-capital. That route reaches supply rather than a person carrying the substance. Its entire regulatory weight sits in law that neither Act carries, so a negative here says very little about what a seller may lawfully do.
If prescribed / medical
Not established for a traveller. This dossier carries no country-level rule for entering New Zealand with a prescribed medicine: it records that medicines status has to be checked alongside the analogue exclusions and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 route, and that a court-grade conclusion can turn on the medicine exclusions, but it states no declaration requirement, no permit, no quantity allowance and no carry limit at the border, and none was researched for this cell. What is established is the placement a traveller would be read against: tobacco is not established as a controlled drug on the text cited, so the Misuse of Drugs Act placement is a negative one and neither section 6 nor section 7 attaches to it. It is not a prescription item, and the border rules that apply to it are duty and quantity rules outside this dossier. Do not read that placement as a ruling on a lawfully prescribed and lawfully carried supply, which is a different question this cell does not answer. Settle the border question with the Ministry of Health, whose classification order implementation page this dossier cites, and with the New Zealand border authority, before travelling.
Documentation
Carry the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 consolidation current at 20 September 2026 and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 together, because the finding for tobacco needs both: the first for the negative and the second for the route that remains. Read this row narrowly, because the separate tobacco control regime is outside both Acts this dossier read. Carry the reasoning and not only the result, because a negative is worth no more than the limb it was tested against, and here that limb is the section 2 exclusion for approved medicines and for substances lacking substantial structural similarity. Carry the classification chain this finding was read against as well: the 2022 and 2025 Classification and Presumption of Supply Orders with their commencement orders, the 2024 pseudoephedrine amendment, and the 2026 Order, which was made but is not treated as law in this dossier because its own section 2 leaves commencement to the Governor-General and no commencement instrument was located by the horizon. Carry the date as well, 20 September 2026, because in New Zealand a classification order can move a substance between classes without a word of the Act changing.
South Africa
Legal status
Not named in Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992, so the plant is not a drug or a scheduled substance under that Act.
Consequences if caught
This row is worth doing carefully, because the Act does catch some plants that it never names. Section 1 defines each of its three drug classes to include any plant from which a listed substance can be manufactured, and manufacture is defined to include extraction. That limb is what brings the khat leaf and the mescaline cactus inside the Act. It does not bite here: the substance this plant yields is nicotine, and nicotine is not printed in any Part of either schedule. So the plant limb was applied and produced a negative, rather than being left unconsidered. Tobacco control legislation is separate and was not read for this cell. Capital exposure: none, and life exposure: none. Section 17 sets out the whole penalty scale of this Act and its highest figure is 25 years for dealing; no provision of the Act carries a death sentence or a sentence of life imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
No exception under section 4 arises, because the plant is not within any of the three definitions that section 4 operates on.
Documentation
Search record. The terms searched were tobacco, Nicotiana, snuff, cigarette and nicotine. All return zero occurrences in the Act. The plant limb in section 1 was applied expressly and is the reason this row is a finding rather than a deferral. The text read for this cell is the Juta consolidation of the Act downloaded on 29 May 2025, taken from the Department of Justice copy at justice.gov.za whose sha256 begins bc1216a3. It carries the substitution of Schedules 1 and 2 by section 2 of Act 14 of 2022 with effect from 14 December 2022, and it marks section 7 of the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act 7 of 2024, the provision that would amend Schedule 2 again, as not yet put into operation by proclamation. The schedules are stated as at that consolidation and this does not rule out a later amendment made or commenced since. The Schedule and the Part named in this cell are read from the Act itself at the lines quoted; they are nowhere printed in the verbatim quotation supplied for this row.
Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992, section 1 plant limb applied and returning a negative · Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992, ss 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 17 and 19, with Schedules 1 and 2 · justice.gov.za · read from the cached text at research/instruments/south-africa/za-drugs-act-140-1992.txt, 84,091 bytes, against the.pdf beside it at 127,460 bytes · Updated September 21, 2026
Kenya
Legal status
Not a controlled drug under Cap. 245 on the text read: it is not named in the First Schedule of narcotic drugs, the Second Schedule of psychotropic substances, the Third Schedule of prohibited plants or the Fourth Schedule of precursor chemicals, as at 31 December 2022. No entry answering to this row was found in any of the four schedules, which were read through rather than searched for one spelling.
Consequences if caught
All four schedules were read through rather than searched for one spelling, and no entry answering to this row was found. Neither tobacco nor the plant Nicotiana tabacum is printed in any of the four schedules, and the Third Schedule list of prohibited plants runs to four entries, none of them this crop. Kenya's tobacco control legislation is a different instrument and was not read for this cell. This is stated as at the Kenya Law revised edition of Cap. 245, being the text as at 31 December 2022 as revised by the 24th Annual Supplement (Legal Notice 221 of 2023), read on 22 September 2026, which the publisher marks as the latest version of the Act. Section 3(2)(b) sets imprisonment of not less than 5 years for possession of a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance other than cannabis, and section 4, which reaches trafficking and possession alike, sets a term of 30 years on its lower band and of 50 years on its upper one. The quantity bands are possession of less than 1 gram under section 3(2)(b), between 1 and 100 grams under section 4(a)(i), and more than 100 grams under section 4(a)(ii). The fines are not less than 5,000,000 shillings under section 3(2)(b), not less than 30,000,000 shillings under section 4(a)(i), and not less than 50,000,000 shillings or three times the market value, whichever is greater, under section 4(a)(ii), each expressed as an alternative to imprisonment or in addition to it. Cap. 245 carries no death penalty, and imprisonment for life appears only at section 4(b)(i), for precursor chemicals and for substances held out to be narcotic or psychotropic, and at section 4B(5), for conspiracy. Those figures are carried across every Kenyan row because Cap. 245 sets them country wide rather than substance by substance, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Kenya's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
Cap. 245 does not reach this substance on the text read, so the section 3(3) exemption for a licence or a prescription is not the provision that governs it. Kenya's medicines, pharmacy and poisons legislation, its customs rules and any import permit requirement sit in other instruments, and none of them was read for this cell, so nothing here settles whether a traveller may bring this substance into Kenya. Carry any prescription you hold and put the question to a Kenyan mission before you travel.
Documentation
This row rests on an absence, so it carries the version of the list it was read against. Cap. 245 is the controlling instrument. It carries four schedules, the First for narcotic drugs, the Second for psychotropic substances, the Third for prohibited plants and the Fourth for precursor chemicals, and none of the four uses entry numbers, so no numbered placement is asserted anywhere in this batch. The text read incorporates the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) (Amendment) Act, 2022 (No. 4 of 2022), assented on 24 February 2022 and commenced on 21 March 2022, which replaced the whole of section 3(2), replaced section 4 outright, inserted sections 4A and 4B, inserted the word tramadol in the First Schedule, inserted the word ketamine in the Second Schedule and added the Fourth Schedule, and which carries no transitional or savings provision. This is stated as at the Kenya Law revised edition of Cap. 245, being the text as at 31 December 2022 as revised by the 24th Annual Supplement (Legal Notice 221 of 2023), read on 22 September 2026, which the publisher marks as the latest version of the Act. Section 87 lets the Cabinet Secretary by order add a substance or plant to the First, Second or Third Schedule or delete one from it, and no order made after 31 December 2022 was found by the routes tried, which does not rule out a later one.
Belgium
Legal status
Tobacco is not reached by the Belgian controlled drug lists on the text checked here. The search found no entry: a search of Annexes I to V and all eight Annex IVA families for tobacco and Nicotiana tabacum returned nothing, and the separate Belgian tobacco product rules produce no narcotic or psychotropic classification. The search was run on the plant name as well as the common word, which is the discipline the dossier applies throughout: the botanical name and the common name are both tried before an absence is recorded. That makes this a positive absence rather than a silence: the dossier records that before any absence was entered, the search moved through Annexes I to IV, all eight Annex IVA generic families, Annex V, product specific royal decrees, the EU precursor schedules, the AFMPS human and veterinary medicine database and the applicable food, plant, tobacco, alcohol or chemical product route. Belgium works a delegated model: article 2bis §1 of the Law of 24 February 1921 punishes breaches concerning substances whose list is settled by the King, and the Royal Decree of 6 September 2017 supplies that list. The named lists are closed, so pharmacological resemblance, a similar spelling or a substring match cannot enlarge them.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Belgium's drug law carries no death penalty and no life sentence. On this row no controlled drug ladder attaches either. Article 2bis of the Law of 24 February 1921 reaches substances the King has listed, and tobacco is not on that list, so it supplies no band, no aggravated ceiling and no fine on this row. Separate product, food, tobacco, alcohol, medicines or veterinary penalties sit outside this row unless it states one, and it states none. The reason is the classification itself rather than a lenient penalty: the plant is outside the subject matter of the drug decree entirely. The consequences that do attach in Belgium come from the product regimes named in this row, and this table does not set them out.
If prescribed / medical
The rule that applies to a traveller here is Belgium's own and it is one rule for the whole country: article 3(4)(4) of the Royal Decree of 6 September 2017. It is a document exception rather than a schedule, and it is not a prescribing right. It covers a medicine that was lawfully obtained, carried for the traveller's own personal use, and limited to no more than three months of treatment, and it expressly excludes the substances in Annex II limb A. Tobacco is not in Annexes I to IV at all on this row's finding, so there is nothing here for the exception to except, and a travel question about it is a medicines or product question rather than a controlled drug one. There is no annex placement, and the rules that do apply to this plant are excise and product ones. No route specific to tobacco was found in this dossier and none has been invented for it.
Documentation
Carry no inference about excise, age limits or plain packaging from this row. It records the absence from the drug annexes only, and the dossier states the other regimes were not audited. This was read on 18 September 2026 against the annex consolidation and the decree. The annex text read is the non official consolidated version published by the AFMPS; it is informative and the Moniteur belge controls. The annex consolidation relied on here is valid from 29 March 2026, following the amending Royal Decree published on 19 March 2026, and carries a correction dated 16 July 2026.
Sweden
Legal status
Not named in the Swedish narkotikaförteckningar, which are Läkemedelsverkets föreskrifter (LVFS 2011:10) om förteckningar över narkotika, made under 3 § förordningen (1992:1554) om kontroll av narkotika. The version read for this cell is the consolidated text, which states on its own first page that it contains amendments through HSLF-FS 2026:26. I searched that text for Tobak and Nikotin, the latter appearing only inside the opioid names Nikokodin, Nikodikodin and Nikomorfin. No entry for Tobacco was found. The föreskrift says of itself that the names of substances, plant material and fungi are not exhaustively given and that other designations may occur, so this is an absence of the names searched for rather than a finding that nothing at all reaches the substance. The live cell for this row said that Sweden has no national list and controls drugs by incorporating the conventions. Sweden does have a national list, it is the föreskrift named here, and this substance was searched for in it and is not there.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Sweden has no death penalty for any offence, so no drug offence here carries capital exposure. The live block for this row was a recital of the statutory definition rather than a statement about this substance, and it opened on the premise corrected above. Every figure in it is carried forward here. 8 § of the Narkotikastrafflag defines narkotika as medicines or goods hazardous to health with dependence forming properties or euphoriant effects, or goods readily convertible into such, which are subject to control under an international agreement Sweden has acceded to, or have been declared narkotika by the government. The second limb is the one that carries the national list: the declaration is made by föreskrift, and the föreskrift is the one quoted in this cell. An ordinary narkotikabrott carries up to three years. A ringa offence, which is the minor form, carries a fine or up to six months. A grov offence carries two to seven years and a synnerligen grov offence six to ten years. Lag (1999:42) om förbud mot vissa hälsofarliga varor applies to goods which by their inherent properties entail danger to human life or health and which are used or can be assumed to be used to achieve intoxication, where the government has prescribed that the act applies to them. Its 2 § keeps the two regimes apart by excluding anything that is narkotika under the 1968 act and any medicine approved within the European Union. Its 4 § punishes an intentional breach with a fine or up to one year, which is a third of the drug law maximum. Whether this substance has been prescribed under that act was not established here. This row is placed outside that regime, so the penalty figures above are recorded as Sweden's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
Not a listed narcotic, so no controlled drug prescription rule applies under the narcotics law. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription.
Norway
Legal status
Not controlled as narkotika in Norway. Tobacco is not a row on the narkotikaliste, and it is not reached by the groups clause or by section 3. Searched as tobakk across all 824 rows, with no hit. It has its own statute, the tobacco harm act, which was not read for this cell.
Consequences if caught
Because it is not narkotika, neither legemiddelloven section 24 nor straffeloven section 231 applies to it. The narkotikaliste read here is the Lovdata consolidation as at 16 September 2026. Its own amendment note ends with forskrift 26 August 2026 no. 1682, in force 1 September 2026, and no instrument after that was read, so this cell does not rule out a later change to the list.
If prescribed / medical
Not a narcotic medicine, so narkotikaforskriften section 19 and its quantity limits do not apply. Any prescription status it has comes from ordinary medicines law.
Documentation
Carry any prescribed medicine in its dispensed packaging with the prescription. The section 19 narcotic regime and the Schengen certificate are not engaged.
Norway, forskrift 14. februar 2013 nr. 199 om narkotika (narkotikaforskriften), narkotikalisten and sections 3, 5 and 19 · legemiddelloven (LOV-1992-12-04-132) sections 22, 24 and 31 · straffeloven (LOV-2005-05-20-28) sections 231 and 232 · lovdata.no · Updated September 16, 2026
Denmark
Legal status
Not a placed plant under the Danish euphoriants legislation: it is not named in liste A, B, C, D or E of bekendtgoerelse nr. 405 af 26. marts 2026 om euforiserende stoffer as in force on 29 March 2026.
Consequences if caught
The search was run on Tobak and on the botanical name Nicotiana and returns nothing from the numbered entries. The instrument places eight plants, plant materials and fungi by name: Catha edulis at liste A nr. 1, Papaver somnifer L. at liste A nr. 6, Cannabis at liste B nr. 83, the mescaline cacti at liste B nr. 258, Kokablad at liste B nr. 261, Kratom at liste B nr. 262, the psilocybin fungi at liste B nr. 411 and Salvia divinorum at liste B nr. 417. This plant is on none of them. What governs it is the Danish tobacco legislation, covering sale, age limits, packaging and where it may be smoked, together with the excise rules. None of those was read for this cell. Section 1 extends the lists to possible salts and simple derivatives with euphoriant effect of a placed substance, giving esters and ethers as its examples, and to all preparations containing or made from one. This row is not such a salt, derivative or preparation of anything on the lists, so that clause does not reach it either. The offence is not in the bekendtgoerelse. Section 30 says a breach of it is punished under section 3 and sections 3 a to 3 d of lov om euforiserende stoffer, and that where the circumstances in section 191 of straffeloven apply the breach is punished under that provision instead. Section 3(1) of the Act sets the ordinary penalty as a fine. The same sentence sets the custodial ceiling at imprisonment for up to 2 years. In fixing the penalty, including a fine, the court must weigh the harmful effects of the substance and, since 1 July 2025, its dangerousness. Section 191 of straffeloven raises the ceiling to imprisonment for up to 10 years where a person transfers euphoriant substances to a larger number of people, or for significant payment, or under other particularly aggravating circumstances. That ceiling rises again to imprisonment for 16 years where the transfer concerns a significant quantity of a particularly dangerous or harmful substance, or where the transfer of such a substance was otherwise of a particularly dangerous character. Section 191(2) applies the same band to importing, exporting, buying, delivering, receiving, manufacturing, processing or possessing such substances with intent to transfer. Section 3(2) of the Act treats four things as significantly aggravating, and lov nr. 724 af 20. juni 2025 added the last two of them: repeated sales of a particularly harmful or dangerous substance, sale or free transfer for later sale at restaurants including discotheques or at concerts or music festivals or other events mainly attended by children or young people, sale or free transfer for later sale through social media, and sale or free transfer for later sale in shops carrying on retail trade. Section 3 c, in force since 1 July 2025, allows a motor vehicle used in a serious breach to be confiscated, and requires confiscation where the vehicle's owner committed an offence falling under section 191, unless special grounds exceptionally tell against it. Section 3 d lets a court disqualify a person from retail shop work for supplying euphoriant substances from a shop, and impose an area ban whose breach carries imprisonment for up to 2 years. Denmark is widely described as refusing warnings for personal possession, and that description now rests on a repealed sentence. The rule that a warning could in general not be given was section 3(1) third sentence, and lov nr. 667 af 11. juni 2024 repealed it with effect from 1 July 2024. In its place section 3(4) says that a withdrawal of the charge shall be given for possession of euphoriant substances for own use where social circumstances speak for it and the possession is due to a strong dependence on hard euphoriant substances following prolonged and sustained misuse, and it says that this applies in repeat cases as well. These are Denmark's general drug penalties rather than a tariff for this substance. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Denmark's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. Read against bekendtgoerelse nr. 405 af 26. marts 2026 om euforiserende stoffer as in force on 29 March 2026, which repealed bekendtgoerelse nr. 2446 af 12. december 2021 at its section 33(2), and against lov om euforiserende stoffer as consolidated on 9 December 2019 and amended by lov nr. 667 af 11. juni 2024 and lov nr. 724 af 20. juni 2025, all read at retsinformation.dk on 22 September 2026. The minister may add a substance to the lists at any time under sections 1 and 2 of the Act, so a placement and an absence are both statements about the lists as they stood on that date.
Finland
Legal status
Controlled by its own statute rather than by the narcotics schedule. Tupakkalaki 549/2016 section 53 subsection 1 reads «Tupakkatuotteita, nikotiininesteitä ja savuttomia nikotiinituotteita ei saa myydä tai muutoin luovuttaa eikä välittää alle 18-vuotiaalle.» Section 118 adds that a person under 18 may not possess a tobacco product or a tobacco substitute, and section 44 makes retail sale licensable. Tobacco is not named in any annex of valtioneuvoston asetus huumausaineina pidettävistä aineista, valmisteista ja kasveista 543/2008 and not named in the annex to valtioneuvoston asetus 1130/2014, as those annexes stand after 651/2026, 1119/2025 and 650/2026. Section 118 reads «Alle 18-vuotias ei saa pitää hallussaan tupakkatuotetta tai tupakan vastiketta.»
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Tupakkalaki 549/2016 section 109 sets a fine or up to six months for a tobacco sales offence, which includes selling, supplying for consideration or passing on a tobacco product, nicotine liquid or smokeless nicotine product to a person under 18 contrary to section 53 subsection 1. Section 113 makes smoking on after a warning in a place where section 74 forbids it a tupakointirikkomus punishable by a fine. Chapter 50 of the Criminal Code (39/1889) carries the narcotics offences. Section 1 sets a fine or up to two years for a huumausainerikos covering manufacture, cultivation, import, export, transport, sale, supply, distribution and possession. Section 2 sets one to ten years for a törkeä huumausainerikos where the object is a very dangerous narcotic or a large quantity, or substantial gain is sought, or the act is part of an organised group, or serious danger to life or health is caused to several people, or the drug is spread to minors. Section 2 a sets a fine or up to six months for a huumausaineen käyttörikos, unlawful use or possession of a small quantity for own use. Section 3 sets a fine or up to two years for preparation and section 4 the same for promotion, while section 4 a sets four months to six years for aggravated promotion. Section 7 allows the charge or the sentence to be waived where the quantity, the circumstances and the use situation make the act minor as a whole, or where the suspect has entered approved treatment. The live Finland cell recorded the same three provisions and asserted no custodial term at all, and every provision it named is carried here: Criminal Code (39/1889) chapter 50, the substantive prohibitions in Narcotics Act 373/2008 section 5 with the lawful exceptions in section 3, and the consumer market conduct offence in Criminal Code chapter 44 section 5 a. The bands stated above are new to this pass and were read off the Criminal Code itself, not carried from that cell. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Finland's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. This row in particular. Tobacco is not carried by either drug decree, so neither the chapter 50 lane nor the chapter 44 section 5 a lane is the one that describes this row. The statute that does is tupakkalaki 549/2016, and the bands stated above are the narcotics bands, reproduced because the live cell named chapter 50 and they are what that citation means, not because this row sits in them. It is not named in either decree and that is a measured absence, not an assumption. The Finnish forms put to both texts for this row were «Tupakka», «Nicotiana», «Nikotiini», «nikotin». Against the consolidated 543/2008, whose annexes carry 196 entries in Liite I, 192 in Liite II, 11 in Liite III, 70 in Liite IV and 1 in Liite V, and against the annex to 1130/2014 as substituted by 650/2026, no form returned an entry of its own. What the search did return is a near miss rather than a hit: in Liite I the longer entry «Nikomorfiini (3,6-dinikotinyylimorfiini)»; and in Liite I the longer entry «Nikodikodiini (6-nikotinyylidihydrokodeiini)», which contains the searched form inside a different molecule's name and is not this row.
Bolivia
Legal status
Not confirmed. No individual status was established for this row. The Anexo to Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, the list article 5(c) of that Law makes operative, does not name it anywhere in Listas I to V. Tobacco appears nowhere in the Anexo, and neither does any tobacco alkaloid. The version read is the Anexo as published in Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC on 23 March 2017, read as at 21 September 2026, and reading it does not rule out a later addition, because article 5(c) closes with las que sean incorporadas por Ley, incorporation by Law. That is an unresolved row and not a permission. [Certain] on the search, [Likely] that the substance is outside the list, because a list can be amended and a name can be printed in a form the search did not anticipate.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 15 I of the 2009 Constitution reads, in its own words, No existe la pena de muerte, and no limb of the Bolivian drug law carries a capital penalty. Nothing in the Anexo to Ley 913 was found to name this substance. Tobacco appears nowhere in the Anexo, and neither does any tobacco alkaloid. Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988 article 48 punishes whoever traffics in sustancias controladas with presidio de diez a veinticinco años y diez mil a veinte mil días multa, ten to twenty five years and ten thousand to twenty thousand day fines, and it makes trafficking in larger volumes an aggravating circumstance. Article 48 takes its conduct from article 33(m) of the same law, which Ley 913 left standing and which defines tráfico ilícito as producing, manufacturing, knowingly possessing, holding in deposit or storage, transporting, delivering, supplying, buying, selling, donating, bringing into the country, taking out of the country and financing. The rest of the ladder sits in the same title. Article 46, cultivating or harvesting controlled plants, one to two years and two to four on a second offence. Article 47, manufacture, five to fifteen years. Article 50, administering to another, ten to fifteen years. Article 51, supplying to another, eight to twelve years. Article 52, fifteen to twenty years where the administering or supplying gravely harms health and twenty to thirty where the conduct results in a death. Article 53, a third more where two or more people organise. Article 55, transport, eight to twelve years with definitive seizure of the vehicle. The day fine unit is the statute's own and is not converted here. Article 49 sends the dependent user and the non habitual user caught holding a minimum quantity for immediate personal consumption to a farmacodependencia institute for treatment rather than to prison. That minimum is fixed case by case on the opinion of two specialists from a public institute and no gram figure is printed anywhere in the statute. Holding more than the minimum falls into article 48. A foreign national without permanent residence who commits these acts has the residence law applied and a fine of five hundred to one thousand days, which is the sentence in the article most likely to reach a traveller and which the live cell did not carry. Those are Bolivia's published penalties. They are the country's penalties and not this row's exposure, because whether the offence reaches this substance is exactly what was not established.
Ecuador
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Ecuador's authorities (COIP; Constitution Art 364) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Ecuadorian sources (COIP Arts 220/228; Constitution Art 364; the repealed CONSEP table), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. Personal-use possession is non-punishable in Ecuador (Constitution Art 364 treats consumption as a public-health matter and bars criminalizing consumers; the COIP confirms personal-use possession is not punishable, and CNJ Resolution 14-2023 confirmed this remains fully in force). CRITICAL: the former CONSEP quantity table was [repealed] by Executive Decree No. 28 on 24 November 2023, the old bright-line thresholds NO LONGER EXIST, there is now NO defined personal-use quantity, and trafficking intent is assessed case-by-case (a legal grey area). Trafficking is tiered (COIP Art 220): minimum 3-5 years, medium 5-7, high 19-22, large 22-26.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Personal-use possession is NON-PUNISHABLE: Constitution Art 364 treats consumption as a public-health matter and bars criminalizing consumers, and the COIP confirms personal-use possession is not punishable (CNJ Resolution 14-2023 confirmed this remains fully in force). CRITICAL: the former CONSEP quantity table (Resolution 001-CONSEP-CO-2013, about 10 g cannabis, 1 g cocaine, 0.1 g heroin, 0.015 g MDMA) was [repealed] by Executive Decree No. 28 on 24 November 2023; those gram thresholds NO LONGER EXIST. There is now NO defined personal-use quantity, trafficking intent is assessed case-by-case (a legal grey area). Trafficking is tiered (COIP Art 220): minimum 3-5 years, medium 5-7, high 19-22, large 22-26. Medical cannabis is legal (2019 Assembly vote; products under 1% THC via pharmacy). [contested] A REDCAN citizen cannabis-regulation initiative was pending in the National Assembly in 2025. Ecuador has NO death penalty for drugs. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Constitution (2008) Art 364 + COIP Arts 220/228 + CNJ Resolution 14-2023 + Executive Decree No. 28 (24 November 2023) · asamblea.gob.ec · defensoria.gob.ec · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Paraguay
Legal status
Not confirmed. This substance is not named in Paraguay's controlled substance schedule and is governed in the ordinary course by its own licensing, health and tax law rather than by Ley 1.340/1988, but the open wording of article 1 limb b was not settled, so no negative answer is asserted. Tabaco and Nicotina each returned nothing in any of the three sheets.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 4 of the 1992 Constitucion Nacional reads Queda abolida la pena de muerte, so no capital penalty is available in Paraguay, and no article of Ley 1.340/1988 provides one. [Certain] This row is not in Paraguay's controlled substance schedule. Tabaco and Nicotina each returned nothing in any of the three sheets. Ley 1.340/1988 sets the conduct offences. Article 13 punishes supply without authorization with 6 to 15 years penitentiary, forfeiture of the goods and a fine of four times their value. Article 14 raises that to 10 to 25 years where the supply is to a minor, and article 15 applies the same range to supply in teaching, religious, welfare, sporting, cultural or social premises, at public entertainments, or in places of detention. Article 16 punishes supply made to prepare, facilitate, commit or conceal another offence with 5 to 15 years. Article 21, as replaced by Ley 1.881/2002, punishes unauthorized introduction into the country or dispatch abroad with 5 to 10 years, forfeiture and the same fine, and article 22 applies that penalty to any plant, substance or product usable in making these substances. Article 25 punishes bringing them in under temporary admission or in transit with 10 to 20 years. Article 26 punishes activity carried on from national territory aimed at sending them abroad with 10 to 25 years. Article 33 punishes sowing, cultivating, harvesting or gathering the plants that serve to make them, and financing that, with 10 to 20 years and destruction of the crop. Article 27, which punished unauthorized possession with 5 to 15 years, was repealed by article 4 of Ley 1.881/2002, so there is no longer a freestanding possession offence in this law. [Certain] The highest range stated in the statute is 10 to 25 years, but that is not the maximum it can reach, because four articles multiply a penalty rather than state one. Article 17 punishes causing a person to consume these substances by deceit, threat or violence with 10 to 20 years, and raises the penalty by one third to one half where the victim is a minor, mentally ill, a relative within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity, or the spouse, or where the author is a health professional, which reaches 30 years. Article 37 punishes instigating or persuading another, or achieving production or trafficking by deceit, threat or violence, with the same 10 to 20 years and the same uplift, where the victim is a minor, a relative within the second degree, the spouse, or a person in a relationship of obedience or dependence. Article 41 punishes committing offences to procure or force the release of someone held for an offence under this law with the maximum penalty for the offence committed, and imposes double that penalty where the release is actually achieved, which on a 25 year offence reaches 50 years. Article 42 punishes belonging to an association formed to commit these offences with 5 to 15 years on that fact alone, and doubles the penalty for its leader or promoter, which reaches 30 years. None of the four is a separate drug offence, so each applies on top of whichever article above is charged. [Certain] Article 30 exempts from penalty a person holding a substance to which the law refers that a doctor prescribed for them, or holding it for their exclusive personal use, and punishes a quantity greater than the amount prescribed or than personal use requires with 2 to 4 years penitentiary and forfeiture. Its second paragraph treats as the exclusive personal use of a farmacodependiente the holding of enough substance for daily use, the amount to be fixed case by case by the Medico Forense, a specialist doctor designated by the Ministerio de Salud Publica y Bienestar Social and another designated by the affected person at their own cost if they ask for one, and then states in its own words: En el caso de la Marihuana no sobrepasara los diez gramos y de dos gramos en el de la Cocaina, Heroina y otros opiaceos. [Certain] Article 30 states a figure only for marihuana and for cocaina, heroina y otros opiaceos. It states none for this row, so any personal use quantity for it falls to the case by case determination in the second paragraph and no gram figure can be quoted for it. [Certain] Those are Paraguay's penalties under the drug law and they are not this row's exposure, because the drug law's schedule does not name it. Separate licensing, health, tax and age restriction law governs it instead, and that law was not read for this row. Why this row defers rather than reporting a settled absence. Article 1 limb b of Ley 1.340/1988 reaches Todas aquellas de origen natural o sintetico que puedan producir estados de dependencia, estimulacion o depresion del sistema nervioso central, or hallucinations, motor and sensory disturbance, or a change in behaviour, perception or mood, or effects analogous to a Convention substance. On its own words that is an open pharmacological description rather than a list, and it describes a psychoactive substance without naming one. The article then provides that the substances of limbs b and c are to be established by decree. Whether limb b can reach a substance the decree has not named was not settled from any text read here, and no Paraguayan decision on the point was found. An absence from the decree and from the Convention lists therefore narrows this question and does not close it, which is why this cell states no answer rather than a negative one. The schedule read was the Listado Actualizado de Sustancias sujetas a fiscalizacion en Paraguay, Dic. 2025, published by DINAVISA under Decreto 5.213/2005 as amended by Decreto 5.282/2021, read as at 21 September 2026, together with the 1961 and 1971 Convention lists that article 1 limb a incorporates directly. Reading them does not rule out a later decree, a later edition of the list, or a later Convention scheduling decision that names this substance.
Ghana
Legal status
Legal for adults and regulated by Part Six of the Public Health Act 2012 (Act 851), «TOBACCO CONTROL MEASURES». Section 65(1) says a person shall not «sell or offer for sale tobacco or a tobacco product to a child», and section 78 defines «"child" means a person below the age of eighteen years». Section 58(1) forbids smoking «in an enclosed or indoor area of a work place, or in any other public place except in a designated area», and section 68 forbids sale in health institutions including pharmacies, in schools other than tertiary institutions, in amusement parks, cinemas and stadiums, by vending machine, and «through the post, the internet or any other medium of communication». The Tobacco Control Regulations, 2016 (L.I. 2247) add packaging and health warning rules. Tobacco is not named in the Fifth to Eighth Schedules of the Narcotics Control Commission Act 2020 (Act 1019). Act 851 was read as printed in the Ministry of Health copy on 3 October 2026; later amendments, if any, were not traced. This is stated as the Schedules stand after the Narcotics Control Commission (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act 1100), which the judy.legal consolidation records as the Act's only amendment and whose Bill substitutes section 43 alone; the enacted text of Act 1100 was not itself read. The power to move the lists is in section 112: its subsection (1) gave a power to revise the Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Schedules within twelve months of commencement, and its subsection (2)(b) gives a continuing power to make Regulations specifying «the classification of drugs and the appropriate penalties». The only Regulations found under the Act, L.I. 2475 of 2023 on cannabis cultivation, revise no Schedule on their table of contents, and this does not rule out a later instrument that was not found.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Act 851 prints no sentence of death. Section 77(1) makes it an offence to smoke in a public place contrary to section 58, to sell tobacco to a child contrary to section 65, to sell in a place barred by section 68, or to contravene any other provision of Part Six, punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than seven hundred and fifty penalty units or imprisonment of not more than three years or both, and ten penalty units a day for a continuing offence. Under section 65(4) it is no defence that the buyer did not appear to be under eighteen.
If prescribed / medical
No prescription rule applies to tobacco. Section 67(2) allows treatment of tobacco addiction to use «a non-tobacco product packaged as a tobacco or tobacco product».
Documentation
No traveller allowance for tobacco was read; customs duty rules were not checked.
Public Health Act 2012 (Act 851), read at https://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Public-Health-Act-851.pdf on 3 October 2026, Part Six, sections 58, 65, 67, 68, 77 and 78 · Updated October 3, 2026
Israel
Legal status
Not confirmed, not named in the First Schedule as read; confirm with Israel's authorities / your embassy
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass from the Ordinance itself: the words מוות, תלייה and הוצאה להורג return zero hits across the whole text, and so does עולם, so there is no life route either, and the heaviest sentence anywhere in it is the 25 years of section 21 for involving a minor. [Certain] Tobacco is not named in the First Schedule as read, and neither tobacco nor Nicotiana nor the Hebrew טבק appears anywhere in the Ordinance. Tobacco is regulated in Israel under separate public health and advertising legislation that was not read in this pass. Read against the consolidated First Schedule whose own amendment note at its head ends at התשע"ח and whose schedule pages carry the 1.4.2018 update stamp, with section 7 stamped 1.1.2019 and the file closing with (סוף הפקודה); a later amendment to the Schedule is not ruled out, and this reading is of that version and no other. [Certain] Section 1 defines סם מסוכן as חומר מן המפורטים בתוספת הראשונה לרבות כל מלח שלו, וכן כל תכשיר, תרכובת, תערובת או תמיסה של חומר כאמור ומלחיהם, a substance listed in the First Schedule including any salt of it, and also any preparation, compound, mixture or solution of such a substance and of their salts. That definition reaches salts and mixtures and stops there: it says nothing about isomers, analogues or structural derivatives, so those come only from the words of an individual פרט or of a סימן wide sweep clause. Section 7(c) sets up to 20 years or a fine 25 times the fine in section 61(a)(4) of the Penal Law 5737-1977 for possession or use, dropping to 3 years or the plain section 61(a)(4) fine where the drug was held or used for the person's own consumption alone. Section 6 sets the same 20 years for growing, manufacturing, producing, preparing or extracting without the Director's licence. Section 19A sets 20 years for the trade and transit offences of sections 13 to 18, which reach export, import, brokering, dealing, any other transaction and supply whether or not for payment. Section 21 raises it to 25 years on any of its three limbs, giving a dangerous drug to a minor, being responsible for a minor and allowing him to obtain or use one, or inducing a minor to obtain or use one, and section 25 bars a wholly suspended sentence or a probation order on that conviction. [Certain] Section 20 is not a penalty provision at all, it is the customs inspection power over a consignment carried in transit through Israel. No Second Schedule quantity is set for this substance, so the section 31(3) reverse onus, which presumes possession beyond personal consumption above a listed weight, has no threshold to run from here.
If prescribed / medical
Not named in the First Schedule as read, so sections 11 and 12 of the Ordinance are not engaged by name for it. Medicines are separately regulated in Israel under the Pharmacists Ordinance and the regulations made under it, and that body of law was not read in this pass. [Likely] Carry the prescription and the dispensing label, and confirm with an Israeli mission before travelling.
Panama
Legal status
Tobacco is not placed inside Panama's drug chapter. It is not named in Resolución 200 of 2025 and no entry for it was read in the schedules of the 1961 or 1971 Conventions. Article 324 of the Código Penal defines the criminal object for the whole drug chapter, and it does so functionally and by incorporation rather than by a closed national list: «droga es toda sustancia que produzca dependencia física o síquica, como los narcóticos, fármacos, estupefacientes y todos aquellos productos, precursores y sustancias químicas esenciales que sirven para su elaboración, transformación o preparación, de conformidad con las disposiciones legales en materia de salud, convenios y acuerdos internacionales vigentes en la República de Panamá.». Panama regulates this row through a separate ordinary-product regime rather than through the drug chapter, so the drug offences are not the law that governs it. The leaf and its botanical genus appear in neither treaty list and not on Panama's controlled list. Panama has a developed tobacco control regime, including restrictions on smoking in enclosed public places, and that regime and not the drug chapter is where the rules for this row live.
Consequences if caught
The articles below are Panama's published drug penalties and they are set out here for completeness, not because Tobacco sits inside them. Customs allowances and tobacco control rules govern it, and neither is part of the drug chapter. Article 321 sets 8 to 12 years of prison for unlawful possession in circumstances objectively showing it is not for consumption, and its printed words are «Quien ilícitamente posea drogas, en circunstancias que objetivamente permitan determinar que no es para el consumo, será sancionado con ocho a doce años de prisión.». Article 312 sets the same 8 to 12 years where two or more people agree to commit a drug offence. Article 313 sets 10 to 15 years for bringing a drug into the national territory, even in transit, and raises that by a third to a half where the drug is brought in for local sale or distribution. Article 314 sets 10 to 15 years for sowing, cultivating, extracting, transforming or manufacturing, and article 318 sets 10 to 15 years for buying, selling, storing or exchanging for commercial purposes, doubled in the five aggravated cases it lists. Article 319 sets 8 to 12 years for devoting premises or a vehicle to drug activity, rising to 10 to 15 years for the owner of a commercial place open to the public. Article 322 sets 20 to 25 years where conduct under articles 312, 313 or 321 is carried out by the leaders, directors or organisers of a criminal band, and its words are «la pena será de veinte a veinticinco años de prisión.», so the ceiling this chapter carries is 25 years. The dossier for this country stated that ceiling as 20 years and that is corrected here against the article itself. Article 320 covers buying or possessing for one's own consumption in scarce quantity, and its penalty is a fine of 50 to 250 day units, weekend arrest or community work, in the words «Quien ilícitamente compre o posea drogas para su consumo en escasa cantidad será sancionado con cincuenta a doscientos cincuenta días-multa o arresto de fines de semana o trabajo comunitario.». Where the person is physically or psychically dependent and the quantity is scarce, article 320 imposes a security measure instead. The live cell attributed a band of 2 to 4 years to article 320; that band is in the third paragraph of article 313 and it applies where a drug is brought into the country and the scarce quantity and the other circumstances show unequivocally that it is for personal consumption, in the words «La sanción será de dos a cuatro años de prisión o su equivalente en días-multa o medidas curativas cuando, por su escasa cantidad y demás circunstancias, se determine inequívocamente que la droga es para el consumo personal.». Panama publishes no numerical quantity table for this corpus. Article 320 provides that scarce quantity for personal use is the measure the Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses determines in each case according to the person's state of dependence, «Se entenderá por cantidad escasa destinada a su uso personal la medida que determine el Instituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses, en cada caso, según el estado de dependencia de la persona.», so the live cell's gloss of a single dose is corrected here as not what the article says. Article 323 directs the court to weigh the dangerousness of the drug and its market value when placing a sentence inside a band. Panama provides no death penalty for any drug offence. Those figures are carried forward from the live cell and re-derived against the Penal Code itself, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Panama's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Nigeria
Legal status
Not confirmed. The Nigeria dossier row for tobacco, checked on 20 September 2026, cites National Tobacco Control Act 2015 and Regulations 2019 and records that «tobacco product» includes products wholly or partly made of tobacco leaf. Only «tobacco product» is in quotation marks; the rest of that sentence is the dossier's own description rather than the instrument's words, and the row names no section, regulation or schedule, so it cannot carry a confirmed answer. The dossier adds that the narcotics schedules it cites for Nigeria do not themselves list tobacco, and that claim is not accepted either, because the row names no edition of those schedules.
Consequences if caught
No penalty is stated for tobacco while its regime is unconfirmed. The dossier's ceiling note says no NDLEA Act life or capital exposure follows from the narcotics list absence and that the product regime uses non capital licensing and offence penalties; it quotes none of those penalties, and none is relied on here.
If prescribed / medical
The dossier carries no prescription information for tobacco, and no prescription route is stated.
Documentation
No documentation rule is stated for tobacco. The search record this cell rests on is the dossier row checked on 20 September 2026, which cites National Tobacco Control Act 2015 and Regulations 2019 at the address in source_url.
ntcang.org · National Tobacco Control Act 2015 and Regulations 2019 · Updated October 3, 2026
Bangladesh
Legal status
Tobacco is not a narcotic under this Act and the narcotics regime does not reach it. It is named nowhere in the First Schedule, and neither is nicotine except inside the definition of shisha, which the schedule's Explanation at clause (গ) defines as a substance made with herbal extracts carrying more than 0.2 percent nicotine with essence, caramel and fruit flavour. Shisha is Class 'kha' serial 4; a cigarette is not. Tobacco in Bangladesh is regulated outside this Act, and this cell does not state which instrument does it because none was read.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Section 9(1) prohibits, for every narcotic except alcohol, cultivation, production or processing, carrying, transport or transfer, import and export at limb (a); supply, marketing, buying, selling, transfer, receipt, sending, dealing, auction, holding, possession, storage, warehousing and display at limb (b); consumption, application or use at limb (c); and any attempt, investment of money, establishing, running or patronising an operation, or a false declaration, at limb (d). Section 36 then sets the penalty from a 34 row table whose second column names a First Schedule class and serial number, not a substance, so what a substance is punished by depends entirely on which serial it sits in. This substance is in no serial of the First Schedule that could be identified, so no row of the section 36 table can be matched to it and no penalty range is stated here. Do not read that as permission. Section 65 lets the Government add a name to any schedule by notification in the official Gazette at any time, and Class 'ka' serial 7, Class 'kha' serial 5 and Class 'ga' serial 4 each sweep in the derivatives, alkaloids, salts, isomers, analogues and agonists of the substances above them. No quantity threshold applies to tobacco because no schedule entry was matched to it, and the death penalty under the section 36 table reaches only three entries in the whole schedule: Class 'ka' serials 4, 5 and 6. Nothing in Class 'kha' or Class 'ga' is capital under that table, and neither is Class 'ka' serial 1, 2, 3, 7 or 8. Section 36A, inserted by the Narcotics Control (Amendment) Act 2026 on 16 July 2026 and in force at once, adds a capital route that has no quantity threshold and no class restriction at all. Buying, selling, supplying, offering, advertising, brokering or communicating about a narcotic or a psychoactive substance through cyberspace, a digital device, a website, social media, a mobile application, an online platform or any other digital medium, or using a digital payment system, an e-wallet, a virtual asset or a cryptocurrency for those purposes, is punishable under section 36A(2) by «যে কোনো মেয়াদের কারাদণ্ডে অথবা সর্বোচ্চ মৃত্যুদণ্ডে», imprisonment for any term or at the maximum death, with a fine of up to 20 lakh taka. Its proviso states that recovery of the drug from the offender is not required. This reaches any substance that is a narcotic under section 2(29), which is anything in the First Schedule, and the schedule's own Explanation at clause (ক) defines a psychoactive substance as anything in Class 'ka' serials 4, 5 and 6, Class 'kha' serials 4 and 5, or Class 'ga' serials 3 and 4. So a substance outside the schedule is outside the section 36 table, and would only reach the capital tier if a court read it into one of those three serials through the derivative and analogue clauses.
Pakistan
Legal status
Not a controlled substance in Pakistan's narcotics law. Tobacco is not an article specified in the Schedule to the Hadd Order, which lists hemp, charas, their mixtures, opium and opium derivatives, coca leaf and coca derivatives, and hashish. It is not in either schedule of the Act or any schedule of the Rules 2001 either. The narcotics regime does not reach it.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. There is no quantity band for tobacco because there is no offence. None of sections 6, 7 or 8 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 is engaged. Those sections bite on 'any narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled substance', and this is none of the three. Death is not available in Pakistani narcotics law at all since 5 August 2023, and it was never available for anything outside the three statutory categories. Death is not available. Act No. XXXVIII of 2023, section 2, assented on 2 August 2023 and published in the Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, on 5 August 2023, removed every death reference from section 9. The words at the heroin and morphine band of 6000 grams or more and at the cocaine band of 5000 grams or more were omitted, and the Pakistan Code now prints a bracketed omission mark where they stood. In the fourth proviso to section 9(2) the words 'may be death or' were replaced by 'shall be'. The word death survives twice in the whole fifty page Act and both are procedural. Because death is unavailable, the question whether it is mandatory does not arise. The ceiling is life, and section 9A(3) says what that means: 'Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for time being in force, imprisonment for life under this Act means imprisonment in jail for the period of twenty-five years.' Section 9A(2) bars probation and parole, and section 9A(1) bars remission except for a juvenile or a female convict.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco needs no licence, permit or authorisation under the Rules 2001. No licence, permit or authorisation under the Rules 2001 is required, because rule 2(1)(xiii) confines a drug of abuse to 'a prohibited drug, a high-risk drug, or a risk drug', each defined by reference to a Schedule to those Rules, and this appears in none of them. Rule 14 provides for permits in relation to first-aid kits and rule 15 for programmes for medical and scientific purposes, and rule 11 governs import, export and transit permits. A traveller carrying a prescribed medicine should hold the prescription and the dispensing label, in the prescriber's name, and should expect the quantity to be measured against the section 9 bands if the substance is scheduled.
Documentation
Scope of this answer for tobacco. This cell answers the narcotics question only. Pakistan regulates food, medicines and tobacco through separate regimes with their own schedules and their own penalties, and none of those was read in this pass. Saying the narcotics Act does not reach a substance is not the same as saying nothing does. The Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 does not reach it either: the Schedule to that Order lists only hemp, charas, mixtures of the two, opium and opium derivatives, coca leaf and coca derivatives, and hashish.
Taiwan
Legal status
Not controlled as a narcotic under Taiwan's Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act (毒品危害防制條例): absent from all four narcotics schedules and from the controlled drugs grades and items list, and regulated instead under the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act. Tobacco is a licensed consumer product regulated under the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act, last amended 15 February 2023, not under any drug schedule. The 2023 amendment raised the age from eighteen to twenty and banned electronic cigarettes outright. The model: the four grades and their anchor substances are in the Act itself, article 2(2) reading 「毒品依其成癮性、濫用性及對社會危害性,分為四級,其品項如下」, and the full item lists are the Act's own four schedules, 附表一 to 附表四. The power to change them is delegated. Article 2(3) reads 「前項毒品之分級及品項,由法務部會同衛生福利部組成審議委員會,每三個月定期檢討,審議委員會並得將具有成癮性、濫用性、對社會危害性之虞之麻醉藥品與其製品、影響精神物質與其製品及與該等藥品、物質或製品具有類似化學結構之物質進行審議,並經審議通過後,報由行政院公告調整、增減之,並送請立法院查照」, a review committee of the justice and health ministries reviewing every three months, adjustment by Executive Yuan announcement, reported to the Legislative Yuan. The Act was last amended 4 May 2022. The list was last amended by the Executive Yuan announcement of 25 June 2026, in force 27 June 2026, which moved etomidate and eight related compounds from Category 2 up to Category 1.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No article of the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act applies, because articles 4 to 11 operate only on substances graded in the Act's four schedules and this substance is in none of them. Article 16(1) provides 「未滿二十歲之人及孕婦,不得吸菸」, that persons under twenty and pregnant women may not smoke. Article 17(1) provides 「任何人不得供應菸品、指定菸品必要之組合元件予未滿二十歲之人」, that no person may supply tobacco products to anyone under twenty. A person under twenty who smokes is directed to cessation education under article 48 rather than fined, and a minor's parent or guardian must attend. Neither reaches this substance, and not because the penalty is low but because no narcotics offence applies to it at all, at any quantity. Articles 4 to 11 of the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act operate only on substances graded in the Act's four schedules, and the death and life penalties live in article 4(1) for Category 1, article 6(1) for forced administration of a Category 1 narcotic, article 4(2) for life on Category 2, and article 15(1) for a public official committing an article 4(2) or article 6(1) offence. None of those can be engaged by a substance with no schedule entry. The one qualification is article 9(3), 「犯前五條之罪而混合二種以上之毒品者,適用其中最高級別毒品之法定刑,並加重其刑至二分之一」: if this substance is held mixed with substances that are graded, the charge is built on those, takes the highest grade among them and adds up to one half, and this substance is swept into that charge rather than giving rise to one of its own.
If prescribed / medical
Nicotine replacement products are medicines and are dealt with under the nicotine entry. Tobacco itself has no medical route.
Documentation
Personal import allowances for tobacco are a customs and tax matter. The heated tobacco category is admissible only after health risk assessment approval, and unapproved heated tobacco products are prohibited.
Hong Kong
Legal status
Not confirmed here. Not a dangerous drug under the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Cap. 134) and not in the Poisons List, but the instrument that does govern it was not read for this cell.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco is not a dangerous drug under Cap. 134. The Pharmacy and Poisons Regulations refer to tobacco in a conventional smoking product only to carve it out of a nicotine entry. Tobacco control, including sale, advertising and smoking bans, sits in separate legislation that was not read for this cell. Search log: Searched the cached Cap. 134 consolidation for tobacco with no result, and the Pharmacy and Poisons Regulations, where the only occurrence is the exception within the nicotine entry. The dangerous drugs penalties in sections 4 and 8 do not apply. What does apply was not established here, so treat this cell as telling you only what this substance is not. Read against the consolidation as in force on 2026-06-12 for the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance and as in force on 2026-07-03 for the Pharmacy and Poisons Regulations. Hong Kong amends the First Schedule by order of the Chief Executive published in the Gazette under section 50(1), so a substance can be added between consolidations.
If prescribed / medical
Not confirmed here. No prescription route is stated because the substance's status under these instruments was not settled.
Documentation
Hong Kong Customs and Excise enforces the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance at the border. Declare any controlled medicine, carry it in its original dispensed container, and carry the prescription or a doctor's letter naming the drug, the dose and the patient. Confirm requirements with the Department of Health and with your embassy before travel.
Outside the criminal drug schedule. Ley Orgánica de Drogas article 3 identifies controlled drugs by reference to the 1961 and 1971 Convention schedules and this substance has no entry in either, as at the INCB list editions named in the documentation. That does not rule out a later edition or a ministerial determination under article 2. [Certain] for the absence from the two editions read, which was re derived in this pass.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The Constitution forbids it at article 43, read here in the Contraloría General de la República text: “El derecho a la vida es inviolable. Ninguna ley podrá establecer la pena de muerte, ni autoridad alguna aplicarla.” [Certain], re derived from that text in this pass. The abolition itself is usually dated to the Decreto de Garantías of 1863. [Likely] and carried, not re derived: that decree was not read here, and the year 1863 appears nowhere in the Constitution or in the Ley Orgánica de Drogas. This row is outside the criminal drug model of the Ley Orgánica de Drogas. The Law identifies estupefacientes and sustancias psicotrópicas by reference to the 1961 and 1971 Convention schedules, and this substance has no entry in either. The Law does touch it, but only outside the offence articles: article 34 obliges makers and importers of bebidas alcohólicas, tabaco y sus mezclas to pay two per cent of their operating profit towards treatment and prevention, and article 60 requires advertising referring to the use or consumption of alcohol, tabaco y sus mezclas to be approved in advance by the communications and health ministries and by the órgano rector, on pain of a fine of 80 to 150 Unidades Tributarias. Neither is a drug offence. The word tabaco is named in the Ley Orgánica de Drogas on two lines, both outside the offence articles: art 34's special contribution and art 60's prior approval of advertising. It is the substance the Law actually addresses, unlike its alkaloid, and it has no entry in either incorporated list. Nothing in articles 149, 150, 151 or 153 attaches to this row. Read as at the INCB Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026, for the 1961 Convention schedules and the INCB Green List, 36th edition of 2025, for the 1971 Convention schedules. That does not rule out a later edition, and article 2 of the Law lets the health and intermediate industries ministries determine further substances, so a later listing is not ruled out either.
If prescribed / medical
Medicines containing estupefacientes or sustancias psicotrópicas may be sold to the public only by pharmacies, and only through the talonario oficial, the official prescription book, under article 62. Article 63 requires every prescription to be written on a special numbered form of a specific colour distributed by the health ministry, legibly and by hand, carrying the prescriber's names, consulting room address, identity number and health registration number, the name of the medicine, the quantity in figures and in words without alteration, the patient's and the purchaser's identification, the prescriber's signature and date, and the prescriber's wet seal. Article 53 provides that importing or exporting these substances, pure or contained in pharmaceutical specialities, by parcel, postal package or correspondence is met with confiscation and the customs law. Article 37 makes lawful only what duly authorised persons do, limits the existence and use of these substances strictly to the quantities needed for medical treatment, the legal manufacture of medicines or scientific research, and declares any other activity, use or destination illicit. This row is not a medicine within that regime, which reaches only medicines containing estupefacientes or sustancias psicotrópicas. The Law's only provisions touching this row are article 34, the two per cent special contribution on makers and importers of bebidas alcohólicas, tabaco y sus mezclas, and article 60, the prior approval of advertising.
Guatemala
Legal status
Outside the Ley contra la Narcoactividad (Decreto 48-92) by the express words of article 2(a), which says the provisions of the law are not applicable to tobacco. No offence under this law reaches it, article 39 included.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. This is established rather than assumed, because Decreto 48-92 as enacted did carry a death penalty: article 12 lists "De muerte" first among the principal penalties for natural persons, and article 52, "Delitos calificados por el resultado", provided that "Si como consecuencia de los delitos tipificados en esta ley, resultare la muerte de una o más personas, se aplicará la pena de muerte o treinta años de prisión, según las circunstancias del hecho". Two things remove it. First, the Corte de Constitucionalidad expelled article 12 literal a) and the words "muerte o" from article 52 by judgment of 24 October 2017, expediente 5986-2016 [Likely, taken from secondary reports; the Court's own record was not reached, and one of those reports contradicts itself on the expediente number]. Second, and independently of that judgment, article 52 was never conditioned on a substance or on a quantity but only on a resulting death, so no row of this table carried capital exposure even on the 1992 text [Certain, re-derived from the gazette this pass]. Readers should know that the government's own published text of the law, at senabed.gob.gt, still prints both capital passages intact. Decreto 48-92 excludes this expressly, and that is a finding from the statute rather than an absence from a list. Article 2, subparagraph (a), having defined drugs and extended the definition to seeds, flowers and plants, ends: "A las bebidas alcohólicas y el tabaco, no les son aplicables las disposiciones de esta ley". Alcoholic drinks and tobacco are therefore outside the whole law, so none of its offence articles reaches them, including article 39. This was read from the gazette scan; the government text at senabed.gob.gt carries the same sentence with an OCR slip, printing "y no le son" where the gazette prints "no les son". The terms "tobacco" and "tabaco" each return zero across both Convention lists. The 1961 Convention does list plant material by name, cannabis at NC 001, the coca leaf at NC 003 and opium at NO 001, so this row is absent from a list that reaches plants rather than from one that only reaches isolated chemicals. One thing does reach a plant whatever the lists say. Article 36 punishes sowing, cultivating or harvesting "semillas, florescencias, plantas o parte de las mismas, de las cuales naturalmente o por cualquier medio, se pueda obtener drogas que produzcan dependencia física o psíquica", and it is not limited to scheduled plants. Whether this plant answers that description was not established here. Being outside this statute is not a statement that the product is unregulated in Guatemala. Ordinary licensing, tax, age and public-order rules were not examined here and are a separate question from the drug law. The penalty articles of Decreto 48-92, which are set out in full on the rows this law does reach, are deliberately not repeated here: they are not this row's exposure, and the superseded cell carried them on all eighty-eight rows including this one.
Nepal
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Nepal's authorities (Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act, 2033) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Nepali sources (Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act, 2033 (1976 AD), amended through 1998), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. Controlled drugs carry tiered penalties up to life imprisonment; Nepal has NO death penalty (the maximum is life).
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Nepal has NO death penalty, the maximum drug penalty is life imprisonment (jiban kaidi), under the Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act, 2033 (1976 AD, amended through 1998). Historically cannabis was legal through government shops until 1973; a cannabis-legalization bill is currently tabled but NOT enacted (proposed, not law). Cannabis consumption draws up to 1 month or an NPR 2,000 fine (first-time minor offenders may be released on a bond, and there is no punishment for a person in recognized treatment, Sec 19A). Cannabis possession is tiered: 50 g or less up to 3 months; 50-500 g up to 1 year; 500 g, 2 kg up to 2 years; 2-10 kg up to 3 years; 10 kg or more 2-10 years plus a fine (a reported personal-use line is about 5 g cannabis / 2 g hashish). Heroin and cocaine: 5 g or less 2-5 years; 5-100 g 5-10 years; over 100 g or any trafficking 10 years to life plus an NPR 500,000-2,500,000 fine. Cultivation: 25 plants or fewer up to 3 months; more than 25 plants 3 months, 3 years. Other hard drugs (methamphetamine/'yaba', MDMA, LSD) are controlled, with trafficking punishable up to life. Foreigners face the same law, no bail, and deportation after sentence. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act, 2033 (1976 AD), amended through 1998, Secs 19/19A · lawcommission.gov.np · Updated July 14, 2026
Romania
Legal status
Tobacco is not controlled in Romania, and that is a completed finding rather than an open question. The search recorded for this row is «Căutare exactă 18 Sep 2026: “tutun”; “Tobacco”; “Nicotiana tabacum”, în Legea 143/2000, tabelele I-III şi clauzele privind sărurile şi produsele. Rezultat: nicio înscriere pentru Tobacco şi nicio trimitere nominală în Legea 194/2011.». Absence from Romania's named schedules is a completed negative result for this slug; it is not deferred as an unperformed search. Romania uses the simplest of the three models: the schedule sits inside the Act. Article 1(a) makes Tables I to IV integral to Legea 143/2000 and supplies the mechanism for adding, deleting or moving an entry. Tables I and II are droguri de mare risc, high-risk drugs; Table III is droguri de risc. A mixture is reached through a listed constituent. Legea 194/2011 is a separate products regime and does not turn an unlisted name into a scheduled drug. This reading is stated as in force on 18 September 2026. The consolidated text identifies Legea 30/2025 as the latest schedule amendment included, effective 29 March 2025, and states that it contains all officially published amendments through that Act. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment, and this one is stated as at that consolidation and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Romania has no death penalty and no life sentence for a drug offence. And none of the drug penalties reach tobacco, because they attach to the substances on the Romania list and tobacco is not one of them. The scale runs by table and by conduct. Article 4(1) sets 3 months to 2 years or a fine for unauthorised own-use acts involving a Table III risk drug, and article 4(2) sets 6 months to 3 years where the drug is high-risk. Article 2 sets 3 to 10 years for risk-drug circulation and 5 to 15 years for high-risk. Article 3(2) sets 10 to 20 years for unauthorised import or export of a high-risk drug. Article 9 raises the special limits by one third where the act finances drug consumption, and article 13(2) permits up to 5 further years in the specified education-related circumstance. Those provisions are stated here so the scale is visible, not because they apply to tobacco. If a listed constituent is proved in a given material, that constituent is assessed on its own and carries its own exposure.
If prescribed / medical
There is no controlled drug prescription question for tobacco in Romania, because the controlled list does not carry it. Whether tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter or on general sale is a question for the Romania medicines and pharmacy regime, which this row did not audit. the Romanian National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices is the body that answers it. Treat the supply route as unread rather than as open.
Documentation
Carry tobacco as the Romania medicines regime allows and do not read this row as a carriage permission, because a substance that is off the controlled list is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for tobacco and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for tobacco appears in what was read here. Provenance follows. The instrument searched was Legea 143/2000, whose Tables I to IV article 1(a) makes integral to the Act itself, on Portal Legislativ, the official legislation portal of the Ministry of Justice, and the ANMDMR consolidated text on 18 September 2026 and no entry for tobacco was found.
Slovakia
Legal status
Tobacco is not listed in the Slovak narcotic and psychotropic schedule. Act No. 139/1998 carries one closed operative schedule at Annex 1, divided into Groups I, II and III, and no matching listed substance was found for tobacco. The source records the aliases searched: tabak; tobacco; Nicotiana, run through every group of Annex 1, its extension clauses and its final line. A no-hit on an English spelling would not have been enough, because the schedule uses Slovak names, chemical formulas, brand-neutral synonyms, plant entries and member-by-member lists. Two statutes divide the work. Act No. 139/1998 decides whether a substance is in the three-group list at Annex 1, and section 3(1) classifies narcotic and psychotropic substances by their effects on health into those three groups. The Criminal Code, No. 300/2005, decides the amount category through sections 135c to 135f and supplies the offences at sections 171 to 173. This reading is stated as in force on 18 September 2026. The consolidation of Act No. 139/1998 read was effective 1 January 2026 and incorporates amendment No. 293/2025; the Criminal Code consolidation read was effective 18 August 2026 and incorporates amendments through No. 168/2026. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment, and this one is stated as at that consolidation and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Slovakia has no death penalty. It does have life imprisonment for a drug offence, under Criminal Code section 173(5), and that is the one point on which this row has to be read carefully: the life ceiling is not assigned to tobacco, because sections 171 to 173 attach to the substances in Act No. 139/1998 Annex 1 and tobacco is not one of them. No controlled-substance threshold is given for it either, for the same reason. If a listed constituent is proved in a given material, that constituent is assessed separately and carries its own exposure. That is not a statement that tobacco is unregulated in Slovakia; it is a statement that the drug offence scale is not the instrument that reaches it, and this row did not audit whichever regime does.
If prescribed / medical
There is no controlled drug prescription question for tobacco in Slovakia, because Annex 1 to Act No. 139/1998 does not carry it. Whether tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter or on general sale is a question for the Slovak medicines and pharmacy regime, which this row did not audit; the source states in terms that it is a schedule and penalty verification and not advice about licensing, medicines, precursors, food or tobacco. The State Institute for Drug Control is the body that answers it. Treat the supply route for tobacco as unread rather than as open.
Documentation
Carry tobacco as the Slovak medicines and pharmacy regime allows and do not read this row as a carriage permission, because a substance that is off the schedule is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for tobacco and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for tobacco appears in what was read here. Provenance follows. Act No. 139/1998 and Criminal Code No. 300/2005 were read on Slov-Lex, the official legal information portal, on 18 September 2026, and every annex was carried to its end: Act 139 Annex 1 ends with zolpidem followed by the salts clause, and Criminal Code Annex 1 ends with the lysergide row.
Trinidad and Tobago
Legal status
Tobacco is not a dangerous drug under Chap. 11:25: it is not listed in the First or Second Schedule, as the Schedules stand after Legal Notice No. 293 of 2026, read 3 October 2026. No Schedule or Order read names tobacco, Nicotiana or cigarettes; searches for tobacco, nicotiana and cigar returned nothing, and the only plants the First Schedule names are the «Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum)», coca and cannabis. Leaf could be a dangerous drug under section 3 only as a «thing that contains such a substance», meaning a listed one, and nicotine, the constituent for which tobacco is used, is listed nowhere; that tobacco's active constituent is nicotine is a fact brought from outside the text. Act No. 24 of 2019 defines «smoke» and in section 5A punishes a «person who smokes or uses cannabis or» cannabis resin in a public place, an offence that does not reach tobacco.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Neither the 2016 consolidation nor Act No. 24 of 2019 prints a sentence of death for any offence. No section 5 possession or trafficking offence attaches to cigarettes, cigars or loose leaf through a listing, and the statutes on the sale, excise and import of tobacco were not read. Section 5(4) separately reaches trafficking in «any substance represented or held out by him to be a dangerous» drug, section 5(6) punishes that offence, and section 5(7) deems a person «other than a person referred to in subsection (2) found in possession of a dangerous drug or a» substance which he represents or holds out to be a dangerous drug, on school premises or within five hundred metres of them, to have it for the purpose of trafficking «unless the contrary is proved, the burden of proof being on the accused». Those limbs turn on what is said about a substance and not on its listing, and no penalty for them is set out here. Section 61 provides that section 68(2) and (3) of the Interpretation Act apply only to the penalties prescribed for possession of dangerous drugs under this Act; section 68 was not read for this cell.
If prescribed / medical
Under Chap. 11:25 no prescription question arises for tobacco products, since the section 5(2) exemptions are written for dangerous drugs.
Documentation
Duty free and import allowances for tobacco are not set by Chap. 11:25 or the Orders read, and this cell states none.
The Dangerous Drugs Act, Chap. 11:25, consolidation «UPDATED TO 31ST DECEMBER 2016», which the Ministry prints as an «UNOFFICIAL VERSION», revision 105641, https://laws.gov.tt/ttdll-web/revision/download/105641?type=act, First, Second and Fourth Schedules and sections 3, 5 and 61 · LN 343/2019, https://laws.gov.tt/ttdll-web/revision/download/108636?type=amendment · Updated October 3, 2026
Ukraine
Legal status
Governed in Ukraine by the tobacco control and excise regime rather than by the narcotics list. Record UKR-85 reports that Постанова № 770, таблиці I to IV, consolidated text read on 20 September 2026, was searched and no narcotics or psychotropic heading was accepted, and that the controls which apply are Ukraine's tobacco control and excise rules on manufacture, packaging, health warnings, advertising, smoking in public places, sale to minors and duty. The finding is that regime. The absence of a narcotics heading is a negative record from one reading of the list rather than an independent confirmation, and the source names no individual instrument within the tobacco regime, so none is cited here. The negative half is unmeasured. The narcotics check logs "tobacco" and the same word in capitals, both Latin, against an annex the source records as printed in Cyrillic, so it could not have matched a Cyrillic heading. The tobacco control and excise finding is the one carrying this cell and it does not depend on that search.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Ukrainian law provides no death penalty, and the narcotics ceiling of twelve years of imprisonment under Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 307, does not reach tobacco on this record because no heading was accepted for it. Наказ МОЗ № 188 has no band for it either. The exposure is fiscal and regulatory: excise evasion, unmarked product, breaches of the public smoking and advertising rules and sale to minors, enforced administratively and at customs. This source reproduces none of those provisions, their penalties or the personal import allowance, so none of them is stated here. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Ukraine entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass, the published penalties are these. Personal use of a small amount is administrative under article 44 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, a fine of 25 to 50 tax free minimum incomes, 20 to 60 hours of community service, or administrative arrest of up to 15 days. Above small, personal use under article 309 is criminal, a fine, correctional labour of up to two years, or restriction of liberty of up to five years, rising to up to three years where aggravated or large and up to eight years where a minor is involved. Trafficking or sale under article 307 draws four to twelve years with property forfeiture. Smuggling under article 305 draws five to eight years, and up to eight to ten years aggravated. The published entry records the small, large and especially large quantity thresholds as very low, and that trace amounts have triggered article 309. Drug use itself, other than in public, is not criminal there. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty range or a fine and none of them is a quantity threshold. This row is placed outside the narcotics regime, so they are recorded as Ukraine's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
The Ukrainian country rule for scheduled substances is no personal use allowance, criminal grading under наказ МОЗ № 188 rather than a traveller's allowance, and compliance with Закон України «Про лікарські засоби» for a scheduled medicine. No limb of it engages on this row, because record UKR-85 is a separate regime finding with no accepted narcotics heading, and tobacco is not a medicine so no prescription question arises. What matters to a traveller is the customs and excise allowance rather than any medicines rule, and that allowance was not established in this source and was not researched. A nicotine replacement medicine is a different product governed by the medicines law and not by this row.
Bahrain
Legal status
Not a controlled drug on the text read. Tobacco is not named in any of the twelve tables annexed to Bahrain's Law 15 of 2007 on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, nor in any of the three decisions that have amended them. Only four plants are prohibited, in Group I Schedule 5: Indian cannabis, poppy capsules or straw, all kinds of coca and all kinds of khat. Bahrain regulates tobacco under a separate regime that was not read for this cell.
Consequences if caught
Whether Bahrain's drug offences reach Tobacco is a question this cell does not answer, because the offences are built on the tables and Tobacco is in none of them; whether the offence reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established. What follows is therefore recorded as Bahrain's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. Article 30(a) punishes trafficking in the narcotic drugs of Group I Schedules 1, 2, 3 and 4, the psychotropic substances of Group II Schedule 1 and the plants of Group I Schedule 5 by death or life imprisonment. That paragraph adds a fine of not less than 5,000 and not more than 50,000 Bahraini dinars, and Article 30(b) makes the penalty death in five listed cases. Article 31(a) sets not less than ten years with a fine of 3,000 to 30,000 dinars, Article 31(b) raises that to life imprisonment, and Article 32 covers personal use of the same schedules with imprisonment and a fine of not more than 3,000 dinars, or not more than seven years with a fine of not more than 5,000 dinars where the purpose is neither trafficking nor personal use. Article 34 sets not more than five years with a fine of not more than 3,000 dinars for Group II Schedules 2, 3 and 4, Article 35 not more than six months with a fine of not more than 100 dinars, and Article 36 imprisonment with a fine of not more than 1,000 dinars for the Group III precursors. The Law states no quantity threshold anywhere, and no table states one for Tobacco. Article 57 forbids going below ten years on Article 30 or Article 31(b) when Article 72 of the Penal Code is applied. Article 49 of the Penal Code, Decree-Law No. 15 of 1976, attaches civil deprivation of 3 to 15 years to a felony and Article 50 civil deprivation of 1 to 3 years to a misdemeanour. They are set out that way because whether the offence reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established. Article 51 makes confiscation of the substance, the equipment and any vehicle prepared for the purpose mandatory in every case. Article 54 lets the court add permanent deportation of a foreign national to the sentence. Bahraini courts have passed drug death sentences, including in a 2019 smuggling case, and executions for drug offences have not been carried out, sentences being commonly commuted; that last point is carried forward from the cell this replaces and was not re-derived here.
If prescribed / medical
The Law provides no prescription route for Tobacco. Article 23 lets a pharmacist dispense only a narcotic drug or a psychotropic substance on a Ministry of Health prescription form, and Article 26's traveller allowances are written for Group I and Group II medicines, so neither reaches this row.
Brunei
Legal status
Not a controlled drug in Brunei. Absent from Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IIIA of the First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 27 of the Laws of Brunei Darussalam, Revised Edition 2013 (B.L.R.O. 2/2013), from both parts of its Third Schedule, and from all four substantive schedules to the Regulations. Searched as "Tobacco" and "Nicotine", and no entry under that name or any synonym searched for it appears in either instrument.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Tobacco carries no penalty under the Misuse of Drugs Act in Brunei, because no offence in the Act reaches it. The Part II offences in sections 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 6 are each framed as an offence in relation to a controlled drug, and section 2 confines that to "any substance or product which is for the time being specified in Part I, II or III of the First Schedule to this Act or anything that contains any such substance or product". What decides it for tobacco is that no entry under that name or any synonym searched for it appears in either instrument. Searching the four parts of the First Schedule, both parts of the Third Schedule and the four substantive schedules to the Regulations under "Tobacco" and "Nicotine" returned nothing. Death is not available, and neither is any penalty under this Act. The substance is not a controlled drug, so no offence in Part II is engaged by it and no column of the Second Schedule is reached. The specified drug column, the only one in which death appears, names only opium, morphine, diamorphine, cocaine, cannabis, cannabis resin, methylamphetamine and MDMA. Where death does appear it is mandatory. Section 29(2) provides that the columns "show respectively the punishments to be imposed on a person convicted of the offence", and each death row gives death alone with no maximum, no minimum and no alternative. No provision of the Act confers a sentencing discretion on a capital conviction. The Act creates no sentence of life imprisonment. The phrase appears nowhere in its text, and the longest determinate term it reaches is 30 years.
If prescribed / medical
Neither the Misuse of Drugs Act nor its Regulations governs the prescribing or supply of tobacco. Neither instrument names it, and no entry under that name or any synonym searched for it appears in either instrument. No register, requisition or prescription requirement in the Regulations attaches to it, since every one of those is keyed to a scheduled controlled drug. What was not checked for this cell is Brunei's medicines and poisons regime, which is a separate body of law that was not fetched. Absence from the Misuse of Drugs Act is not a statement that a substance is freely available.
Documentation
No document is required for tobacco under the Misuse of Drugs Act, because the Act does not reach it. No entry under that name or any synonym searched for it appears in either instrument. That is a statement about one Act and no wider. A traveller carrying a prescribed medicine should still carry the prescription and keep the product in its labelled dispensed container. What was not checked for this cell is Brunei's medicines and poisons regime, which is a separate body of law that was not fetched. Absence from the Misuse of Drugs Act is not a statement that a substance is freely available.
Iran
Legal status
Tobacco is placed under the Comprehensive National Tobacco Control Law of 1385/06/15, amended 1390/04/08, whose fines were revised on 1403/03/30. It is a licensing and public health statute, not a narcotics one. Article 3 bans advertising, sponsorship and inducement. Article 4 reserves import policy and import permits to the state. Article 5 requires pictorial health warnings covering at least fifty per cent of each side of the pack. Article 6 requires serial numbered packs and the words for sale in Iran only on imported packaging. Article 7 requires a sale licence from the Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco is a fine regime and not a prison one for a traveller. Article 13 bans smoking inside the public bodies it lists and sets a fine of 2.9 to 4.2 million rials for anyone who is not a member of their staff. Its first note sets a fine of 2.1 to 4.2 million rials for smoking in public places or on public transport, and its second note lets the Cabinet adjust those limits every three years for inflation. Article 16 sets 2.1 to 8.4 million rials for selling from an opened pack. Article 14 sends smuggled tobacco product to the goods smuggling rules instead. Iran keeps the death penalty for drug offences and uses it. Article 45, added by the Act of 1396/07/12, which is 4 October 2017, and approved by the Guardian Council on 1396/07/26, which is 18 October 2017, reaches only offences that already carry death or life imprisonment under this Law, and its paragraph (t) sets the quantity limb: «کلیه جرائم موضوع ماده (4) این قانون مشروط بر اینکه بیش از پنجاه کیلوگرم باشد و مواد موضوع ماده (8) این قانون مشروط بر اینکه بیش از دو کیلوگرم باشد و در خصوص سایر جرائم موضوع ماده (8) در صورتیکه بیش از سه کیلوگرم باشد». The quantities are more than 50 kilograms for Article 4 offences, more than 2 kilograms for the Article 8 supply limb, and more than 3 kilograms for the other Article 8 offences of buying, keeping, concealing or transporting, which is how the Head of the Judiciary circular of 1396/10/16, meaning 6 January 2018, reads that paragraph at its own paragraph 7. Below those quantities the older capital wording does not lapse by itself, because Article 45 converts a former death case to grade one imprisonment of up to thirty years and a former life case to grade two imprisonment, with confiscation of drug proceeds in both. The money runs beside that conversion: a grade one fine up to twice its minimum for the former death case and a grade two fine for the former life case. Paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Article 45 carry no quantity floor at all, and reach an offender who drew or carried a weapon, a ringleader, a financial backer or investor, an offender who used a person under eighteen or a person lacking capacity, and an offender with a final prior conviction under this Law for death, life or more than fifteen years. Advisory opinion 7/99/136 applies paragraph (c) to the transport of 80 grams of heroin and to the possession of 200 kilograms of opium, which is why a weight under two kilograms is not a safe limit. At least 503 drug related executions were recorded in 2024 and 471 in 2023, roughly half of all executions and carried out by hanging, which the US Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor reports and Harm Reduction International and Amnesty International corroborate. A second figure of 485 for 2024 also sits in this project’s earlier Iran records, unattributed there, and the two were not reconciled, so both are printed rather than one being chosen. Those figures are set out here because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Iran’s published drug penalties and not as this substance’s exposure.
Laos
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Laos's authorities (Lao Penal Code Art 146; Law on Narcotics No. 22/NA) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Lao sources (Lao Penal Code 2017, Art 146; Law on Narcotics No. 22/NA of 2012), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. The Art 146 death thresholds are stated for heroin/morphine/cocaine (more than 500 g) and amphetamines/methamphetamine/ecstasy/psychotropics (more than 3 kg). [retained; abolitionist in practice, no executions since 1989, routine commutation] The death penalty is retained for drugs (Penal Code Art 146), and some sources describe it as MANDATORY above the thresholds [reported], but NO executions have been carried out since 1989 and commutation is routine (e.g. the Orobator case, where a pregnant defendant caught with 680 g of heroin received life, not death).
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Laos (a Golden Triangle state where about 90% of death-row sentences are drug-related, with roughly 315 people on death row) retains the death penalty for drugs under the Lao Penal Code (2017, Art 146, consolidating the earlier Penal Law and the Law on Narcotics No. 22/NA of 2012). Death applies to producing, distributing, possessing or transporting more than 500 g of heroin, morphine or cocaine; more than 3,000 g (3 kg) of amphetamines, methamphetamine, ecstasy or other psychotropics; or more than 10,000 g of drug precursors. Some sources describe the death penalty as MANDATORY above these thresholds [reported], but it is abolitionist in practice, NO executions have been carried out since 1989, and commutation is routine (e.g. the Orobator case, where a pregnant defendant caught with 680 g of heroin received life, not death). Personal-use possession is graduated: for heroin, morphine or cocaine, less than 0.2 g is treated as a victim needing treatment and 0.2-2 g draws 2-10 years plus a fine; for methamphetamine or ecstasy, less than 0.3 g is treated as a victim and 0.3-3 g draws 1-5 years; using a marijuana-smoking service draws 3 months, 5 years. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lao Penal Code (2017), Art 146, consolidating Penal Law Art 146 + Law on Narcotics No. 22/NA (2012) · laoofficialgazette.gov.la · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Myanmar
Legal status
Outside the reach of Myanmar's narcotics law. Tobacco is not named in Notification 24/2025 or Notification 25/2025, and the Law only ever bites through those lists, so the narcotic and psychotropic regime does not govern it. Tobacco is regulated, where it is regulated, by other legislation that this cell does not cover.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: not established. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass: the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law 1993 was read at myanmar-law-library.org on 21 September 2026. Section 20 takes «a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance» as its object, and section 2 defines both by delegation: a narcotic drug is the poppy, coca or cannabis plant and what is derived or extracted from it, or «drugs which the Ministry of Health has, by notification declared to be a narcotic drug», and a psychotropic substance is «drugs which the Ministry of Health has, by notification declared» to be one. This substance is not one of the three named plants or an extract of one, so whether section 20 reaches it turns entirely on a Ministry of Health notification, and that notification was not reached in this pass, so no capital provision is asserted for this row and none is ruled out. The Law's penalties do not apply to Tobacco. Section 16(c) at 5 to 10 years, section 19 at 10 years to an unlimited period and section 20 at 15 years to an unlimited period or death all take a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance as their object, and Tobacco is neither under the instruments audited here. What this finding is, and what it is not. No entry for Tobacco was established under this Act, and that is not a statement that Tobacco is lawful under Myanmar's other laws. Medicines, imports, customs, product and excise law were not audited here and any of them may reach it. None is assigned to Tobacco under this Law, and the reason is structural rather than a matter of degree. Section 20, the only article that reaches death, takes a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance as its object, and Tobacco has never been declared by notification to be either one. Section 19 and its 10 years to an unlimited period are out of reach for the same reason, and section 26 never engages at all, because its deemed sale quantities presuppose a substance the notifications have already caught. The definition in section 2 is closed. Status is conferred entirely by Ministry of Health notification, and the Act carries no analogue clause, no structural derivative limb and no generic definition anywhere in its 31 sections, so a substance absent from the lists is not swept in by chemical resemblance to one that is present. What this cell states is the statute as written. It is not a description of enforcement. Policing of these provisions since February 2021 is not what the text describes, and substantial areas of the country sit outside central government control, so the law on the page and the treatment a person actually meets are two different questions.
If prescribed / medical
Section 28, the medical and research exemption, has nothing to operate on for Tobacco, because an exemption only matters where a prohibition reached first and this Law's prohibitions never reach Tobacco. Any medical or licensing question about it belongs to a different regime entirely, and that regime was not audited for this cell.
Oman
Legal status
Not a controlled substance under the Law on Combating Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances issued by Royal Decree 67/2026. Tobacco is in none of the four groups annexed to it, as the dossier records its search: «سجل البحث الخاص بـ tobacco: لم يوجد قيد مطابق في المجموعات الأربع الملحقة», “Completed annex search: no exact tobacco entry”. Article 5 lets the Minister add a substance by decision, so this is a reading as of 20 September 2026, and rules outside this law were not read.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none under this law for tobacco as read. The source read assigns no penalty under the Law on Combating Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances issued by Royal Decree 67/2026 to a substance outside its annex, and tobacco is in none of its tables as the dossier records them. Article 5 lets the Minister add a substance by decision, so this holds as of 20 September 2026 only, and it is not a statement that tobacco is lawful under medicines, product, customs or other law, which was not read for this cell.
If prescribed / medical
This law sets no prescription rule for tobacco, because tobacco is outside its annex as read. Medicines, product and import rules sit outside it and were not read for this cell.
Documentation
This law asks for no document for tobacco, because tobacco is outside its annex as read. Medicines, customs and product rules are separate and were not read for this cell. Where the rule comes from. The law changed in September 2026. Royal Decree 67/2026 was issued on 3 September 2026. Its Article III repeals the Law on Combating Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances issued by Royal Decree 17/99, and its Article IV brings the decree, and with it the new law, into force on the day after its publication in the Official Gazette. Decree.om and the dossier this cell was authored from both record that publication as issue 1664 of 6 September 2026, so the law took effect on 7 September 2026. Article II keeps existing regulations and decisions running until replacements issue, «وإلى أن تصدر يستمر العمل باللوائح والقرارات القائمة، بما لا يتعارض مع أحكامه», so far as they do not conflict with its provisions. The decree's own articles were read in the text the Oman News Agency published on 3 September 2026. The attached law and its annex were read only through the verbatim quotations in the dossier dated 20 September 2026, because on 3 October 2026 qanoon.om served a Cloudflare challenge in place of the text, the web archive held no copy, and decree.om carried the decree's Articles I to IV and its Gazette reference but not the attached law, which it said would be uploaded shortly. Article 5 of the law, as that dossier quotes it, provides «يجوز بقرار من الوزير تعديل المجموعات الملحقة بهذا القانون بالحذف أو الإضافة أو تغيير النسب أو الكميات كلما اقتضت الضرورة ذلك», the Minister may by decision amend the annexed groups by deletion, by addition or by changing percentages or quantities whenever necessary. It takes the place of article 4 of the 1999 law, «يجوز بقرار من الوزير تعديل المجموعات الملحقة بهذا القانون بالحذف أو الإضافة أو تغيير النسب كلما اقتضت الظروف ذلك», which gave the same power without the word for quantities and with «الظروف», circumstances, where the 2026 text has «الضرورة», necessity. So a reading of the annex is a reading as of a date, and this one runs to 20 September 2026. Placement for Tobacco: none in the 2026 annex as read. Under the 1999 law this page recorded: in no table of this law. The 1999 placements in this cell are this page's earlier reading and are not printed in the quoted extract the dossier carries for this row.
Bulgaria
Legal status
Not listed. Tobacco is not a named entry of Списък I, Списък II or Списък III of the Наредба за реда за класифициране на растенията и веществата като наркотични. The forms searched in the Bulgarian text were «Тютюн», «Nicotiana», «ютюн», in the running text and again with all whitespace removed so that a name broken across lines could not read as an absence. A search of all three lists in Bulgarian and in Latin returned nothing. The plant entries that are there are the poppy, the coca bush, cannabis and kratom. This is an absence from the lists and not a statement that the substance is free of Bulgarian law: чл. 4, ал. 2 of the Закон за контрол върху наркотичните вещества и прекурсорите applies the same control measures to preparations and to analogues, and § 1, т. 17 defines the analogue as «"Аналог" означава всяко вещество, което не е включено в списъците по чл. 3, ал. 2, но има сходен химически строеж с някое наркотично вещество и предизвиква аналогично действие върху човешкия организъм.» so an unlisted molecule that is chemically close to a listed one can still be reached. Whether this substance is such an analogue was not established here. The absence is stated as those lists stand after Постановление № 49 of 8 May 2025, which is the last amendment to the наредба recorded by the Council of Ministers legal information system.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Bulgaria is in the European Union and the death penalty was abolished in 1998, so no Bulgarian drug provision carries one. The figures in the rest of this paragraph are carried forward from the live Bulgaria cell and were not re-derived in this pass. Possession is not subject to a formal personal-use threshold. Penal Code article 354a(5) lets a judge impose a fine up to about 1,000 leva (about €511) for insignificant quantities, but it remains a criminal conviction. Standard possession of high-risk drugs draws 1 to 6 years. A 2,000 to 10,000 leva fine runs alongside that band. Possession of moderate-risk drugs draws up to 5 years. Trafficking under article 354a draws 2 to 8 years for high-risk drugs and 1 to 6 years for moderate-risk drugs. It rises to up to 15 years for aggravated or particularly large amounts. Cultivation of opium poppy, coca or cannabis is prohibited by article 354c. The high-risk and moderate-risk split those bands run on is drawn by Penal Code articles 354a, 354b and 354c together with the Law on Control of Narcotic Substances and Precursors, the ЗКНВП. Those are Penal Code provisions rather than наредба provisions, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Bulgaria's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
If prescribed / medical
Чл. 58, ал. 1 of the Закон за контрол върху наркотичните вещества и прекурсорите lets a person in transit or temporarily in the country hold medicinal products containing narcotic substances «от списъците по чл. 3, ал. 2, т. 2 и 3» only for treatment and in quantities no greater than 30 days of treatment, and чл. 58, ал. 2 requires a foreign national to hold a document issued by the competent authorities of the country where the treatment was prescribed. A substance outside all three списъци is not one of the products that allowance is written for, so neither the 30 day rule nor the чл. 59 permit for taking narcotic medicines abroad is the route for Tobacco. If it is a prescription medicine where you are travelling from, carry the prescription and the original dispensing packaging, and treat the absence from the lists as an absence rather than as permission. Confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lithuania
Legal status
Tobacco is not listed in the Lithuanian narcotic and psychotropic lists. Health Minister Order No. 5 is the list that Criminal Code article 269(1) adopts as the Code's drug definition, and no entry for tobacco was found in it. The source records the Lithuanian language search run for this row and the terms used: tabakas; tobacco; Nicotiana. Both Order No. 5 and Order V-239 were searched, and all four schedules of the order were covered. The search was run in Lithuanian rather than in English, which matters because the order is printed in Lithuanian and an English search returns a false absence. The chain has four links and each one matters. The Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Control Law, at article 4, delegates classification to the Ministry of Health. Health Minister Order No. 5 of 6 January 2000 is the resulting list and carries Schedules I to IV. Criminal Code article 269(1) makes those ministerial lists the Criminal Code's own drug definition. Criminal Code article 269(2) then sends the quantity question to ministerial recommendations, and Health Minister Order V-239 of 23 April 2003 supplies the figures. This reading is stated as in force on 18 September 2026. The current consolidation of Order No. 5 begins on 18 June 2025 and the current consolidation of Order V-239 begins on the same day; the Control Law edition read includes the changes effective 1 November 2025 and the Criminal Code edition read was effective 3 July 2026. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment, and this one is stated as at that consolidation and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Lithuania has no death penalty and no life sentence for a drug offence, and in any event none of the drug penalties reach tobacco, because articles 259 and 260 attach to the substances in Order No. 5 and tobacco is not one of them. The 15 year ceiling under Criminal Code article 260(3) is therefore not assigned on this record, and Order V-239 prints no small, large or very large amount for tobacco. If a controlled constituent is proved in a given material, that constituent's own table row governs and this row does not.
If prescribed / medical
There is no controlled substance prescription question for tobacco in Lithuania, because Order No. 5 does not carry it and the Control Law's licensing machinery follows that order. Whether tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter or on general sale is a question for the Lithuanian medicines regime, which this row did not audit. The State Medicines Control Agency of Lithuania is the body that answers it. Treat the supply route for tobacco as unread rather than as open.
Documentation
Carry tobacco as the Lithuanian medicines regime allows and do not read this row as a carriage permission, because a substance that is off the controlled lists is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for tobacco and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for tobacco appears in what was read here. Provenance follows. Order No. 5 and Order V-239 were searched in Lithuanian on the official Register of Legal Acts on 18 September 2026 and no entry was found. The final rows of the quantity annex were read: Schedule IV ends at item 402, isopropyl nitrite, after the nitrous oxide, gamma-butyrolactone and other alkyl nitrite entries, so the search reached the end of the instrument rather than stopping at the older Schedule III drug list.
Estonia
Legal status
Tobacco is not listed in the Estonian narcotic and psychotropic schedule. It is governed instead by the Tobacco Act, Tubakaseadus, which is a separate regulatory regime and not the narcotic schedule. No entry for tobacco was located in Lists I to VI of Annex 1. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act prohibition therefore does not attach to tobacco by name. This rests on the compiler's statement that no entry appears in Annex 1 to Minister of Social Affairs Regulation No 73, and the source records no search terms for this row, so the absence is weaker evidence than a recorded query would be. This reading is stated as in force on 18 September 2026, the day the instruments were read, and the schedule review covers the amendment effective 31 December 2024. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment, and this one is stated as at that date and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Estonia has no death penalty and none of the drug penalties reach tobacco, because those penalties attach to the narcotic schedule and tobacco is not on it. The Penal Code drug ceiling of life imprisonment under section 184(2) with a superscript one is therefore not assigned on this record, and neither is the large quantity test at section 3(1)(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. That is not a statement that tobacco is unregulated. It is a statement that the narcotic offence scale is not the instrument that regulates it, and any penalty attaches under the regime that does.
If prescribed / medical
There is no narcotic prescription question for tobacco in Estonia, because the narcotic schedule does not carry it. The governing regime is the Tobacco Act, Tubakaseadus, which is a separate regulatory regime and not the narcotic schedule. Whether tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter, or on general sale is a question for that regime, and this row did not audit it. The State Agency of Medicines is the body that answers it for a medicine. Treat the supply route for tobacco as unread rather than as open.
Documentation
Carry tobacco as the governing regime allows and do not rely on this row for a carriage permission, because a substance that is off the narcotic schedule is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for tobacco and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for tobacco appears in what was read here, and an absence in what was read is not proof that no scheme exists. Provenance follows. Annex 1 to Minister of Social Affairs Regulation No 73 was read on 18 September 2026 on Riigi Teataja, the official state gazette, and the source states that no entry appears in Lists I to VI. It records no search terms for this row, which is a limit on how strong that absence can be taken to be.
Estonia, Tobacco, provenance carried from the source compilation, which read Riigi Teataja, the official state gazette of the Republic of Estonia · Updated September 20, 2026
Latvia
Legal status
Tobacco is not listed in the Latvian controlled substances annex. Annex 2 to the law on the entry into force and application of the Criminal Law is the current list, because section 3(2) of the Circulation Law points to it expressly, and no entry for tobacco was located in it. The Latvian language search log for this row records the terms searched: tabaka; tobacco; Nicotiana. The search was run in Latvian rather than in English, which matters because the annex is printed in Latvian and an English search returns a false absence. This reading is stated as in force on 18 September 2026. Annex 2 identifies its current version as the 29 April 2021 text, as amended to 13 November 2025, with the cited 2025 change taking effect on 1 December 2025. An absence is a statement about a list at a moment, and this one is stated as at that version and no later.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Latvia has no death penalty and no life sentence for a drug offence, and in any event none of the drug penalties reach tobacco, because they attach to Annex 2 and tobacco is not on it. The 15 year drug ceiling under subsection (3) of Criminal Law section 253 with a superscript one is therefore not assigned on this record, and Annex 2 prints no small ceiling and no large floor. That is not a statement that tobacco is unregulated in Latvia. It is a statement that the controlled drug offence scale is not the instrument that regulates it, and this row did not audit whichever regime does.
If prescribed / medical
There is no controlled drug prescription question for tobacco in Latvia, because Annex 2 does not carry it and the Circulation Law licensing and prescribing machinery follows the annex. Whether tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter or on general sale is a question for the Latvian medicines and pharmacy regime, which this row did not audit. The State Agency of Medicines of Latvia is the body that answers it. Treat the supply route for tobacco as unread rather than as open.
Documentation
Carry tobacco as the Latvian medicines and pharmacy regime allows and do not read this row as a carriage permission, because a substance that is off the controlled list is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for tobacco and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for tobacco appears in what was read here. Provenance follows. Annex 2 to the law on the entry into force and application of the Criminal Law was searched in Latvian on likumi.lv, the official consolidated law portal of Latvia, on 18 September 2026, and no entry was located. The final page of Annex 2 was read, so the search reached the end of the instrument rather than stopping part way.
Latvia, Tobacco, read from likumi.lv, the official consolidated law portal of the Republic of Latvia · Updated September 20, 2026
Slovenia
Legal status
Not named in the annex. A search of every named row of the annex to the Uredba o razvrstitvi prepovedanih drog, across Groups I, II and III and covering salts, stereochemical notes, plants and the most recent cannabinoid additions, returned no entry. The search covered the single term tobacco. Tobacco is governed by the Restriction on the Use of Tobacco and Related Products Act, the ZOUTPI, and by excise legislation, and the annex does not carry it. Article 2 of the Uredba makes the annex a constituent part of the regulation, so the list moves by amendment of the Uredba and not of the Criminal Code. The annex was read on 20 September 2026 and this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Slovenia has abolished the death penalty and no Slovenian drug offence carries one, so this is a settled country level fact and not a reading of where any substance sits on the list. The exposure that does attach runs on three provisions. Personal use is handled under article 33 of the Production of and Trade in Illicit Drugs Act, the ZPPPD, which treats a smaller quantity held for one time personal use as a minor offence and carries a fine of roughly 42 to 209 euro, reduced or remitted where the person enters approved treatment. That article states no gram figure at all and it is a lighter route rather than a lawful possession allowance. Trafficking and manufacture fall under article 186 of the Criminal Code, the KZ-1, at one to ten years, rising to three to fifteen years on the aggravated limbs for organised conduct or conduct involving minors or vulnerable persons, and fifteen years under article 186, paragraphs 2 and 3, is the drug offence ceiling in Slovenian law. Facilitating consumption falls under article 187 at six months to twelve years. Because the annex carries no entry for this substance, those three provisions are not what governs it on the strength of the list alone: the Restriction on the Use of Tobacco and Related Products Act and excise legislation is where its treatment sits, and that is a different regime with different requirements rather than an absence of regulation.
If prescribed / medical
The source read for this cell carries no prescription column, so no substance specific Slovenian medical route is stated here and none is assumed. The country level traveller rule is the one the source does state: Groups II and III of the annex can include medicines, and lawful travel still turns on the applicable prescription, the original dispensing packaging and any Schengen or Slovenian certificate that is required, with a foreign brand assessed through its proved active ingredients rather than its name. This row has no annex placement at all, because the annex does not name it, and its treatment sits under the Restriction on the Use of Tobacco and Related Products Act and excise legislation instead. The source states no traveller route for it, so that route is deferred here rather than stated.
Documentation
Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and carry a Schengen certificate where one is required for the substance and the length of stay. Confirm the requirement with the Slovenian embassy or consulate before travelling rather than at the border, and be ready to show the active ingredient, since a foreign brand name is assessed in Slovenia through its proved ingredients and not through the name on the box. For this row the finding is an absence from the annex rather than a placement in it, and the absence was measured on 20 September 2026. The annex to the Uredba o razvrstitvi prepovedanih drog was read on 20 September 2026. The dossier read for this cell names no edition and no amendment date for that annex, so the horizon of this cell is the reading date and nothing later, and this does not rule out a later amendment. The list moves by amendment of the Uredba itself, because article 2 of the Uredba makes the annex a constituent part of the regulation, so the Criminal Code can stay untouched while the names on the list change.
Serbia
Legal status
Tobacco is not a named entry on the Serbian controlled substance list. The dossier records a negative check against the Spisak psihoaktivnih kontrolisanih supstanci at Službeni glasnik RS 12/2026 for the term «duvan», finding no exact row, and it records the governing Serbian instrument instead as «Zakon o duvanu; Zakon o akcizama», placing the substance in what it calls a tobacco and excise regime. Tobacco sits under the tobacco law together with the excise law, which govern production, trade, taxation and labelling rather than possession as a drug. The negative is recorded as verified, and that is a claim about the check rather than about every possible route: it means the search for that term across the Spisak returned nothing, not that no Serbian instrument anywhere reaches the substance. The Serbian strings here are the dossier's record in Latin script and are not offered as the Cyrillic wording of the Službeni glasnik RS.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. There is no controlled substance quantity threshold for tobacco, because the Spisak does not name it, so the division of conduct by manja količina and velika količina in Criminal Code arts 246 and 246a has nothing to attach to. The ceiling this dossier records for Serbia is 20 years of imprisonment, by Criminal Code art. 246(5) read with the general maximum in art. 45(1). That figure is document level, the same sentence on all 88 Serbian rows, so it is given here as the dossier's recorded ceiling for the country and not as a measured statement about this substance, and no route in the instruments the dossier cites reaches death. That ceiling is the narcotics ceiling and it does not describe what happens to a substance the narcotics list does not name, which is why it is reported on this row and not applied on it. The exposure that does exist runs through «Zakon o duvanu; Zakon o akcizama» as a tobacco and excise regime. The controls are on production, trade, taxation and labelling, and the border question is a customs and duty question rather than a drug one. The dossier does not carry the penalties under those instruments, so this cell does not state them, and a reader who needs them has to go to «Zakon o duvanu; Zakon o akcizama» itself. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Serbia entry rather than re-derived from the Criminal Code in this pass, the published penalties are these. Drug use itself is not a criminal offence. Possession of a small amount for one's own use under Criminal Code article 246a paragraph 1 draws a fine or up to three years, and punishment may be remitted in minor cases. Small quantity is not numerically defined in law, so there is no fixed statutory quantity. Possession of a large quantity under article 246a paragraph 2 draws three to ten years. Production, circulation or sale under article 246 draws three to twelve years, five to fifteen years if committed by a group, and at least ten years if by an organised group. Cultivation of opium poppy or psychoactive hemp under article 246 draws six months to five years. Facilitating the taking of narcotics is an offence under article 247. The death penalty was abolished in 2002. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty range or a fine and none of them is a quantity threshold. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Serbia's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Iraq
Legal status
Not listed as at 22 September 2026. Tobacco appears nowhere in the ten schedules under any Latin or Arabic spelling searched, and neither does nicotine. It is not named in any of the ten schedules annexed to Iraq's Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Law No. 50 of 2017, as those schedules stand after Statement 347 of 2025 of 17 November 2025, the Official Gazette having been checked to issue 4881 of 14 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco appears nowhere in the ten schedules under any Latin or Arabic spelling searched, and neither does nicotine. Tobacco control in Iraq runs through its own legislation, which is outside the narcotics law. Under the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Law No. 50 of 2017, Article 27 punishes importing, bringing in or exporting, producing or manufacturing, and cultivating a producing plant, in each case with intent to trade, by death or life imprisonment. Trafficking possession carries life or a term of imprisonment under Article 28, First, for a Schedule One substance, and severe detention under Article 28, Sixth, for a substance on any of the other tables. The fine on the Article 28, First, offence runs from 10,000,000 to 30,000,000 Iraqi dinars, and the fine on the Article 28, Sixth, offence from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Iraqi dinars. Possession, purchase, import, production or cultivation for personal use carries one to three years under Article 32. The fine on personal use runs from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Iraqi dinars. Article 27 keys on the act rather than on a weight, and the law sets no gram threshold for it. Article 1 defines narcotics, psychotropics and precursors exclusively by the substances listed in the ten annexed schedules, and Article 49, Second, is the only route by which a substance is added, by a ministerial statement published in the Official Gazette. This row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Iraq's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. Iraq enforces the drug death penalty in practice: 144 drug-trafficking death sentences were issued in 2024, a figure carried forward here from the previous cell and not re-derived, on the authority of the US State Department and Iraqi court statements reported by 964media and The New Region.
If prescribed / medical
Not a prescribed traveller medicine in this form.
Documentation
Tobacco is governed in Iraq by tobacco-control instruments outside the narcotics law, and customs allowances are a separate question. Running or preparing a place for drug use is Article 28, Fourth, of this law; it is not a Penal Code Article 288 offence. Allowing another person to use drugs on premises of yours carries six months to two years under Article 33, First, with a fine of 3,000,000 to 5,000,000 Iraqi dinars. A doctor who writes a prescription for other than medical treatment faces not less than three months detention or a fine of 3,000,000 to 5,000,000 Iraqi dinars and a one year ban on practice under Article 31. Article 1 defines the ten schedules as the lists adopted by the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances and the 1988 United Nations Convention against illicit traffic, each with its amendments, and Article 49, Second, is how Iraq amends them. Article 50 repeals Narcotics Law No. 68 of 1965, so the 1965 law is not the governing Act. Harm Reduction International reported 140 drug death sentences in Iraq between January and August 2024, a figure carried forward here and not re-derived. The US State Department has reported personal-use sentences of up to 15 years, which is longer than the Article 32 range and is carried forward here as that department reported it rather than re-derived from the statute. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with the Iraqi embassy before travel.
Jordan
Legal status
Tobacco is outside the Law No. 23 of 2016 scheduling question altogether, and the schedule search that establishes that is recorded as «بحث الجداول عن التبغ: لا يوجد قيد مطابق في جداول المواد المخدرة أو المؤثرات العقلية.», a schedule search for tobacco returning no matching narcotic or psychotropic entry. The Law's definitions are membership tests rather than descriptions: article 2 makes «المادة المخدرة» every natural or synthetic substance listed in Schedules 1 to 4, and «المؤثرات العقلية» every such substance listed in Schedules 5 to 9, so a plant that appears on no schedule is not a narcotic drug for this Law. Tobacco appears on none of them, and article 19(a)(1), which reaches a plant producing narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, does not reach it either, because the substance the plant produces is itself unlisted. It is governed instead by the tobacco control provisions of Public Health Law No. 47 of 2008, which this schedule audit did not read. The only limb of Law No. 23 that could reach an unlisted substance at all is article 14(a), «... من غير المواد المنصوص عليها في الجداول المرفقة بهذا القانون بقصد أحداث التخدير أو أي إثر آخر ضار بالعقل.», substances other than those specified in the schedules attached to this Law, taken with intent to cause intoxication or another harmful effect on the mind.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Neither the death penalty nor life imprisonment reaches tobacco through Law No. 23 of 2016, because articles 19 and 20 operate on scheduled narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and chemical precursors, and tobacco is in none of those classes. The plant limb at article 19(a)(1) does not reach it either, since it is directed at plants producing scheduled substances. There is no drug quantity threshold, because a threshold is something a schedule entry carries and there is no entry. Article 14, the only limb capable of reaching an unlisted substance, is non-capital in any event. The Jordanian consequences that do attach to tobacco are public health and revenue consequences: restrictions on smoking in public places, on sale to minors and on advertising under Public Health Law No. 47 of 2008, and customs and excise treatment on import. Those were not audited for this table, and a quantity brought in beyond the personal allowance is a duty and smuggling question rather than a drug question, which is a different problem and not a smaller one.
If prescribed / medical
No prescribing consequence follows from Law No. 23 of 2016 for tobacco, because the Law does not schedule it and there is no control here for a prescription to lift. Tobacco is not a medicine and there is no medical route to describe. The country-level position is that Law No. 23 of 2016 fixes control status and does not fix supply or dispensing conditions, so the public health and revenue regimes that do govern it are treated here as unread rather than as absent.
Documentation
No documentation is required for tobacco by the narcotics law, and no carriage allowance is granted by it either, because a carriage requirement under that statute is something a schedule entry creates and there is no entry. That is a narrow answer rather than a clearance. The rules a traveller actually meets are the customs duty-free allowance on cigarettes and other tobacco products, and the public health restrictions on where a product may be used once inside the country. Both sit in instruments this table did not read, and the allowance in particular changes without notice. The schedule search recorded above was run against the official consolidation updated 29 December 2025 and read on 17 September 2026.
Syria
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Syria's authorities (Narcotic Drugs Law No. 2 of 1993) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Syrian sources (Narcotic Drugs Law No. 2 of 1993, Legislative Decree, Arts 39/43), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Syria (Narcotic Drugs Law No. 2 of 1993, Legislative Decree), trafficking, cultivation or manufacture is punishable by DEATH (Art 39); a user draws 3-15 years (Art 43); possession not for trafficking draws up to 1 year plus a fine up to 5,000 SYP; trafficking draws life plus a 1-5 million SYP fine. Death applies in aggravated cases (a public official combating drugs, a minor used, or an international smuggling syndicate). [retained; enforcement opaque amid conflict] Syria is retentionist on paper, death applies in aggravated cases (a public official combating drugs, a minor used, or an international smuggling syndicate), but enforcement is opaque amid the conflict, and a September 2019 amnesty reduced some death sentences to life. Active executions are not asserted.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Syria (Narcotic Drugs Law No. 2 of 1993, Legislative Decree), trafficking, cultivation or manufacture is punishable by DEATH (Art 39); a user draws 3-15 years (Art 43); possession not for trafficking draws up to 1 year plus a fine up to 5,000 SYP; trafficking draws life plus a 1-5 million SYP fine. Death applies in aggravated cases (a public official combating drugs, a minor used, or an international smuggling syndicate). There is no medical cannabis. [retained; enforcement opaque amid conflict] Syria is retentionist on paper, death applies in aggravated cases (a public official combating drugs, a minor used, or an international smuggling syndicate), but enforcement is opaque amid the conflict, and a September 2019 amnesty reduced some death sentences to life. Active executions are not asserted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs Law No. 2 of 1993 (Legislative Decree), Arts 39/43 · corroborated by Harm Reduction International, CountryReports and NPA Syria · sherloc.unodc.org · hri.global · Updated July 14, 2026
Yemen
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Yemen's authorities (Law No. 3 of 1993) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Yemeni sources (Law No. 3 of 1993 on Control of Illicit Trafficking in and Abuse of Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, Arts 34/39), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Yemen (Law No. 3 of 1993 on Control of Illicit Trafficking in and Abuse of Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances), trafficking or cultivating schedule-V plants with intent to traffic is punishable by DEATH or 25 years (Art 34); possession not for trafficking draws a lesser penalty (Art 39). The penalty keys on INTENT, not a fixed statutory quantity, there is no fixed gram threshold. [retained; executions rare amid conflict] Yemen is retentionist, death applies for trafficking or cultivation with intent to traffic, but executions are rare amid the conflict. Active executions are not asserted.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Yemen (Law No. 3 of 1993 on Control of Illicit Trafficking in and Abuse of Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances), trafficking or cultivating schedule-V plants with intent to traffic is punishable by DEATH or 25 years (Art 34); possession not for trafficking draws a lesser penalty (Art 39). The penalty keys on INTENT, not a fixed statutory quantity, there is no fixed gram threshold; there is no medical cannabis. [retained; executions rare amid conflict] Yemen is retentionist, death applies for trafficking or cultivation with intent to traffic, but executions are rare amid the conflict. Active executions are not asserted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law No. 3 of 1993 on Control of Illicit Trafficking in and Abuse of Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, Arts 34/39 · corroborated by Harm Reduction International · sherloc.unodc.org · hri.global · Updated July 14, 2026
Libya
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Libya's authorities (Law No. 7 of 1990 as amended) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Libyan sources (Law No. 7 of 1990 on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, as amended), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Libya (Law No. 7 of 1990 on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, amended by Law No. 19 of 1994 and Law No. 19 of 1996), drugs are prohibited and aggravated trafficking is death-eligible. The specific death-penalty article number and any quantity thresholds are NOT individually confirmed in the cited sources (do not rely on a specific article or gram figure), verify; there is no fixed statutory quantity asserted here. [retained; enforcement opaque amid conflict] Libya is on the drug-death-penalty retentionist list and aggravated trafficking is death-eligible under Law No. 7 of 1990 (as amended), but the specific death-penalty article and any quantity thresholds are NOT individually confirmed in the cited sources, verify the specific article before relying on it. Enforcement is opaque amid the conflict; active executions are not asserted.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Libya (Law No. 7 of 1990 on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, amended by Law No. 19 of 1994 and Law No. 19 of 1996), drugs are prohibited and aggravated trafficking is death-eligible. The specific death-penalty article number and any quantity thresholds are NOT individually confirmed in the cited sources, verify the specific article before relying on it; there is no fixed statutory quantity asserted here, and there is no medical cannabis. [retained; enforcement opaque amid conflict] Libya is on the drug-death-penalty retentionist list and aggravated trafficking is death-eligible under Law No. 7 of 1990 (as amended), but the specific death-penalty article and any quantity thresholds are NOT individually confirmed in the cited sources, verify the specific article before relying on it. Enforcement is opaque amid the conflict; active executions are not asserted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law No. 7 of 1990 on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances (amended by Law No. 19 of 1994 and Law No. 19 of 1996) · corroborated by Human Rights Watch · security-legislation.ly · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Sudan
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Sudan's authorities (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994) / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Sudanese sources (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994, Arts 15/16/17), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Sudan (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994, Arts 15/16/17), the death penalty is conditional and aggravator-based, mandated for trafficking or producing by a recidivist, by an official entrusted with combating drug trafficking, or as part of an international criminal organization (Arts 15/17), and for providing drugs to students or in schools or assisting trafficking generally (Arts 16/17). It is NOT a flat general-trafficking death penalty. [retained for aggravated/recidivist trafficking; enforcement opaque] The death penalty is conditional and aggravator-based, mandated for trafficking or producing by a recidivist, by an official entrusted with combating drug trafficking, or as part of an international criminal organization (Arts 15/17), and for providing drugs to students or in schools or assisting trafficking generally (Arts 16/17). It is NOT a flat general-trafficking death penalty. Sudan is retentionist with a historical execution record (1994), but there is no reliable current execution stream amid the conflict; active executions are not asserted.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Sudan (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994, Arts 15/16/17), the death penalty is conditional and aggravator-based, mandated for trafficking or producing by a recidivist, by an official entrusted with combating drug trafficking, or as part of an international criminal organization (Arts 15/17), and for providing drugs to students or in schools or assisting trafficking generally (Arts 16/17). It is NOT a flat general-trafficking death penalty, and there is no medical cannabis. [retained for aggravated/recidivist trafficking; enforcement opaque] The death penalty is conditional and aggravator-based, mandated for trafficking or producing by a recidivist, by an official entrusted with combating drug trafficking, or as part of an international criminal organization (Arts 15/17), and for providing drugs to students or in schools or assisting trafficking generally (Arts 16/17). It is NOT a flat general-trafficking death penalty. Sudan is retentionist with a historical execution record (1994), but there is no reliable current execution stream amid the conflict; active executions are not asserted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994, Arts 15/16/17 · Updated July 14, 2026
Albania
Legal status
Tobacco is not listed in the narcotic, psychotropic and plant tables annexed to Ligji nr. 7975, datë 26.7.1995, për barnat narkotike, psikotrope dhe të kontrolluara. The search recorded for this row ran «tobacco» against those tables, recording the national language form «duhan», and accepted no printed row. The instrument that governs it instead is Ligji nr. 9636/2006 për mbrojtjen e shëndetit nga produktet e duhanit and Ligji nr. 61/2012, and the legal category the dossier records is tobacco and excise regime. The tables are read here as those tables stand after Ligji nr. 17/2026, the statute that last moved the list by adding substances to the 1971 Convention list annexed to Ligji nr. 7975, datë 26.7.1995, për barnat narkotike, psikotrope dhe të kontrolluara through its shtojca nr. 1, and that does not rule out a later addition under the same power.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Albania has abolished the death penalty and no offence in the Criminal Code, Ligji nr. 7895, datë 27.1.1995, carries it, so the abolition is a country level fact and does not turn on where a substance sits in the annexed tables. The drug offences are in that Code: article 283, the narcotics offence, whose first paragraph excludes personal use in a small dose; article 283/a, also cited as 283-a, the trafficking article; and article 284, the cultivation article for narcotic plants. The one figure the Albania dossier prints is the ceiling, twenty years, at article 283/a, second paragraph. The dossier records no numerical substance by substance table behind the small dose exclusion, so nothing in the statute fixes the weight at which a small dose stops being one, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not a general lawful possession safe harbour. The figures that follow are carried forward from the Albania entry already published on this site and were not re-derived from the statute text in this pass. Under article 283 the published entry gives five to ten years for manufacturing, selling, transporting or keeping, rising to seven to fifteen years in complicity or on repeat and ten to twenty years for organising, managing or financing. Under article 283/a it gives seven to fifteen years for trafficking by import, export or transit, rising to ten to twenty in complicity or on repeat and fifteen years and above for organising or financing. Under article 283/b it gives three to seven years for facilitating intake or use by administering drugs. Under article 284 it gives three to seven years for cultivating narcotic plants, rising to five to ten in complicity or on repeat and ten to twenty for organising or financing. Those are penalty bands and nothing else: they are not quantities and they are not fines. They sit alongside the ceiling the dossier states, twenty years at article 283/a second paragraph, and this pass did not re-derive either, so whether the published ten to twenty and fifteen years and above limbs state that same ceiling in other words is not resolved here. Quantity is a separate question from any of those bands, and the published entry answers it the same way the dossier does: there is no statutory gram threshold. It records that the Supreme Court, in Decision 1 of 27 March 2008, defined small quantity as a single dose for that individual, decided case by case. Observed practice is a third thing again and it is reported rather than enacted. The published entry records that in practice low level users are still prosecuted under article 283, and that five year minimums have been seen even for roughly 0.4 to 1.9 g. That is a quantity seen in reported cases, not a threshold the statute sets. The published entry also records that personal possession may, in practice, be handled administratively under the Code of Misdemeanors article 121, with a fine of about 10,000 to 50,000 ALL. That is a money figure and not a quantity, and the published entry marks the path reported, not controlling. Those articles are not reached through the annexed tables for this row, because the search recorded against «duhan» accepted no printed entry there. What governs instead is Ligji nr. 9636/2006 për mbrojtjen e shëndetit nga produktet e duhanit and Ligji nr. 61/2012, whose duties are its own and are not the Criminal Code's drug offences.
North Macedonia
Legal status
Not a controlled drug under the classification lists. The lists carry no row for тутун, and the instrument the source checked instead is Закон за тутун, производи од тутун и сродни производи; Закон за акцизите, under the legal category it records as tobacco and excise regime. That is an absence in the narcotics lists and a presence in another regime, not an absence of regulation. The version read is the classification list published at Службен весник на РСМ бр. 104/2021, read as at 20 September 2026. The power that moves that list is член 21 став 2 of Закон за контрола на опојни дроги и психотропни супстанции, under which the minister of health adopts the lists, so the list can be replaced without the statute changing, and a later amendment is not ruled out by this reading.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. North Macedonia carries no death penalty, and the dossier read for this pass states that on all 88 of its rows. The drug offence itself is Article 215 of the Кривичен законик, which sits in the chapter on offences against people's health, chapter 21. On penalty: Article 215 carries three to ten years, and the lesser-quantity paragraph added in September 2009 carries six months to three years. Article 216 covers facilitating or enabling the use of drugs, and Article 217 covers causing severe bodily injury or health damage through the Article 215 and Article 216 offences. There is no separate personal-possession offence in the Code, and personal use is often charged under Article 215. On quantity, which is a different question from penalty and must not be read as the same one: small versus large quantity is not defined in the Code. Article 215(2) recognises a smaller quantity for the reduced offence but states no grams and creates no lawful allowance, so there is no statutory quantity band and no weight below which possession becomes lawful. The Public Prosecutor's internal guidelines set non-statutory cut-offs instead, and the reported working thresholds are around 2 g of cocaine, 2 g of heroin and 5 g of cannabis, above which intent to sell is presumed. That is reported prosecutorial practice and not statutory, and that hedge is part of the figure rather than a footnote to it. The penalty bands, the chapter 21 locator, Article 216 and Article 217, the absence of a separate possession offence and the reported thresholds are all carried forward from the published entry for this country and were not re-derived from the Кривичен законик or from any statute text in this pass. The dossier read for this pass records only a ten year ceiling at Article 215(1) and the bare existence of a reduced offence at Article 215(2), so the three year floor, the six months to three years band and the two neighbouring articles are the published entry's material and not the dossier's. Because the lists carry no row for it, Article 215 does not engage through the classification lists at all, and the exposure that applies is whatever Закон за тутун, производи од тутун и сродни производи; Закон за акцизите carries. The source names that instrument and does not state its penalties, so no figure is reported for it here.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Legal status
Not a controlled drug under the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26. The list and its Tables I to III were searched for this term and returned no controlled drug entry; entity and Brčko District tobacco control and excise legislation is recorded as the governing regime instead. That makes this an absence claim about a list at a moment rather than a permanent fact: the list was read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Criminal law in Bosnia and Herzegovina runs at state, entity and Brčko District level at once, and the sources read do not establish which code governs a given case: they name the applicable entity or Brčko criminal code without choosing between them, and the only code actually read is the Federation one, where drug trafficking sits at article 238 and the fixed-term ceiling is article 43, «Kazna zatvora ne može biti kraća od trideset dana ni duža od dvadeset godina.», thirty days at the bottom and twenty years at the top. Where in the country the conduct happens is therefore the first thing that has to be settled, and this answer does not settle it. The drug offences do not reach tobacco, and the excise regime named for it carries a different kind of exposure that is not described. No quantity band applies on this record: a separate quantity instrument was searched alongside the list and returned no entry for this substance, so nothing in the national material read converts a weight into a tier. The penalty detail that follows is carried forward from this substance's own published entry on 2cb.com and was not re-derived from statute text in this pass, so it is reported as carried forward rather than asserted here: state-level Criminal Code article 195, illicit production and trafficking of narcotics, is charged for cross-entity or organized trafficking, with up to roughly 10 to 20 years for aggravated or organized forms and about 3 to 15 years base per secondary sources; possession for personal use is a misdemeanour under entity or district public-order law, for example the Brčko Law on Public Order article 31, a fine of about €250 to €750, with Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska equivalents, rather than the felony track, but each entity's criminal code can pursue felony charges for cultivation, sale, or possession beyond personal-use quantities; and the 2017 EUDA report notes the misdemeanour penalties do not vary by drug, recidivism or quantity. That published entry also states that the exact article and range a person faces depends on where in the country the offence occurs, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Republika Srpska versus Brčko, that article 195 at state level is the anchor, and that entity-level article numbers not confirmed there are not pinned. Every figure in that carried-forward detail is a penalty range or a fine and not one of them is a quantity threshold: the published entry itself says there is no uniform statutory gram threshold distinguishing personal use from intent to sell and that it varies by entity, which is the same absence recorded above and not a contradiction of it.
Georgia
Legal status
Tobacco is not carried on Georgia's narcotics lists and it is not therefore unregulated. The dossier records a separate regime finding: the annexes to Law No. 624 were searched with "tobacco" and supplied no entry, and the controls the dossier names instead are tobacco-control and excise legislation. The regime recorded instead is tobacco control together with excise, so the route is a fiscal one as much as a health one. The dossier records the regime by name and does not reproduce its provisions, so nothing here states what that regime requires. The final consolidated text was read on the Legislative Herald of Georgia, which the dossier calls Matsne, on 20 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Georgia has abolished the death penalty and the dossier records no capital route for any substance on these lists. Article 260 of the Criminal Code of Georgia, whose ceiling is life imprisonment for aggravated illegal circulation, operates on the narcotics lists, and this product has been established not to be on them, so no circulation offence reaches it, and the consequences are excise and product control consequences that the dossier names without reproducing. The quantity table that governs listed substances is not the instrument that applies to this row, and no penalty figure is given in this cell because the dossier names the regime without reproducing it. Nothing here says the product is free of control, only that the control is not the one Article 260 administers.
If prescribed / medical
The prescription position is deferred here rather than stated. No Georgian rule on a traveller carrying a prescribed supply has been established for this substance, so whether a foreign prescription is recognised has to be settled with the Georgian authorities before travel. The placement this row attaches is a regime rather than a list entry: the substance sits under tobacco-control and excise legislation. It is a consumer product rather than a dispensed one, so no prescription question arises.
Documentation
The dossier records no documentary requirement for Georgia and carries no column for one, so nothing is prescribed in this cell. What the row fixes is which regime was found to apply, tobacco-control and excise legislation, recorded after the narcotics lists had actually been searched. There is nothing to document, and the value of this row is that it records the search rather than assuming the answer. The record and its outcome were read on 20 September 2026 and this cell is dated 21 September 2026.
Georgia, Law No. 624 and its annexed Lists I to IV, with Article 260 of the Criminal Code of Georgia carrying the penalty ceiling · the annexes supplied no entry for this row, so the instrument that governs it is tobacco-control and excise legislation, recorded at GEO-85. Read in the final consolidated text on the Legislative Herald of Georgia, which the dossier calls Matsne, on 20 September 2026. The citation is to an excise and product control route, recorded after the lists had actually been searched. The set that produced this record is one term written twice, in lower case and in capitals, so it is a single name rather than two independent ones, and the record is only as wide as that name. No per row link exists in the dossier this cell is built from, which carries no web address for this substance or for any other, so the instrument is cited in prose and no address is given · Updated September 21, 2026
Armenia
Legal status
Governed in Armenia through tobacco-control and excise legislation rather than through the narcotics annex, and the cell is a finding about which body of law applies rather than a settled finding that the annex is silent. Record ARM-85 names that regime and describes the control as tobacco product controls, which is the positive half and it stands. The annex to Government Decision N 1129-Ն of 21 August 2003, at controlled lists 1 to 4, was also searched for this row and returned no accepted entry, and that is the negative half, which does not stand on its own. The version read was the current incorporation of N 1129-Ն read together with amendment N 334-Ն of 26 March 2026, which took effect on 27 March 2026. The limit of this record has to be on the face of it. The terms this row was searched under were «tobacco», all of them Latin script. Not one of the 186 search terms logged across the eighty eight rows of this dossier carries a single Armenian letter, while 39 of the 41 entries the same dossier accepts elsewhere are printed in Armenian script. A Latin search of an Armenian list returns nothing whether or not the substance is on it. So this record states what the logged search could reach, and it does not establish that the annex is silent about anything searched for that way. The 2 term set recorded for this row collapses to 1 string once case is ignored, so the breadth it appears to claim is not breadth. Two boundaries follow and both belong on the face of the cell. The regime is identified and the provision inside it is not, because the dossier names the legislation and no article, section or schedule within it. And the absence from the annex is not established, so nothing here says the substance could not turn out to be listed once the annex is searched in its own script. The instrument named is the tobacco control and excise legislation, which is a different label from the one the nicotine row of this same set carries, so the leaf and the molecule are recorded under two regimes.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Armenia has abolished the death penalty and Article 393 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia provides no life sentence for a drug offence, so the real exposure is a term of years. The 12 year ceiling under Article 393(3) would not be engaged if that absence holds, because the logged search returned no annex entry for tobacco and record ARM-85 names tobacco-control and excise legislation as the governing regime instead. Whatever control exists sits in that regime and carries that regime's own penalties, which this pass did not read. Excise and tobacco control carry their own penalties, and none of them is the narcotics ceiling.
If prescribed / medical
Armenia states no lawful personal use allowance for a scheduled substance, and Article 393(4) to (6) measures its significant, large and especially large bands from the minimum small amount figure the Government sets, which is a criminal threshold and never a traveller quota. A scheduled medicine must in addition satisfy the law on medicines, «Դեղերի մասին» Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենք, together with the prescription, packaging, import and customs rules that law carries. That is the country rule, and the placement it attaches to for tobacco is no accepted narcotics annex entry on the logged search, with the substance governed instead through tobacco-control and excise legislation, and no provision within that regime named. The dossier read for Armenia states no separate traveller allowance, no personal import quota and no per substance medical route, so none is stated here and anything beyond the country rule is left to the Armenian Ministry of Health. The enquiry belongs to customs and excise, because the regime named here is a tobacco control and excise one and personal import limits are set there.
Montenegro
Legal status
Not listed in Montenegro's narcotics and psychotropics schedule, and placed instead under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, where the dossier records its legal category as tobacco and excise regime. The Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, was searched for «duvan» and prints no row for it, and the instrument recorded as governing it instead is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama. The placement is in the tobacco control and excise regime, alongside the separate nicotine row in this table, so the drug offence ceiling printed down the dossier's own column does not attach here. The list is not the criminal code's to move. Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga gives it to the state administration body responsible for health and requires publication in the official gazette: «Spisak droga donosi organ državne uprave nadležan za poslove zdravlja... Spisak droga se objavljuje u Službenom listu Crne Gore.» The version read is the Prilog as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, read on 20 September 2026, and because Član 4 leaves the list with the health administration this does not rule out a later amendment.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Montenegro's criminal code carries no death penalty and the dossier records none. The ceiling it records is fifteen years under Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik, the aggravated drug offence, read with the Code's imprisonment rules, and that is the only criminal article this reading names. That ceiling belongs to the drug offence and this row is placed outside the drug regime, under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, so Article 300 is not stated here as this substance's exposure. The penalty provisions of Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama were not opened in this reading, so what a breach of that regime carries is not established, and the category recorded for it is tobacco and excise regime. No numerical lawful personal use threshold was found in the controlling Act or in the list, so there is no stated weight below which the question changes, and a reduced offence or an exclusion from one trafficking paragraph is not described here as a general lawful possession safe harbour. Separately from that, and carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry rather than re-derived from the Code in this pass: production, distribution or trafficking are reported at roughly two to fifteen years, the source given there being the United States State Department narcotics report, which also records that the individual paragraph ranges of Article 300(1) to (5) are not pinned in the sources it cites. The Article 300(6) offence of unlawfully making, acquiring, possessing, transporting or supplying equipment, material or substances knowing they are intended for narcotics production is reported at six months to five years. An addiction driven offender may receive mandatory treatment as a security measure to a maximum of three years, alongside or in place of imprisonment, and possession is reported as handled inside Article 300 with treatment diversion available. A foreigner faces expulsion for one to ten years or permanently. Every figure in this paragraph is a penalty band and none of them is a quantity threshold, which is the separate point made above. These bands describe the Article 300 drug offence, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Montenegro's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. What this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.
Kazakhstan
Legal status
Tobacco is not controlled by Kazakhstan's Resolution No. 470, on the version of the lists read for this row. Government Resolution No. 470 of 3 July 2019 approves three documents in all, the Список наркотических средств, психотропных веществ и прекурсоров, подлежащих контролю в Республике Казахстан, the Сводная таблица of sizes, a substituent list and a short list of veterinary medicines, and all three were searched. Tobacco is named nowhere in the Resolution. A search for табак across the Список, the Сводная таблица and the precursor schedule returns nothing, and the cultivation table names only the coca bush, khat, the opium poppy and ephedra. Tobacco in Kazakhstan is an excise and public health subject rather than a controlled substances one. Searches were anchored at the start of each entry name rather than run as free substring matches, because unanchored matching in this document produces false hits: the Russian for codeine matches acetyldihydrocodeine, the Russian for diazepam matches fludiazepam and the Russian for ephedrine matches cathine. The copy read carries the amendment of 24 February 2026 made by Government Resolution No. 111, and the Сводная таблица is wholly in that redaction, so every size quoted here is the 24 February 2026 text, and a later amendment adding this substance is expressly not ruled out. [Certain] that the substance is absent from all three lists as this version stands, the search having been re-run from the instrument in this pass.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Kazakhstan has abolished the death penalty. No capital punishment remains available anywhere in its Criminal Code, because the law of 29 December 2021 numbered 89-VII on abolition replaced the words carrying it in Article 11 with life imprisonment, and Article 46 now names life imprisonment as the heaviest penalty the Code holds. Because Resolution No. 470 does not reach tobacco, it sets no size bands for it and no threshold can be quoted, so nothing in the criminal ladder below attaches to this substance on the strength of this instrument. Criminal Code Article 296 governs handling without intent to supply. Part 2 reaches manufacture, processing, acquisition, storage and transport and carries a fine of up to 160 monthly calculation indices, corrective labour, community work or arrest of up to 40 days. Part 3 raises that to up to 200 indices or arrest of up to 50 days once the quantity is крупный. Part 4 is the first custodial rung and runs to three to seven years once the quantity is особо крупный. Part 1 deals separately with non-medical consumption in a public place. Supply is Article 297, at five to eight years with confiscation, rising through six to ten and seven to twelve to fifteen to twenty years for its aggravated parts, and Article 297-1, inserted by the amending law of 2 January 2025 No. 150-VIII, covers manufacture and processing for supply and reaches life imprisonment at its part 4. Every one of those rungs is read off a size band in the Сводная таблица, and for an unlisted substance there is no band to read. Article 296 also carries a note releasing from liability under that article a person who voluntarily hands the substance over, seeks medical help or actively assists in uncovering a related offence. [Likely] The Criminal Code articles and their year ranges in this cell were read from secondary consolidations rather than from an official publisher in this pass. Two independent consolidations agree on them, and the Code's own article text was not reached: the state portal served only its contents list. The abolition of the death penalty, by contrast, was confirmed against the Code itself and is tagged [Certain] where it appears.
Cuba
Legal status
Not controlled in Cuba as an illicit drug. Tobacco is not a «droga ilícita» for the purposes of articles 235 to 238 and Cuba is a tobacco producing state that regulates it as an agricultural and commercial product. Cuba operates no national list of controlled substances. The Código Penal creates the offences and names the subject matter only as «drogas ilícitas o sustancias de efectos similares», an undefined term. Across all 470,392 characters of the Code the words estupefaciente and psicotrópico appear zero times, and the only substances named anywhere are cocaína once and Cannabis, conocida por marihuana, twice.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Articles 235 to 238 do not apply to it, so no drug penalty attaches. No capital or life exposure arises from this substance as such, because articles 235 to 238 reach only «drogas ilícitas o sustancias de efectos similares» and this is not one. Article 235.2, which carries «privación perpetua de libertad o muerte», is engaged by the drug offences alone. The name was searched in Ley 151/2022 articles 235 to 238 and returned «sin entrada como droga ilícita».
If prescribed / medical
Article 236 begins «La simple tenencia de drogas ilícitas o sustancias de efectos similares sin la debida autorización o prescripción facultativa», so a substance held under a doctor's prescription is outside the possession offence. Article 237.1(a) punishes the authorised professional who prescribes or administers for purposes other than strictly therapeutic ones.
Documentation
Carry any prescribed medicine in its dispensed packaging with the prescription, because article 236 turns on whether the holder has «la debida autorización o prescripción facultativa». No Cuban traveller allowance was read for this cell, so no quantity is stated.
Cuba, Ley 151 de 2022, Código Penal, published in Gaceta Oficial No. 93 Ordinaria de 1ro. de septiembre de 2022 and in force from 1 December 2022, articles 235 to 238 and articles 33 and 34 · read from the Gaceta Oficial de la República de Cuba PDF, 141 pages, 907,882 bytes, located by walking the gazette's own search rather than by constructing an identifier · gacetaoficial.gob.cu · Provenance of this revision: consequences_street was re-authored in this pass from research/dossiers/Cuba_2cb_88_REBUILT_2026-09-20.docx. The other four fields are carried unchanged from the entry published before this batch, including the Gaceta Oficial reading described above, which was NOT re-performed in this pass. · Updated September 21, 2026
Guyana
Legal status
Not assigned a controlled drug offence in Guyana. The scope search recorded for this row against the First and Second Schedules to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, Cap. 10:10 is «tabaco», and the dossier records the result as a scope finding: this substance is not placed in those Schedules and the Act's trafficking offence does not reach it. Tobacco is regulated by its own statute, with duty, packaging, advertising and public place rules, and this cell reserves all of it. That is a finding about this Act and about nothing else. Separate product, excise, tobacco, food and medicines law is expressly reserved, and the dossier does not describe it. The scope search was recorded on 20 September 2026.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Guyana's Cap. 10:10 carries no death penalty at any tier; section 5(1) sets the indictable trafficking ceiling at life imprisonment, so the worst outcome this Act reaches is a life sentence. This row does not reach even that, because no criminal controlled drug ceiling is assigned to it at all. Customs allowances on tobacco are the practical constraint for a traveller and they are not in this Act. The consequence is not that the substance is unregulated. It is that the regulation, whatever it amounts to, sits outside the criminal drug statute the dossier read, in law the dossier did not examine.
If prescribed / medical
Not a controlled drug question in Guyana, so there is no schedule placement for a prescription to be measured against. Tobacco is not a prescribed medicine, so the prescription question does not arise. The dossier carries no Guyanese prescription rule, import permit or personal allowance in any event, so nothing here should be read as a customs or duty allowance.
Documentation
Customs declaration limits, not narcotics paperwork, are what apply. The scope finding recorded for this row was read on 20 September 2026 against «tabaco». Because the reserved law was never examined, the honest position is that this cell tells you what the drug statute does not do and not what any other statute does.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, Cap. 10:10, First and Second Schedules, read for this row as a scope finding rather than a placement · the term searched is «tabaco» and the row boundary the dossier records for that search is «reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty.» · read at https://mola.gov.gy/laws-of-guyana, the Ministry of Legal Affairs Laws of Guyana collection. The citation behind this cell is document level and not per substance. The source document carries exactly one hyperlink target for all 88 of its rows, and what it calls a links column holds constructed text such as «tobacco schedule | tobacco penalty» rather than a web address, so no page, paragraph or deep link exists for this row and none is invented here. Many of the dossier's entry and search strings are recorded in Spanish language or international nonproprietary form rather than in the English wording a Guyanese statute prints, so every string here is reproduced exactly as the dossier holds it and is not offered as the literal printed text of the Schedules · Updated September 21, 2026
Bahamas
Legal status
Not listed in the Schedule to the Dangerous Drugs Act (Application) Order, 1994 (S.I. 77 of 1994) as those schedules stand after S.I. 50 of 1996, and not named in section 6 or section 11(1) of the Dangerous Drugs Act, Chapter 228. Searched case insensitively across all three held instruments for tobacco, for nicotiana and for cigarette: zero hits in every one, including the 2024 draft Order. There is no nearest entry to reject. Tobacco is not a dangerous drug under Chapter 228 and is dealt with by tobacco control and excise law that was not read for this cell.
Consequences if caught
No offence under Chapter 228 attaches to a substance that neither the Act nor the Application Order reaches, because every offence in the Act is framed around a drug to which the Act or a Part of it applies. One offence is still capable of applying: section 29(1)(f) with section 29(10) makes it an offence to solicit a person for the purpose of selling a dangerous drug, or to obtain money by representing that a substance is a dangerous drug when it is not.
If prescribed / medical
Chapter 228 does not reach it, so no authority under section 24 of that Act is needed to hold it. Chapter 228 is not the only law that can apply. The Pharmacy Act, the medicines law and the food and excise law of The Bahamas were not read for this cell and may regulate manufacture, sale or import independently of the drugs Act.
Documentation
A traveller carrying it into The Bahamas is not carrying a drug to which Chapter 228 applies on the reading above, but should expect the question to be settled at the border by the substance rather than by the brand name on the packet. No Ministerial Order later than S.I. 50 of 1996 was read for this cell, so a later addition by Order under section 6, section 11(3) or section 12(3) of the Act is not excluded. The Dangerous Drugs (Application) Order, 2024 was read and is not relied on: it carries no Statutory Instrument number, no signature and a blank execution block reading Made this day of 2024, and the Bahamas legislation portal serves it from its Bills directory rather than its subsidiary legislation directory.
Dangerous Drugs Act, Chapter 228, Statute Law of The Bahamas, LRO 1/2017 · laws.bahamas.gov.bs · Dangerous Drugs Act (Application) Order, 1994, S.I. 77 of 1994 as amended by S.I. 50 of 1996 · laws.bahamas.gov.bs · Dangerous Drugs (Application) Order, 2024, an unexecuted draft that the Bahamas legislation portal serves from its Bills directory, read but not relied on · Updated October 2, 2026
Lebanon
Legal status
Not a controlled substance under Law 673 of 16 March 1998 on the version read: it is not named in the four tables annexed to that Law, as those tables stand after Decree 343 of 16 May 2025, the last table change the publisher records, read on 22 September 2026 in the Ministry of Public Health consolidated annex carrying the seventh modification of January 2019 and in the Lebanese University consolidation note. It falls outside the narcotics law and is regulated in Lebanon under its tobacco control law rather than as a controlled substance.
Consequences if caught
No tobacco entry and no nicotine entry appears in any of the four tables, and no Nicotiana species is named. Article 124 confines the penal part of Law 673 to the plants and substances placed under control, and article 11's cultivation prohibition names the cannabis plant, the opium poppy and the coca plant. Lebanon regulates tobacco separately, and that regime was not read for this cell. Article 124 of Law 673 of 16 March 1998 on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors opens the penal part by confining it to the plants and substances placed under control and by dividing them into the highly dangerous substances of Tables 1 and 2, the dangerous substances of Table 3 and the precursors of Table 4. Article 125 punishes the Table 1 and Table 2 offences with hard labour for life and a fine of 25,000,000 to 100,000,000 Lebanese pounds. Article 128 punishes the Table 3 offences with hard labour not exceeding five years and a fine of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Lebanese pounds. Article 127 punishes a small quantity of a Table 1 or Table 2 substance held for personal use with three months to three years and a fine of 2,000,000 to 5,000,000 Lebanese pounds, and article 130 punishes the Table 3 equivalent with two months to two years and a fine of 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 Lebanese pounds. None of those articles states a quantity threshold. Article 150 doubles the maximum penalty in a list of aggravating cases that includes organising, directing or financing the offence, repeat offending, membership of an international smuggling ring, use of violence or a weapon, holding public office, working in health care, and supplying the drug to a minor. Article 148 gives the accomplice, the instigator and the intervener the penalty fixed for the principal. Article 155 makes confiscation of the substance and of the vehicles, equipment and other movable property used or prepared for the offence mandatory in every case. Article 152 lets the court expel a convicted foreign national from Lebanon permanently in felony and repeat misdemeanour cases, and remove him for one to five years in a misdemeanour case, taking him to the border once the prison term has run. Article 159 converts an unpaid fine into one day's imprisonment for every 25,000 Lebanese pounds. Article 161 bars suspension, splitting, day release, early release and conditional release during the first two thirds of any unsuspended sentence of a year or more. Articles 182 to 190 carry the treatment route the cell this replaces described: a user may come forward before any prosecution, article 189 exempts him from prosecution and puts the cost on the State once the addiction committee certifies his recovery, and article 190 arranges the aftercare. Articles 193 to 195 extend the same route into an investigation or a trial, with proceedings stayed definitively on recovery, and article 197 applies the articles 127 and 130 penalties where treatment is refused. Law 673 puts no capital penalty on any drug offence, and the one death penalty in it, article 140, attaches to killing a public official enforcing the Law or to an assault on one that causes a death. The cell this replaces stated that use or possession for personal use is punished by up to about 6 months' imprisonment plus a fine. That figure is carried here from the cell it replaces and it is not supported by the text: article 127 sets three months to three years, and article 130 sets two months to two years. The same cell put the treatment route at arts 182 to 190, which is right as far as it goes, and the route in fact runs to article 200. Its description of enforcement as uneven and of the treatment diversion as only partly implemented is carried forward from that cell and was not re-derived here. The figures above are Lebanon's published drug penalties, but this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Lebanon's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure.
Tunisia
Legal status
Not confirmed, status not individually verified; confirm with Tunisia's authorities (Law No. 92-52 of 18 May 1992, 'Law 52' / 'Law 92-52') / your embassy
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not named in the cited Tunisian source (Law No. 92-52 of 18 May 1992 on Narcotics, 'Law 52' / 'Law 92-52', as amended April 2017), do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Tunisia, drugs fall under Law No. 92-52 of 18 May 1992 on Narcotics ('Law 52' / 'Law 92-52'), as amended in April 2017. Use or possession for personal use carries 1-5 years' imprisonment plus a fine of 1,000-3,000 dinars; the April 2017 reform removed the mandatory-minimum sentence for a first offence and gave judges sentencing discretion for first and second offences (previously a near-automatic minimum applied). Cultivation or distribution carries 6-10 years plus a fine of 5,000-10,000 TND. Offences linked to organized gangs or smuggling carry 20 years to life imprisonment plus a fine of 100,000-1,000,000 TND.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Tunisia, drugs fall under Law No. 92-52 of 18 May 1992 on Narcotics ('Law 52' / 'Law 92-52'), as amended in April 2017. Use or possession for personal use carries 1-5 years' imprisonment plus a fine of 1,000-3,000 dinars; the April 2017 reform removed the mandatory-minimum sentence for a first offence and gave judges sentencing discretion for first and second offences (previously a near-automatic minimum applied). Cultivation or distribution carries 6-10 years plus a fine of 5,000-10,000 TND. Offences linked to organized gangs or smuggling carry 20 years to life imprisonment plus a fine of 100,000-1,000,000 TND. Cannabis is controlled under the same Law 92-52 framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime asserted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law No. 92-52 of 18 May 1992 on Narcotics ("Law 52" / "Law 92-52"), as amended in April 2017 · UNODC SHERLOC legal database (statute named in free text) · sherloc.unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Cyprus
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law of 1977 (Law No. 29(I)/1977, as amended) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Cyprus is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Cyprus's drug schedule; the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law of 1977 (Law No. 29(I)/1977, as amended) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Cyprus, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law of 1977 (Law No. 29(I)/1977), as amended, which sorts controlled substances into Classes A, B and C. Personal possession is a criminal offence, punishable by up to 12 years for a Class A drug, up to 8 years for Class B, and up to 4 years for Class C, though small-cannabis first offences in practice draw fines of about €400-1,000. Since 2003, possession at or above set quantities, three or more cannabis plants, 30 g or more of cannabis, or 10 g or more of prepared cocaine or opium, raises a presumption of intent to supply. Trafficking of a Class A or Class B drug is punishable by up to life imprisonment (a maximum not yet imposed in practice), and Class C trafficking by up to 8 years.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Cyprus, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law of 1977 (Law No. 29(I)/1977), as amended, which sorts controlled substances into Classes A, B and C. Personal possession is a criminal offence, punishable by up to 12 years for a Class A drug, up to 8 years for Class B, and up to 4 years for Class C, though small-cannabis first offences in practice draw fines of about €400-1,000. Since 2003, possession at or above set quantities, three or more cannabis plants, 30 g or more of cannabis, or 10 g or more of prepared cocaine or opium, raises a presumption of intent to supply. Trafficking of a Class A or Class B drug is punishable by up to life imprisonment (a maximum not yet imposed in practice), and Class C trafficking by up to 8 years. Cannabis is a Class B drug; recreational use is illegal and only a limited medical-cannabis framework exists. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law of 1977 (Law No. 29(I)/1977), as amended (classes A/B/C) · naac.org.cy · Updated July 14, 2026
Iceland
Legal status
Not a controlled substance in Iceland's narcotics list. Tobacco is not named in Fylgiskjal I, searched as tobacco, tóbak and Nicotiana, and it is not named in Fylgiskjal II or in the 6. gr. list of lög nr. 65/1974. The contrast with the other listed plants is worth holding. Iceland brings Cannabis, Khat with all parts of the plant, Kratom, Salvia divinorum, Poppy straw and cacti containing mescaline into the instrument by name or by description, so it does list plants when it means to, and it has not listed tobacco. Tobacco is governed by its own control legislation, which was not read for this cell.
Consequences if caught
The 2. gr. prohibition and the offence in 5. gr. of lög nr. 65/1974 both bite on a substance the instruments reach, and this row is not one of them. Iceland's published drug penalties are set out next so the reader can see what the narcotics regime does carry. The custodial ceiling for an offence against the Act and against the regulations made under it is imprisonment for up to 6 years, which 5. gr. of lög nr. 65/1974, the Narcotics Act, prints as "fangelsi allt að 6 árum", and the aggravated offence at article 173a of almenn hegningarlög nr. 19/1940, the General Penal Code, carries imprisonment for up to 12 years. Iceland prints no quantity band: neither the Act nor the reglugerð sets a weight, a purity or a number of doses that moves an offence from one tier to another, and article 173a turns instead on supplying narcotics to many people, on handing them over for substantial payment, or on doing so in another particularly culpable way, its second paragraph extending the same ceiling to production, preparation, import, export, purchase, delivery, receipt and possession carried out for that purpose. The fine is separate again: 5. gr. of lög nr. 65/1974 sets a fine as the alternative to imprisonment for the base offence, the same article makes the substances, the proceeds of unlawful sale and the articles used forfeit to the Treasury, and it directs increased punishment for a repeat offence involving import or distribution. The 12 year ceiling is not the original figure: 1. gr. of lög nr. 32/2001 raised the aggravated ceiling from 10 to 12 years at article 173a of the General Penal Code, where 10 years had stood since lög nr. 64/1974, and that Act prints the substitution as "kemur: 12 árum". Possession is unlawful and consumption is not among the conduct the two instruments enumerate. 2. gr. of lög nr. 65/1974 and 2. gr. of the reglugerð, headed "Bannákvæði", both list import, export, sale, purchase, exchange, delivery, receipt, production, preparation and possession, and neither of them prints consumption in that list. Iceland has not decriminalised possession. What it has done instead is 2. gr. a of the Act, inserted by lög nr. 48/2020 and amended by lög nr. 41/2025, which lets the Directorate of Health licence a "neyslurými", a supervised consumption room governed by reglugerð nr. 170/2021, in which a user may hold the quantity he intends to consume there. Those figures are Iceland's and not this substance's: this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Iceland's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. The list read for this cell is Fylgiskjal I of reglugerð nr. 233/2001, read at api.reglugerd.is on 22 September 2026 in the consolidation the publisher serves as current, which carries amendments 1 to 19 and its own last amendment date of 9 August 2025 from reglugerð nr. 879/2025. That consolidation is one amendment behind the law and this cell says so: the 20th amendment, reglugerð nr. 1036/2025, is flagged pending by the publisher although its own 3. gr. commences it on 1 November 2025, and the two texts of 5. gr. visibly differ, the served one opening at pharmacy stock sent to Lyfjastofnun and the amending one opening at the holder of a pharmacy, wholesale or manufacturing licence. It was read in full and it rewrites 5. gr. and the heading of 7. gr. and nothing else, leaving both Fylgiskjöl untouched and printing no transitory article. The Act and the penal code were read in the Lagasafn consolidation stamped "Íslensk lög 1. september 2026", útgáfa 157c, whose own note records that lög nr. 85/2026 will amend the Act from 1 January 2027; that Act was read and its 51. gr. only renames the authority in 2. gr. b. A scan of the 360 regulations the publisher issued between 27 November 2025 and 7 September 2026 found no further amendment, so this cell does not rule out a later change to the list.
Luxembourg
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Narcotics Law of 1973 (as amended by the Law of 10 July 2023) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Luxembourg is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Luxembourg's drug schedule; the Narcotics Law of 1973 (as amended by the Law of 10 July 2023) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Luxembourg, drugs fall under the Narcotics Law of 1973, amended by the Law of 10 July 2023. For drugs other than cannabis, possession remains criminal under the 1973 law, minor possession draws imprisonment of 8 days to 6 months plus fines, and trafficking and large-scale supply carry heavier penalties under the separate provisions of that law.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Luxembourg, drugs fall under the Narcotics Law of 1973, amended by the Law of 10 July 2023. For drugs other than cannabis, possession remains criminal under the 1973 law, minor possession draws imprisonment of 8 days to 6 months plus fines, and trafficking and large-scale supply carry heavier penalties under the separate provisions of that law. For cannabis specifically, the Law of 10 July 2023 legalised home cultivation of up to four plants per household and private consumption at home for adults; public possession of 3 g or less draws a €145 administrative fine with no criminal record. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law of 10 July 2023 amending the Narcotics Law of 19 February 1973 · police.public.lu · Updated July 14, 2026
Malta
Legal status
Neither Maltese drug ordinance governs tobacco. Malta runs two drug ordinances and a cell that answers from one when the substance sits in the other is wrong. For this item the answer is that it sits outside both: it is not a single scheduled drug classification under the Medical and Kindred Professions Ordinance, Chapter 31, or the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Chapter 101. The two drug schedules contain no tobacco entry. Tobacco is outside the two controlled-drug ordinances assessed here, while separate tobacco-control legislation is not answered by this dossier. The legislation this row did not read, and which may still govern the item, is named by the source itself: medicines, pharmacy, veterinary, poisons, tobacco, alcohol, food, product safety and driving law.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Malta has no death penalty and no Maltese drug offence can bring one. No penalty ceiling and no Chapter 537 diversion analysis applies to tobacco within this two ordinance question, because it is not a single scheduled drug classification under either ordinance. There is accordingly no article to quote, since the articles that carry the ceilings, Chapter 101 article 22 and Chapter 31 article 120A, operate on scheduled drugs. Other Maltese legislation may impose its own consequences and was not read for this row.
If prescribed / medical
No prescribing consequence follows from the two drug ordinances for tobacco, because neither schedules it, and there is no control here for a prescription to lift. The two ordinance question is the wrong question to ask about this item. Whatever rules govern it in Malta sit in other legislation, which was not read for this row, and the dossier says in terms that it ‘did not attempt to decide separate medicines, pharmacy, veterinary, poisons, tobacco, alcohol, food, product-safety, or driving laws’. Nothing in this cell should be read as saying the item is unregulated.
Not a controlled drug for the purposes of Articles 31 to 34 of the Ley Reguladora de las Actividades Relativas a las Drogas, Decreto Legislativo 153 of 2 October 2003. Article 2's third paragraph provides that alcoholic drinks, tobacco, and solvents and inhalants, although within this subject matter, are to be regulated by special laws: «Las bebidas alcohólicas, el tabaco, y los solventes e inhalantes, no obstante estar enmarcadas dentro de esta materia, serán reguladas por leyes especiales.» Tobacco is also not named in the Listado de sustancias estupefacientes, psicotropicos, precursores y agregados 2026, approved by Acuerdo SI.2026.03.20-01 of the Superintendencia de Regulacion Sanitaria. Article 2's third paragraph names el tabaco in the same sentence as alcoholic drinks, so the leaf product is reserved to special laws by name, which is not true of the alkaloid row beside it.
Consequences if caught
Article 2's third paragraph names el tabaco in the same sentence as alcoholic drinks, so the leaf product is reserved to special laws by name, which is not true of the alkaloid row beside it. Tobacco is outside the offences that Articles 31, 33 and 34 create, and the penalties below are set out because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as El Salvador's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. Article 34 divides possession from trafficking by a 2 gram line: possession of under 2 grams carries 1 to 3 years, possession of 2 grams or more carries 3 to 6 years, and possession of any quantity with the object of doing anything Article 33 lists carries 6 to 10 years. Article 34 closes by providing that it does not apply where the conduct fits a graver offence. There is no personal use exemption anywhere in the Ley. Article 31 sets 5 to 15 years for sowing, cultivating or harvesting, and Article 33 sets 10 to 15 years for acquiring, transferring, importing, exporting, storing, transporting, distributing, supplying or selling. Article 33's second paragraph raises the trafficking penalty by one third of the stated maximum where the act is international trafficking, so the ceiling on that route is 20 years, and Article 54 allows a court to raise the penalty by up to one third of the maximum on any of nine listed aggravating circumstances, which is a discretion and not the mandatory increase Article 33 creates. Article 55 allows the penalty to be cut to half the minimum where the accused names others or enables a seizure. The ceiling on every one of these routes is imprisonment, because the severest sanction is constitutionally barred for ordinary offences in El Salvador, so no offence in this Ley carries it. The Ley creates no lawful recreational regime and no medical regime for any substance it reaches, cannabis included: Article 3's final paragraph permits a listed substance to be imported, produced, made, extracted, possessed or used only in the quantities strictly necessary for scientific research, for making medicines, for medical treatment or for making products of industrial use, and only with the health regulator's authorisation. On the fine, the Sala de lo Constitucional struck the multa in each of these three articles as a penal consequence, Article 34 by the accumulated 2006 judgments published on 22 October 2007, Article 33 by the 92-2007 judgments published on 19 August 2009 and Article 31 by judgment 45-2010 published on 23 October 2013, so no fine now attaches to cultivation, trafficking or possession under this Ley. On quantity, the 2 gram line in Article 34 is the only weight the Ley fixes; it sets no substance by substance threshold and no quantity table, so the same 2 grams applies whatever the substance is. The 2 gram line and the bands of 1 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 10, 5 to 15 and 10 to 15 years and the one third increase are carried forward from the live cell and were re-read against the Asamblea Legislativa text for this pass; the Article 34 graver offence proviso, the Article 54 and Article 55 provisions and the three unconstitutionality rulings are new to this cell.
Honduras
Legal status
Not a controlled drug for the purposes of Articles 311 to 313 of the Código Penal. Tobacco, searched also as Nicotiana tabacum, is not named in Listas I, II or IV of the 1961 Convention or in Listas I to IV of the 1971 Convention, which Article 321 makes the closed definition of droga, estupefaciente o sustancia psicotrópica: «Por droga, estupefaciente o sustancia psicotrópica, se entiende cualquiera de las sustancias incluidas en las Listas I, II y IV de la Convención Única y sus Protocolos de Naciones Unidas sobre estupefacientes, hecha en Nueva York de 1961 y en las Listas I, II, III y IV del Convenio y sus Protocolos de Naciones Unidas sobre sustancias psicotrópicas, hecho en Viena, el 21 de febrero de 1971.» Nothing in the surviving definitions in Article 5 of Decreto 126/89 reaches it either, because those definitions name particular substances and close their groups on chemical families this row does not belong to.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco is outside the offence that Articles 311 to 313 of the Código Penal create. What distinguishes this row is that the plant is absent, and so is the alkaloid that this corpus carries a separate row for. Art. 311 sets 4 to 7 years where the drug does not cause grave harm to health and 7 to 10 years in every other case. The fine under Art. 311 is 100 to 500 days. Art. 311's second paragraph allows 1 to 3 years or 2 to 5 years instead where the facts and the offender's own circumstances show lesser gravity, and that reduction is closed once an Art. 312 aggravator applies. Art. 312 replaces those terms with 10 to 15 years and a fine of 300 to 500 days on any of nine listed aggravators, and adds a further third where the organised group aggravator meets either the special quantity or the extraordinary transport one. Art. 313 cuts the Art. 311 first paragraph terms and the Art. 312 terms by a third on confession or on cooperation with the authorities. Art. 321 sets the special quantity in five categories, of marihuana, hashish, cocaine, opium and synthetic drug, none of which is engaged by this row. Art. 26 of Decreto 126/89, which set a first offence internment of up to 30 days in a rehabilitation centre with a fine, was repealed by Art. 632 of the Código Penal, which repeals Arts 16 to 30 and 41 of that law by name, so the 30 day figure is corrected here rather than restated. Nothing replaced it inside the Code's drug chapter, and Art. 311 reaches possession only where the substance is held for the purposes that article lists, so neither the Código Penal nor Decreto 126/89 as it now stands fixes a personal use quantity or a personal use measure. Those are the two instruments read for this cell, and other Honduran law was not searched for one. The Art. 311 bands of 4 to 7 and 7 to 10 years, the Art. 312 band of 10 to 15 years and the 30 day figure from Art. 26 are carried forward from the live cell and not re-derived here, and this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Honduras's published drug penalties and not as this substance's exposure. The Art. 311 fine, the lesser gravity terms, Art. 313 and the Art. 321 quantities are read from the Gaceta text and are new to this cell.
Maldives
Legal status
Tobacco is subject to a generational prohibition in the Maldives: effective 1 November 2025, anyone born on or after 1 January 2007 is permanently barred from buying, using or possessing tobacco in any form. The Ministry of Health's generational tobacco ban applies to residents and foreign visitors alike, making the Maldives the first country worldwide to bring a generational tobacco prohibition into force (the Maldives separately bans e-cigarettes and vapes for all ages).
Consequences if caught
The prohibition binds tourists as well as residents, a genuine traveler trap; retailers must verify age and selling to a person within the banned birth cohort carries a fine of MVR 50,000 (about USD 3,200).
If prescribed / medical
n/a, tobacco is not a prescription product.
Documentation
Age verification required at point of sale; the ban covers all forms of tobacco.
Not confirmed, the Law on Campaign Against Intoxicants, Drugs and their Control (with the 2005 Counter-Narcotics Law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Afghanistan is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Afghanistan's drug schedule; the Law on Campaign Against Intoxicants, Drugs and their Control (with the 2005 Counter-Narcotics Law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Afghanistan, drugs fall under the Law on Campaign Against Intoxicants, Drugs and their Control (with the 2005 Counter-Narcotics Law). Trafficking penalties are graduated by weight: trafficking heroin, morphine or cocaine caps at 20 years (Art. 42), and the largest quantities reach life imprisonment, the named statute's drug-trafficking ceiling is imprisonment. Drug use carries roughly a short prison term (about 3 months). Enforcement since 2021 under the de facto authorities is opaque and may diverge from the statute on the books; any sanction beyond what the named statute provides is not confirmed here, verify against current practice.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Afghanistan, drugs fall under the Law on Campaign Against Intoxicants, Drugs and their Control (with the 2005 Counter-Narcotics Law). Trafficking penalties are graduated by weight: trafficking heroin, morphine or cocaine caps at 20 years (Art. 42), and the largest quantities reach life imprisonment, the named statute's drug-trafficking ceiling is imprisonment. Drug use carries roughly a short prison term (about 3 months). Enforcement since 2021 under the de facto authorities is opaque and may diverge from the statute on the books; any sanction beyond what the named statute provides is not confirmed here, verify against current practice. Cannabis is controlled under the same framework; cultivation and trafficking are prohibited, with penalties graduated by weight up to imprisonment. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law on Campaign Against Intoxicants, Drugs and their Control (Arts 41-47) + the 2005 Counter-Narcotics Law · sherloc.unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Belarus
Legal status
Tobacco is regulated in Belarus, and it is regulated somewhere other than the narcotics annexes. The route is tobacco-control and excise legislation, which carries tobacco product controls. Tobacco is reached through tobacco control and excise legislation, which governs the product, its packaging, its sale and its taxation. The narcotics annexes were searched and returned no accepted row. The annexes to Постановление Министерства здравоохранения № 19 от 11 февраля 2015 г. республиканский перечень were searched on "tobacco", "TOBACCO" at № 19/2015 with the official 2025 and 10 March 2026 amendments and returned no accepted entry, and that absence is recorded as a finding about where the regulation sits rather than as a finding that nothing regulates it. Record BEL-85. The negative half of that cross check carries a limit worth stating: the terms just quoted are in Latin script, as all eighty eight search sets in this source are, while the entries the source accepts elsewhere are mostly printed in Cyrillic, so a Latin search of a Cyrillic annex can return nothing whether or not the substance is on it.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Belarus retains capital punishment in its general criminal law, and that is a separate question from what a drug offence carries. Criminal Code Article 328 provides neither the death penalty nor life imprisonment, so a term of years is the whole of the drug scale here. The figure itself is disputed and the dispute is stated rather than hidden: this repair reads Article 328(5) as a twenty year ceiling, the cell it replaces read the same paragraph as twelve to twenty five years, and the sources reachable here do not settle which reading is right. The earlier cell also framed the offence as articles 327 to 328 with a superscript one, a range this repair does not mention at all, so treat the article range as well as the figure as open. That scale attaches to an offence in a substance the narcotics annexes list, and this row is not one of them. Tobacco sits under tobacco-control and excise legislation at record BEL-85, so Article 328 does not engage on the footing that this substance is scheduled. What applies instead are the offence and penalty provisions of that separate regime, which are product, licensing and supply rules rather than narcotics rules, and this cell does not state a figure for them because the source does not carry one. The applicable rules are product, packaging, sale and excise rules, and the enforcement risk is administrative rather than criminal on this record.
If prescribed / medical
The traveller rule is stated at country level and it is the same for every substance in this set: Belarus provides no lawful personal use allowance for a scheduled drug and no traveller exemption, and a scheduled medicine has to satisfy Закон Республики Беларусь «О лекарственных средствах» as well as the narcotics annexes. This row's placement is outside those annexes and inside tobacco-control and excise legislation, record BEL-85, so what a traveller has to satisfy is that regime's own requirements, tobacco product controls. The source states no medical route specific to tobacco and none is supplied here. There is no schedule placement to attach, and what applies is excise and product law.
Kyrgyzstan
Legal status
Not confirmed. The dossier classes tobacco as not applicable to the drug lists: «tobacco» was searched in the controlled list and in the narcotic, psychotropic and plant tables of the criteria and sizes annex of Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 152 of 26 March 2025, as checked on 18 September 2026, and no controlled drug entry was returned; Criminal Code articles 282 to 284 did not convert the term into a listed narcotic or psychotropic substance. That is a finding about the drug lists read, not an answer on how tobacco is otherwise regulated in Kyrgyzstan, and the dossier treats other regulatory regimes as outside its scope.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The dossier records for this row that no death penalty applies to the drug offences in Criminal Code articles 282 to 284. No other penalty is stated for tobacco. The dossier found no drug list entry for it and did not read any other regime that might apply.
If prescribed / medical
No prescription route is stated for tobacco, because the dossier did not read medicines law.
Documentation
No traveller rule is stated for tobacco. The dossier records no open point within the drug list framework and treats other regulatory regimes as outside its scope.
Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 152 of 26 March 2025, controlled list and criteria and sizes annex, with Criminal Code articles 282 to 284, as checked on 18 September 2026 · cbd.minjust.gov.kg · Updated October 3, 2026
Uzbekistan
Legal status
Legal for adults in Uzbekistan, with an age limit of twenty one and a ban on some forms. Tobacco is not a controlled drug: it is not named in Lists I to IV of Resolution 330 or in the potent substance list of Resolution No. 818, read on 3 October 2026, and that does not rule out a later amendment [Certain]. Article 21 of Law ZRU-844 of 24 May 2023 forbids selling tobacco products «йигирма бир ёшга тўлмаган шахсларга» (to persons under twenty one) [Certain]. Since 1 March 2026 article 37 bans non smoked tobacco such as tobacco snus, and every e-cigarette, from import and possession, with an exception for nasvay inside the country [Certain].
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan of 30 April 2023 provides «Ўзбекистон Республикасида ўлим жазоси тақиқланади», in the Russian text «В Республике Узбекистан смертная казнь запрещается» (the death penalty is prohibited in the Republic of Uzbekistan), read in both texts on lex.uz on 3 October 2026 [Certain]. Smoking in the public places listed in article 24 of Law ZRU-844, among them restaurants, transport, stations, parks and the entrances to stations and airports, is banned, and Administrative Code article 56-1 fines it at one third of the base calculation amount, or twice the base amount on an aircraft [Certain]. Possessing banned tobacco products is an administrative offence under article 186-1 of the Administrative Code, and in a considerable amount or after a penalty a crime under article 186-1 of the Criminal Code, set out in the nicotine row [Certain].
If prescribed / medical
Not applicable.
Documentation
Cigarettes, cigars and heated tobacco may be carried; the duty free quantity for a traveller was not read in this run. Do not carry snus or any vape [Certain that they are banned].
Law ZRU-844 of 24 May 2023, articles 21, 24 and 37, read on 3 October 2026 · lex.uz · Administrative Code articles 56-1 and 186-1 · Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 330 of 12 November 2015, annexes 4 to 7 (Lists I to IV) and their notes, read on 3 October 2026 · lex.uz · lex.uz · Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, articles 270 to 276 and 276-1 to 276-13 as restated or added by Law ZRU-1151 of 11 June 2026 · Updated October 3, 2026
Tanzania
Legal status
Not confirmed. The dossier assigns tobacco to the Tobacco Products (Regulation) Act 2003, but the row quotes no clause of that instrument: its quotation column reads 'The separate regime regulates "tobacco" as a beverage, tobacco product or medicine.', a sentence written for the dossier rather than text of the law, so the placement is not established from it.
Consequences if caught
No penalty is stated for tobacco in this cell, because the instrument and the offence that would govern it are not established from the dossier row.
If prescribed / medical
The source this cell rests on does not state a prescription route for tobacco.
Documentation
Search record, from the dossier row checked on 20 September 2026: 'tobacco is governed by Tobacco Products (Regulation) Act 2003; the narcotics schedules cited for Tanzania do not themselves list it.' The row cites no section of that regime and quotes none of its text. The previous cell named the Drug Control and Enforcement Act No. 5 of 2015 as the governing drug law for tobacco; the dossier instead assigns tobacco to the regime named above, and neither placement is established here.
Tobacco Products (Regulation) Act 2003, as named in the dossier · tmda.go.tz · Updated October 3, 2026
Azerbaijan
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Code (adopted 30 December 1999, in force 1 September 2000) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Azerbaijan is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Azerbaijan's drug schedule; the Criminal Code (adopted 30 December 1999, in force 1 September 2000) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Azerbaijan, drugs fall under the Criminal Code (adopted 30 December 1999, in force 1 September 2000). Illegal acquisition and possession of narcotic or psychotropic substances without intent to sell is the lower tier (Art. 234), while illegal manufacture, production, sale and trafficking (Art. 235), cultivation (Art. 237) and related conduct (Art. 240) escalate with quantity and aggravating factors, the Code's punishment ceiling being life imprisonment. Penalties were tightened by 2022 amendments to Articles 235, 237 and 240.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Azerbaijan, drugs fall under the Criminal Code (adopted 30 December 1999, in force 1 September 2000). Illegal acquisition and possession of narcotic or psychotropic substances without intent to sell is the lower tier (Art. 234), while illegal manufacture, production, sale and trafficking (Art. 235), cultivation (Art. 237) and related conduct (Art. 240) escalate with quantity and aggravating factors, the Code's punishment ceiling being life imprisonment. Penalties were tightened by 2022 amendments to Articles 235, 237 and 240. Cannabis is controlled under the same Criminal Code framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of Azerbaijan (adopted 30 December 1999, in force 1 September 2000), Arts 234/235/237/240 · track.unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Mongolia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised, in force 1 July 2017) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Mongolia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Mongolia's drug schedule; the Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised, in force 1 July 2017) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Mongolia, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised, in force 1 July 2017). The core offences are drug trafficking, the illegal manufacture, sale or distribution of drugs, and drug possession; trafficking carries imprisonment up to life, while use or possession of small amounts carries lesser imprisonment. Mongolia's drug law does not provide a life-or-higher term for simple use; trafficking is the serious tier.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Mongolia, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised, in force 1 July 2017). The core offences are drug trafficking, the illegal manufacture, sale or distribution of drugs, and drug possession; trafficking carries imprisonment up to life, while use or possession of small amounts carries lesser imprisonment. Mongolia's drug law does not provide a life-or-higher term for simple use; trafficking is the serious tier. Cannabis is controlled under the same Criminal Code framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised, in force 1 July 2017) · legalinfo.mn · Updated July 14, 2026
Moldova
Legal status
Tobacco is not on Moldova's narcotic and psychotropic lists, and this cell states that as a finding rather than as a gap. The repair searched Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 79/2006 for "tobacco", "TOBACCO" and accepted no list row, then went on to record the body of rules that does reach the substance, which is tobacco control and excise legislation, described in the record as tobacco product controls. That placement is held as record MOL-85. This is one of four rows in the set answered by a consumer product regime rather than by a medicines regime or by the schedule, which is why the paperwork that matters here is a duty question and not a prescription one. Being outside the narcotics lists is not being outside the law, and nothing here says the substance may be carried or supplied freely. Legea nr. 382/1999 cu privire la circulaţia substanţelor stupefiante, psihotrope şi a precursorilor and the decision made under it govern listed substances; this row is answered by different legislation. Read as at 20 September 2026, against the official consolidated record of the decision.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Moldova provides no death penalty for a drug offence, and Article 217¹ of the Codul penal does not provide life imprisonment either, so the top of the scale is a term of years. The fifteen year ceiling at Article 217¹(4) is not the route for this row. Article 217¹ reaches substances carried on the lists approved by Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 79/2006, and record MOL-85 places this one outside them after searching "tobacco", "TOBACCO". Stating the narcotics ceiling as this row's exposure would be a cell arguing against its own finding, which is why the ceiling is named and then set aside rather than repeated as though it applied. The repair did not transcribe the penalty provisions of the regime it did name, so no figure is stated here either. What attaches instead runs through tobacco control and excise, which is a duty and labelling regime and reaches a traveller through allowances rather than through a criminal band. [Likely] Carried forward from the published entry and not re-derived from statute in this pass: The ceiling is 15 years. Criminal Code article 217 with a superscript one, subsection (4), provides a term of seven to fifteen years.
If prescribed / medical
Moldova states its traveller rule at country level rather than substance by substance. A scheduled medicine has to satisfy Legea nr. 1409/1997 cu privire la medicamente together with the prescription, packaging, import and customs rules, and a criminal quantity band under Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 79/2006 is not a lawful traveller allowance. That rule reaches scheduled medicines, and record MOL-85 places this row outside the lists entirely, under tobacco control and excise legislation. No prescription route is in question for a product controlled that way, and the repair records no traveller medicine rule for it, so this field is deferred rather than answered: the placement is stated, the medicine question is not one this row has. Import quantity, duty and labelling rules under that separate regime are a different matter and were not audited here. The country rule is about medicines, and a tobacco product is not one, so the traveller question is a duty and allowance question and the repair did not audit the allowances.
Turkmenistan
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Code (No. 222-1 of 1997, as amended) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Turkmenistan is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Turkmenistan's drug schedule; the Criminal Code (No. 222-1 of 1997, as amended) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Turkmenistan, drugs fall under the Criminal Code (No. 222-1 of 1997, as amended). The illegal manufacture, processing, acquisition, storage, transport or transfer of narcotic or psychotropic substances for the purpose of sale (Art. 292) and related articles are the trafficking offences: production, storage or transport for sale carries 3-10 years, escalating to 12-20 years with confiscation for large-quantity, official-position or otherwise aggravated cases, while use or possession carries up to 5 years.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Turkmenistan, drugs fall under the Criminal Code (No. 222-1 of 1997, as amended). The illegal manufacture, processing, acquisition, storage, transport or transfer of narcotic or psychotropic substances for the purpose of sale (Art. 292) and related articles are the trafficking offences: production, storage or transport for sale carries 3-10 years, escalating to 12-20 years with confiscation for large-quantity, official-position or otherwise aggravated cases, while use or possession carries up to 5 years. Cannabis is controlled under the same Criminal Code framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of Turkmenistan (No. 222-1 of 1997, as amended), Art. 292 · bwcimplementation.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Senegal
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Code des Drogues (Loi No. 97-18 of 1997, amended by Loi Latif Guèye No. 2007-31 of 27 December 2007) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Senegal is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Senegal's drug schedule; the Code des Drogues (Loi No. 97-18 of 1997, amended by Loi Latif Guèye No. 2007-31 of 27 December 2007) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Senegal, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues (Loi No. 97-18 of 1997, amended by the 'Loi Latif Guèye' No. 2007-31 of 27 December 2007). For Tableau I high-risk drugs, cultivation, production or manufacture (Art. 95) and international import, export or transport (Art. 96) carry 5-10 years and a fine equal to triple the value of the drugs seized; offer, sale, distribution, brokerage, transport, purchase, possession or use of Tableau I drugs (Art. 97) carries 5-10 years and a 2,000,000-10,000,000 franc fine, raised by the 2007 amendment to fixed-term hard labour of 10-20 years for aggravated offering or sale. Facilitating others' use (Art. 98) carries 2-5 years, and personal-use possession or purchase (Art. 109) two months to one year.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Senegal, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues (Loi No. 97-18 of 1997, amended by the 'Loi Latif Guèye' No. 2007-31 of 27 December 2007). For Tableau I high-risk drugs, cultivation, production or manufacture (Art. 95) and international import, export or transport (Art. 96) carry 5-10 years and a fine equal to triple the value of the drugs seized; offer, sale, distribution, brokerage, transport, purchase, possession or use of Tableau I drugs (Art. 97) carries 5-10 years and a 2,000,000-10,000,000 franc fine, raised by the 2007 amendment to fixed-term hard labour of 10-20 years for aggravated offering or sale. Facilitating others' use (Art. 98) carries 2-5 years, and personal-use possession or purchase (Art. 109) two months to one year. Cannabis (chanvre indien) is a Tableau I drug under the same Code des Drogues, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Code des Drogues (Loi No. 97-18 of 1997, amended by Loi Latif Guèye No. 2007-31 of 27 December 2007), Arts 95/96/97/98/109 · sherloc.unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Nicaragua
Legal status
Not confirmed. Tobacco was not settled against Nicaragua's controlled list in this pass. Tobacco is not named in the annexed lists. Nicaragua regulates it through separate tobacco control law, which was not read for this cell. The lists relied on are those as annexed in 1999 and carried into Ley No. 735 by article 101 of the consolidated text published in La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 32 of 20 February 2024. That reading does not rule out a later incorporation by the Ministry of Health, which article 1 permits to be published in any newspaper of national circulation before it reaches the gazette.
Consequences if caught
Tobacco was not settled against Nicaragua's controlled list in this pass, and it should not be treated as permitted on that account. Tobacco is not named in the annexed lists. Nicaragua regulates it through separate tobacco control law, which was not read for this cell. Trafficking under article 359 of Ley No. 641 carries 5 to 15 years of prison, rising to 10 to 20 years where the trafficking is international. Article 358, as reformed in September 2024, bands simple possession at more than 1 gram and under 5 grams for cocaine or any other controlled substance, at more than 5 grams and under 20 grams for marihuana, and at 1 to 5 psychoactive plants, with a heavier band of 3 to 8 years above those figures. The fine article 359 attaches is 300 to 800 day fines, and 500 to 1000 day fines for the international form. Whether the offence reaches this row at all is exactly what was not established.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Nicaragua controls by three limbs at once: the lists and tables annexed to the law, whatever the Ministry of Health incorporates afterwards, and whatever the international instruments in force contain. The first limb is readable and was read for this cell. The second is published by the Ministry of Health and article 1 allows it to appear in any newspaper of national circulation before the gazette carries it, so it cannot be enumerated from the gazette alone. The third moves whenever the international schedules move. The same title prices the other conduct separately: financing at 10 to 25 years under article 348, sowing, growing or harvesting at 5 to 10 under article 349, industrial or artisanal processing at 5 to 20 under article 351, transport at 5 to 15 under article 352, carrying on the body at 2 to 8 under article 353, and storage at 5 to 15 under article 355. Carry any controlled medicine in its original labelled packaging with the prescription and confirm the position with a Nicaraguan consulate before travelling. The lists relied on are those as annexed in 1999 and carried into Ley No. 735 by article 101 of the consolidated text published in La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 32 of 20 February 2024. That reading does not rule out a later incorporation by the Ministry of Health, which article 1 permits to be published in any newspaper of national circulation before it reaches the gazette.
Uganda
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, 2016 (Act No. 3 of 2016) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Uganda is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Uganda's drug schedule; the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, 2016 (Act No. 3 of 2016) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Uganda, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, 2016 (Act No. 3 of 2016). Possession (s.4) carries imprisonment, substantial fixed terms up to around 25 years depending on the substance and quantity, while trafficking, smuggling and dealing (s.5 and related provisions) carry up to life imprisonment. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences. A later 2023 consolidation/amendment of the drug law has been reported; this entry states the 2016 Act as in force and any subsequent amendment should be confirmed.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Uganda, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, 2016 (Act No. 3 of 2016). Possession (s.4) carries imprisonment, substantial fixed terms up to around 25 years depending on the substance and quantity, while trafficking, smuggling and dealing (s.5 and related provisions) carry up to life imprisonment. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences. A later 2023 consolidation/amendment of the drug law has been reported; this entry states the 2016 Act as in force and any subsequent amendment should be confirmed. Cannabis is controlled under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, 2016 (Act No. 3 of 2016), ss.4-5 · media.ulii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Zimbabwe
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] and the Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02] is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Zimbabwe is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Zimbabwe's drug schedule; the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] and the Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02] is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Zimbabwe, drugs fall under the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (dangerous-drugs provisions, s.155 onward), together with the Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02]. Use, possession or cultivation for one's own use carries a fine and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years, while dealing and trafficking carry long fixed-term imprisonment that rises with quantity and aggravation. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Zimbabwe, drugs fall under the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (dangerous-drugs provisions, s.155 onward), together with the Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02]. Use, possession or cultivation for one's own use carries a fine and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years, while dealing and trafficking carry long fixed-term imprisonment that rises with quantity and aggravation. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences. Cannabis is controlled under the same framework, with no legal recreational regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (dangerous-drugs provisions, s.155 onward) + Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02] · zimlii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Ethiopia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 414/2004) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Ethiopia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Ethiopia's drug schedule; the Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 414/2004) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Ethiopia, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 414/2004). Trafficking in narcotic or psychotropic substances (Art. 525) carries rigorous imprisonment of 5-15 years plus a fine, while lesser dealing sub-articles carry rigorous imprisonment in the 5-7 year range. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Ethiopia, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 414/2004). Trafficking in narcotic or psychotropic substances (Art. 525) carries rigorous imprisonment of 5-15 years plus a fine, while lesser dealing sub-articles carry rigorous imprisonment in the 5-7 year range. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences. Khat (chat) is lawful and culturally significant in Ethiopia and is not a prohibited substance under the Criminal Code. Cannabis, by contrast, is controlled under the same Criminal Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 414/2004), Art. 525 · wipo.int · Updated July 14, 2026
Algeria
Legal status
Not confirmed, Law No. 04-18 of 25 December 2004 (as amended by Law No. 23-05 of 7 May 2023) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Algeria is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Algeria's drug schedule; Law No. 04-18 of 25 December 2004 (as amended by Law No. 23-05 of 7 May 2023) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Algeria, drugs fall under Law No. 04-18 of 25 December 2004 on the prevention and suppression of the illicit use and trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as amended by Law No. 23-05 of 7 May 2023. Trafficking, production, manufacture, sale or transport with intent, carries imprisonment of 10-20 years plus a fine of DZD 5,000,000-50,000,000, rising to 20-30 years where committed by a public official or a health professional or in aggravated circumstances; personal-use possession carries lesser imprisonment and/or a fine. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Algeria, drugs fall under Law No. 04-18 of 25 December 2004 on the prevention and suppression of the illicit use and trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as amended by Law No. 23-05 of 7 May 2023. Trafficking, production, manufacture, sale or transport with intent, carries imprisonment of 10-20 years plus a fine of DZD 5,000,000-50,000,000, rising to 20-30 years where committed by a public official or a health professional or in aggravated circumstances; personal-use possession carries lesser imprisonment and/or a fine. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment; the separate provisions for the gravest non-drug crimes do not extend to drug offences. (Reported/unverified: human-rights reporting in 2025 referred to legislative efforts to expand the death penalty to certain drug offences; this is a reported proposal and is NOT reflected as enacted in the statute cited here, confirm against the current law.) Cannabis is controlled under the same statute, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law No. 04-18 of 25 December 2004 on the prevention and suppression of illicit use and trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as amended by Law No. 23-05 of 7 May 2023 · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Tajikistan
Legal status
Not confirmed. Tobacco is not named in the National List approved by Government Resolution No. 121 of 27 February 2020 as the Drug Control Agency published it, read at https://akn.tj/ru/2020/04/09/national-list-of-narcotic-drugs-psychotropic-substances-and-their-precursors/ on 3 October 2026, nor in the Agency's consolidation of the list as amended up to Resolution No. 87 of 2 March 2023, nor in Annex 1 to the Criminal Code in the prg.kz consolidation dated 17 June 2026. The texts were searched in Russian and Latin script for "табак", "tobacco", "никотиана". Tobacco is outside the drug list, and the laws that govern it in Tajikistan were not read. So this cell does not say whether tobacco is controlled in Tajikistan.
Consequences if caught
Not confirmed. No offence article, size band or penalty is stated for tobacco, because no entry for it was found in the texts read. The previous version of this cell named Criminal Code arts 200 to 204 and the quantity list in Criminal Code Appendix 1, Table 1 as the framework its dossier checked.
If prescribed / medical
Not confirmed. With no entry found for tobacco, the prescription rule in article 15 of Law No. 873, which governs narcotic and psychotropic substances, is not applied to it here, and no medical route is stated.
Documentation
Not confirmed. No traveller, permit, import or customs rule is stated for tobacco, because the drug law's permit rule in article 10 of Law No. 873 attaches to listed substances. Routes tried in this run: the Drug Control Agency's 2020 list page and its 2023.doc file, both answered HTTP 200; zakon.kz and spinform.ru copies of the resolution, both paywalled after the opening; the ncz.tj Criminal Code page, HTTP 200 but without the annex table; the ncz.tj Code files, HTTP 503 and 404; the prg.kz consolidation of the Code, HTTP 200 with the annex. Carried from the previous version of this cell: Not confirmed. The dossier row states no traveller, permit, import or customs rule for tobacco. Its search record for this row, as the dossier gives it: Search record: searched «tobacco»; transliteration/Latin identifier: tobacco; searched Government Resolution No. 121 of 27 February 2020, National List and Appendix 1, Table 1. No controlled-drug entry was returned for this ordinary product term. Second instrument checked: Criminal Code arts 200 to 204; it did not convert the term into a listed narcotic or psychotropic substance. Open point: none within this drug-list framework.
National List of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, approved by Government Resolution No. 121 of 27 February 2020, as the Drug Control Agency published it, read on 3 October 2026 · akn.tj · Updated October 3, 2026
Papua New Guinea
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Controlled Substances Act 2021 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Papua New Guinea is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Papua New Guinea's drug schedule; the Controlled Substances Act 2021 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Papua New Guinea, drugs fall under the Controlled Substances Act 2021, which replaced the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (whose penalties had been capped at around two years). The 2021 Act substantially increased the penalties for possession, dealing and trafficking, modelled on the imprisonment-based regimes of comparable Pacific and Commonwealth jurisdictions; Papua New Guinea repealed the death penalty in 2022, so the ceiling for all offences, drug offences included, is imprisonment. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. The precise penalty quantities and section numbers under the 2021 Act are not pinned in this cell and should be confirmed against the current statute.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Papua New Guinea, drugs fall under the Controlled Substances Act 2021, which replaced the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (whose penalties had been capped at around two years). The 2021 Act substantially increased the penalties for possession, dealing and trafficking, modelled on the imprisonment-based regimes of comparable Pacific and Commonwealth jurisdictions; Papua New Guinea repealed the death penalty in 2022, so the ceiling for all offences, drug offences included, is imprisonment. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. The precise penalty quantities and section numbers under the 2021 Act are not pinned in this cell and should be confirmed against the current statute. Cannabis is controlled under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Controlled Substances Act 2021 (replacing the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952), specific penalty terms not pinned · reported by The National (thenational.com.pg, 2021) · Updated July 14, 2026
Angola
Legal status
Not confirmed, Lei n.º 3/99 (Lei sobre o Tráfico e Consumo de Estupefacientes, Substâncias Psicotrópicas e Precursores) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Angola is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Angola's drug schedule; Lei n.º 3/99 (Lei sobre o Tráfico e Consumo de Estupefacientes, Substâncias Psicotrópicas e Precursores) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Angola, drugs fall under Lei n.º 3/99 (Lei sobre o Tráfico e Consumo de Estupefacientes, Substâncias Psicotrópicas e Precursores), a six-table Portuguese-model statute. The cultivation, production, manufacture, trade, distribution, import, export, transport and possession of Table substances are prohibited; trafficking carries lengthy imprisonment, with severe cases reaching the 10-25 year range characteristic of this statutory model. The precise trafficking-article number is not separately pinned here, verify the exact article and term against the current statute. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Angola, drugs fall under Lei n.º 3/99 (Lei sobre o Tráfico e Consumo de Estupefacientes, Substâncias Psicotrópicas e Precursores), a six-table Portuguese-model statute. The cultivation, production, manufacture, trade, distribution, import, export, transport and possession of Table substances are prohibited; trafficking carries lengthy imprisonment, with severe cases reaching the 10-25 year range characteristic of this statutory model. The precise trafficking-article number is not separately pinned here, verify the exact article and term against the current statute. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. Cannabis (liamba) is a controlled drug under the same statute, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lei n.º 3/99 (Lei sobre o Tráfico e Consumo de Estupefacientes, Substâncias Psicotrópicas e Precursores) · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Côte d'Ivoire
Legal status
Not confirmed, Loi n° 2022-407 du 13 juin 2022 (lutte contre le trafic et l'usage illicites des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et leurs précurseurs) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Côte d'Ivoire is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Côte d'Ivoire's drug schedule; Loi n° 2022-407 du 13 juin 2022 (lutte contre le trafic et l'usage illicites des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et leurs précurseurs) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Côte d'Ivoire, drugs fall under Loi n° 2022-407 du 13 juin 2022 (lutte contre le trafic et l'usage illicites des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et leurs précurseurs), a four-table system that repealed Loi 88-686 of 1988. Trafficking-type offences, cultivation, production, manufacture, import, export, transport and the offer, sale or distribution of Table I high-risk drugs, carry imprisonment of 5 to 10 years plus fines; supplying drugs to a minor carries 5 to 10 years; and personal use carries 1 to 3 months. Penalties are doubled in aggravated cases (violence or a weapon, or commission by a public official). The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Côte d'Ivoire, drugs fall under Loi n° 2022-407 du 13 juin 2022 (lutte contre le trafic et l'usage illicites des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et leurs précurseurs), a four-table system that repealed Loi 88-686 of 1988. Trafficking-type offences, cultivation, production, manufacture, import, export, transport and the offer, sale or distribution of Table I high-risk drugs, carry imprisonment of 5 to 10 years plus fines; supplying drugs to a minor carries 5 to 10 years; and personal use carries 1 to 3 months. Penalties are doubled in aggravated cases (violence or a weapon, or commission by a public official). The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. Cannabis is a Table I high-risk drug under the same statute, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi n° 2022-407 du 13 juin 2022 (lutte contre le trafic et l'usage illicites des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et leurs précurseurs) · agp.africanlii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Rwanda
Legal status
Not confirmed, Law n° 03/2012 of 15/02/2012 (governing narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors) together with the Penal Code (Law n° 68/2018) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Rwanda is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Rwanda's drug schedule; Law n° 03/2012 of 15/02/2012 (governing narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors) together with the Penal Code (Law n° 68/2018) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Rwanda, drugs fall under Law n° 03/2012 of 15/02/2012 governing narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, together with the Penal Code (Law n° 68/2018, Official Gazette 27/09/2018). The unlawful manufacture, transformation, import, transport, sale or distribution of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is the serious tier, while use and possession sit at lower tiers; the 2018 Penal Code substantially raised drug-offence penalties, serious trafficking reaching long fixed-term to life imprisonment. The exact current Penal Code article year-terms are not separately pinned here, verify against the current Penal Code. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Rwanda, drugs fall under Law n° 03/2012 of 15/02/2012 governing narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, together with the Penal Code (Law n° 68/2018, Official Gazette 27/09/2018). The unlawful manufacture, transformation, import, transport, sale or distribution of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is the serious tier, while use and possession sit at lower tiers; the 2018 Penal Code substantially raised drug-offence penalties, serious trafficking reaching long fixed-term to life imprisonment. The exact current Penal Code article year-terms are not separately pinned here, verify against the current Penal Code. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. Cannabis is controlled under the same framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Law n° 03/2012 of 15/02/2012 governing narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors + Penal Code (Law n° 68/2018, Official Gazette 27/09/2018) · rwandalii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Mozambique
Legal status
Not confirmed, Lei n.º 3/97 (combate ao tráfico e consumo de estupefacientes e substâncias psicotrópicas) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Mozambique is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Mozambique's drug schedule; Lei n.º 3/97 (combate ao tráfico e consumo de estupefacientes e substâncias psicotrópicas) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Mozambique, drugs fall under Lei n.º 3/97 (combate ao tráfico e consumo de estupefacientes e substâncias psicotrópicas), a six-table Portuguese-model statute. Trafficking, manufacture, import, export and distribution of controlled substances carry lengthy imprisonment, the ceiling being life imprisonment for the gravest cases. The precise trafficking-article number and terms are not separately pinned here, verify the exact article and term against the current statute. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Mozambique, drugs fall under Lei n.º 3/97 (combate ao tráfico e consumo de estupefacientes e substâncias psicotrópicas), a six-table Portuguese-model statute. Trafficking, manufacture, import, export and distribution of controlled substances carry lengthy imprisonment, the ceiling being life imprisonment for the gravest cases. The precise trafficking-article number and terms are not separately pinned here, verify the exact article and term against the current statute. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same statute, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lei n.º 3/97 (combate ao tráfico e consumo de estupefacientes e substâncias psicotrópicas) · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Mauritius
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Dangerous Drugs Act 2000 (Act No. 41 of 2000, as amended) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Mauritius is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Mauritius's drug schedule; the Dangerous Drugs Act 2000 (Act No. 41 of 2000, as amended) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Mauritius, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act 2000 (Act No. 41 of 2000), as amended, a three-schedule system (Schedules I, II and III). Drug-dealing and trafficking offences (s.30 and s.29) carry a fine together with penal servitude (imprisonment); for a person averred to be a drug trafficker where the street value of the drugs exceeds one million rupees, the penalty is a fine of up to 2,000,000 rupees together with penal servitude for a term of up to 60 years. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment (penal servitude).
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Mauritius, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act 2000 (Act No. 41 of 2000), as amended, a three-schedule system (Schedules I, II and III). Drug-dealing and trafficking offences (s.30 and s.29) carry a fine together with penal servitude (imprisonment); for a person averred to be a drug trafficker where the street value of the drugs exceeds one million rupees, the penalty is a fine of up to 2,000,000 rupees together with penal servitude for a term of up to 60 years. The maximum penalty for drug offences is imprisonment (penal servitude). Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Dangerous Drugs Act 2000 (Act No. 41 of 2000), as amended, ss.29-30 · health.govmu.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Bhutan
Legal status
Bhutan famously banned the sale of tobacco under the Tobacco Control Act of Bhutan 2010, which prohibited the cultivation, manufacture and sale of tobacco and tobacco products (permitting only limited personal import, subject to heavy tax and possession of a receipt). That sales ban was reversed by the Tobacco Control (Amendment) Act 2021, passed by Parliament in July 2021 (with interim measures effective from 2 July 2021), which legalised the import, sale and purchase of tobacco and tobacco products, a change prompted by cross-border smuggling from India during the COVID-19 pandemic. So tobacco in Bhutan is best described as ban-then-lifted: prohibited 2010-2021, now lawfully sold under regulation.
Consequences if caught
Under the 2010 Act, selling, buying, manufacturing or smuggling tobacco was a punishable offence (illegal sale/smuggling was treated harshly, at one point drawing felony-level exposure). Since the 2021 amendment, buying and selling tobacco is no longer illegal; retail sale is channelled through authorised outlets and remains subject to controls, with sale to persons under 18 still prohibited and domestic production/manufacture still banned.
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is not a medicinal product and has no prescription status; it is regulated as a consumer product under the Tobacco Control Act framework administered by the Bhutan Food and Drug Authority, not through the medicines system.
Documentation
The governing instruments are the Tobacco Control Act of Bhutan 2010 (original sales ban) and the Tobacco Control (Amendment) Act 2021 (which legalised import, sale and purchase while retaining the manufacturing ban, age limits and public-place smoking restrictions).
Not confirmed, the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2018 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Botswana is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Botswana's drug schedule; the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2018 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Botswana, drugs fall under the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2018. Trafficking (s.5) carries imprisonment of up to 25 years together with a fine of up to P500,000, and cultivation (s.6) up to 20 years; the precise quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Botswana retains and uses the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes (murder, treason, piracy under the Penal Code); it does NOT extend to drug offences, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A 2024 government white paper reportedly recommended introducing a death penalty for drug trafficking; this was a recommendation only and has NOT been enacted; verify against the current statute. botswanalaws.com is a lead for the consolidated text only, never a cited source.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Botswana, drugs fall under the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2018. Trafficking (s.5) carries imprisonment of up to 25 years together with a fine of up to P500,000, and cultivation (s.6) up to 20 years; the precise quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Botswana retains and uses the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes (murder, treason, piracy under the Penal Code); it does NOT extend to drug offences, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A 2024 government white paper reportedly recommended introducing a death penalty for drug trafficking; this was a recommendation only and has NOT been enacted; verify against the current statute. botswanalaws.com is a lead for the consolidated text only, never a cited source. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2018, ss.5-6 · sherloc.unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Zambia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act No. 35 of 2021 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Zambia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Zambia's drug schedule; the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act No. 35 of 2021 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Zambia, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act No. 35 of 2021, which repealed the former Cap. 96 of 1993. Possession carries up to 15 years and trafficking up to 25 years; the precise quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Zambia retains the death penalty for murder and treason only and is abolitionist in practice (commutations in 2022); it does NOT extend to drug offences, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Zambia, drugs fall under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act No. 35 of 2021, which repealed the former Cap. 96 of 1993. Possession carries up to 15 years and trafficking up to 25 years; the precise quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Zambia retains the death penalty for murder and treason only and is abolitionist in practice (commutations in 2022); it does NOT extend to drug offences, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act No. 35 of 2021 (repealed Cap. 96 of 1993) · zambialii.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Cameroon
Legal status
Not confirmed, Loi n° 97/19 du 7 août 1997 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Cameroon is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Cameroon's drug schedule; Loi n° 97/19 du 7 août 1997 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Cameroon, drugs fall under Loi n° 97/19 du 7 août 1997. Trafficking offences (Sections 91-95) carry imprisonment of 10 to 20 years together with a fine of up to 250,000,000 FCFA; cannabis, heroin and cocaine are high-risk drugs. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cameroon retains the death penalty for terrorism and murder and is abolitionist in practice (no executions since 1997); the drug statute does NOT provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. droitcamerounais.info and vertic.org are leads for the consolidated text only, never cited sources.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Cameroon, drugs fall under Loi n° 97/19 du 7 août 1997. Trafficking offences (Sections 91-95) carry imprisonment of 10 to 20 years together with a fine of up to 250,000,000 FCFA; cannabis, heroin and cocaine are high-risk drugs. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cameroon retains the death penalty for terrorism and murder and is abolitionist in practice (no executions since 1997); the drug statute does NOT provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. droitcamerounais.info and vertic.org are leads for the consolidated text only, never cited sources. Cannabis is a high-risk drug under the same statute, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi n° 97/19 du 7 août 1997 (relative au contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs), Sections 91-95 · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Fiji
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Fiji is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Fiji's drug schedule; the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Fiji, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004. The unlawful import, export, manufacture, possession, supply or trafficking of illicit drugs (s.4) carries a fine of up to FJ$1,000,000 together with imprisonment up to life. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is life imprisonment. A March 2026 proposal to reintroduce the death penalty amid trafficking concerns was reported; it has NOT been enacted; verify against the current statute.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Fiji, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004. The unlawful import, export, manufacture, possession, supply or trafficking of illicit drugs (s.4) carries a fine of up to FJ$1,000,000 together with imprisonment up to life. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is life imprisonment. A March 2026 proposal to reintroduce the death penalty amid trafficking concerns was reported; it has NOT been enacted; verify against the current statute. Cannabis is an illicit drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004, s.4 · laws.gov.fj · Updated July 14, 2026
Liechtenstein
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Betäubungsmittelgesetz of 20 April 1983 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Liechtenstein is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Liechtenstein's drug schedule; the Betäubungsmittelgesetz of 20 April 1983 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Liechtenstein, drugs fall under the Betäubungsmittelgesetz of 20 April 1983, which follows the Austrian/Swiss model. Trafficking and the unlawful supply of narcotic drugs carry imprisonment; cannabis containing more than 1% THC is prohibited. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Liechtenstein, drugs fall under the Betäubungsmittelgesetz of 20 April 1983, which follows the Austrian/Swiss model. Trafficking and the unlawful supply of narcotic drugs carry imprisonment; cannabis containing more than 1% THC is prohibited. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis containing more than 1% THC is prohibited under the same Act, with no legal recreational regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Betäubungsmittelgesetz of 20 April 1983 · gesetze.li · Updated July 14, 2026
Macau
Legal status
Not confirmed. The Macau 88 substance legal dossier of 2 October 2026 searched Law 17/2009 Tables I-A to VI, as amended through Law 12/2026, in force 18 August 2026, and established no specific matching table item for tobacco. The dossier's reason: The tobacco plant is not a Law 17/2009 table item; tobacco rules are separate. A row the dossier does not verify leaves the statutory assignment open and does not mean that use or supply is lawful.
Consequences if caught
Not confirmed. The dossier assigns no Law 17/2009 Article 8 or 14 penalty to tobacco without a supported match in Tables I to IV and notes that other law may apply, so no penalty is stated for it here. It establishes no substance specific daily reference quantity and says not to infer a permitted amount.
If prescribed / medical
Not confirmed. The dossier does not state a prescription or medical route for tobacco.
Documentation
Not confirmed, because the dossier records no table item for it. The dossier's own search for this row: Query: 菸草; tobacco; 尼古丁; nicotine. Inspected Macau Table I-A/I-B/I-C, II-A/II-B/II-C, III, IV, V and VI by Chinese name, Portuguese name and chemical structure; result: No specific matching table item established for “菸草; tobacco; 尼古丁; nicotine”. The dossier row for this substance carries no URL, so the instrument is cited by name.
Law 17/2009 of Macau, Articles 2 and 4 and Tables I-A to VI, as amended through Law 12/2026, in force 18 August 2026 (amended by Laws 4/2014, 10/2016, 10/2019, 22/2020, 10/2021, 4/2023, 18/2023, 16/2024, 2/2025 and 12/2026) · Updated October 3, 2026
Namibia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Namibia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Namibia's drug schedule; the Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Namibia, drugs fall under the Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971. Dealing in a dangerous dependence-producing drug (s.2) and possession (s.3) carry imprisonment together with a fine, case law has seen sentences of around 12 years for cocaine dealing, and cannabis possession or dealing draws fines and imprisonment of up to about 10 years; the precise trafficking-quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Namibia, drugs fall under the Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971. Dealing in a dangerous dependence-producing drug (s.2) and possession (s.3) carry imprisonment together with a fine, case law has seen sentences of around 12 years for cocaine dealing, and cannabis possession or dealing draws fines and imprisonment of up to about 10 years; the precise trafficking-quantity bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a prohibited dependence-producing drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Abuse of Dependence-Producing Substances and Rehabilitation Centres Act 41 of 1971, ss.2-3 · namiblii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Madagascar
Legal status
Not confirmed, Loi n° 97-039 sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Madagascar is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Madagascar's drug schedule; Loi n° 97-039 sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Madagascar, drugs fall under Loi n° 97-039 sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs, which classifies drugs across a six-table/high-risk model. Trafficking in a high-risk (Tableau I) drug carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Madagascar, drugs fall under Loi n° 97-039 sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs, which classifies drugs across a six-table/high-risk model. Trafficking in a high-risk (Tableau I) drug carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi n° 97-039 sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Burkina Faso
Legal status
Not confirmed, Burkina Faso's national drug code (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Burkina Faso is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Burkina Faso's drug schedule; Burkina Faso's national drug code (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Burkina Faso, drugs fall under the national drug code (loi sur les stupéfiants). Drug use is punishable by 1 to 6 months' imprisonment, and trafficking or import carries imprisonment; the precise trafficking article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Burkina Faso, drugs fall under the national drug code (loi sur les stupéfiants). Drug use is punishable by 1 to 6 months' imprisonment, and trafficking or import carries imprisonment; the precise trafficking article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Code des Drogues is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Benin is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Benin's drug schedule; the Code des Drogues is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Benin, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues. Cannabis, heroin and cocaine are classified as drogues à haut risque, and any export regardless of quantity is treated as trafficking; trafficking in a high-risk drug carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Benin, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues. Cannabis, heroin and cocaine are classified as drogues à haut risque, and any export regardless of quantity is treated as trafficking; trafficking in a high-risk drug carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a drogue à haut risque under the same Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Code des Drogues (Loi) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Mali
Legal status
Not confirmed, Mali's national drug law (loi portant répression du trafic et de l'usage illicite des stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Mali is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Mali's drug schedule; Mali's national drug law (loi portant répression du trafic et de l'usage illicite des stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Mali, drugs fall under the national drug law (loi portant répression du trafic et de l'usage illicite des stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Malian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Mali, drugs fall under the national drug law (loi portant répression du trafic et de l'usage illicite des stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Malian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi portant répression du trafic et de l'usage illicite des stupéfiants · unodc.org · https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/ [primary statute portal pending] · Updated July 14, 2026
Togo
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Code des Drogues (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Togo is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Togo's drug schedule; the Code des Drogues (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Togo, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Togo, drugs fall under the Code des Drogues (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Ordonnance of 1903 on chanvre (approved by the Décret of 10 March 1917) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the DR Congo is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the DR Congo's drug schedule; the Ordonnance of 1903 on chanvre (approved by the Décret of 10 March 1917) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, drugs fall under the Ordonnance of 1903 on chanvre (approved by the Décret of 10 March 1917), which prohibits the cultivation, sale, transport, possession and consumption of drugs. Trafficking offences carry 5 to 20 years' servitude pénale principale under Congolese penal doctrine; the precise trafficking article is left to confirmation against the current statute (the 1903/1917 ordinance is old and not granular). The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. The Democratic Republic of the Congo retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes, but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (servitude pénale).
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, drugs fall under the Ordonnance of 1903 on chanvre (approved by the Décret of 10 March 1917), which prohibits the cultivation, sale, transport, possession and consumption of drugs. Trafficking offences carry 5 to 20 years' servitude pénale principale under Congolese penal doctrine; the precise trafficking article is left to confirmation against the current statute (the 1903/1917 ordinance is old and not granular). The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. The Democratic Republic of the Congo retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes, but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (servitude pénale). Cannabis (chanvre) is the drug specifically prohibited by the same Ordonnance, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Ordonnance de 1903 sur le chanvre (approuvée par le Décret du 10 mars 1917) · leganet.cd · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Malawi
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 35:02) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Malawi is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Malawi's drug schedule; the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 35:02) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Malawi, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 35:02). Trafficking and the unlawful possession or supply of dangerous drugs carry imprisonment; the precise penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Malawi, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 35:02). Trafficking and the unlawful possession or supply of dangerous drugs carry imprisonment; the precise penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Drugs of Abuse Act No. 6 of 2008 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Lesotho is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Lesotho's drug schedule; the Drugs of Abuse Act No. 6 of 2008 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Lesotho, drugs fall under the Drugs of Abuse Act No. 6 of 2008. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Lesotho retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes and is abolitionist in practice; its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Lesotho, drugs fall under the Drugs of Abuse Act No. 6 of 2008. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Lesotho retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes and is abolitionist in practice; its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Drugs of Abuse Act No. 6 of 2008 · lesotholii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Eswatini
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Opium and Habit-Forming Drugs Act (with Pharmacy Act provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Eswatini is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Eswatini's drug schedule; the Opium and Habit-Forming Drugs Act (with Pharmacy Act provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Eswatini, drugs fall under the Opium and Habit-Forming Drugs Act together with provisions of the Pharmacy Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise statute and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Eswatini retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes and is abolitionist in practice (no executions in decades); its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Eswatini, drugs fall under the Opium and Habit-Forming Drugs Act together with provisions of the Pharmacy Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise statute and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Eswatini retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes and is abolitionist in practice (no executions in decades); its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Opium and Habit-Forming Drugs Act / Pharmacy Act provisions · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Mauritania
Legal status
Not confirmed, Mauritania's national drug control statute (within a sharia-influenced criminal law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Mauritania is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Mauritania's drug schedule; Mauritania's national drug control statute (within a sharia-influenced criminal law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Mauritania, drugs fall under the national drug control statute within a sharia-influenced criminal law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty asserted for a drug offence under the named drug law is imprisonment. Not confirmed, Mauritania's criminal law is sharia-influenced and reportedly permits the death penalty for some trafficking offences, but a specific drug death-penalty statute article is not confirmed here. The country has observed a de facto execution moratorium since 1987. Verify against the current statute.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Mauritania, drugs fall under the national drug control statute within a sharia-influenced criminal law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty asserted for a drug offence under the named drug law is imprisonment. Not confirmed, Mauritania's criminal law is sharia-influenced and reportedly permits the death penalty for some trafficking offences, but a specific drug death-penalty statute article is not confirmed here. The country has observed a de facto execution moratorium since 1987. Verify against the current statute. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Mauritania national drug control statute (sharia-influenced criminal law) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Sierra Leone
Legal status
Not confirmed, the National Drugs Control Act 2008 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Sierra Leone is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Sierra Leone's drug schedule; the National Drugs Control Act 2008 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Sierra Leone, drugs fall under the National Drugs Control Act 2008, which schedules drugs as Prohibited, High-Risk and Risk drugs. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise penalty bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Sierra Leone, drugs fall under the National Drugs Control Act 2008, which schedules drugs as Prohibited, High-Risk and Risk drugs. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise penalty bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
National Drugs Control Act 2008 · sierra-leone.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Seychelles
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Seychelles is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Seychelles' drug schedule; the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Seychelles, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine, with aggravated trafficking punishable by up to life imprisonment; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Seychelles, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine, with aggravated trafficking punishable by up to life imprisonment; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Misuse of Drugs Act, 2016 · seylii.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Cabo Verde
Legal status
Not confirmed, Lei n.º 78/IV/93 (the drug law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Cabo Verde is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Cabo Verde's drug schedule; Lei n.º 78/IV/93 (the drug law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Cabo Verde, drugs fall under Lei n.º 78/IV/93, which follows the Lusophone six-table model. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Cabo Verdean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Cabo Verde, drugs fall under Lei n.º 78/IV/93, which follows the Lusophone six-table model. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Cabo Verdean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lei n.º 78/IV/93 (Lusophone six-table model) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Gambia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Drug Control Act 2014 (as amended) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Gambia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Gambia's drug schedule; the Drug Control Act 2014 (as amended) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Gambia, drugs fall under the Drug Control Act 2014 (as amended). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Gambian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Gambia, drugs fall under the Drug Control Act 2014 (as amended). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Gambian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Drug Control Act 2014 (as amended) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Belize
Legal status
Not confirmed. Tobacco and Nicotiana returned nothing in either file. There is no near entry, and there would not be one. Chapter 103 does not govern tobacco in Belize. Sale, advertising, age limits and import duty sit in public health and customs legislation that was not read for this row. This row is the leaf and the manufactured product, and it is kept apart from the nicotine row because the two are governed by different parts of the same public health framework. Nothing in this cell rests on an absence being the whole answer: the Misuse of Drugs Regulations are subsidiary law, and the list that decides whether a substance is a controlled drug at all is the Act's own Second Schedule, which section 4 divides into Parts I, II and III for Class A, Class B and Class C. That schedule is in the Substantive Laws volume of Chapter 103 and was not among the four instruments in the subsidiary volume read, so this row is left open rather than answered. The search recorded above covers the Misuse of Drugs Regulations, the Cannabis Violation Tickets Regulations and the Industrial Hemp Regulations as the Revised Edition 2020 volume prints them, showing the subsidiary laws as at 31 December 2020, together with the 1990 Act text. The schedule placement in this cell is read off the instrument and is not printed in the quoted dossier extract, which names the Act's schedules only as a range.
Consequences if caught
No penalty is stated for this row and that is deliberate. Section 7(1) of the Act makes it unlawful to have a controlled drug in your possession, section 7(2) makes that an offence, and section 7(3) makes possession with intent to supply a separate offence. Those provisions bite on a controlled drug, and whether this substance is one was not established, so a penalty sentence would have nothing to attach to. What is established, and is worth carrying, is that the Act's trafficking penalties in section 17 of the 1990 text do not vary by class, while the ordinary possession maximum in section 27 does and is taken from a Third Schedule that was not read. One caution about section numbers. The Act text read here is the Misuse of Drugs Act 1990, Act 22 of 1990, as UNODC holds it, and the current Chapter 103 has been renumbered since. The Cannabis Violation Tickets Regulations cite section 12 for the smoking offence the 1990 text puts at section 11, and section 18 for the school premises presumption the 1990 text puts at section 17, so the current numbering runs one ahead from about section 11. Section 7 is the possession section in both, which the ticket schedule confirms independently. The same amendments that renumbered the Act may also have changed what these provisions say, so every figure quoted here from the 1990 text is the figure as enacted in 1990 and its currency is not established.
If prescribed / medical
No prescription route is stated for this row, because a prescribing rule in these Regulations attaches to a schedule and this substance is in none of them. Regulation 4 is the rule a traveller would want, and it operates only on Schedules IV and V: it lifts the section 5(1) import and export prohibition for both, and the section 7(1) possession prohibition for a Schedule IV drug in a medicinal product and for a Schedule V preparation outright. Whether this substance is reached by the Act's own Second Schedule, and so is a controlled drug taking none of those exemptions, was not settled here.
Kosovo
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Criminal Code of Kosovo (narcotics articles) together with the Law on Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Kosovo is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Kosovo's drug schedule; the Criminal Code of Kosovo (narcotics articles) together with the Law on Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Kosovo, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of Kosovo (narcotics articles) together with the Law on Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Kosovo, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of Kosovo (narcotics articles) together with the Law on Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of Kosovo (narcotics articles) · Law on Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors · gzk.rks-gov.net · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Timor-Leste
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Penal Code of Timor-Leste (drug-trafficking articles) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Timor-Leste is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Timor-Leste's drug schedule; the Penal Code of Timor-Leste (drug-trafficking articles) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Timor-Leste, drug trafficking falls under the Penal Code of Timor-Leste (drug-trafficking articles), backed by the country's adhesion to the UN 1988 Convention. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the Penal Code's maximum term is 30 years, with no life imprisonment; the precise drug-trafficking article and penalty bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Timor-Leste, drug trafficking falls under the Penal Code of Timor-Leste (drug-trafficking articles), backed by the country's adhesion to the UN 1988 Convention. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the Penal Code's maximum term is 30 years, with no life imprisonment; the precise drug-trafficking article and penalty bands are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same framework, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Penal Code of Timor-Leste (drug-trafficking articles) · UN 1988 Convention (adhesion) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Eritrea
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Penal Code of Eritrea 2015 (drug-control provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Eritrea is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Eritrea's drug schedule; the Penal Code of Eritrea 2015 (drug-control provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Eritrea, drugs fall under the Penal Code of Eritrea 2015 (drug-control provisions), which grades drug trafficking by scale: small-scale trafficking carries 3 to 5 years, a commercial quantity 5 to 7 years, a large commercial quantity 7 to 10 years, and supply to a minor 16 to 19 years; personal-use possession is a lesser offence; the precise article is left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Eritrea retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes, but its Penal Code drug provisions do not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Eritrea, drugs fall under the Penal Code of Eritrea 2015 (drug-control provisions), which grades drug trafficking by scale: small-scale trafficking carries 3 to 5 years, a commercial quantity 5 to 7 years, a large commercial quantity 7 to 10 years, and supply to a minor 16 to 19 years; personal-use possession is a lesser offence; the precise article is left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Eritrea retains the death penalty for the gravest non-drug crimes, but its Penal Code drug provisions do not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Penal Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Penal Code of Eritrea 2015 (drug-control provisions) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Somalia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Somali Penal Code of 1964 (unrevised) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Somalia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Somalia's drug schedule; the Somali Penal Code of 1964 (unrevised) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Somalia, drug offences fall under the Somali Penal Code of 1964 (unrevised); Somalia has ratified the UN narcotic conventions but has no modern codified drug-control statute with quantified penalties, so the precise penalty is not cleanly pinned. The maximum penalty asserted under the named (dated) Penal Code is imprisonment; the specific penalty is left to confirmation against the current statute. Not confirmed, Somalia carries out executions for the gravest non-drug crimes, but no codified drug-death-penalty statute article is confirmed here; the 1964 Penal Code governs drug offences and its specific penalties are not confirmed. Verify against the current statute.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Somalia, drug offences fall under the Somali Penal Code of 1964 (unrevised); Somalia has ratified the UN narcotic conventions but has no modern codified drug-control statute with quantified penalties, so the precise penalty is not cleanly pinned. The maximum penalty asserted under the named (dated) Penal Code is imprisonment; the specific penalty is left to confirmation against the current statute. Not confirmed, Somalia carries out executions for the gravest non-drug crimes, but no codified drug-death-penalty statute article is confirmed here; the 1964 Penal Code governs drug offences and its specific penalties are not confirmed. Verify against the current statute. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same dated Penal Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Somali Penal Code of 1964 (unrevised) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Congo
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Republic of the Congo's Penal Code drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Republic of the Congo is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Republic of the Congo's drug schedule; the Republic of the Congo's Penal Code drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville), drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville), drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Republic of the Congo Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Burundi
Legal status
Not confirmed, Burundi's Penal Code 2009 drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Burundi is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Burundi's drug schedule; Burundi's Penal Code 2009 drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Burundi, drugs fall under the Penal Code 2009 drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Burundi, drugs fall under the Penal Code 2009 drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Burundi Penal Code 2009 drug provisions / loi sur les stupéfiants · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Djibouti
Legal status
Not confirmed, Djibouti's national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Djibouti is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Djibouti's drug schedule; Djibouti's national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Djibouti, drugs fall under the national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Djibouti, drugs fall under the national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Djibouti national drug law / Penal Code drug provisions · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Gabon
Legal status
Not confirmed, Gabon's Penal Code drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Gabon is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Gabon's drug schedule; Gabon's Penal Code drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Gabon, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Gabon, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions (loi sur les stupéfiants). Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Gabon Penal Code drug provisions / loi sur les stupéfiants · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Guinea
Legal status
Not confirmed, Guinea's drug-control law (Loi L/2016/035/AN; Loi sur le contrôle des drogues) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Guinea is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Guinea's drug schedule; Guinea's drug-control law (Loi L/2016/035/AN; Loi sur le contrôle des drogues) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Guinea, drugs fall under the national drug-control law (Loi L/2016/035/AN; Loi sur le contrôle des drogues). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Guinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Guinea, drugs fall under the national drug-control law (Loi L/2016/035/AN; Loi sur le contrôle des drogues). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Guinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Guinea drug-control law (Loi L/2016/035/AN · Loi sur le contrôle des drogues) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Niger
Legal status
Not confirmed, Niger's drug law (Loi n° 99-42 du 23 septembre 1999 sur la lutte contre la drogue) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Niger is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Niger's drug schedule; Niger's drug law (Loi n° 99-42 du 23 septembre 1999 sur la lutte contre la drogue) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Niger, drugs fall under Loi n° 99-42 du 23 septembre 1999 sur la lutte contre la drogue. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Nigerien drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Niger, drugs fall under Loi n° 99-42 du 23 septembre 1999 sur la lutte contre la drogue. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Nigerien drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi n° 99-42 du 23 septembre 1999 sur la lutte contre la drogue (Niger) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Chad
Legal status
Not confirmed, Chad's drug law (Loi n° 31/PR/2018 / Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Chad is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Chad's drug schedule; Chad's drug law (Loi n° 31/PR/2018 / Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Chad, drugs fall under Loi n° 31/PR/2018 together with the Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Chadian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Chad, drugs fall under Loi n° 31/PR/2018 together with the Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Chadian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Loi n° 31/PR/2018 / Penal Code drug provisions (Chad) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Central African Republic
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Central African Republic's Penal Code drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Central African Republic is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Central African Republic's drug schedule; the Central African Republic's Penal Code drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Central African Republic, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Central African drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Central African Republic, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Central African drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Central African Republic Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Liberia
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014 (as amended in 2022) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Liberia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Liberia's drug schedule; the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014 (as amended in 2022) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Liberia, drugs fall under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014, as amended in 2022 to reclassify drug offences as a first-degree felony. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Liberia retains the death penalty in law for the gravest non-drug crimes (it has not carried out an execution in decades and has acceded to the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Liberia, drugs fall under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014, as amended in 2022 to reclassify drug offences as a first-degree felony. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Liberia retains the death penalty in law for the gravest non-drug crimes (it has not carried out an execution in decades and has acceded to the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014 (as amended 2022) (Liberia) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Equatorial Guinea
Legal status
Not confirmed, Equatorial Guinea's Penal Code 2022 drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Equatorial Guinea is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Equatorial Guinea's drug schedule; Equatorial Guinea's Penal Code 2022 drug provisions (national drug law) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Equatorial Guinea, drugs fall under the Penal Code 2022 drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Equatoguinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Equatorial Guinea, drugs fall under the Penal Code 2022 drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Equatoguinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Equatorial Guinea Penal Code 2022 drug provisions / national drug law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Guinea-Bissau
Legal status
Not confirmed, Guinea-Bissau's drug-control law (Lei n.º 7/2008) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Guinea-Bissau is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Guinea-Bissau's drug schedule; Guinea-Bissau's drug-control law (Lei n.º 7/2008) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Guinea-Bissau, drugs fall under Lei n.º 7/2008 (the national drug-control law); the country is a known trans-shipment state. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Bissau-Guinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Guinea-Bissau, drugs fall under Lei n.º 7/2008 (the national drug-control law); the country is a known trans-shipment state. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Bissau-Guinean drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Lei n.º 7/2008 / Guinea-Bissau national drug-control law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Comoros
Legal status
Not confirmed, Comoros' national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Comoros is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Comoros' drug schedule; Comoros' national drug law (Penal Code drug provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Comoros, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Comorian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Comoros, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Comorian drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Comoros Penal Code drug provisions / national drug law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
South Sudan
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Penal Code Act, 2008 (South Sudan) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in South Sudan is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against South Sudan's drug schedule; the Penal Code Act, 2008 (South Sudan) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In South Sudan, drugs fall under the Penal Code Act, 2008. Under the Penal Code Act 2008, high-level/aggravated drug trafficking is a capital offence, the Penal Code enumerates the offences punishable by death, which include high-level drug trafficking alongside murder, treason and terrorism resulting in death; lower-level drug offences and personal-use possession carry imprisonment and/or a fine. South Sudan actively carries out executions (140+ between 2011 and 2018, with 300+ reported on death row), and a death sentence must be confirmed by the President and the Supreme Court. The specific Penal Code article for the drug capital provision is left to confirmation against the current Penal Code; the capital-for-high-level-trafficking assertion itself stands.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In South Sudan, drugs fall under the Penal Code Act, 2008. Under the Penal Code Act 2008, high-level/aggravated drug trafficking is a capital offence, the Penal Code enumerates the offences punishable by death, which include high-level drug trafficking alongside murder, treason and terrorism resulting in death; lower-level drug offences and personal-use possession carry imprisonment and/or a fine. South Sudan actively carries out executions (140+ between 2011 and 2018, with 300+ reported on death row), and a death sentence must be confirmed by the President and the Supreme Court. The specific Penal Code article for the drug capital provision is left to confirmation against the current Penal Code; the capital-for-high-level-trafficking assertion itself stands. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Penal Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
The Penal Code Act, 2008 (South Sudan) · wipo.int · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Vanuatu
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 12) (Vanuatu) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Vanuatu is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Vanuatu's drug schedule; the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 12) (Vanuatu) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Vanuatu, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 12). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Ni-Vanuatu drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Vanuatu, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 12). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Ni-Vanuatu drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Narcotics Act 1967 (Samoa) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Samoa is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Samoa's drug schedule; the Narcotics Act 1967 (Samoa) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Samoa, drugs fall under the Narcotics Act 1967. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Samoan drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Samoa, drugs fall under the Narcotics Act 1967. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Samoan drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 98) (Solomon Islands) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Solomon Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Solomon Islands' drug schedule; the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 98) (Solomon Islands) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Solomon Islands, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 98). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Solomon Islands drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Solomon Islands, drugs fall under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Cap. 98). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Solomon Islands drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Andorra's Penal Code (Codi Penal) drug-trafficking provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Andorra is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Andorra's drug schedule; Andorra's Penal Code (Codi Penal) drug-trafficking provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Andorra, drugs fall under the Penal Code (Codi Penal) drug-trafficking provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Andorran drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Andorra, drugs fall under the Penal Code (Codi Penal) drug-trafficking provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Andorran drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Penal Code provisions, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Monaco's drug law (Penal Code / Loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Monaco is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Monaco's drug schedule; Monaco's drug law (Penal Code / Loi sur les stupéfiants) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Monaco, drugs fall under the Penal Code together with the Loi sur les stupéfiants. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Monégasque drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Monaco, drugs fall under the Penal Code together with the Loi sur les stupéfiants. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Monégasque drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Monaco Penal Code / Loi sur les stupéfiants · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
San Marino
Legal status
Not confirmed, San Marino's Penal Code drug provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in San Marino is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against San Marino's drug schedule; San Marino's Penal Code drug provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In San Marino, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Sammarinese drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In San Marino, drugs fall under the Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal for the current Sammarinese drug law was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is controlled under the same provisions, with a regulated medical-cannabis regime permitted while recreational supply remains prohibited. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
San Marino Penal Code drug provisions · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Cook Islands
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Cook Islands' Narcotics and Misuse of Drugs Act 2004 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Cook Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Cook Islands' drug schedule; the Cook Islands' Narcotics and Misuse of Drugs Act 2004 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Cook Islands, drugs fall under the Narcotics and Misuse of Drugs Act 2004. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Cook Islands, drugs fall under the Narcotics and Misuse of Drugs Act 2004. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Narcotics and Misuse of Drugs Act 2004 (Cook Islands) · paclii.org · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Nauru
Legal status
Not confirmed, Nauru's drug law (Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 / Crimes Act 2016 drug provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Nauru is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Nauru's drug schedule; Nauru's drug law (Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 / Crimes Act 2016 drug provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Nauru, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 together with the Crimes Act 2016 drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Nauru, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 together with the Crimes Act 2016 drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Illicit Drugs Control Act 2004 / Crimes Act 2016 drug provisions (Nauru) · paclii.org · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Palau
Legal status
Not confirmed, Palau's National Code Title 34 (Crimes) controlled-substances provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Palau is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Palau's drug schedule; Palau's National Code Title 34 (Crimes) controlled-substances provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Palau, drugs fall under the National Code Title 34 (Crimes) controlled-substances provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Palau, drugs fall under the National Code Title 34 (Crimes) controlled-substances provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Title 34 provisions, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Palau National Code Title 34 (Crimes) controlled-substances provisions · paclii.org · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Tonga
Legal status
Not confirmed, Tonga's Illicit Drugs Control Act (as amended in 2020 and 2021) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Tonga is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Tonga's drug schedule; Tonga's Illicit Drugs Control Act (as amended in 2020 and 2021) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Tonga, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act, as amended in 2020 and 2021. The 2020 amendment toughened penalties (modelled on New Zealand's drug law); trafficking and serious offences carry up to life imprisonment, and the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (up to life). Tonga retains the death penalty in law for murder and treason under the Criminal Offences Act (abolitionist in practice, no execution since 1982), but its drug legislation does NOT provide a death penalty: a 2021 bill to extend the death penalty to serious drug trafficking was debated and REJECTED by the Legislative Assembly (the death-penalty provisions were withdrawn before the Illicit Drugs Control Bill passed 19-0), and a 2004 proposal to add the death penalty for drug possession was likewise defeated. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (up to life).
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Tonga, drugs fall under the Illicit Drugs Control Act, as amended in 2020 and 2021. The 2020 amendment toughened penalties (modelled on New Zealand's drug law); trafficking and serious offences carry up to life imprisonment, and the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (up to life). Tonga retains the death penalty in law for murder and treason under the Criminal Offences Act (abolitionist in practice, no execution since 1982), but its drug legislation does NOT provide a death penalty: a 2021 bill to extend the death penalty to serious drug trafficking was debated and REJECTED by the Legislative Assembly (the death-penalty provisions were withdrawn before the Illicit Drugs Control Bill passed 19-0), and a 2004 proposal to add the death penalty for drug possession was likewise defeated. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment (up to life). [reported, NOT enacted] A 2021 private member's bill proposed a mandatory death sentence for trafficking 5 kg or more of a Class A drug; it was rejected and is NOT law. Verify against the current statute. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
· Updated July 14, 2026
Kiribati
Legal status
Not confirmed, Kiribati's Penal Code / drug-control provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Kiribati is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Kiribati's drug schedule; Kiribati's Penal Code / drug-control provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Kiribati, drugs fall under the Penal Code / drug-control provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Kiribati, drugs fall under the Penal Code / drug-control provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same provisions, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Tuvalu's Penal Code / drug-control provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Tuvalu is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Tuvalu's drug schedule; Tuvalu's Penal Code / drug-control provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Tuvalu, drugs fall under the Penal Code / drug-control provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Tuvalu, drugs fall under the Penal Code / drug-control provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same provisions, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Marshall Islands Revised Code (Title 25 / controlled-substances provisions) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Marshall Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Marshall Islands' drug schedule; the Marshall Islands Revised Code (Title 25 / controlled-substances provisions) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Marshall Islands, drugs fall under the Revised Code, Title 25 (controlled-substances provisions). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Marshall Islands, drugs fall under the Revised Code, Title 25 (controlled-substances provisions). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the FSM Code Title 11 (Crimes) / controlled-substances provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Micronesia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Micronesia's drug schedule; the FSM Code Title 11 (Crimes) / controlled-substances provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Micronesia (the Federated States of Micronesia), drugs fall under the FSM Code, Title 11 (Crimes) / controlled-substances provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Micronesia (the Federated States of Micronesia), drugs fall under the FSM Code, Title 11 (Crimes) / controlled-substances provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute (paclii.org) with UNODC (unodc.org/cld) and Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
FSM Code Title 11 (Crimes) / controlled-substances provisions · paclii.org · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Suriname
Legal status
This act does not reach it. Tobacco is not listed in either annex to the Wet verdovende middelen and no plant of the genus Nicotiana is named in article 2. The text read for this cell is the consolidation that stops at S.B. 2002 no. 68, so it is twenty four years old. Article 3 lid 2 lets further middelen be designated by Staatsbesluit and article 3 lid 3 lets the Minister designate one at short notice with the approval of the Procureur-Generaal, and article 4 lid 2 does the same for lijst II. No register of those designations was located, so anything added since 2002 is outside what was read and this does not rule out a later designation.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. This act carries no death penalty and its heaviest sentence is levenslange gevangenisstraf, life imprisonment, under article 11 lid 1. Searched as 'tabak', 'tobacco', 'nicotiana' and 'sigaret'. All four return nothing. Article 2, the only provision of this act that forbids the cultivation of a plant, names Papaver Somniferum (L), Canabis Sativa (L), Erythroxylon coca (Lamarck), Erythroxylon Novogranatense (Morris), Hieronymus and other Erythroxylaceën, and tobacco is not among them, so growing it is not an offence under this act. Tobacco control in Suriname is public health and excise law and was not read here. No offence in this act reaches it, because every prohibition in articles 3 and 4 is framed by reference to lijst I, to lijst II or to a designation made under article 3 lid 2, article 3 lid 3 or article 4 lid 2, and this substance is on neither list. The act carries no analogue limb and no definition by effect. The bands in article 11, which run from at most seven years for a non-intentional lijst II possession up to levenslange gevangenisstraf for an intentional supply or import, therefore have nothing to attach to on this row.
If prescribed / medical
This act does not place it on either list, so the article 5 recept machinery and the article 7 exemptions do not reach it. Whether it is regulated as a medicine, as a food or as a consumer product under Suriname's separate law was not established here, because that law was not read.
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation duty arises under this act, because the substance is outside it. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription in the ordinary way. No local traveller permit scheme under this act was established here, and the text relied on stops at S.B. 2002 no. 68. Any lijst, onderdeel or numbered part named in this cell are read from the annex to the act itself and are not printed in the quoted dossier extract, whose quotation column for this jurisdiction carries no division marker for any substance.
Wet verdovende middelen, S.B. 1998 no. 14, gelijk zij luidt na de daarin aangebrachte wijzigingen bij S.B. 2002 no. 68, articles 1 to 14 and the annexed lijst I and lijst II, read as at S.B. 2002 no. 68, the last amendment carried in the text consulted · Updated October 2, 2026
North Korea
Legal status
Not confirmed, the DPRK Criminal Code (2013 revision and later amendments) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in North Korea is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against North Korea's drug schedule; the DPRK Criminal Code (2013 revision and later amendments) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In North Korea, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of the DPRK (2013 revision and later amendments). The 2013 penal code revision designated illegal drug production a capital offence, and serious drug trafficking and smuggling are treated as grave crimes that can carry the death penalty; lower-level offences carry imprisonment or corrective labour. North Korea is among the small group of states with believed or confirmed drug-related executions in recent years (per the Harm Reduction International Global Overview); independent verification is constrained by extreme state opacity, and the specific Criminal Code article is left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for the gravest drug offences is death. A primary statute portal for DPRK law was not located; this cell is sourced via the Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor (loc.gov) and the UNODC legal database, with Harm Reduction International as a corroborating record.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In North Korea, drugs fall under the Criminal Code of the DPRK (2013 revision and later amendments). The 2013 penal code revision designated illegal drug production a capital offence, and serious drug trafficking and smuggling are treated as grave crimes that can carry the death penalty; lower-level offences carry imprisonment or corrective labour. North Korea is among the small group of states with believed or confirmed drug-related executions in recent years (per the Harm Reduction International Global Overview); independent verification is constrained by extreme state opacity, and the specific Criminal Code article is left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for the gravest drug offences is death. A primary statute portal for DPRK law was not located; this cell is sourced via the Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor (loc.gov) and the UNODC legal database, with Harm Reduction International as a corroborating record. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Criminal Code, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Criminal Code of the DPRK (2013 revision and later amendments) · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
State of Palestine
Legal status
Not confirmed, the applicable Palestinian penal law (Gaza Strip military orders / West Bank Palestinian Authority framework) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the State of Palestine is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the State of Palestine's drug schedule; the applicable Palestinian penal law (Gaza Strip military orders / West Bank Palestinian Authority framework) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the State of Palestine, drug law differs by territory. In the Hamas-administered Gaza Strip, serious drug trafficking is a capital offence under military orders, and Gaza courts have sentenced people to death for drug trafficking (for example, four death sentences in 2022) with executions carried out. In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority applies a different framework and maintains a longstanding execution moratorium. Harm Reduction International's 2023 Global Overview lists the State of Palestine among states retaining the death penalty for drug offences. The precise governing instrument and article are left to confirmation against the current law in each territory. [jurisdiction-split] Capital drug provisions are associated with the Hamas-administered Gaza Strip; the West Bank / Palestinian Authority framework differs and maintains an execution moratorium. Verify against the current governing law in each territory. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor (loc.gov) and the UNODC legal database, with Harm Reduction International as a corroborating record.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the State of Palestine, drug law differs by territory. In the Hamas-administered Gaza Strip, serious drug trafficking is a capital offence under military orders, and Gaza courts have sentenced people to death for drug trafficking (for example, four death sentences in 2022) with executions carried out. In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority applies a different framework and maintains a longstanding execution moratorium. Harm Reduction International's 2023 Global Overview lists the State of Palestine among states retaining the death penalty for drug offences. The precise governing instrument and article are left to confirmation against the current law in each territory. [jurisdiction-split] Capital drug provisions are associated with the Hamas-administered Gaza Strip; the West Bank / Palestinian Authority framework differs and maintains an execution moratorium. Verify against the current governing law in each territory. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor (loc.gov) and the UNODC legal database, with Harm Reduction International as a corroborating record. Cannabis is a controlled drug, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Antigua and Barbuda
Legal status
Not listed, and this Act does not reach it at all. This is a positive finding of absence and not a deferral. The terms searched were tobacco, Nicotiana, cigarette, snuff, each returning nothing in Parts I, II or III of the First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap. 283. The entries nearest to it were read in full and rejected: 'Cannabis and cannabis resin.', 'Coca leaf.' and 'Poppy-straw and concentrate of poppy-straw.'.. The Act names exactly three plants or plant materials, the cannabis plant, the coca leaf and the opium poppy and its straw, and tobacco is not among them. Part IV defines coca leaf and poppy straw and section 2 defines cannabis, and none of those definitions could extend to a different genus. Tobacco control is dealt with by other legislation which was not read for this cell. Stated as at Parts I, II and III of the First Schedule as printed in the Revised Edition read on 22 September 2026, whose amendment list ends at Act 18 of 1989.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. No provision of the Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap. 283 imposes a capital penalty. The heaviest term printed anywhere in it is 14 years, in the General column of the Second Schedule against section 10, and section 26 gives 10 years on conviction on indictment for import or export of a Class A or Class B drug. This Part placement is not printed in the dossier quotation, which cites only 'First Schedule, Parts I to III' as a search scope; it is read from the Act's own First Schedule. The First Schedule is printed in two columns, so the class is taken from the entry's position within its Part and not from the line it shares with the facing column. Nothing in the Act attaches a punishment to a substance that is not a controlled drug: sections 4, 5, 6 and 8 each operate on a controlled drug or on a plant of the genus Cannabis, and the Second Schedule columns are headed by the three classes. So no figure from the Second Schedule is stated for this row, and that is a consequence of the finding rather than a gap in it. The one route by which an unnamed substance can still be caught is a group rule, and each was tested for this row: paragraph 2 of Part I for a stereoisomeric form, paragraph 3 for an ester or ether, paragraph 4 for a salt, and paragraph 5 for a preparation or other product containing a listed substance. None reaches it. This is stated from the consolidated text of Cap. 283 in the Revised Edition of the Laws of Antigua and Barbuda, whose printed amendment list runs 21 of 1973, 5 of 1975, 10 of 1979, 9 of 1982, 11 of 1987 and 18 of 1989, read on 22 September 2026. Section 3(2) provides that the Minister may by Order make such amendments to the First Schedule or any part thereof as may be necessary, so an Order made after that consolidation is not excluded by this cell.
If prescribed / medical
Section 9 builds the prescribing and dispensing regime around a controlled drug, and this substance is not one on the text read here, so no section 9 route applies to it. Any medicines control on it would come from the Medical Act and the pharmacy law rather than from Cap. 283, and neither was read for this cell. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original pharmacy packaging with the prescription.
Barbados
Legal status
Under the Drug Abuse (Prevention and Control) Act, Cap. 131, enacted as Act 1990-14 and commenced 15 August 1990, read in the L.R.O. 1991 revised edition, it is not a controlled drug. The plant is not named anywhere in the First Schedule. That absence is meaningful rather than accidental, because Part I does name plant material where Parliament chose to: «coca leaf», «poppy-straw and concentrate OF poppy-straw» and the cannabis entry are all botanical, and this plant is in none of them. Tobacco excise, retail and public place restrictions in Barbados sit in other legislation that was not read for this cell. Section 3 makes a substance a controlled drug only by its presence in the First Schedule, and section 3(2) lets the Minister by order add to or remove from Parts I to III of that Schedule, after consultation with the Drug Formulary Committee under section 3(3) and subject to affirmative resolution under section 3(4). The edition read is the L.R.O. 1991 consolidation served by the Barbados law courts statute portal. No amending order or later revision was located on that portal, so anything made after that revision has not been read and is not asserted here.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The Fourth Schedule, given effect by section 37, sets the punishment for every offence under the Act, and it was read row by row from the section 4(3) row to the section 35(3) row, which is its last. Not one row carries death. The heaviest punishment it prints anywhere is «Imprisonment for life» on indictment. No offence under this Act attaches to it, because every offence in Parts II to IV is framed against «a controlled drug» and section 3 makes that a schedule question. The section 8 misuse offence, the section 9 equipment offence and the section 18 trafficking offence all fail at the same first step. Part I's botanical list runs to three entries and each of them carries real consequences, including a cultivation offence under section 11(2) punished by a fine of $500,000 or 20 years on indictment. This plant is in none of them and no cultivation offence under this Act reaches it. Barbados retains capital punishment for murder in its general criminal law. This Act is not part of that and provides no death penalty for any drug offence, which is why the opening sentence reads as it does.
If prescribed / medical
Section 6(1) makes possession of a controlled drug unlawful unless regulations under section 12 permit it, and section 12(3) requires the Minister to secure that a practitioner acting as such may prescribe, administer, compound or supply, and that a practitioner or pharmacist may possess for that purpose. The Act defines «doctor» as a medical practitioner registered in the Medical Register under the Medical Registration Act, Cap. 371, and «dentist» and «veterinary practitioner» by the equivalent Barbados registers, so the lawful route runs through a Barbados registration and not through a foreign one. Importation is a separate question under section 4(1), which an arriving traveller engages on their own account. It is not a controlled drug and section 12 has nothing to say about it. Any restriction on importing it as a traveller comes from customs and excise law that was not read for this cell.
Dominica
Legal status
Tobacco is not a controlled drug under this Act. No plant of the genus Nicotiana is printed in Parts I, II or III, read in full as page images at the revision note «L.R.O. 1/1991» printed in the footer of those pages, and the only plant materials the Schedule carries are «Cannabis and cannabis resin» in Class B and «Coca leaf», «Opium, whether raw, prepared of medicinal» and «Poppy-straw and concentrate of poppy-straw» in Class A. Tobacco control in Dominica sits in separate legislation which was not read for this row. The compilation recorded «TABACO» as the printed entry for this row. That string does not appear anywhere in this Act; the Act is written in English and that record's quotation column is largely in another language, which is a property of the record rather than of the instrument, so it is reported here and is not offered as a quotation from the Act. The reading is stated as at the revision note «L.R.O. 1/1991» printed in the footer of those pages; section 4(3) lets the Minister amend Parts I to III by Order and this consolidation reproduces none made after that note.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The word death appears nowhere in this Act, counted across the whole 64 page chapter. The ceiling, however, is not in the Fourth Schedule: every limb of that Schedule stops at fourteen years and $200,000, and section 16 sits outside it carrying imprisonment for life. No limb of the Fourth Schedule attaches to this row, because the Fourth Schedule prosecutes offences under sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21 and 24 of this Act and every one of those offences is defined by reference to a controlled drug, which section 4(1)(a) ties to Parts I, II and III of the Third Schedule. Section 7(4) carries the only quantity figures in the Act and it names five substances: more than two grammes of diacetylmorphine, one gramme of cocaine, fifty-five grammes of opium, three grammes of morphine, and for cannabis or cannabis resin twenty-eight grammes, a figure the 1991 consolidation prints as fifteen and which Act No. 16 of 2020 raised, and this substance is not among them. The Act's true ceiling is not in the Fourth Schedule either: section 16(2) and section 16(5) carry imprisonment for life on conviction on indictment, and a mandatory minimum of seven years on summary conviction, for a drug trafficking offence or possession for the purpose of drug trafficking committed in a school, prison or military premises or with violence, official corruption or a child carrier. Both limbs are keyed to a controlled drug as section 4(1)(a) defines it, so neither can attach to a row that no printed entry places. One later amendment was found, read in full and is relied on here: the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 16 of 2020, assented to and gazetted on 30 October 2020. It amends section 7(4), inserts new sections 7A and 7B and amends section 8, and it does not touch the Third Schedule, so it moves the cannabis possession rules without moving any substance between the Parts. Its existence is the measured proof that the consolidation held here is not current, which is why an absence from that consolidation is not published as a finding. Nothing here speaks to any non drug statute of Dominica that may regulate it, none of which was read for this row.
Grenada
Legal status
Not listed in the First Schedule to the Drug Abuse (Prevention and Control) Act, Chapter 84A, as that schedule stands as at SRO 16 of 2011. Neither the plant nor its alkaloid is printed anywhere in the act. Section 3(2) lets the Minister amend the First Schedule by Order subject to affirmative resolution, so the printed schedule is not the last word and no Order later than SRO 16 of 2011 was read here.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Searched as 'tobacco', 'tabaco', 'Nicotiana' and 'cigarette'. None appears. This row and the nicotine row reach the same answer by different routes: the plant route fails because the act names only cannabis, the coca plant and the opium poppy, and the constituent route fails because nicotine is not an entry either. Tobacco in Grenada is dealt with by tobacco control and customs law, which was not read here. Section 3(1) defines a controlled drug exhaustively as a narcotic drug listed in Part I of the First Schedule, a psychotropic substance listed in Part II, or a listed substance listed in Part III. There is no analogue limb and no definition by effect. No offence in this act reaches it, because every offence in Parts II to V is framed in relation to a controlled drug and section 3(1) confines that expression to the three Parts of the First Schedule. The Part of the First Schedule named in this cell is read from the act itself and is not printed in the quoted dossier extract, which cites the schedule only as Parts I to IV.
If prescribed / medical
Not a controlled drug under this act, so the section 12 and section 24 prescription machinery for controlled drugs does not reach tobacco. Whether it is regulated as a medicine or as a consumer product under Grenada's separate pharmacy and medicines law was not established here.
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation requirement arises under this act, because the substance is outside it. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original pharmacy packaging with the prescription. No local traveller permit scheme was established here.
Drug Abuse (Prevention and Control) Act, Chapter 84A of the Laws of Grenada, Act No. 7 of 1992 as amended by SRO 16 of 2011, sections 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 21, 24 and 37, the First Schedule Parts I to IV, the Second Schedule and the Fifth Schedule, read as at SRO 16 of 2011 · laws.gov.gd · consulted 22 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Legal status
Not confirmed, Saint Kitts and Nevis's Drugs (Prevention and Abatement of the Misuse and Abuse) Act is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Saint Kitts and Nevis is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Saint Kitts and Nevis's drug schedule; Saint Kitts and Nevis's Drugs (Prevention and Abatement of the Misuse and Abuse) Act is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Saint Kitts and Nevis, drugs fall under Saint Kitts and Nevis's Drugs (Prevention and Abatement of the Misuse and Abuse) Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Saint Kitts and Nevis retains the death penalty in law for murder (abolitionist in practice), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Saint Kitts and Nevis, drugs fall under Saint Kitts and Nevis's Drugs (Prevention and Abatement of the Misuse and Abuse) Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Saint Kitts and Nevis retains the death penalty in law for murder (abolitionist in practice), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Saint Kitts and Nevis's Drugs (Prevention and Abatement of the Misuse and Abuse) Act · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Saint Lucia
Legal status
Not a named entry in Schedule 2 to the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, Cap. 3.02, in any of Part I, Part II or Part III, as the act stands in the Revised Edition showing the law as at 31 December 2021. The search terms tobacco, Nicotiana, cigarette and smoking were run across the whole act; tobacco and cigarette return zero and smoking appears only in relation to cannabis and opium. Schedule 2 contains no entry for tobacco or for any tobacco product. The only smoking provisions in the act are section 11(c) and (d), which reach an occupier who permits cannabis, cannabis resin or opium to be prepared for smoking or smoked, and section 27A, which prohibits smoking cannabis in a public place, neither of which touches tobacco. Tobacco control, excise and public health law govern tobacco in Saint Lucia and none of it was read here. Section 4(2) lets the Minister amend Schedule 2 by statutory instrument after consultation with or on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and section 49 lets the Minister amend the Schedules by order, so the printed schedule is not the last word. No statutory instrument later than the Revised Edition showing the law as at 31 December 2021 was read here, and no index of Saint Lucia statutory instruments could be enumerated, so that is a real limit on this cell and not a form of words.
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Section 4(1)(a) confines the expression controlled drugs to a substance or product specified in Part I, Part II or Part III of Schedule 2, and every offence in sections 5, 6, 8 and 12 and every punishment in Schedule 3 is keyed to a controlled drug. A substance outside Schedule 2 therefore attracts no offence and no penalty under this act, and no trafficking ceiling under section 25. Schedule 2 contains no entry for tobacco or for any tobacco product. The only smoking provisions in the act are section 11(c) and (d), which reach an occupier who permits cannabis, cannabis resin or opium to be prepared for smoking or smoked, and section 27A, which prohibits smoking cannabis in a public place, neither of which touches tobacco. This is an absence finding about Schedule 2 as printed in the Revised Edition showing the law as at 31 December 2021, not a statement that the substance is unregulated by any other Saint Lucia law, and no other Saint Lucia law was read here.
If prescribed / medical
Not a controlled drug under this act, so the practitioner exemption route in section 10(3) and the prescription regulation power in section 21(2)(g) do not reach it. Whether it is an authorised or a prescription only medicine in Saint Lucia turns on medicines and pharmacy law that was not read here.
Documentation
The act puts no documentation duty on a private traveller and none at all on a substance outside Schedule 2. Sections 15 to 18 govern controlled drugs brought into Saint Lucia in transit under an export authorisation or diversion certificate, and section 21(2)(b) and (c) put documentation and record keeping on the trade in controlled drugs. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original pharmacy packaging with the prescription as ordinary practice.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Legal status
Not confirmed, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's drug schedule; Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, drugs fall under Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines retains the death penalty in law for murder (abolitionist in practice), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, drugs fall under Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines retains the death penalty in law for murder (abolitionist in practice), but its drug legislation does not provide a death penalty, the maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Act, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Haiti
Legal status
Not confirmed, Haiti's drug-control law / Penal Code drug provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Haiti is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Haiti's drug schedule; Haiti's drug-control law / Penal Code drug provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Haiti, drugs fall under Haiti's drug-control law / Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Haiti, drugs fall under Haiti's drug-control law / Penal Code drug provisions. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Haiti's drug-control law / Penal Code drug provisions · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Sao Tome and Principe
Legal status
Not confirmed, Sao Tome and Principe's Lusophone Penal Code / drug-control law is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Sao Tome and Principe is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Sao Tome and Principe's drug schedule; Sao Tome and Principe's Lusophone Penal Code / drug-control law is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Sao Tome and Principe, drugs fall under Sao Tome and Principe's Lusophone Penal Code / drug-control law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Sao Tome and Principe, drugs fall under Sao Tome and Principe's Lusophone Penal Code / drug-control law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Sao Tome and Principe's Lusophone Penal Code / drug-control law · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Holy See
Legal status
Not confirmed, Vatican City State criminal law (Law No. CCXCVII and related) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Holy See is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Holy See's drug schedule; Vatican City State criminal law (Law No. CCXCVII and related) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Holy See, drugs fall under Vatican City State criminal law (Law No. CCXCVII and related). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Vatican City is a very small jurisdiction with minimal independent drug caselaw; this cell asserts controlled status conservatively, and the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Holy See, drugs fall under Vatican City State criminal law (Law No. CCXCVII and related). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. Vatican City is a very small jurisdiction with minimal independent drug caselaw; this cell asserts controlled status conservatively, and the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. A primary statute portal was not located; this cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress pending a primary portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same law, with no legal recreational or medical regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Vatican City State criminal law (Law No. CCXCVII and related) · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Puerto Rico (US)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Puerto Rico's Controlled Substances Act (Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico, 24 LPRA) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Puerto Rico is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Puerto Rico's drug schedule; Puerto Rico's Controlled Substances Act (Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico, 24 LPRA) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Puerto Rico, drugs fall under the Controlled Substances Act of Puerto Rico (Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico, 24 LPRA), the territory's own statute, distinct from the US federal Controlled Substances Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Puerto Rico, drugs fall under the Controlled Substances Act of Puerto Rico (Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico, 24 LPRA), the territory's own statute, distinct from the US federal Controlled Substances Act. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Cannabis is controlled under the same Act with a regulated medical-cannabis exception: medical cannabis is legal for registered patients under Puerto Rico's 2015 medical-cannabis law, while recreational use, sale and cultivation remain prohibited. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Controlled Substances Act of Puerto Rico (Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico, 24 LPRA) · 2015 medical-cannabis law · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Guam (US)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Guam's Uniform Controlled Substances Act (9 GCA Chapter 67) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Guam is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Guam's drug schedule; Guam's Uniform Controlled Substances Act (9 GCA Chapter 67) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Guam, drugs fall under the Guam Uniform Controlled Substances Act (9 GCA Chapter 67), the territory's own statute. Trafficking and unlicensed supply carry imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Guam Compiler of Laws (guamcourts.gov) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Guam, drugs fall under the Guam Uniform Controlled Substances Act (9 GCA Chapter 67), the territory's own statute. Trafficking and unlicensed supply carry imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Guam Compiler of Laws (guamcourts.gov) with Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: it is legal for adults 21 and over under the Guam Cannabis Industry Act of 2019, alongside the medical-cannabis programme (Public Law 34-80), with a regulated retail market; sale outside the licensed system remains an offence. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Guam Uniform Controlled Substances Act (9 GCA Chapter 67) · Guam Cannabis Industry Act of 2019 · Public Law 34-80 (medical cannabis) · guamcourts.gov · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
U.S. Virgin Islands (US)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the U.S. Virgin Islands Code (Title 19) controlled-substances provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the U.S. Virgin Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the U.S. Virgin Islands' drug schedule; the U.S. Virgin Islands Code (Title 19) controlled-substances provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the U.S. Virgin Islands, drugs fall under the Virgin Islands Code (Title 19) controlled-substances provisions, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the U.S. Virgin Islands, drugs fall under the Virgin Islands Code (Title 19) controlled-substances provisions, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: medical cannabis is legal under the Virgin Islands Medical Cannabis Patient Care Act (2019) and personal-possession of small amounts has been decriminalized, while non-medical sale and cultivation remain prohibited. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Virgin Islands Code Title 19 (controlled substances) · Virgin Islands Medical Cannabis Patient Care Act 2019 · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Northern Mariana Islands (US)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Northern Mariana Islands' Commonwealth controlled-substances code is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Northern Mariana Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Northern Mariana Islands' drug schedule; the Northern Mariana Islands' Commonwealth controlled-substances code is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Northern Mariana Islands, drugs fall under the Commonwealth's own controlled-substances code. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Northern Mariana Islands, drugs fall under the Commonwealth's own controlled-substances code. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: it is legal for adults 21 and over under the Taulamwaar Sensible CNMI Cannabis Act of 2018, which authorizes personal possession, cultivation and a regulated adult-use market; no separate medical-cannabis programme is authorized, and sale outside the licensed system remains an offence. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Taulamwaar Sensible CNMI Cannabis Act of 2018 · Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands controlled-substances code · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
American Samoa (US)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the American Samoa Code Annotated (Title 13) controlled-substances provisions is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in American Samoa is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against American Samoa's drug schedule; the American Samoa Code Annotated (Title 13) controlled-substances provisions is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In American Samoa, drugs fall under the American Samoa Code Annotated (Title 13) controlled-substances provisions, the territory's own statute, among the harshest of any US jurisdiction. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In American Samoa, drugs fall under the American Samoa Code Annotated (Title 13) controlled-substances provisions, the territory's own statute, among the harshest of any US jurisdiction. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Cannabis is a controlled drug under the same Title 13 provisions, fully prohibited with no medical or recreational regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
American Samoa Code Annotated Title 13 (controlled substances) · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Bermuda (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Bermuda's Misuse of Drugs Act 1972 (as amended) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Bermuda is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Bermuda's drug schedule; Bermuda's Misuse of Drugs Act 1972 (as amended) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Bermuda, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972 (as amended), Bermuda's own statute. Supply, cultivation and trafficking carry imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Bermuda statute portal (bpa.bm) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Bermuda, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972 (as amended), Bermuda's own statute. Supply, cultivation and trafficking carry imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Bermuda statute portal (bpa.bm) with Library of Congress corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Bermuda Misuse of Drugs Act 1972 (as amended by the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 2017) · bpa.bm · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Cayman Islands (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Cayman Islands' Misuse of Drugs Act (2026 Revision) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Cayman Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Cayman Islands' drug schedule; the Cayman Islands' Misuse of Drugs Act (2026 Revision) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Cayman Islands, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act (2026 Revision), the territory's own statute, enforced with a zero-tolerance import policy. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Cayman Islands legislation portal (legislation.gov.ky) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Cayman Islands, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act (2026 Revision), the territory's own statute, enforced with a zero-tolerance import policy. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Cayman Islands legislation portal (legislation.gov.ky) with Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: medical cannabis and CBD products are permitted only on local prescription (since 2017), while recreational cannabis is fully prohibited under zero-tolerance enforcement, possession carries a fine up to CI$3,000 and up to 3 years' imprisonment, and importation a fine up to CI$20,000 and up to 7 years on first conviction. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Cayman Islands Misuse of Drugs Act (2026 Revision) · legislation.gov.ky · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Gibraltar (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Gibraltar's Crimes Act 2011 (drug offences) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Gibraltar is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Gibraltar's drug schedule; Gibraltar's Crimes Act 2011 (drug offences) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Gibraltar, drugs fall under the Crimes Act 2011 (drug offences), Gibraltar's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Gibraltar Laws portal (gibraltarlaws.gov.gi) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Gibraltar, drugs fall under the Crimes Act 2011 (drug offences), Gibraltar's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Gibraltar Laws portal (gibraltarlaws.gov.gi) with Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: recreational cannabis is illegal, while medical cannabis has been permitted since October 2019 under prescription; sale and cultivation outside the medical framework remain prohibited. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the British Virgin Islands' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the British Virgin Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the British Virgin Islands' drug schedule; the British Virgin Islands' Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the British Virgin Islands, drugs fall under the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the BVI Financial Services Commission legislation portal (bvifsc.vg) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the British Virgin Islands, drugs fall under the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the BVI Financial Services Commission legislation portal (bvifsc.vg) with Library of Congress corroboration. Cannabis is treated differently from other controlled drugs: the Cannabis Licensing Act 2020 establishes a regulated cannabis-licensing framework (medical, research and religious use), while unlicensed recreational possession, sale and cultivation remain restricted. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
British Virgin Islands Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act (Revised Edition) · Cannabis Licensing Act 2020 · bvifsc.vg · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Turks and Caicos Islands (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Turks and Caicos Islands' Control of Drugs Ordinance is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Turks and Caicos Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Turks and Caicos Islands' drug schedule; the Turks and Caicos Islands' Control of Drugs Ordinance is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Turks and Caicos Islands, drugs fall under the Control of Drugs Ordinance, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Turks and Caicos Islands, drugs fall under the Control of Drugs Ordinance, the territory's own statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Cannabis and cannabis resin are Class B controlled drugs (Part II) under the same Ordinance, fully prohibited with no medical or recreational regime. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Turks and Caicos Islands Control of Drugs Ordinance · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Jersey (UK Crown Dependency)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Jersey is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Jersey's drug schedule; the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Jersey, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978, the Bailiwick's own statute, built on the UK-model Class A/B/C system. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Jersey Legal Information Board (jerseylaw.je) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Jersey, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978, the Bailiwick's own statute, built on the UK-model Class A/B/C system. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Jersey Legal Information Board (jerseylaw.je) with Library of Congress corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978 · jerseylaw.je · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Guernsey (UK Crown Dependency)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Misuse of Drugs (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1974 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Guernsey is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Guernsey's drug schedule; the Misuse of Drugs (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1974 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Guernsey, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1974, the Bailiwick's own statute, built on the UK-model Class A/B/C system. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via Guernsey Legal Resources (guernseylegalresources.gg) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Guernsey, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1974, the Bailiwick's own statute, built on the UK-model Class A/B/C system. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise article and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via Guernsey Legal Resources (guernseylegalresources.gg) with Library of Congress corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Isle of Man's Misuse of Drugs Act is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Isle of Man is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Isle of Man's drug schedule; the Isle of Man's Misuse of Drugs Act is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Isle of Man, drugs fall under the Island's own Misuse of Drugs Act, which replicates the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Schedule 2 Classes A/B/C, administered by the Island's own ACMD). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Isle of Man Government legislation portal (gov.im) with Library of Congress corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Isle of Man, drugs fall under the Island's own Misuse of Drugs Act, which replicates the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Schedule 2 Classes A/B/C, administered by the Island's own ACMD). Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Isle of Man Government legislation portal (gov.im) with Library of Congress corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Isle of Man Misuse of Drugs Act (Schedule 2 Classes A/B/C) · gov.im · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Montserrat (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Montserrat's Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Montserrat is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Montserrat's drug schedule; Montserrat's Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Montserrat, drugs fall under the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act/Ordinance, a UK-model statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Montserrat, drugs fall under the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act/Ordinance, a UK-model statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Montserrat Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act / Ordinance · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Anguilla (UK)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Misuse of Drugs Act (Anguilla) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Anguilla is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Anguilla's drug schedule; the Misuse of Drugs Act (Anguilla) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Anguilla, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act (Anguilla), a UK-model statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Anguilla, drugs fall under the Misuse of Drugs Act (Anguilla), a UK-model statute. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise section and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current statute. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Misuse of Drugs Act (Anguilla) · cannabis decriminalization effective 1 December 2024 · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Aruba (Netherlands)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Aruba's Criminal Code and narcotics (opium) ordinance is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Aruba is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Aruba's drug schedule; Aruba's Criminal Code and narcotics (opium) ordinance is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Aruba, drugs fall under Aruba's own Criminal Code and narcotics (opium) ordinance, Aruba has been an autonomous country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands since 1986 and, unlike the European Netherlands, operates NO coffeeshop tolerance. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Aruba, drugs fall under Aruba's own Criminal Code and narcotics (opium) ordinance, Aruba has been an autonomous country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands since 1986 and, unlike the European Netherlands, operates NO coffeeshop tolerance. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Curaçao's Opium Ordinance is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Curaçao is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Curaçao's drug schedule; Curaçao's Opium Ordinance is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Curaçao, drugs fall under Curaçao's own Opium Ordinance, distinct from the European Netherlands' tolerance regime. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine, and cocaine/heroin/MDMA offences draw severe sentences; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current ordinance. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Curaçao, drugs fall under Curaçao's own Opium Ordinance, distinct from the European Netherlands' tolerance regime. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine, and cocaine/heroin/MDMA offences draw severe sentences; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current ordinance. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Sint Maarten's Opium National Ordinance of 1960 is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Sint Maarten is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Sint Maarten's drug schedule; Sint Maarten's Opium National Ordinance of 1960 is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Sint Maarten, drugs fall under the Opium National Ordinance of 1960, covering both hard and soft drugs. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current ordinance. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Sint Maarten, drugs fall under the Opium National Ordinance of 1960, covering both hard and soft drugs. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise provision and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current ordinance. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Sint Maarten Opium National Ordinance of 1960 · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
French Polynesia (France)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in French Polynesia is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in French Polynesia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against French Polynesia's drug schedule; the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in French Polynesia is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In French Polynesia, drugs fall under the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in the territory (with local island variation in enforcement). Trafficking carries up to 30 years' imprisonment and a fine up to EUR 150,000 under the French penalty structure; the precise classification is left to confirmation against the current Code. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr) and the Library of Congress with UNODC corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In French Polynesia, drugs fall under the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in the territory (with local island variation in enforcement). Trafficking carries up to 30 years' imprisonment and a fine up to EUR 150,000 under the French penalty structure; the precise classification is left to confirmation against the current Code. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr) and the Library of Congress with UNODC corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) applied in French Polynesia · legifrance.gouv.fr · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
New Caledonia (France)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in New Caledonia is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in New Caledonia is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against New Caledonia's drug schedule; the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in New Caledonia is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In New Caledonia, drugs fall under the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in the territory. Trafficking carries up to 30 years' imprisonment and a fine up to EUR 150,000 under the French penalty structure; the precise classification is left to confirmation against the current Code. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In New Caledonia, drugs fall under the French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) as applied in the territory. Trafficking carries up to 30 years' imprisonment and a fine up to EUR 150,000 under the French penalty structure; the precise classification is left to confirmation against the current Code. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
French Code de la santé publique (narcotics provisions) applied in New Caledonia · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Caribbean Netherlands (BES)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the BES narcotics law (the old-Antillean Opium Ordinance applied through the WvS-BES penal framework) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Caribbean Netherlands (BES) is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Caribbean Netherlands' drug schedule; the BES narcotics law (the old-Antillean Opium Ordinance applied through the WvS-BES penal framework) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Caribbean Netherlands (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, the BES islands), drugs fall under the old-Antillean narcotics law applied through the WvS-BES penal framework, NOT the European Netherlands' Opium-Act tolerance, penalties are HARSHER than in the European Netherlands. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise instrument and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Caribbean Netherlands (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, the BES islands), drugs fall under the old-Antillean narcotics law applied through the WvS-BES penal framework, NOT the European Netherlands' Opium-Act tolerance, penalties are HARSHER than in the European Netherlands. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise instrument and penalty terms are left to confirmation against the current law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Caribbean Netherlands (BES) narcotics law, old-Antillean Opium Ordinance via the WvS-BES penal framework · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Aceh (Indonesia)
Legal status
Not confirmed, Indonesia's national Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 (applied in Aceh) is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Aceh is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Aceh's drug schedule; Indonesia's national Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 (applied in Aceh) is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Aceh, drugs fall under Indonesia's national Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 (Articles 111-127), which applies in the province; Aceh ADDITIONALLY applies the qanun jinayat (Islamic criminal bylaws) imposing caning for certain offences as a corporal-punishment overlay distinct from the national penal regime. Organized or large-scale trafficking of Category I narcotics is capital-eligible, the death penalty is NATIONAL (under Law 35/2009), NOT a separate Aceh statute, and Indonesia actively imposes drug death sentences. Possession and lower-level offences carry imprisonment from 4 years or court-ordered rehabilitation; the precise article and threshold are left to confirmation against the current law. This cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress, with the qanun framing corroborated in free text.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Aceh, drugs fall under Indonesia's national Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 (Articles 111-127), which applies in the province; Aceh ADDITIONALLY applies the qanun jinayat (Islamic criminal bylaws) imposing caning for certain offences as a corporal-punishment overlay distinct from the national penal regime. Organized or large-scale trafficking of Category I narcotics is capital-eligible, the death penalty is NATIONAL (under Law 35/2009), NOT a separate Aceh statute, and Indonesia actively imposes drug death sentences. Possession and lower-level offences carry imprisonment from 4 years or court-ordered rehabilitation; the precise article and threshold are left to confirmation against the current law. This cell is sourced via the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) and the Library of Congress, with the qanun framing corroborated in free text. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Indonesia national Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 (Articles 111-127), applied in Aceh · Aceh qanun jinayat (Islamic criminal bylaws), corroborated free-text · unodc.org · loc.gov · Updated July 14, 2026
Faroe Islands (Denmark)
Legal status
Not confirmed, the Faroe Islands' own narcotics-control framework is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Faroe Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Faroe Islands' drug schedule; the Faroe Islands' own narcotics-control framework is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Faroe Islands, drugs fall under the Faroe Islands' own narcotics-control and customs-enforcement framework, the Faroes self-govern health and justice and operate a drug-control regime distinct from Denmark. The specific consolidating statute is left to confirmation against current Faroese law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Faroese Government portal (government.fo) and the Library of Congress with UNODC corroboration.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Faroe Islands, drugs fall under the Faroe Islands' own narcotics-control and customs-enforcement framework, the Faroes self-govern health and justice and operate a drug-control regime distinct from Denmark. The specific consolidating statute is left to confirmation against current Faroese law. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Faroese Government portal (government.fo) and the Library of Congress with UNODC corroboration. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, the Falkland Islands' own misuse-of-drugs / crimes ordinance framework is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in the Falkland Islands is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against the Falkland Islands' drug schedule; the Falkland Islands' own misuse-of-drugs / crimes ordinance framework is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In the Falkland Islands, drugs fall under the Islands' own misuse-of-drugs / crimes ordinance framework, built on the UK model. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise ordinance and penalty terms are left to confirmation against current Falkland Islands law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In the Falkland Islands, drugs fall under the Islands' own misuse-of-drugs / crimes ordinance framework, built on the UK model. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise ordinance and penalty terms are left to confirmation against current Falkland Islands law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Not confirmed, Saint Helena's misuse-of-drugs ordinance is the governing drug law; the specific scheduling/penalty for tobacco in Saint Helena is not confirmed here. Verify against the current schedule.
Consequences if caught
This specific substance was not individually verified against Saint Helena's drug schedule; Saint Helena's misuse-of-drugs ordinance is the governing law. Do NOT assume it is permitted; verify before travel. In Saint Helena (the territory of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), drugs fall under Saint Helena's own misuse-of-drugs ordinance, built on the UK model. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise ordinance and penalty terms are left to confirmation against current Saint Helena law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal.
If prescribed / medical
If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
In Saint Helena (the territory of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), drugs fall under Saint Helena's own misuse-of-drugs ordinance, built on the UK model. Trafficking carries imprisonment together with a fine; the precise ordinance and penalty terms are left to confirmation against current Saint Helena law. The maximum penalty for a drug offence is imprisonment. This cell is sourced via the Library of Congress and the UNODC legal database (unodc.org/cld) pending a clean territory-primary statute portal. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Saint Helena misuse-of-drugs ordinance (Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha · UK-model) · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
United States
Legal status
Not a federally controlled substance. It is in no schedule of 21 CFR 1308.11 to 1308.15 and no federal drug trafficking or possession penalty attaches to it as such. This cell states federal law only. Every state has its own controlled substances act and several differ from the federal schedules, so check the law of the state you are in.
Consequences if caught
It is not a federally controlled substance. It is not listed in any schedule of 21 CFR 1308.11 to 1308.15, it is not reached by a class entry, and no federal drug trafficking or possession penalty attaches to it as such. Other federal law may still regulate it, and state law frequently does. State law frequently reaches substances that federal law does not, and this cell does not state the law of any state.
If prescribed / medical
Prescription supply through the licensed channel is lawful. 21 USC 844(a) excepts a substance obtained on a valid prescription from a practitioner acting in the course of professional practice, and handling outside that channel is an offence under 21 USC 841 and the registration provisions at 21 USC 822 and 823.
Documentation
Carry any prescribed medicine in its original labelled container with the prescription. Federal law and the law of the state you are entering can differ, so confirm both before travel.
Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 802, 812, 813, 841 and 844 (Office of the Law Revision Counsel) · 21 CFR 1308.11 to 1308.15 (Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, current as of 11 September 2026) · 91 FR 22714, 28 April 2026, for marijuana in an approved product or under a state medical licence · uscode.house.gov · ecfr.gov · federalregister.gov · Updated September 15, 2026
· the instrument is written in Arabic and the English renderings are the dossier's
· read as at 20 September 2026
Documentation
Carry the distinction this row rests on: the finding for Tobacco is an absence from the Thai FDA Table of Controlled Narcotic Drugs updated 15 September 2025 and from the Ministry of Public Health psychotropic naming notifications of B.E. 2565, which is not a clearance under Thai law generally, so any paperwork it needs would come from the Drug Act B.E. 2510 rather than from the Narcotics Code, and this reading did not open that Act to say which of its tiers, if any, applies. Treat the import allowance question separately, because tobacco allowances run on customs and tobacco control instruments that were not read. The reading was taken on 20 September 2026 from the consolidated narcotics table, read alongside the psychotropic naming notices, at https://narcotic.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=808160206197497856&name=NARCO+list+(update+15.09.2025)+NEW.pdf. No express open reuse licence was located on the cited page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The names and categories are set by ministerial notification, and the publications do not certify that no later notification exists, so re-read before relying on this.
Thailand, closed list negative finding for Tobacco: no entry in the Ministry of Public Health narcotic naming notifications as consolidated in the Thai FDA Table of Controlled Narcotic Drugs updated 15 September 2025, and none in the B.E. 2565 psychotropic naming notifications · the naming power is delegated by the Narcotics Code B.E. 2564 and no generic analogue clause was identified · read at https://narcotic.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=808160206197497856&name=NARCO+list+(update+15.09.2025)+NEW.pdf on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on the cited page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is not a medicine and holds no medicine registration.
Documentation
A traveller brings tobacco within the customs allowance and pays duty above it. No narcotics document is involved.
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, LN 2009/143, TLN 5062, as amended by Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023, and Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika, LN 1997/10, TLN 3671 · empowering articles Pasal 6(3) and Pasal 2(4) respectively, both of which were checked because a finding of absence has to hold against both regimes · absence was established by reading all seven current lists in full, Narkotika Golongan I, II and III from Permenkes Nomor 15 Tahun 2025 and Psikotropika Golongan I, II, III and IV from Permenkes Nomor 14 Tahun 2025, and both precursor tables from Lampiran II of the Act, and by reading every apparent text match in its surrounding region rather than counting it as an entry · the finding is named in none of the seven current golongan: Narkotika Golongan I, II and III of Permenkes No. 15 Tahun 2025, and Psikotropika Golongan I, II, III and IV of Permenkes No. 14 Tahun 2025 · All seven current golongan read in full and searched for the plant and the genus. Aceh runs a separate criminal code for some conduct and is a separate jurisdiction in this dataset · the Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat was read for this batch and mentions narkotika and psikotropika zero times, so narcotics law in Aceh is the national Act unchanged. Read 2026-09-17 · e-pharm.kemkes.go.id · jdih.kemkes.go.id · jdih.kemkes.go.id · e-pharm.kemkes.go.id · Placement re-derived in this pass from Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 15 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika and Nomor 14 Tahun 2025 tentang Penetapan dan Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika, both read at jdih.kemkes.go.id on 21 September 2026. Permenkes 15/2025 was ditetapkan 21 November 2025 and diundangkan 28 November 2025 at Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 988, and it repeals Permenkes 7/2025. The matched entry is quoted in the cell. Section membership is stated rather than entry number, because a watermark in the published PDF reflows the numbering. · Updated September 21, 2026
· the Law of Combating Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances, Royal Decree M/39 of 1426 AH, does not schedule tobacco, and Schedules I to IV in the version issued on 4 September 2026 were searched with no matching entry. This row's source set carries only the anti-smoking regulation, so the narcotics schedules are cited here by name for the search that was run rather than by link
· read as at 17 September 2026
Malaysia, Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, Act 234, first enacted as Ordinance No. 30 of 1952 and revised in 1980 with effect from 17 July 1980 · read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text headed «As at 4 July 2023», latest Act amendment being the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, in force 4 July 2023 · Poisons Act 1952, Act 366, revised 1989, read from the Attorney General's Chambers online updated text as at 1 January 2022, latest amendment P.U. (A) 412/2021 in force 3 November 2021 · read for this substance: both schedules in full, the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 First Schedule in all five Parts and the Poisons Act 1952 Poisons List and Third Schedule, with tobacco found in neither as a controlled entry · sections 2, 11(1) and 45A of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and sections 30(1) and 32(2) of the Poisons Act 1952 · the First Schedule has since been amended twice under section 45A, by the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment of First Schedule) Order 2024, P.U. (A) 97, gazetted 2 April 2024, which inserts Etazene, Etonitazepyne, 2-Methyl-AP-237 and Protonitazene into Part III and substitutes Proheptazine for Propheptazine, and by the Order 2025, P.U. (A) 416, gazetted 25 November 2025, which inserts Butonitazene into Part III · both orders were read in full and neither touches this substance · the publisher's own disclaimer is carried forward: this is only an updated text and not an authentic text until it is reprinted under subsection 14(1) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 · read as at 2026-09-17 from https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1840725_BI/22.11.2023%20-%20Act%20234.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1714451_BI/ACT%20366_MUKTAMAD_1%20JANUARY%202022.pdf and https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1826840_BI/Akta%20846%20BI.pdf · re-derived in this pass, from the on-disk Attorney General's Chambers online updated text of Act 234 whose own header reads «As at 4 July 2023»: sections 2, 5, 6, 6B, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25, 30, 37, 38A, 38B, 39, 39A, 39B, 39C, 41, 41A, 41B, 45A and 46, and the First Schedule read line by line in all five Parts · and from the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, Act 846, sections 1(2), 2, 54 and 55 · the First Schedule has five Parts and not three: Part I and Part II are the plant and prepared-opium lists, Part III the long alphabetical chemical list, Part IV a shorter codeine group carrying its own isomer clause and its own salt clause, with Part III's ester and ether clause running across the whole Schedule and not only that Part because it reads «of the drugs in this Schedule» where the other two read «this Part», and Part V is headed «PREPARATION FOR THE EXPORT OF WHICH EXPORT AUTHORIZATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED» and is an exemption list rather than a control list · section 39B carries no quantity table of its own, the weights being in section 37(da), which is a rebuttable presumption of trafficking, and in section 39A, which applies only where the offence is not punishable with death · the file the Act 234 text is served from is dated 22 November 2023 in its name while the text's own header reads «As at 4 July 2023», and the header is the version stated here · all Poisons Act 1952 material in this cell, including every Poisons List and Third Schedule entry and every figure drawn from that Act, is carried forward from the earlier reading recorded above and was not re-derived in this pass · so is every other fact in this cell that is not derivable from the two texts named above, which includes the two section 45A orders of 2024 and 2025, the commencement of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 on 15 March 2018, and any statement here about the Single Convention or the 1971 Convention and their schedules · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
It is not a medicine and is not in any Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.
Documentation
No permit applies to a traveller with tobacco for personal use beyond customs allowances, which this cell did not read; the Home Office page at https://www.gov.uk/travelling-controlled-drugs, read on 2 October 2026, concerns controlled drugs.
Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, s. 2 and Schedule 2, read as in force on 2 October 2026, no known outstanding effects recorded · legislation.gov.uk · Psychoactive Substances Act 2016, Schedule 1 para. 5 · legislation.gov.uk · Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026, ss. 1 and 175 · legislation.gov.uk · Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Temporary Class Drug) Order 2026, S.I. 2026/613 · legislation.gov.uk · Draft Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2026, not made as at 2 October 2026 · legislation.gov.uk · S.I. 2024/1361 read as made on 2 October 2026 · legislation.gov.uk · Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 · Updated October 3, 2026
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. The highest penalty anywhere in Part 9.1 of the Criminal Code is imprisonment for life, and Death Penalty Abolition Act 1973 s6 provides «The punishment of death must not be imposed as the penalty for any offence referred to in subsection 3(2) or (3).» No Commonwealth criminal drug offence reaches possession, sale or use of tobacco. Part 9.2 excludes «a tobacco product (within the meaning of the Public Health (Tobacco and Other Products) Act 2023)», s320.2(2)(b). Importing tobacco products without the permission regulation 4DA requires is a prohibited import, Customs Act s233(1)(b), punishable under s233AB(2) by a fine only, the greater of 3 times the value of the goods or 1,000 penalty units ($364,000). The Customs Act has tobacco offences of its own in s233BABAD (Compilation No. 193, compilation date 19 September 2026). Importing tobacco products «with the intention of defrauding the revenue» (s233BABAD(1)), or conveying or possessing them knowing they were imported with intent to defraud the revenue (s233BABAD(2)), is «punishable on conviction by imprisonment for not more than 15 years», a fine of up to 30 times the duty that would have been payable or, where the court cannot determine the duty, 12,000 penalty units, or both (s233BABAD(4) and (5)). Importing them «reckless as to whether there would be defrauding of the revenue» (s233BABAD(2A)), or conveying or possessing them reckless as to whether they were imported with that intent (s233BABAD(2B)), carries «imprisonment for not more than 10 years», a fine of up to 20 times the duty or 8,000 penalty units, or both (s233BABAD(4A) and (5A)). A person convicted or acquitted under s233BABAD is not liable under s233 for the same conduct (s233BABAD(6)). Duty and excise rates and the Public Health (Tobacco and Other Products) Act 2023 packaging and product rules were not read for this cell. A penalty unit is $364 for an offence committed on or after 1 July 2026 under the Crimes (Amount of a Penalty Unit) Instrument 2026 (F2026N00424), made under Crimes Act 1914 s4AA, so 400 penalty units is $145,600, 2,000 is $728,000 and 7,500 is $2,730,000; «or both» in each penalty means the prison term and the fine are available alternatively or together.
If prescribed / medical
Not applicable: tobacco for smoking is not a medicine. Nicotine replacement therapy is covered under nicotine.
Documentation
The Australian Border Force duty-free guidance (abf.gov.au, read 2 October 2026) states: «As a traveller, you can bring tobacco products with you into Australia if you are aged 18 years or older. You do not need a permit to bring in tobacco products to Australia as a traveller.» Duty and tax apply above the duty-free concession. The medicines traveller rule in Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 Schedule 5 item 1, which covers «therapeutic goods that are imported for therapeutic use in the treatment of the importer or the importer’s immediate family», concerns therapeutic goods and does not apply to tobacco prepared for smoking.
Poisons Standard October 2026, F2026L01327 · legislation.gov.au · Criminal Code Act 1995, Compilation No. 174, volume 1 (s10.5) and volume 2 (Part 9.1, Part 9.2) · legislation.gov.au · legislation.gov.au · Criminal Code Regulations 2019, Compilation No. 6 (Schedules 1 and 2) · legislation.gov.au · Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956, Compilation No. 147 (regulation 5, Schedule 4) · legislation.gov.au · Customs Act 1901, Compilation No. 193, volume 1 (s4) and volume 3 (Part XIII, s233 to s233BABAD) · legislation.gov.au · legislation.gov.au · Australian Border Force, duty free · abf.gov.au · Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990, Compilation No. 130 (Schedule 5 item 1) · legislation.gov.au · Crimes (Amount of a Penalty Unit) Instrument 2026, F2026N00424 · legislation.gov.au · Death Penalty Abolition Act 1973 s6 · legislation.gov.au · Australian Border Force, medicines and substances · abf.gov.au · Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 2 October 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to · legislation.gov.au · Federal Register of Legislation content licensed CC BY 4.0 · Australian Border Force material: Australian Government Department of Home Affairs, licensed CC BY 3.0 Australia · Updated October 3, 2026
France, consolidated Arrêtés du 22 février 1990, narcotics and psychotropics lists, with the finding for tobacco recorded as Absence de classement opératoire sous « tobacco » dans les listes examinées · the Code de la santé publique at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006072665 carries the classification machinery and Penal Code article 222-34 at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006417715 carries a ceiling that this negative finding does not engage · read at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000533085, Légifrance, the official publisher · the body of law flagged as possibly still applying is tobacco law and consumer law · read as at 18 September 2026. · Updated September 20, 2026
If prescribed / medical
The Opiumwetbesluit prescription regime does not apply, because article 2 of that decree governs the prescribing of Opiumwet substances and this is not one. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription.
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation is required under the Opiumwet. Customs allowances are not stated here.
Opiumwet, artt. 1, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 3aa, 10, 10b, 10c and 11, and lijsten I, Ia and II · wetten.overheid.nl · geldend van 17-09-2026, read 22 September 2026 · Opiumwetbesluit · wetten.overheid.nl · geldend van 01-01-2023 · Aanwijzing Opiumwet, prosecution policy of the Openbaar Ministerie · wetten.overheid.nl · geldend van 01-03-2015 · Wetboek van Strafrecht art. 23, fine categories · wetten.overheid.nl · figures carried forward from the live cell and tagged in its text as unverified here · Updated October 2, 2026
· Real Decreto 2829/1977, de 6 de octubre, article 1, article 4, Anexo 1 and Anexo 2, BOE consolidated text whose own note reads «Última actualización publicada el 21/04/2026», Anexo 1 in force from 22/04/2026, Anexo 2 last updated 06/06/1986
· Based on data from the Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado (Basado en datos de la Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado), https://www.boe.es
· each BOE consolidated text carries the notice «Este texto consolidado es de carácter informativo y no tiene valor jurídico.»
DPR 309/1990 article 14 with the Ministry of Health compilation of the narcotics tables and its ministerial amendment index, read at https://www.salute.gov.it/new/it/tema/medicinali-stupefacenti-e-precursori-di-droghe/tabelle-delle-sostanze-stupefacenti-e on 18 September 2026 · route for Tobacco: no operative entry in tables I to IV or in the table of medicinal products, searched as «tobacco» · DPR 309/1990 at https://www.normattiva.it/eli/id/1990/10/31/090G0363/CONSOLIDATED · Penal Code article 78 at https://www.normattiva.it/eli/id/1930/10/26/030U1398/CONSOLIDATED · penalties at DPR 309/1990 articles 73, 75 and 80 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Its sale is governed by the separate federal tobacco statute rather than by anything in these two articles. No narcotics or psychotropics prescription route follows from the Ley General de Salud, because neither of its two lists reaches this row. The special duties articles 240 onward impose on estupefacientes are not engaged, and the group specific rules of articles 250, 251 and 252 have no group to attach to. Ordinary Mexican medicines and consumer regulation may still apply, and a foreign prescription evidences therapeutic purpose and nothing more.
Documentation
Carry nothing on the strength of this name alone on the drug-control side, because neither article 234 nor article 245 of the Ley General de Salud reaches this row. Ordinary customs, quantity and medicines rules still apply, and a prescription and labelled packaging remain the sensible thing to carry. The plant is not printed in either list, although article 234 does print three other plants by name. The absence was established by reading the whole of the Ley General de Salud as it stands after the decree published in the Diario Oficial de la Federacion on 15 January 2026, which reforms article 234 whole and article 245 fracciones I segundo parrafo, II and IV, read together with the Orden Juridico Nacional consolidated text to 7 June 2024 for the articles that decree does not touch, read as at 21 September 2026.
Mexico, not named in either of the two lists at Ley General de Salud articles 234 and 245 · the reforming decree, titled as a reform, addition and repeal of various provisions of the Ley General de Salud, published in the Diario Oficial de la Federacion on 15 January 2026, which is the operative text of articles 234 and 245 used here · dof.gob.mx · the official consolidated text of the Ley General de Salud published by the Orden Juridico Nacional, texto vigente to 7 June 2024, used for articles 235, 237, 239 to 243, 246 to 252 and 473 to 482, which that decree does not list · ordenjuridico.gob.mx · Codigo Penal Federal articles 193 to 196, texto vigente to 7 June 2024 · the three later reforms of that code, published on 16 July 2025, 28 November 2025 and 13 March 2026, reach articles 400 Bis, 11 Bis and 390, and 260 and 266 Bis, and none of them touches this chapter · ordenjuridico.gob.mx · Constitucion Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos article 22, texto vigente, last reform on 15 April 2025 · ordenjuridico.gob.mx · the penalty bands, the fines and the article 479 amounts were re-derived from those articles for this cell and are not carried over as figures · the previous version of this cell cited a Chamber of Deputies consolidation whose latest reform it gave as 15 January 2026 · that date was not carried forward but tested, and the decree of that date was found, downloaded and read for this cell, which is why the two scheduling articles here are the reformed ones and not the 7 June 2024 ones · terms searched case-insensitively and accent-insensitively across the whole consolidated text for this row, with the occurrences found: tobacco 0, tabaco 8 · the previous version of this cell recorded its own reading as at 18 September 2026, and the articles were re-read for this cell rather than that reading being relied on · read as at 21 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
No list of the annex names this substance, so no special control prescription tier attaches to it under Portaria 344/98. For a traveller the rule is Resolucao 81 de 5 de novembro de 2008 as amended by Resolucao 28 de 28 de junho de 2011. Its item 1 dispenses with sanitary authorisation at the point of entry for a finished medicine imported by an individual for his own use, item 1.1 brings goods in accompanied or unaccompanied baggage of a traveller arriving from abroad inside that dispensation, and item 1.2 defines own use as a quantity and frequency compatible with the duration and purpose of treatment and not amounting to trade. Item 1.3 takes medicines based on substances listed in Portaria 344/98 back out of the dispensation and sends them to Resolucao 63 de 9 de setembro de 2008. That resolution rewrote article 34 of Portaria 344/98 to forbid purchase and sale of listed substances and their medicines by reimbursement systems through any means of communication including post and electronic channels, excepting only medicines based on lista C1 substances in presentations not registered or marketed in Brazil, bought abroad by an individual for his own use, on production of a medical prescription and a fiscal document, in a quantity for individual use, with resale forbidden. That resolution was read in full this pass, through a rendering fetcher because a direct request to the publisher is refused with a challenge page and the health ministry library returns a server error, so the reading is [Certain] and the route to it is worth stating. The prescribing chapters of Portaria SVS/MS 344/1998 itself were not read this pass, so no validity period and no quantity per prescription is stated here.
Documentation
The complete Anexo I was read on 21 September 2026, in the version published with Resolucao da Diretoria Colegiada 1.036, de 9 de julho de 2026, whose annex heads itself Atualizacao n. 101 and whose footer records publication in the Diario Oficial da Uniao of 13 July 2026. ANVISA's own update register numbers that resolution row 102 of its history and marks it the version in force, and both numbers are recorded because they disagree. The finding that no entry names this substance is stated as at that version and does not rule out a later one. Carried from the live cell and not re-derived this pass: combustible tobacco is recorded there as lawful and regulated, and use in enclosed public places as separately prohibited. Those instruments were not read this pass. [Likely], carried.
Brazil, Portaria SVS/MS 344 de 12 de maio de 1998, Anexo I, as published with Resolucao da Diretoria Colegiada 1.036 de 9 de julho de 2026 (Atualizacao n. 101, Diario Oficial da Uniao of 13 July 2026), read at https://anvisalegis.datalegis.net/action/ActionDatalegis.php?acao=abrirTextoAto&tipo=RDC&numeroAto=00001036&seqAto=000&valorAno=2026 on 21 September 2026 · the update register that marks it the version in force is at https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/medicamentos/controlados/lista-substancias · Lei 11.343 de 23 de agosto de 2006 at https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11343.htm · Constituicao da Republica Federativa do Brasil de 1988, article 5, XLVII, at https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm · Supremo Tribunal Federal, Tema 506, leading case RE 635659, at https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudenciaRepercussao/verAndamentoProcesso.asp?incidente=4034145&numeroProcesso=635659&classeProcesso=RE&numeroTema=506 · Resolucao 81 de 5 de novembro de 2008 as amended by Resolucao 28 de 28 de junho de 2011, and Resolucao 63 de 9 de setembro de 2008 at https://anvisalegis.datalegis.net/action/ActionDatalegis.php?acao=abrirTextoAto&tipo=RDC&numeroAto=00000063&seqAto=000&valorAno=2008 · Updated September 21, 2026
NDPS Act 1985, the Schedule (list of psychotropic substances) · NDPS Rules 1985 · Regulation of Controlled Substances Order 2013 · quantity notification S.O. 1055(E) · searched by name and by chemical synonym across all 264 pages of that consolidation for tobacco, nicotiana, with no match · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985, sections 2, 3 and 8, section 3 being the power under which the Central Government adds to or omits from the psychotropic Schedule by Official Gazette notification · the offence and sentencing provisions read for this cell are sections 15 to 27, with sections 31, 31A, 37, 64A, 80 and 81 · enforcement is by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and the Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN), under the Department of Revenue · Central Bureau of Narcotics consolidation of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Rules 1985 labelled updated 2026, which prints the Act's Schedule as amended through S.O. 1730(E) of 16 April 2025 · the Schedule as it stands after S.O. 906(E) of 18 February 2026 · small and commercial quantity notification S.O. 1055(E) of 19 October 2001 as amended through S.O. 1731(E) of 16 April 2025 · cbn.gov.in · cbn.gov.in · cbn.gov.in · dor.gov.in · indiacode.nic.in · the publisher's own acts and rules page was read at that address on 22 September 2026 and lists no later amendment of the Schedule, which does not rule out a later notification made or commenced since. · Updated September 21, 2026
· the controlled drug schedules were searched with no tobacco entry, and the classification mechanism is article 19 of Law No. 2313 on the Control of Narcotic Substances, read at https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.3.2313.pdf (HTTP 200, 220,153 bytes), with the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237 at https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.5237.pdf (HTTP 200, 1,070,143 bytes), both fetched on 20 September 2026. The dossier's own url column holds one identical string for all 88 Turkey rows and that string is these two addresses run together with no separator, so the citation it supplies is document level rather than per substance.
Schedule 1 and Schedule 3(a,b,d) medicines CANNOT be imported even with a foreign prescription, explicitly banned: amphetamine/dexamphetamine (Adderall), methylphenidate (Ritalin/Concerta) and methadone; tramadol is banned for recreational use and tightly controlled. Codeine, diazepam and some sleep aids may be carried WITH a doctor's letter, original packaging, a 2-3 month maximum supply, and a customs declaration. (Reference: a 2017 traveller received a 3-year sentence for carrying 290 tramadol tablets.)
Egypt, Ministry of Health and Population Decision 44 of 2026, which replaced every table annexed to Law 182/1960, published in Al-Waqa'i' al-Misriya issue 39 (continued, c) on 17 February 2026 and in force from publication, scanned schedules read page by page at https://dev.edaegypt.gov.eg/media/dkjooww3/قرار-وزارة-الصحة-والسكان-رقم-44-لسنة-2026-ar-2026_.pdf on 3 October 2026 · Decision 242 of 2026 at https://dev.edaegypt.gov.eg/media/lydpgqi5/لمكافحة-المخدرات_2026_242-وزير-الصحة.pdf · Law 182/1960 Article 1, Al-Jarida al-Rasmiya No. 131 of 13 June 1960 page 962, scan at https://dev.edaegypt.gov.eg/media/ekgifxb3/1960-182.pdf · penalty Articles 33, 34 and 35 to 45 as replaced by Law 122/1989, read in the Arabic gazette scan at https://dev.edaegypt.gov.eg/media/452pd1zf/1989-122.pdf and in the UNODC English reproduction at https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/egy/law-no-122-of-1989_html/egypt-law_122-89.pdf · Decision 44's preamble cites Law 127/1955 on the practice of pharmacy, the 1961 Single Convention, the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances and the 1988 Convention · Article 1 bis added by Law 134/2019 and the release rule of Law 19/2020, the substitution of penalties by Law 95/2003, Al-Jarida al-Rasmiya No. 25 (continued) of 19 June 2003 pages 23 and 24, scan at https://manshurat.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/016268.pdf, read in the reproductions at https://www.mohamah.net/law/?p=155743 and https://www.mohamah.net/law/?p=173630 · the Egyptian Drug Authority laws index at https://dev.edaegypt.gov.eg/ar/المرجع-التنظيمي-لهيئة-الدواء-المصرية/القوانين-واللوائح-التنفيذية/ · Updated October 3, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is at no entry of the four tables, so the narcotics prescribing chapter of Law 4139/2013 does not govern it. A separate medicines or registration rule may still apply, and a prescribing rule is never a criminal schedule. The article 2 paragraphs in this field are carried forward from the published Greece entry and were not re-derived in this pass.
Documentation
No narcotics paperwork arises for this substance at a Greek border, because it is at no entry of the four tables. Carry the original container and the pharmacy label for any medicine you travel with, and a doctor's letter if it was prescribed, because a customs officer decides from what is in front of them. Where the rule comes from. The offences are in Law 4139/2013, the narcotics code, gazette A 74 of 20 March 2013, and the substance lists are not in it. Article 1 paragraph 2 provides that the substances «περιλαμβάνονται ιδίως στους πίνακες Α΄, Β΄, Γ΄ και Δ΄, οι οποίοι αναφέρονται στην παρ. 2 του άρθρου 1 του ν. 3459/2006». Article 1 paragraph 4 gives the power that moves the list: «Με κοινή απόφαση των Υπουργών Υγείας και Δικαιοσύνης», by joint decision of the Ministers of Health and of Justice, after the opinion of the Narcotics Committee, substances may be added, removed or moved between categories. What this cell incorporates is the Ministry of Health consolidated edition of June 2026, read in full rather than searched, and reading it does not rule out a later joint ministerial decision. It carries 375 numbered entries, 138 in ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ Α, 18 in ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ Β, 135 in ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ Γ and 84 in ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ Δ, each series running from 1 without a gap. Every entry names the gazette that placed it. Counting those gazettes by number and date gives 29, of which one, gazette 6034 B of 31 December 2018, is a correction of an error rather than a placing decision. The published Greece entry gives that figure as twenty eight, and the two counts differ by exactly that correction. The most recent placing instrument in the file is gazette 3277 B of 11 June 2026. Placement for Tobacco: at no entry of any of the four tables.
Tables of substances of article 1 of Law 3459/2006 as in force under Law 4139/2013, Ministry of Health consolidated edition of June 2026, the file «Πίνακες Ναρκωτικών (Α_Β_Γ_Δ) ΕΠΙΚΑΙΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΙΟΥΝΙΟΥ 2026.pdf», read in full at www.moh.gov.gr on 21 September 2026 · moh.gov.gr · moh.gov.gr · Law 4139/2013, the narcotics code, gazette A 74 of 20 March 2013, articles 1, 2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 29 and 30: the offence articles, the penalty figures and the article 2 prescribing paragraphs in this cell are carried forward from the published Greece entry and were not re-derived in this pass · et.gr · Placement for Tobacco: at no entry of any of the four tables · Updated September 21, 2026
Nghị định 28/2026/NĐ-CP, danh mục chất ma túy và tiền chất, issued and in force 19 January 2026 · vbpl.vn · Bộ luật Hình sự số 100/2015/QH13 as amended by Luật số 86/2025/QH15, khoản 18 Điều 1, in force 1 July 2025 · vbpl.vn · văn bản hợp nhất số 135/VBHN-VPQH, the consolidated Criminal Code text used for the article wording · thuvienphapluat.vn · placement for Tobacco: not listed, carried forward from the published 2cb entry and not re-derived from the decree text in this pass · read as those lists stand after Nghị định 28/2026/NĐ-CP, in force 19 January 2026, and this reading does not rule out a later amendment made under Điều 3 khoản 6 of that decree · dossier date checked 17 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
· BetmG articles 19, 19a and 19b at https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1952/241_241_245/de
· Swiss Criminal Code article 40 at https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/de
· German consolidation dated 13 March 2026, read 18 September 2026.
If prescribed / medical
The country level rule in Czechia is that a Schengen Article 75 certificate is evidential and administrative rather than the schedule itself, so producing one changes what a traveller can show and not where a substance sits. Attached to this row: No prescribing route attaches to this row, and tobacco is governed in Czechia by its own public health and excise legislation rather than by the seznamy of návykové látky.
Documentation
Carry any prescribed narcotic or psychotropic medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a Schengen Article 75 certificate, and treat that certificate as proof of lawful carriage rather than as anything that alters a list. Medical cannabis has been available on prescription in Czechia since 2013, and the lists keep konopí pro léčebné použití in seznam č. 1 separate from the konopí entry in seznam č. 3. For this row the record is an absence tested against the four plant entries the narcotic lists carry.
Czechia, Tobacco is not an entry in any of the eight seznamy of nařízení vlády č. 463/2013 Sb. o seznamech návykových látek nor in either 2025 list · nařízení vlády č. 463/2013 Sb. o seznamech návykových látek, consolidated version 17 in force from 25 June 2026 after nařízení vlády č. 107/2026 Sb. read at https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2013-463 on 21 September 2026 · the enabling provision is § 44c of zákon č. 167/1998 Sb. o návykových látkách · Criminal Code zákon č. 40/2009 Sb. §§ 251a, 283, 283a, 284, 285, 286 and 286a, consolidated version 46 in force from 1 January 2026, read at https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2009-40 on 21 September 2026 · Listina základních práv a svobod, ústavní zákon č. 2/1993 Sb. čl. 6 odst. 3, read at https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/1993-2 on 21 September 2026 · zakonyprolidi.cz · psp.cz · the two portal links above are the live cell's own publisher references carried forward, and the CZK 15,000 misdemeanour fine, the Supreme Court greater than small quantity thresholds and the 2026 cannabis permission figures are carried forward from the live cell and were not re-derived in this pass · the official e-Sbírka route was tried and refused: e-sbirka.gov.cz, e-sbirka.cz and two of its api paths each returned the same 1040 byte application shell with no document payload, and sbirka.gov.cz did not resolve, so the consolidated text relied on is the zakonyprolidy.cz consolidation of the same nařízení · Updated September 21, 2026
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. Article 26 of the Constitution provides that "A nadie se le aplicará la pena de muerte", no one shall have the death penalty applied to them, and no limb of Decreto-Ley 14.294 provides a capital sentence [Certain]. Uruguay’s published penalties for the drug offences of Decreto-Ley 14.294 are two to ten years of penitenciaría for unauthorised production under article 30, two to twelve years under article 31 for import, export, transit, distribution, transport, possession not for one’s own consumption, storage and offering for sale, three to twelve years where an organised criminal group is involved, two to six years under article 35 for the lower convention tiers, four to twenty years under article 32 for organising or financing, and four to fifteen or five to twenty years under article 36 for the listed aggravations, subject to the scope note below. Those are the country’s penalties and they are not this row’s exposure, because this substance could not be placed in any list. Article 36 has to be read with its own scope rather than recited flatly. Its numeral 1, supply to a person under twenty one, and its numeral 6, using a home as a place of sale or storage, are limited in terms to "las sustancias a que se refiere el artículo 1° de la presente ley", and this row is outside article 1, so on the face of the text those two numerals do not reach it. Numerals 4 and 5 speak of "el delito" generically and are not so limited, so the four to fifteen year band and the five to twenty year band where the victim dies may still apply through them [Certain as to the wording]. The two amending Laws matter to this row and are named here because the articles quoted above are theirs. Ley 17.016 of 22 October 1998 article 2 gave article 15 of Decreto-Ley 14.294 the wording under which the list that places this row was made, and its article 3 gave articles 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 the wording those articles descend from; article 5 of the same Ley added the chapters that carry the precursor and chemical tables [Certain, read from the amendment notes on the consolidated text and from Ley 17.016 itself]. Ley 19.172 of 20 December 2013 rewrote article 30 by its article 6 and article 31 by its article 7, and that article 7 is the source of the personal consumption exemption quoted above. It does not touch article 35, which descends from article 3 of Ley 17.016 and was last rewritten by article 72 of Ley 19.889 of 9 July 2020 [Certain]. The b176 cell recorded that this substance could not be placed in any list, and disclosed that the generic groups of Anexo II had never been read. Both annexes have now been read: tobacco is absent from the 526 entry name column of the list in force and is caught by none of the three generic groups, being a plant, and Anexo II describes chemical nuclei rather than botanical material. So the ranges above remain the country's published penalties and are still not this row's exposure, and that conclusion now rests on the list in force rather than on the one it replaced.
If prescribed / medical
No schedule placement was established for this row, so no controlled medicine route attaches to it in the official text I read. Article 111 of Decreto 454/976 prohibits outright the circulation in transit through national territory of narcotic or psychopharmacological substances coming from and destined for abroad, which is a country level rule and not a rule about this substance [Certain]. The traveller question is deferred: no personal medication allowance was found in the reachable official text.
Documentation
Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription and declare it at the border. Legal cannabis access in Uruguay is a separate regime restricted to registered Uruguayan citizens and accredited permanent residents and it does not extend to this substance, see the cannabis row.
[Certain] Re-derived in this pass. Article 5 of Ley 23.737 opens with the words sin autorización o con destino ilegítimo, so an authorised medical channel sits outside it. Article 8 sets reclusión o prisión de tres a quince años, three to fifteen years, a fine and special disqualification for five to twelve years for a person authorised to produce, manufacture, extract, prepare, import, export, distribute or sell estupefacientes who holds them in quantities other than those authorised, or who applies, delivers or sells them sin receta médica o en cantidades mayores a las recetadas. Article 9 sets prisión de dos a seis años, two to six years, a fine and disqualification for one to five years for a doctor or other authorised prescriber who prescribes, supplies or delivers estupefacientes fuera de los casos que indica la terapéutica o en dosis mayores de las necesarias, rising to reclusión o prisión de cuatro a quince años, four to fifteen years, where the destination is illegitimate. Article 1 of the same Act replaced article 204 of the Penal Code, which sets prisión de seis meses a tres años, six months to three years, for a person authorised to sell medicinal substances who supplies them otherwise than in accordance with the prescription, or without presenting and filing it where the regulations require one. [Certain] Whether those articles reach this row was not established, because no estupefaciente placement was established. A product containing it may still be a prescription medicine under the ANMAT medicines regime, which is a separate instrument that was not read in this pass, and the figures above are the country's prescription offences rather than this row's exposure. [Likely] Carried from the published dossier prepared for this country, not re-derived here: for an authorised medicine a traveller should hold the original labelled package, the prescription that medicine requires, and a medical certificate in Spanish naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose, the quantity and the treatment period. Import rules and ANMAT authorisation remain product specific, and none of those documents creates a personal use quantity or authorises an illicit preparation.
Documentation
[Likely] Carried from the live cell: medical cannabis is lawful for registered patients only, and recreational sale and purchase remain criminal offences. The instrument named for that regime, Ley 27.350, was not read in this pass. [Likely] Carried from the published dossier: carry any controlled medicine in its original labelled package with the prescription it requires and a medical certificate in Spanish naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose, the quantity and the treatment period, and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel. Import rules and ANMAT authorisation are product specific. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass for this row: no placement was established for this substance on either list, so no estupefaciente documentation requirement was established for it either, and the lines above are the country rule rather than this row's rule.
Ley 23.737, consolidated text, InfoLEG https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/138/texact.htm · Decreto 560/2019, consolidated text https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/norma-326675/actualizacion · Decreto 122/2026, substituting Anexo I, published 02/03/2026 https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/norma-423520/texto · Anexo I as substituted, the complete 886 row text-layer PDF published by the Boletín Oficial, https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/338915/20260302?anexos=1, sha256 197fce006cd7388d4eb06adae573487d2fe820976f55f242d0623e3215deca62, kept at research/instruments/argentina/ · Anexo II, published image https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/326675_dec560anexoII_jpg/archivo · Corte Suprema, Arriola (2009), carried from the live cell https://www.loc.gov/item/2019668143/ · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Colombia's traveller rule runs through the medicamentos de control especial regime. It has no entry in Anexo Técnico 1, a sweep of all 469 entry names and chemical names returning no hit for it, Tapentadol, and entry 427, Tebacón, and it is on none of the three medicamentos de control especial lists in Anexo Técnico 3, so it is not a controlled medicine on the face of Resolución 116 de 2026 as at 27 January 2026. That does not rule out a later resolution. Ley 30 de 1986 article 3 limits the use and possession of estupefacientes to medical and scientific ends under Ministry of Health regulation, and article 20(a) routes import and sale through the Fondo. Penal Code article 379 punishes a doctor, dentist, nurse or pharmacist who illegally prescribes, supplies or applies a dependence-producing drug with 48 to 144 months and 80 to 180 months of professional disqualification. The specific traveller certificate requirements were not established in this pass, because Resolución 1478 de 2006 could not be retrieved from an official source. [Certain] as to the listing.
Documentation
Carry any controlled medicine in its original labelled packaging with the prescription. Import, export, processing, synthesis, manufacture, distribution, purchase, sale and use of the substances under fiscalización run through the Unidad Administrativa Especial Fondo Nacional de Estupefacientes or the Fondos Rotatorios de Estupefacientes, and article 3 of Resolución 116 de 2026 allows one month for bencilfentanilo and anhídrido propiónico and six months for the other newly incorporated substances and medicines to register. Constitution article 49, as amended by Acto Legislativo 02 de 2009, provides that el porte y el consumo de sustancias estupefacientes o sicotrópicas está prohibido, salvo prescripción médica. Two official portals print different current texts of article 49 and that conflict is recorded here rather than resolved, so no adult-use permission is asserted in this cell. The resolution prints its entry names in capitals and they are given here in title case. This substance has no entry in Anexo Técnico 1 as at 27 January 2026, and a sweep of all 469 entry names and chemical names returns no hit for it. [Certain] Corrected in this pass: an earlier version of this cell named the two entries either side of where the term would sort. That pair was computed on the assumption that the annex sorts on the printed string, and it does not. It sorts ignoring hyphens, spaces and punctuation, which an independent re-parse demonstrated on two runs of the instrument, 2C-B, 2C-E, 2-Fluorodescloroketamina, 2-Metil-AP-237, and Nicocodina, Nicodicodina, Nicomorfina, Nimetazepam, Nitrazepam, N-metilefedrina, Norcodeína. The neighbour pair is withdrawn. The absence itself is unchanged and rests on a complete reading of all 469 entries, which does not depend on the sort order. [Certain] The second limb was swept as well as the first, and saying so matters because Penal Code article 376 does not reach a substance by way of Anexo Técnico 1. It reaches one contemplado en los cuadros uno, dos, tres y cuatro del Convenio de las Naciones Unidas sobre Sustancias Sicotrópicas, which is a reference to the Convention itself, so an absence from the Colombian annex alone would not settle the question. Both cached editions were searched free-substring rather than anchored, because an anchored zero on these lists is unreliable where a name wraps across two printed lines: the Green List 36th edition of 2025 and the Yellow List 65th edition of July 2026. The search returned no hit at all, so the second limb is clean for this row as well as the first. [Certain] Re-derived in this pass and restored, because it was on the live cell for this row and on none of the replacements I first built: Ley 1787 de 2016 is the medicinal and scientific cannabis statute, and it works on the Penal Code directly. The consolidated text of Código Penal article 375 carries the note Inciso adicionado por el artículo 12 del Ley 1787 de 2016, and article 377 carries Inciso adicionado por el artículo 14 del Ley 1787 de 2016. Those added paragraphs are what take licensed medicinal and scientific handling out of the cultivation and possession-of-plant offences. Recreational sale is untouched by them and remains criminal.
Ley 7786 of 30 April 1998 as integrally reformed by Ley 8204, arts 1, 2, 36, 58, 73, 74, 77, 77 bis, 79, 96 and 100 · icd.go.cr · Ley 10961 of 9 June 2026, Alcance 78 a La Gaceta 113 of 19 June 2026, in force 19 September 2026 · imprentanacional.go.cr · Lista de sustancias sometidas a fiscalizacion nacional, incluidos los medicamentos psicotropicos y estupefacientes, Ministerio de Salud, updated 10 September 2026, made under Reglamento 45161-S · ministeriodesalud.go.cr · Circular JVD-002-2015 of 14 December 2015, Junta de Vigilancia de Drogas Estupefacientes · ministeriodesalud.go.cr · Constitucion Politica de Costa Rica art 21 · constituteproject.org · Incb Green List, 36th edition, 2025 · incb.org · Incb Yellow List, 65th edition, July 2026 · incb.org · Incb Red List, 23rd edition, July 2025 · swissmedic.ch · read as at 2026-09-21 · ministeriodesalud.go.cr · ministeriodesalud.go.cr · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
The terms searched for this row were «tabaco», «tobacco», «Nicotiana tabacum» and «nicotina», each checked in the Consejo Nacional de Drogas consolidated text, in the Ministerio de Salud Pública text and in the text of Decreto 275-21 that replaced the precursor chapter, after the dot leaders and the accents were normalised. The row for nicotine, the alkaloid it carries, is recorded separately in this corpus and reaches the same finding. Article 9 extends only to the Cannabináceas and to coca, so neither of the law's plant clauses reaches this one. There is no medical cannabis programme in the Dominican Republic and CBD is treated the same as THC. The United States embassy warns of zero tolerance enforcement in which small quantities can lead to arrest, and it states that United States cannabis or medical marijuana cards are not recognised.
Ley 50-88 sobre Drogas y Sustancias Controladas de la República Dominicana of 30 May 1988, in the consolidated text published by the Consejo Nacional de Drogas, which carries Ley 35-90 of 7 June 1990, Ley 17-95 of 17 December 1995 and the substitution of the article 76 párrafo by article 33 of Ley 72-02 of 7 June 2002 · not named in the Categorías of article 8, in the article 2 definitions or in Capítulo V of the Reglamento as replaced by article 5 of Decreto 275-21, read as at 21 September 2026 · consejodedrogasrd.gob.do · cross-read entry by entry against the Ministerio de Salud Publica copy titled y sus modificaciones, which lists the same substances · msp.gob.do · Reglamento Decreto 288-96 of 3 August 1996 · Decreto 275-21 of 26 April 2021, read in full to its final article, which carries no transitory article · presidencia.gob.do · the zero tolerance enforcement warning, the statement that United States cannabis and medical marijuana cards are not recognised and the absence of a medical cannabis programme are carried forward from the live cell and from the United States embassy guidance and are not re-derived · every figure this cell states from articles 5, 6, 7, 58, 59, 75, 85 and 87 was re-derived from the article itself and is not carried forward · do.usembassy.gov · read as at 21 September 2026 · Updated October 3, 2026
Documentation
No Jamaican controlled drug document is needed for this substance, because the Dangerous Drugs Act does not reach it. Any paperwork that is needed comes from customs, excise or product law, which this citation does not cover, so do not treat this row as clearance for a quantity carried for sale. When you confirm this row, put to them the question this row is drawn around, which is the one that reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty. The scope search relied on here, «tabaco», was read on 20 September 2026.
Jamaica, the Dangerous Drugs Act, consolidated text, sections 10 and 22, read at https://laws.moj.gov.jm/library/statute/the-dangerous-drugs-act/download, the Ministry of Justice laws of Jamaica library · the download is a 43 page scan of the consolidation whose latest amendment notes are L.N. 3/2001 and, on the Part IIIA pages, L.N. 192A/2017, and five of its pages carry no text layer and were read as page images. This citation is document level and not per substance: the links column of the compilation for this row holds the constructed text «tobacco schedule | tobacco penalty» rather than an address, and the single hyperlink target in the whole document is the download named above, so no per row source exists and none is implied. The compilation's own outcome for this row is VERIFIED, and the terms it records as searched are «tabaco». There is no First Schedule of substances in this Act · its Schedule is the set of licence Forms A, B and D, and the list of drugs to which Part IV applies is in section 10(1). The row boundary the read was carried out against is recorded as follows: it reserves the tobacco statute instead of assigning a controlled-drug trafficking penalty. Read as at 20 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
Carry the product's own labelling and full ingredient list, because the analysis on this row turns on what the product actually is and not on what it is called, and the source read here establishes no placement in the controlled-drug schedules for tobacco to be identified against. Provenance: the placement relied on reads: No controlled-drug schedule; 2010 Act s. 2(1)(d) exclusion. It was checked on 20 September 2026. What was actually read is “a tobacco product”, and nothing beyond that wording is carried here. The dossier behind this cell supplied no address for this row, so the citation carried here is to the named instrument and not to a retrieved document.
Ireland. The governing statute is the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977, and the provisions this row relies on are the ones printed in its own recorded lines below, with none added to them. This row names no statutory instrument at all. It rests on what its own line records rather than on a regulation, so no instrument number is given here and none has been added to it. The instrument and section string recorded in full for tobacco is: No controlled-drug schedule · 2010 Act s. 2(1)(d) exclusion · row-specific search for tobacco (tobacco). The entry or wording read is “a tobacco product”, quoted here as the dossier prints it. The exact search recorded against that instrument is: "tobacco" / "tobacco" in the instrument named in column 3. The ceiling and the provision carrying it are recorded as: No 1977 Act controlled-drug ceiling attaches to tobacco · the stated section 2 exclusion prevents the 2010 Act route for the qualifying product. Read as at 20 September 2026. The second statute is named in the dossier only as the 2010 Act, with no short title given, so it is cited here in the dossier's own words and no title has been supplied for it. No address is given here because the dossier supplied none. Its address column carried only the words "Source 1Source 2" for this row, and no address of any kind appears anywhere in the dossier, so this citation is to the named instrument rather than to a retrieved document. Nothing has been supplied in place of the missing address. · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
Carry nothing under the drug instruments for this, because no narcotics, psychotrope or NPS designation exists. The tobacco rules bind the seller far more than the carrier, so the obligations are mostly not the traveller's. The tobacco act was read on 18 September 2026 at the version including BGBl I 68/2026, operative from 20 August 2026 under §18(18).
Austria, the tobacco and non smokers protection act §2 prohibition on sales to persons under eighteen, with §§2a and 2b on distance selling, read at https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10010907 · the prescription regulation exception was read at https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10010358 and the medicines act at https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10010441 · RIS is the official publisher · its open data notice at https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/UI/Ogd.aspx places the reused material under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International and requires attribution, and its imprint at https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/UI/Impressum.aspx identifies the signed authentic gazette instruments as the binding text and disclaims accuracy, currency and completeness for the consolidated versions · the version applied includes BGBl I 68/2026 operative from 20 August 2026 · at that placement the reading also covered this: the age, distance selling, labelling, advertising and smoking provisions were read as one regime, and the drug instruments were searched and returned nothing · read as at 18 September 2026. · the section 27, 35, 28 and 28a penalties stated above are carried forward from this site's published Austria entry, which cites the Suchtmittelgesetz and the Suchtgift-Grenzmengenverordnung. They were not re-derived from either instrument in this pass, and that entry's own framing, depenalised and not legalised and no legal minimum quantity, is carried with them · Updated September 21, 2026
· the regulation, both amending regulations and the Act were read at api.sejm.gov.pl on 21 September 2026
If prescribed / medical
The country level rule in Croatia is that carriage of a medicine containing a listed drug is set by Articles 24 and 24.a of the Zakon o suzbijanju zlouporabe droga rather than by the schedule, so paperwork changes what a traveller may hold and not where a substance sits. At the state border a traveller may hold such a medicine only on medical documentation and only in the quantity needed for personal use for at most 5 days. A person on substitution therapy for addiction, or on symptomatic therapy in the terminal phase of a malignant disease, may hold up to 15 days on the same documentation. A resident of Croatia travelling to Schengen states, and a Schengen national travelling to Croatia, may hold up to 30 days on a certificate issued on the prescribed form by an authorised doctor, whose content and appearance the health minister sets by pravilnik. Attached to this row: Tobacco has no pharmaceutical form, and the nicotine replacement products that do are a different row. The live cell recorded for this row: If a controlled medicine, carry the prescription and confirm with your embassy (see documentation).
Documentation
Under Article 24(3) the name and quantity of the medicine must be declared to customs on crossing the European Union border, with the medical documentation produced. Article 59 of the control Act makes each of those failures a misdemeanour for a natural person punishable by a fine of 1.000,00 to 10.000,00 kuna, which is roughly 133 to 1,327 euro at the fixed conversion rate, and the four failures it names are carrying without documentation or beyond the 5 day quantity, the substitution and terminal care case beyond 15 days, failing to declare to customs, and travelling within Schengen beyond 30 days or without the certificate. Medical cannabis has been legal in Croatia since October 2015 on prescription, capped at 0,75 g of THC per month and limited to residents, which is carried forward from the live cell. Claims of a 2026 reform introducing a five gram cannabis threshold are not supported by any primary source and should be disregarded, which is also carried forward. Tobacco documents in Croatia are excise and consumer documents rather than drug Act documents. For this row the provenance is the absence of any entry, which on this row is silence rather than an express exclusion.
Croatia, Popis droga, psihotropnih tvari i biljaka iz kojih se može dobiti droga te tvari koje se mogu uporabiti za izradu droga, NN 19/2023, no entry for this row in the narcotic list, the psychotropic list or the precursor categories, which on this row is silence rather than an express exclusion · the terms searched across all three lists of the Popis for this row were duhan, Nicotiana tabacum, nikotin · the live cell's recital that this substance was not named in the cited Croatian sources is superseded here by a search of the operative Popis itself, which is the instrument those cited sources point at · the Popis as published at NN 19/2023 of 17 February 2023, in force 18 February 2023, read at https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2023_02_19_331.html on 21 September 2026 · its only amendment, Izmjene i dopune Popisa, NN 154/2024 of 30 December 2024, read at https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2024_12_154_2555.html on 21 September 2026 · the enabling provision is Article 2(2) of the Zakon o suzbijanju zlouporabe droga, Narodne novine 107/01, 87/02, 163/03, 141/04, 40/07, 149/09, 84/11, 80/13 and 39/19 · Zakon o suzbijanju zlouporabe droga, Articles 2, 3, 13, 24, 24.a, 54 and 59, read in the consolidation at https://www.zakon.hr/z/293/zakon-o-suzbijanju-zlouporabe-droga on 21 September 2026 · Kazneni zakon, Articles 41, 44, 46 and 190, read in the consolidation at https://www.zakon.hr/z/98/kazneni-zakon on 21 September 2026 · the current three to twelve year band in Article 190(2) was set by Article 10 of the Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Kaznenog zakona, NN 136/2025, read at https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2025_11_136_2018.html on 21 September 2026, against which the private consolidation was checked · Ustav Republike Hrvatske, Article 21, read at https://www.zakon.hr/z/94/Ustav-Republike-Hrvatske on 21 September 2026 · the live cell's own references, the Drug Abuse Prevention Act (Zakon o suzbijanju zlouporabe droga, Official Gazette 107/2001, as amended) and the Criminal Code, carried forward · euda.europa.eu · the 2013 reclassification, the 660 to 2,650 euro fine, the 90 day detention, the no statutory quantity rule, the six months to five years, three to twelve years and fifteen to twenty year figures and the October 2015 medical cannabis permission with its 0,75 g monthly cap are carried forward from the live cell and were not re-derived in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
There is no controlled drug prescription question for Tobacco in Hungary under these jegyzékek, because none of the six carries it. Whether Tobacco is available on prescription, over the counter or on general sale is a question for the Hungarian medicines and pharmacy regime, which this row did not audit. The Hungarian National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition is the body that states them, and the reporting and licensing forms in the mellékletek to 66/2012. (IV. 2.) Korm. rendelet are headed with its Hungarian abbreviation, NNGYK. The plant is sold through a state controlled retail channel in Hungary, which is a different regime from the one this row reads. Treat the supply route as unread rather than as open. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Documentation
Carry Tobacco as the Hungarian medicines and consumer regimes allow and do not read this row as a carriage permission, because a substance off the jegyzékek is not thereby free to cross a border. That is the carriage answer for this row and it is deliberately narrow. No traveller permit scheme, declaration form or carriage allowance for this substance appears in what was read here. No row is relied on for this cell, because none was found. Provenance follows. The controlling text is 78/2022. (XII. 28.) BM rendelet az ellenőrzött anyagokról, read at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2022-78-20-0A on 21 September 2026 in the consolidated text as in force on 29 June 2026. Its section 1 puts the kábítószer jegyzékek in the 1. melléklet, the pszichotróp anyag jegyzékek in the 2. melléklet, «A 2. melléklet tartalmazza a pszichotróp anyagnak minősülő anyagok jegyzékeit.», and the új pszichoaktív anyag jegyzék in the 3. melléklet. The Criminal Code was read at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2012-100-00-00 on 21 September 2026 in the consolidated text as in force on 26 August 2026, and that rendering stops at section 339, so sections 459(1a) and 461 were read instead in the Act that enacted them, 2025. évi XIX. törvény sections 26 and 27, at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2025-19-00-00.0. The Criminal Code page carries a footnote recording that section 461 is the text established by section 27 of that Act, so the two readings agree. On the instrument itself: the schedules are not in 66/2012. (IV. 2.) Korm. rendelet. That decree survives as the activities, licensing and definitions instrument, its 1. melléklet was repealed by section 11 h) of 607/2022. (XII. 28.) Korm. rendelet, and 78/2022 has carried the jegyzékek since 1 January 2023.
Hungary, Tobacco, searched across all six jegyzékek and the five structural descriptions of 78/2022. (XII. 28.) BM rendelet az ellenőrzött anyagokról and no controlling entry was found · the entry or the search record is quoted in full in the legal status field and is not repeated here · the rendelet, consolidated text as in force on 29 June 2026, read at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2022-78-20-0A on 21 September 2026 · 2012. évi C. törvény a Büntető Törvénykönyvről, sections 176 to 180, read at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2012-100-00-00 on 21 September 2026 · sections 459(1a) and 461 of that Act as established by sections 26 and 27 of 2025. évi XIX. törvény, read at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2025-19-00-00.0 on 21 September 2026, because the Nemzeti Jogszabálytár rendering of the Criminal Code stops at section 339 · 66/2012. (IV. 2.) Korm. rendelet, the activities and definitions decree whose 1. melléklet formerly carried the jegyzékek and was repealed by section 11 h) of 607/2022. (XII. 28.) Korm. rendelet, at https://njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/2012-66-20-22 · every Criminal Code figure in this cell was re-derived from the Act in this pass and the live Hungary figure is printed beside it in the street field · read on 21 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Nicotine replacement products are medicines and are dealt with in the nicotine cell.
Documentation
Personal import allowances are a customs matter. Electronic cigarettes and their liquids are separately restricted under the tobacco regime rather than the drugs regime.
Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Chapter 218), as last amended by Act No. 7 of 2026, certified 6 March 2026 · absence was established by reading Groups A, B, C, D and E of Part I in full, Group B from Act No. 41 of 2022 and Groups A, C, D and E from a private consolidation to 2024, and by reading Parts I to V of the First Schedule and all four Parts of the Second Schedule in that same consolidation · the finding is that the substance is absent from Groups A, B, C, D and E of the Third Schedule · National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol Act, No. 27 of 2006. Principal Ordinance read from the National Dangerous Drugs Control Board's own copy. Read 2026-09-17 · nddcb.gov.lk · nddcb.gov.lk · parliament.lk · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Smoking tobacco is not a medicine question here and no prescription rule applies to it. Nicotine as a pharmaceutical substance sits in tableau A, the produits toxiques regime of the 1922 dahir, and that regime governs nicotine as a substance, not a cigarette.
Documentation
Loi n° 15-91, promulgated by dahir n° 1-91-112 of 27 moharrem 1416 (26 June 1995), was read in full from the page images of Bulletin officiel 4318 of 2 August 1995, pages 542 and 543: chapter I, articles 1 to 3, packaging; chapter II, articles 4 to 6, smoking in public places; chapter III, articles 7 to 10, advertising; chapter IV, articles 11 to 14, sanctions and entry into force six months after publication. A Ministry of Health legal database copy republished by tobaccocontrollaws.org gives the same reference. In 2008 the Chamber of Representatives was reported to have adopted a bill amending the law, raising the smoking fine and penalising sale to minors, and in 2022 a parliamentary group proposed adding a fine for sale to minors as a complement to loi 15-91. No promulgated amending law was found by searching in French and Arabic, but the gazette after 1995 was not swept issue by issue, so an amendment cannot be ruled out. The alkaloid was read separately: « Nicotine et ses sels » is in the tableau A annexed to the dahir of 2 December 1922, Bulletin officiel 534 of 16 January 1923, page 63, read from the page image, and in tableau A of arrêté n° 171-66, Bulletin officiel 2817 of 26 October 1966. Tobacco, tabac, Nicotiana and cigarette are in no entry of tableau B as replaced by arrêté n° 1850-96 in 1996, Bulletin officiel 4422, pages 713 to 716, and in none of tableaux A and C of 1966 as searched in an OCR text of every page. The narcotics dahir portant loi 1-73-282, Bulletin officiel 3214 of 5 June 1974, pages 928 and 929, enumerates no substance, and its articles 11 and 13 apply only to the offences it creates. Placement for tobacco: in no section II tableau; the product is governed by loi 15-91 as published in 1995, and its alkaloid nicotine is in tableau A. Tobacco is also in no entry of the 1971 Convention tableaux as printed at Bulletin officiel 3590 of 19 August 1981, page 404, as the live cell recorded on 22 September 2026.
Loi n° 15-91 relative à l'interdiction de fumer et de faire de la publicité et de la propagande en faveur du tabac dans certains lieux, promulguée par le dahir n° 1-91-112 du 27 moharrem 1416 (26 juin 1995), Bulletin officiel 4318 of 2 August 1995, pages 542 to 543, read from the page image on 3 October 2026 · https://www.sgg.gov.ma/BO/bo_fr/1995/bo_4318_fr.pdf | Ministry of Health legal database copy of the same law, read on 3 October 2026 · https://assets.tobaccocontrollaws.org/uploads/legislation/Morocco/Morocco-Smoke-Free-Ads-Propaganda-native.pdf | Dahir du 12 rebia II 1341 (2 décembre 1922), annexe, tableau A, Bulletin officiel 534 of 16 January 1923, page 63, read from the page image on 3 October 2026 · https://www.sgg.gov.ma/BO/bo_fr/1923/bo_534_fr.pdf | Arrêté du ministre de la santé publique n° 171-66 du 11 mars 1966, tableau A, Bulletin officiel 2817 of 26 October 1966 · https://www.sgg.gov.ma/BO/bo_fr/1966/bo_2817_fr.pdf | Arrêté du ministre de la santé publique n° 1850-96 du 3 septembre 1996, tableau B, Bulletin officiel 4422 of 17 October 1996, pages 713 to 716 · https://www.sgg.gov.ma/BO/bo_fr/1996/bo_4422_fr.pdf | Dahir portant loi n° 1-73-282 du 21 mai 1974, Bulletin officiel 3214 of 5 June 1974, pages 928 to 929, read from the page image on 3 October 2026 · https://www.sgg.gov.ma/BO/bo_fr/1974/bo_3214_fr.pdf | placement for tobacco: in no section II tableau · governed by loi 15-91 as published in 1995 · « Nicotine et ses sels » in tableau A · Updated October 3, 2026
If prescribed / medical
No prescription route arises under Law No. 9 of 1987 for a substance that Law does not carry. If the material is a medicine it sits in the medicines and pharmacy regime, which is registration, import permission and dispensing rules administered by the Pharmacy and Drug Control Department, and this row did not audit that regime. Read the absence as an absence from the drug schedules and not as permission to carry the thing.
Documentation
No Qatari carriage permit, declaration form or traveller allowance for this substance was found in what was read for this row, and an absence in what was read is not proof that no scheme exists. If you carry it as a medicine, carry the prescription and the original dispensing packaging and ask the Pharmacy and Drug Control Department at the Ministry of Public Health in writing before you travel rather than at the border, because the Department decides release at the point of entry. Tables 1 to 5 and the three Ministry lists were searched for this name on 22 September 2026.
the table and item placement stated for this row is not printed in the quotation column of the dossier checked against this batch, because no quoted extract in that dossier carries a table or item marker for any of its 88 rows, measured at 0 of 88 on 22 September 2026 · it was read instead in the Official Gazette annex named above · the statute amendment chain carried in the consolidated text and re-derived from it on 22 September 2026 is Law No. 7 of 1998, Law No. 20 of 2003, Law No. 1 of 2006, Law No. 3 of 2020 and Law No. 16 of 2023, which that text marks on 5, 1, 28, 33 and 1 articles respectively, article 41 bis having been repealed by Law No. 1 of 2006 · the separate medicines regime is Law No. 19 of 1993, whose article 14 gives the Minister the parallel power over its own schedules · Qatar, Tobacco, outside Law No. 9 of 1987, governed where applicable by tobacco-control law · Qatar, Law No. 9 of 1987 on the control of narcotic drugs and dangerous psychotropic substances, consolidated Arabic text read at https://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt&LawID=3989&language=ar on 22 September 2026, where the portal states its material is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 · the attached annex, which the Al Meezan schedule note returns empty, was read instead in the Official Gazette scan at https://encyclop.sjc.gov.qa/Portal3/ahkam/OpenpdfFile.aspx?id=8, all thirty pages, a scan carrying no text layer, so it was rendered and read as images and the Latin entry column was transcribed by optical character recognition and confirmed against the page image · the Supreme Judicial Council site reserves all rights and no open-reuse licence was located, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced · the schedule amendments read in full, each through its last article, are Ministerial Decision 22 of 2015 at https://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt&LawID=6806&language=ar, Decision 6 of 2024 at https://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt&LawID=9649&language=ar, Decision 2 of 2025 at https://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt&LawID=9855&language=ar and Decision 8 of 2026 at https://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt&LawID=10296&language=ar · the Ministry of Public Health Pharmacy and Drug Control Department guideline Controls and Regulations for the release of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and psychoactive drugs, signed by the Director of that Department, read on 22 September 2026 from a mirror because the Ministry host www.moph.gov.qa refused programmatic retrieval behind a challenge page on that date, so this list is cited as an administrative Ministry list and never as proof of a numbered table placement · the penalty, quantity and fine figures in this cell were re-derived from the consolidated article text on 22 September 2026 and are not carried forward from any earlier cell or summary · Updated September 21, 2026
· https://alwifaqkw.com/2025/12/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%85-%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%81/ | Ministry of Health Decision 165 of 2026, made 24 May 2026 under article 40, annexing the complete updated schedules, gazetted Kuwait Al-Youm issue 1793 on 31 May 2026
· https://mesferlaw.com/ | placement for Tobacco: in no annexed table
Consequences if caught
Capital exposure: none. This is not a flat abolition. Article 140 of the 1993 Constitution, read in the official text in this run, provides that "La pena de muerte sólo puede aplicarse por el delito de traición a la patria en caso de guerra, y el de terrorismo, conforme a las leyes y a los tratados de los que el Perú es parte obligada". The penalty therefore exists in Peruvian constitutional law and reaches two offences, neither of which is a drug offence. Read against the articles themselves, every offence among Codigo Penal articles 296 to 302 states pena privativa de libertad with a numeric range, article 299 declares a possession not punishable and sets no penalty, article 303 provides expulsion, article 296-D is derogated, and none of them states death. Read the penalties that follow with this in front of them. They are Peru's published penalties and they are not this row's exposure, because whether the trafficking offence reaches this substance at all is exactly what the listing did not establish. They are set out in full rather than dropped, so that nothing sourced is lost, but no figure below is asserted against this substance. With that said, these are the published figures. The trafficking offence is article 296 of the Codigo Penal in the wording given it by article 3 of Decreto Legislativo 1592, published on 14 December 2023, which names "drogas tóxicas, sean estupefacientes, sustancias psicotrópicas o nuevas sustancias psicoactivas". Article 296 first paragraph sets 8 to 15 years, 180 to 365 dias-multa and disqualification for promoting, favouring or facilitating illegal consumption by acts of manufacture or trafficking; its second paragraph sets 6 to 12 years and 120 to 180 dias-multa for possession "para usos ilegales", the words Decreto Legislativo 1592 put in place of the earlier "para su tráfico ilícito", so the possession limb no longer turns on proof of an intent to traffic; its third paragraph sets 5 to 10 years for supplying raw materials or chemical substances, controlled or not, destined for the illegal elaboration of those drugs; and its fourth paragraph sets 5 to 10 years for a conspiracy of two or more persons. Article 297 raises the range to 15 to 25 years for its listed aggravations, among them commission by three or more persons or inside a criminal organisation, sale to minors, and commission in or near a school, health centre, sports venue or place of detention. The ceiling that does run is 25 to 35 years under article 297, which reaches the agent who acts as jefe, dirigente o cabecilla of an organisation dedicated to illicit drug trafficking or to the inputs for its elaboration, applies the same range where a person uses illicit drug trafficking to finance terrorist activity, and, in the final paragraph Ley 32250 added on 19 January 2025, applies it again where drug trafficking activity violates or seeks to violate the life, physical or mental integrity, liberty or property of one or more persons. Article 297 numeral 7, as reworded by Ley 32250, sets the quantity aggravation at 20 kg of pasta basica de cocaina, 10 kg of clorhidrato de cocaina, 5 kg of latex de opio or 500 g of its derivatives, 100 kg of marihuana or 2 kg of its derivatives, 15 g of extasis, or three milligrams of fentanilo or its analogues. Article 298, retitled by Decreto Legislativo 1592 as the formas atenuadas and reworded again by Ley 32250, sets 3 to 7 years where the toxic drug elaborated, manufactured, prepared, traded, handed to others or possessed para usos ilegales does not exceed 50 g of pasta basica de cocaina, 25 g of clorhidrato de cocaina, 5 g of latex de opio or 1 g of its derivatives, 100 g of marihuana or 10 g of its derivatives, 2 g of extasis, or up to one milligram of fentanilo, rising to 6 to 10 years where the conduct also answers aggravations 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 of article 297. Article 299, in the wording given it by Decreto Legislativo 1592, makes possession of a toxic drug destined for the holder's own and immediate consumption not punishable in a quantity not exceeding five grams of pasta basica de cocaina, two grams of clorhidrato de cocaina, eight grams of marihuana or two grams of its derivatives, one gram of latex de opio or two hundred milligrams of its derivatives, or two hundred and fifty milligrams of extasis, and its second paragraph excludes from that protection the possession of two or more kinds of toxic drugs, "sean estupefacientes, sustancias psicotrópicas o nuevas sustancias psicoactivas". The lineage of these articles, kept so that nothing sourced is lost: Ley 28002 of 17 June 2003 derogated article 296-D; Decreto Legislativo 982 of 22 July 2007 replaced articles 296, 296-A, 297, 298 and 299; Decreto Legislativo 1237 of 26 September 2015 replaced articles 296, 296-B and 297, the wording of 296 and 297 the previous cell quoted as current; Decreto Legislativo 1592 of 14 December 2023 replaced articles 296, 298 and 299; and Ley 32250 of 19 January 2025 replaced article 297 numeral 7, added its final paragraph and replaced article 298 numeral 1. The last two are the current text read in this run. Articles 297 numerals 1 to 6 and 300 to 303 were read in the Congreso compendio. Article 303, as replaced by the second complementary modifying provision of Ley 30219 of 8 July 2014, provides that a foreign national who has served the custodial sentence imposed, or who is granted a penitentiary benefit, is expelled from the country and barred from returning. Article 15 letter d of Decreto Legislativo 1241, read in the consolidated text in this run, lets the Policia Nacional detain a person caught in flagrante for up to fifteen calendar days. Carried from the previous cell and not re-derived in this run: about 60 per cent of drug detentions in Peru are for use or possession, and police frequently treat a possessor as a trafficker. Article 89 numeral 13 of Decreto Ley 22095, defining droga, closes by providing that "para los efectos de la represión penal, se considera únicamente las listas I y II A", and article 296 as worded by Decreto Legislativo 1592 reaches drogas tóxicas, sean estupefacientes, sustancias psicotrópicas o nuevas sustancias psicoactivas; neither brings in a substance that no list names, which is why no figure above is asserted here. What was not established on this row is the placement itself. The search run over Anexo N. 2 under tabaco, nicotiana tabacum and nicotina returned no entry. The previous pass said that Peru regulates tobacco through its own tobacco control law outside the Reglamento; no such law was read in this run, so that is carried and unverified.
If prescribed / medical
The country level rule in Peru is that the Reglamento approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA governs prescription and dispensing by the list a substance sits in: article 23 requires the special numbered prescription forms distributed by the Ministerio de Salud for Listas II A, III A, III B and III C, and article 27 allows an ordinary medical prescription for Listas II B, IV A, IV B and VI, both read in this run; article 300 of the Codigo Penal punishes a health professional who improperly prescribes, administers or dispenses a medicine containing a toxic drug with 2 to 5 years and disqualification. Attached to this substance: this substance has no Anexo N. 2 placement to attach, so there is no list to set the form of the receta and no controlled medicines route the Reglamento provides for it. Tobacco is not among the 244 entries. The previous pass said that Peru regulates tobacco through its own tobacco control law outside the Reglamento; no such law was read in this run, so that is carried and unverified. Whether it is a registered medicine in Peru at all is a medicines registration question that sits outside the schedule and was not examined here, so no carriage rule is stated for it.
Documentation
Provenance: this row stays unplaced after this run's searches of the annex to Resolucion Ministerial 0804-2026-IN, of the INCB Green List 36th edition and Yellow List 65th edition, and of Anexo N. 2 in its 9 March 2026 Wayback capture, all on 3 October 2026. The offence articles set out are Codigo Penal article 296 and articles 298 and 299 as worded by Decreto Legislativo 1592, article 297 as reworded by Ley 32250, and articles 297 numerals 1 to 6 and 300 to 303 as read in the Congreso compendio. The previous pass's provenance, carried: the finding relied on is a negative search of all 244 entries of Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA, read in the DIGEMID Catalogo de Sustancias Controladas marked NOVIEMBRE_2024_V1, whose address is given in full in the source field, and cross read against the DIGEMID publication of the same Anexo dated 2021, together with the 1978 annex to Decreto Ley 22095, and every list was followed to its final numbered item. The terms carried into that search over Anexo N. 2 were tabaco, nicotiana tabacum and nicotina. None of them reached an entry. Personal use possession of a single kind of drug below its article 299 figure is not a crime, while possessing two or more kinds at once is, because the second paragraph of article 299 withdraws the protection. Carried from the previous cell and not re-derived in this run: medical cannabis is lawful under Ley 30681 of 2017, whose Reglamento was approved by Decreto Supremo 005-2019-SA and is cited in the catalogue's own footnote to the Lista II A cannabis entries, items 12 and 13; hemp is regulated under Ley 32195 of 2024, carried from the previous cell and not re-derived here. The coca leaf has a status of its own, carried from the cell settled on 21 September 2026 and not re-read in this run: no entry among the 244 in Anexo N. 2 is the leaf, the only coca entries being Cocaina at Lista II A item 1 and Lista IV A item 10, and article 89 numeral 6 of Decreto Ley 22095 defines Cocaina as the alkaloids extracted from the leaves of the coca bush or synthesised from ecgonina, while numeral 4 defines the arbusto de coca separately as the plant of the genus erythroxilon. The leaf is therefore outside the drug schedule altogether and sits instead under a state monopoly and cultivation regime: article 31 prohibits cultivation in new areas, article 32 puts all coca varieties under state fiscalisation, and article 41, as replaced by article 1 of Ley 27634 published on 16 January 2002, gives the industrialisation and commercialisation of leaf from registered holdings to the state company ENACO S.A. The previous cell gave article 60 as substituted by article 1 of Decreto Legislativo 122, which is right, but described under it the 1978 text that Decreto Legislativo 122 repealed, as Decreto Ley 22095, read in this run, shows. Article 60 as enacted in 1978 set 2 to 5 years for cultivating coca without registration or beyond the registered extent, for paying for personal services in coca leaf, for an owner, tenant, administrator, guard or person in charge who consents to the distribution or consumption of drugs on premises in their charge, and for selling leaf in unauthorised zones or without an ENACO licence. Article 1 of Decreto Legislativo 122, published on 15 June 1981, repealed that text and put in its place an offence of shielding a person from prosecution or punishment for drug trafficking, 5 to 8 years, or 10 to 15 years where the one who shields is an official charged with the investigation of the offence or the custody of the offender, and the consolidated text refers the reader to Section II, Chapter III of the Codigo Penal approved by Decreto Legislativo 635. The premises offence the previous cell called the one most likely to reach a visitor is therefore the repealed 1978 text and is not stated here as law; permitting drug use on premises is not shown by anything read in this run to be an offence of its own, and article 296 reaches promoting, favouring or facilitating illegal consumption only through acts of manufacture or trafficking. Nothing read in the 21 September 2026 pass makes possession or traditional chewing of the leaf an offence, which is why it is not treated here as one. Carry any controlled medicine in its original labelled packaging with the prescription, and confirm the position with your embassy before travelling.
Peru, Resolucion Ministerial 0804-2026-IN of the Ministerio del Interior approving the Lista de Nuevas Sustancias Psicoactivas (NSP), in El Peruano at https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/dispositivo/NL/2526706-1 and on gob.pe at https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mininter/normas-legales/8278257-0804-2026-in, resolution https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/10174756/8278257-0804-2026-in.pdf and annex https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/10174757/8278257-anexo-0804-2026-in.pdf · Decreto Legislativo 1241 as consolidated by the Congreso, with article 14 as replaced by Decreto Legislativo 1592, at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con6_uibd.nsf/DEEDF5BA81015EF805258AB40052BA3C/$FILE/dec_leg_1241.pdf · Decreto Legislativo 1592, article 3 on Codigo Penal articles 296, 298 and 299, at https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/dispositivo/NL/2244234-2 · Ley 32250 on Codigo Penal articles 297 and 298 at https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/dispositivo/NL/2363369-3 · Codigo Penal articles 296 to 303 in the Compendio Normativo sobre Trafico Ilicito de Drogas of the Congreso at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/99D85DBA6D67749605257F540070950B/$FILE/Compendio-Normativo-TID.pdf · Decreto Legislativo 982 at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/448FEBA50C50F63B05257A6E005C3C8C/$FILE/DL_982.pdf · Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA in the DIGEMID Catalogo de Sustancias Controladas NOVIEMBRE_2024_V1, https://www.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/Archivos/PortalWeb/Informativo/Catalogacion/SUSTANCIA_CONTROLADA_NOVIEMBRE_2024.pdf, read in the capture https://web.archive.org/web/20260309092330/https://www.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/Archivos/PortalWeb/Informativo/Catalogacion/SUSTANCIA_CONTROLADA_NOVIEMBRE_2024.pdf · the Reglamento itself on gob.pe at https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minsa/normas-legales/255646-023-2001-sa · Decreto Ley 22095 at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con6_uibd.nsf/1AC694FF39FA6B7105258AB40050EAB2/$FILE/decreto_ley_22095.pdf · the Constitution, articles 55 and 140, at https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/198518/Constitucion_Politica_del_Peru_1993.pdf · the 1971 Convention schedules in the INCB Green List 36th edition of 2025 at https://www.incb.org/incb/uploads/documents/Psychotropics/forms/greenlist/2026/2510307E.pdf and the 1961 Convention schedules in the INCB Yellow List 65th edition of July 2026 at https://www.incb.org/incb/uploads/documents/Narcotic-Drugs/Yellow_List/65th_Edition/YL_65th_EN_unedited.pdf, with the editions the previous cell read, the Green List 35th edition at https://www.incb.org/documents/Psychotropics/forms/greenlist/2025/2412193E.pdf and the Yellow List 64th edition at https://www.incb.org/documents/Narcotic-Drugs/Yellow_List/64th_edition/YL_64th_E.pdf, fetched as well · all fetched on 3 October 2026. The previous cell's sources, carried: Peru, Anexo N. 2 of the Reglamento de Estupefacientes, Psicotropicos y otras sustancias sujetas a fiscalizacion sanitaria approved by Decreto Supremo 023-2001-SA, read in the DIGEMID Catalogo de Sustancias Controladas NOVIEMBRE_2024_V1 at https://www.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/Archivos/PortalWeb/Informativo/Catalogacion/SUSTANCIA_CONTROLADA_NOVIEMBRE_2024.pdf, which is the Area de Catalogacion of DIGEMID reproducing Anexo N. 2 under its own heading rather than the annex as enacted, and cross read against the DIGEMID publication of the same Anexo at https://www.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/Archivos/PortalWeb/Informativo/Psicotropicos/LISTAS_CONTROLADOS_2021.pdf · the Reglamento's own text, whose article 2 makes Anexo N. 2 the operative listing, at https://www.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/Archivos/Normatividad/2001/DecretoSupremoN023-2001-SA.pdf · Decreto Ley 22095 with its 1978 annexed lists at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con6_uibd.nsf/1AC694FF39FA6B7105258AB40050EAB2/$FILE/decreto_ley_22095.pdf · Codigo Penal articles 296 to 303 in the Compendio Normativo sobre Trafico Ilicito de Drogas published by the Congreso de la Republica at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/99D85DBA6D67749605257F540070950B/$FILE/Compendio-Normativo-TID.pdf, with the current wording of articles 298 and 299 confirmed against Decreto Legislativo 982 at https://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/448FEBA50C50F63B05257A6E005C3C8C/$FILE/DL_982.pdf · the Constitution, articles 140 on the death penalty, 55 on treaties in national law and 2 numeral 24 letter d on the legality principle, in the official text at https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/198518/Constitucion_Politica_del_Peru_1993.pdf · the 1971 Convention schedules in the INCB Green List 2025 at https://www.incb.org/documents/Psychotropics/forms/greenlist/2025/2412193E.pdf and the 1961 Convention schedules in the INCB Yellow List 64th edition of July 2025 at https://www.incb.org/documents/Narcotic-Drugs/Yellow_List/64th_edition/YL_64th_E.pdf · read as at 21 September 2026. The finding for this row is an absence from all 244 entries of Anexo N. 2 rather than an entry in it, recorded against the Spanish terms tabaco, nicotiana tabacum, nicotina. · Updated October 3, 2026
If prescribed / medical
No prescription question arises: tobacco is regulated by Ley 19.419, not as a medicine [Likely].
Documentation
Ley 19.419 is the governing law, read in the leychile version of 4 January 2024 on 3 October 2026, and that does not rule out a later amendment. What follows is Chile's drug offence framework, given as background. It does not govern this row, because this substance is in neither lista of Decreto 867 and artículo 50 reaches only the drugs mentioned in artículo 1 of Ley 20.000 [Likely]. For a listed drug, artículo 1 inciso primero of Ley 20.000 sets presidio mayor en sus grados mínimo a medio, five years and one day to fifteen years, with a fine of forty to four hundred unidades tributarias mensuales, for unauthorised elaboration, manufacture, transformation, preparation or extraction. Artículo 3 applies the same penalties to trafficking, and its second inciso treats importing, exporting, transporting, acquiring, transferring, abstracting, possessing, supplying, keeping or carrying as trafficking [Certain]. Artículo 1 inciso segundo allows the penalty to be reduced by up to one degree for substances in the lighter lista, which takes the floor to presidio menor en su grado máximo, three years and one day to five years. The reduction is discretionary on the wording podrá rebajarse, so the inciso primero band stays available to the court [Certain]. Artículo 4 punishes possessing, transporting, keeping or carrying small quantities with presidio menor en sus grados medio a máximo, five hundred and forty one days to five years, and a fine of ten to forty unidades tributarias mensuales, unless the holder justifies a medical treatment or exclusive personal use proximate in time, and a final inciso added by Ley 21.817 applies the artículo 1 penalty to small quantities of substances the reglamento marks as gravely harmful [Certain]. Artículo 19 raises the penalty by one degree where any of its twelve listed aggravations, lettered a to l, applies, and permits two degrees where two or more concur. One degree above the artículo 1 band is presidio mayor en sus grados medio a máximo, ten years and one day to twenty years, read against the table in artículo 56 of the Código Penal [Certain]. The two degree ceiling turns on Código Penal degree arithmetic that I did not settle in this pass, so it is not established here. Artículo 50 makes consuming in a public place, and holding or carrying in such a place for exclusive personal use proximate in time, a falta punished by a fine of one to ten unidades tributarias mensuales, attendance at a prevention programme for up to sixty days or treatment for up to one hundred and eighty days, or community work of up to thirty hours, with an accessory driving licence suspension of up to six months. The same penalties reach consumption in a private place where those present agreed beforehand to consume [Certain]. Artículo 50 refers to the drugs mentioned in artículo 1 of the law, which covers both incisos and so both listas [Certain]. A falta is not a prison sentence, but it can become one. Artículo 52 provides that where the fine under artículo 50 letter a) is not paid, the court may substitute the prevention, treatment or community service penalty, that any such substitution requires the agreement of the convicted person, and that in the absence of that agreement the court shall impose reclusion by way of substitution and enforcement of the fine, at one day for each third of a unidad tributaria mensual, never exceeding six months [Certain]. Because the artículo 50 fine runs from one to ten unidades tributarias mensuales, one day per third of a unidad puts the ceiling reachable from that fine at thirty days, and the six month figure is the statutory cap rather than an outcome this route can reach [Certain]. Artículo 52 also lets the court waive the fine or set it below the legal minimum in duly qualified cases, and artículo 51 requires the pecuniary sanction at its maximum where the falta is committed in a place of detention, a military or police precinct by an outsider, or in an educational or health establishment by someone who works there [Certain]. Decreto 867 states no numerical quantity for any substance and artículo 4 works from the open phrase pequeñas cantidades, so the line between artículo 4 and artículo 3 is judicial and not arithmetic [Certain]. Medical cannabis: Decreto 84 de 2015 amended the Reglamento de Estupefacientes, Decreto 404 de 1983, so that the Instituto de Salud Pública may authorise cannabis, its resin, extracts and tinctures for human pharmaceutical products, and such products «podrán expenderse al público en farmacias o laboratorios mediante receta médica retenida con control de existencia» [Certain]. Home cultivation is governed by artículo 8 of Ley 20.000, which sets no plant count; the six plant figure that circulates comes from reform bills and not from the law in force [Certain that artículo 8 states no number]. Ley 21.817 was published on 23 May 2026 and amended artículos 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 and 43 of Ley 20.000, and it did not touch artículo 50 [Certain]. Travel with any controlled medicine in its packaging with the prescription.
Decreto Supremo 867 de 2007 del Ministerio del Interior, reglamento of Ley 20.000, artículos 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 with the four list images embedded in the text, leychile version in force from 16 September 2023, read on 3 October 2026 · leychile.cl · Ley 20.000 artículos 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5 bis, 6, 7, 8, 19, 50, 51, 52 and 63, leychile version of 23 May 2026 · leychile.cl · Ley 21.817 of 23 May 2026, artículo único and artículo transitorio · leychile.cl · Código Penal artículos 21, 25, 56 and 313 · leychile.cl · Ley 19.734 of 2001, artículo 1, read from the Justia reproduction of leychile idNorma 186161 · chile.justia.com · Ley 19.419 que regula actividades relacionadas con el tabaco, artículos 1, 2, 4, 10, 11, 11 bis, 16 and 20, leychile version of 4 January 2024, which carries Ley 21.642 · leychile.cl · Updated October 3, 2026
Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, Schedules 1 to 5, at https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1975/116/en/latest/, read as at 20 September 2026. The power that moves the list is section 4, which authorises the Governor General by Order in Council to amend Schedules 1 to 5 subject to statutory approval and commencement machinery, so the schedules are not fixed by the Act's own date. The chain the source records as checked is the current consolidation, the 2022 and 2025 Classification and Presumption of Supply Orders with their commencement orders, and the 2024 pseudoephedrine amendment. A 2026 Order exists and the source records it as uncommenced at that date, so this reading does not rule out a later amendment that had commenced or been made after it. The published URL resolves to the latest consolidation rather than to a fixed version, so the read date above is what identifies the text, not the link. · Updated September 21, 2026
· the consolidation is dated 29 May 2025 and carries the Act 14 of 2022 substitution of both schedules with effect from 14 December 2022
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act, Cap. 245 (No. 4 of 1994), text as at 31 December 2022 revised by the 24th Annual Supplement (Legal Notice 221 of 2023), incorporating the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) (Amendment) Act, 2022 (No. 4 of 2022), commenced 21 March 2022 · ss. 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4B, 5, 6, 13, 16, 87 and the First to Fourth Schedules · new.kenyalaw.org · Updated October 2, 2026
Belgium, Royal Decree of 6 September 2017, Annexes I to V, the eight Annex IVA generic families and articles 2, 8 and 61, checked for tobacco with the result that there is no entry: a search of Annexes I to V and all eight Annex IVA families for tobacco and Nicotiana tabacum returned nothing, and the separate Belgian tobacco product rules produce no narcotic or psychotropic classification · read at https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/arrete/2017/09/06/2017031231/justel on 18 September 2026 · the decree is at https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/arrete/2017/09/06/2017031231/justel and the Law of 24 February 1921 bilingual consolidation at https://afmps.be/sites/default/files/downloads/LOI-WET-1921-02-24.pdf · the annex text is the AFMPS non official consolidated version, valid from 29 March 2026 with a correction dated 16 July 2026, and the Moniteur belge controls · Updated September 20, 2026
Documentation
No controlled drug documentation requirement arises under the drug law for a substance that is not in the narcotics lists. Carry any prescribed medicine in its original packaging with the prescription.
Läkemedelsverkets föreskrifter (LVFS 2011:10) om förteckningar över narkotika, konsoliderad version, as amended through HSLF-FS 2026:26, read on 21 September 2026 · 3 § förordningen (1992:1554) om kontroll av narkotika · Quotations in guillemets are the row's printed tokens in column order. Line wraps inside a name are rejoined, and a hyphen that exists only because of the wrap is dropped. Any further name printed in the row is reported in prose rather than inside the quotation, because the two column layout interleaves it into the middle of the chemical name · lakemedelsverket.se · lakemedelsverket.se · Narkotikastrafflag (1968:64), 1 §, 2 §, 3 § and 8 § · Narkotikastrafflag (1968:64), read as at amendments through SFS 2024:797, which is the currency the Riksdag prints on the text, carried forward from the live cell and not re-derived · riksdagen.se · Every penalty band, fine, date, quantity, article and instrument attributed to the live cell in this row is carried forward from it and was not re-derived in this pass · Lag (1999:42) om förbud mot vissa hälsofarliga varor, 1 to 4 §§, carried forward from the live cell · INCB Yellow List, 65th edition, and INCB Green List, 36th edition 2025, carried forward from the live cell as read on 16 September 2026 · riksdagen.se · incb.org · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
It is not dispensed as a medicine in Denmark, so no prescription route arises for it.
Documentation
Declare any controlled medicine on arrival, carry it in its original dispensed container, and carry the prescription or a doctor's letter naming the substance, the dose and the patient. Within the Schengen area a doctor's certificate under Article 75 of the Schengen Convention is the usual document for a controlled medicine. Confirm requirements with the Danish Medicines Agency and with your embassy before travel.
Tobacco is not a prescription medicine here, although nicotine as a substance is listed separately in the medicines list. Where a substance is a medicinal ingredient rather than a listed narcotic, it is handled through the Medicines Act 395/1987, in particular the conduct and import rules in section 3 and the medicinal substances list, and its status turns on individual product classification. This row in particular. Neither decree names this row, so section 24 of huumausainelaki 373/2008 has no list to match it against: that section is written by reference to the convention lists and takes out of the Act's import and export provisions only medicinal products «joita matkustaja käyttää henkilökohtaiseen lääkitykseensä» containing a substance in one of them. The medicines list 230/2025 was read for this row as well, in its Liite 1, Liite 1 A and Liite 2, and the Finnish forms recorded in the documentation field return no row of its own there either.
Documentation
No document is carried for tobacco. Age is the operative control and sections 53 and 118 set it at 18. Carry any prescribed medicine in its dispensed packaging with the prescription. Finland's personal import rules for medicines sit in the Medicines Act 395/1987 and were not read for this cell, so no traveller allowance is stated here. This row in particular. The search behind the absence stated for this row was run in Finnish and the forms were «Tupakka», «Nicotiana», «Nikotiini», «nikotin». Section 24 of huumausainelaki 373/2008, the provision that would otherwise carry a traveller's own medicine past the Act's import and export rules, reaches only products «joita matkustaja käyttää henkilökohtaiseen lääkitykseensä» that contain a substance in one of the convention lists, and this row is in none of them. Provenance for this row. The consolidated 543/2008 read here is the Finlex text carrying amendments up to 25.6.2026/651, the version Finlex identifies as data.finlex.fi/eli/sd/2008/543/ajantasa/2026-06-26/fin, in force from 10 July 2026, read on 21 September 2026; the consolidated 1130/2014 read here is the Finlex text whose annex was substituted by 650/2026 with effect from 10 July 2026, read on 21 September 2026; and where the medicines list is cited it is the Finnish annex text to decision 230/2025 served by Finlex, read on 21 September 2026.
Finland, tobacco, not a named entry of either drug decree and governed by tupakkalaki 549/2016 · the entry text, the closing extension clause of its list and the statutory wording are quoted in the other fields and are not repeated here, because this field is split into citation chips on every semicolon · Valtioneuvoston asetus huumausaineina pidettävistä aineista, valmisteista ja kasveista 543/2008, section 1 and annexes I to V · Valtioneuvoston asetus kuluttajamarkkinoilta kielletyistä psykoaktiivisista aineista 1130/2014, section 1 and its annex · Huumausainelaki 373/2008, sections 3, 5, 7, 23, 23 b and 24 · Rikoslaki 39/1889, chapter 44 sections 5 and 5 a and chapter 50 sections 1, 2, 2 a, 3, 4, 4 a, 5 and 7 · finlex.fi · finlex.fi · finlex.fi · finlex.fi · 543/2008 read in the consolidated Finlex text carrying amendments up to 25.6.2026/651, the version identified as data.finlex.fi/eli/sd/2008/543/ajantasa/2026-06-26/fin and in force from 10 July 2026, read on 21 September 2026 · 1130/2014 read in the consolidated Finlex text whose annex was substituted by 650/2026 with effect from 10 July 2026, read on 21 September 2026 · Finlex is the Ministry of Justice public legal database, its data is published under CC BY 4.0 and the statutes themselves are outside copyright under section 9 of the Copyright Act 404/1961 · read on 21 September 2026 · finlex.fi · carried forward from the b966 Finland cell, which this batch stacks on and does not replace: sections 44 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
The country level rule is Ley 913 article 20, which puts a medicine containing a sustancia controlada of Listas I to IV behind an authorised pharmacy and a doctor's prescription or a Ministry of Health form, and article 21 I, which obliges a carrier to require a Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation before such a substance crosses the customs frontier. Attached to this row: neither article attaches on the reading made here, because both are keyed to a place in the Anexo and no place for this substance was established. That is not a statement that it may be carried freely. It is a statement that the controlled medicines route was not shown to reach it. What the search did return on this row was this. Tobacco appears nowhere in the Anexo, and neither does any tobacco alkaloid. A band that article 20 does govern therefore exists close by, and this substance was not found in it or in any other.
Documentation
Provenance. The Anexo was read in the Gaceta Oficial edition of Ley 913, edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, downloaded from the Gaceta at gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo, and cross checked line by line against the copy the Dirección General de Sustancias Controladas publishes at dgsc.gob.bo. The two copies carry the same entries and differ only in line breaks and in a handful of characters where a capital letter I is set as a lowercase letter l in the text layer. The Anexo says on its own face that it reproduces the 1961 and 1971 convention lists as amended in force from 19 September 1987, so it is an old list re enacted in 2017 and it is materially the same list Ley 1008 annexed. Which instrument governs, re derived this pass. Ley 913 did not replace Ley 1008. Its first derogatory disposition derogates article 33 incisos a), q) and r), articles 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 44 of Título II, and Títulos VI, VII and VIII, and nothing else. Título III, the offences and penalties at articles 46 to 55, was left standing and is still the law, and Ley 913 itself contains no criminal penalty at all. What did move is the schedule. Article 33(a), the inciso that defined sustancias controladas by pointing at the Ley 1008 annex, is derogated, and Ley 913 article 5(c) with its own Anexo took its place. Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 separately abrogated the coca title of Ley 1008. So a cell that cites Law 1008 for the list is citing a derogated inciso, while a cell that cites it for the penalty is right. One loose end sits in the statute itself: article 46 still reads plantas señaladas por el anexo a que se refiere el inciso a) del artículo 33, and that inciso no longer exists. [Certain] Carriage. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription, and expect a carrier to ask for the Ministry of Health or Ministry of Government authorisation that article 21 I of Ley 913 obliges it to require before a substance of the Anexo lists crosses the customs frontier.
Bolivia. Ley 913 of 16 March 2017, Ley de Lucha contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Sustancias Controladas, article 5(c) and its Anexo, Gaceta Oficial edition 947NEC of 23 March 2017, read at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/913 and cross checked against https://dgsc.gob.bo/normativa/leyes/Ley913.pdf, complete read of Listas I to V with no entry found for tobacco · Ley 1008 of 19 July 1988, Título III, articles 46 to 55 and article 33(m), read in the Gaceta Oficial edition at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/1008 and against the Ministerio de Gobierno consolidated text at https://web.mingobierno.gob.bo/ · Constitution of 2009 articles 15 and 384 at https://www.senarecom.gob.bo/files/transparencia/CONSTITUCION_POLITICA_DEL_ESTADO.pdf · Ley 906 of 8 March 2017 article 16 at http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscar/906 · all read as at 21 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
This row is not dispensed as a controlled medicine in Paraguay on the text read, so the quadruplicate prescription regime of article 6 of Ley 1.340/1988 and of Decreto 5.213/2005 does not attach to it. A traveller carrying any controlled medicine should still hold its prescription.
Documentation
Control model. Article 1 of Ley 1.340/1988 defines sustancias estupefacientes y drogas peligrosas as, first, those in the lists annexed to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs and to the Convention on Psychotropic Substances ratified by Leyes 338 and 339 of 17 December 1971, second, any substance of natural or synthetic origin able to produce dependence, stimulation or depression of the central nervous system, or hallucinations, motor and sensory disturbance, or a change in behaviour, perception or mood, or effects analogous to the first limb, and third, the salts, preparations and pharmaceutical specialities and any product usable in their elaboration. The second and third limbs are fixed by decree of the Executive originating in the Ministerio de Salud Publica y Bienestar Social, on a list article 1 requires to be updated in December of each year and to name substances by the generic name adopted by the World Health Organization. The decree in force is Decreto 5.213 of 6 May 2005, whose article 1 was replaced by Decreto 5.282 of 2021, which also abrogated Decreto 12.064/2008. [Certain] Schedule read. The consolidated schedule is published by DINAVISA as the Listado Actualizado de Sustancias sujetas a fiscalizacion en Paraguay, Dic. 2025, in three sheets, estupefacientes, psicotropicos, and precursores y productos quimicos. It was read in full for this row and it holds 469 named entries. [Certain] That workbook is a publisher consolidation and not the instrument itself, and it was checked against both of the sources it consolidates. Two omissions were measured. It drops 25I-NBOMe, which is entry PN 008 of the 1971 Convention list and sits between two entries the workbook does reproduce, and it drops Amitriptilina from the national tier although Decreto 5.282/2021 opens that list with that name. So an absence in the workbook alone does not establish an absence in law. Every row in this batch that is recorded as not found was searched against the Convention lists as well, in Spanish and in English and by chemical name, because article 1 limb a of Ley 1.340/1988 incorporates those lists directly and only limbs b and c depend on the decree. [Certain] Search result for this row. Tabaco and Nicotina each returned nothing in any of the three sheets. [Certain] that this is what the December 2025 schedule holds. Amending history re-derived this pass. Ley 1.340/1988 has been amended by Ley 68/1992 on article 2, Ley 171/1993 on articles 51 and 52, Ley 1.881/2002, Ley 5.434/2015 on article 23, and Ley 6.902/2022 on articles 2, 3, 4, 23, 47, 101 and 105. Ley 1.881/2002 rewrote articles 19, 21, 23, 53 and 54, added chapters 10 to 16, renumbered the old articles 72 to 83 as 99 to 111, and by its article 4 repealed articles 27, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60. Articles 1 and 30 have not been amended. [Certain] Correction to the live cell. The live Paraguayan cells attribute trafficking and cultivation to article 16 at 10 to 20 years. Article 16 is supply made to facilitate another offence and carries 5 to 15 years. Cultivation is article 33 and carries 10 to 20 years. The article number in the live cell is wrong and has been corrected here against the statute text. [Certain] The research dossier was not relied on for placement. Its two cited library identifiers for the primary instrument were both fetched and both resolve to unrelated statutes, one on housing debt and one on a municipal land transfer. Its quotation column is a formula wrapped around the corpus name rather than a quotation from any Paraguayan text. It assigns a 20 year ceiling to article 27, which set 5 to 15 years and was repealed in 2002. It offered Escopolamina, Catha edulis, Lophophora williamsii and Ergina as Paraguayan entry names and none of the four is in the December 2025 schedule. It recorded ketamine, tramadol, GHB, mephedrone, methylone, MDPV, MXE and 2C-B as unresolved and all eight are named entries. Every placement stated here was read from the schedule itself. [Certain] Capital and life. Article 4 of the 1992 Constitucion Nacional reads Queda abolida la pena de muerte. Ley 1.340/1988 contains no capital provision and no life provision, and its highest range is 10 to 25 years. [Certain] The schedule read was the Listado Actualizado de Sustancias sujetas a fiscalizacion en Paraguay, Dic. 2025, published by DINAVISA under Decreto 5.213/2005 as amended by Decreto 5.282/2021, read as at 21 September 2026, together with the 1961 and 1971 Convention lists that article 1 limb a incorporates directly. Reading them does not rule out a later decree, a later edition of the list, or a later Convention scheduling decision that names this substance.
· Tobacco Control Regulations, 2016 (L.I. 2247), read at https://assets.tobaccocontrollaws.org/uploads/legislation/Ghana/Ghana-TC-Regs-2016-native.pdf on 3 October 2026
· Narcotics Control Commission Act, 2020 (Act 1019), official parliamentary text, read at https://repository.parliament.gh/bitstreams/2ae84af6-4f3f-49e5-aae1-b340fe350cb8/download on 3 October 2026, Fifth to Eighth Schedules
· Narcotics Control Commission (Amendment) Bill, 2023, https://repository.parliament.gh/server/api/core/bitstreams/bddf7867-d1e8-4c0c-a44d-bc984aa53ec8/content
· consolidation note «Amended by Narcotics Control Commission (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act 1100 of 2023)», https://www.judy.legal/legislation/akn/gh/act/2020/1019
· Narcotics Control Commission (Cultivation and Management of Cannabis) Regulations, 2023 (L.I. 2475), https://www.judy.legal/legislation/akn/gh/act/li/2023/2475
Documentation
[Certain] Placement read in this pass: not named in the Schedule as read. The reading is of the consolidated First Schedule whose own amendment note at its head ends at התשע"ח and whose schedule pages carry the 1.4.2018 update stamp, with section 7 stamped 1.1.2019 and the file closing with (סוף הפקודה), and a later amendment to the Schedule is not ruled out, and this reading is of that version and no other. Carried from the published entry and from the b162 staging, not re-derived in this pass [Likely]: cannabis is decriminalised by policy rather than legalised. Since 1 April 2019, under a temporary order following the July 2018 Knesset approval, adult personal use or possession of a small amount, 15 g or less, is handled administratively rather than as a criminal offence; private home use is said to be no offence at all, while public use draws a graduated fine, the first about NIS 1,000 or about USD 275, doubled on the second, with the third triggering a criminal investigation or licence loss and the fourth prosecution. Per NIDA and the Anti-Drug Authority cannabis use is still forbidden. Soldiers, prisoners, minors and police are excluded from that framework and remain criminal. The framework is cannabis only and does not extend to other drugs. Also carried and flagged as draft rather than enacted: a 2020 bill to decriminalise up to 50 g did not pass; 2022 Sa'ar draft regulations to make personal use purely administrative and expunge records; a February 2024 redefinition of dangerous drug to only cannabis above 0.3% THC, which would place low-THC CBD outside the Ordinance. The b162 staging also carried an 8 year asset seizure exposure on the trafficking route, which was not re-derived here and is not in the sections read in this pass. Medical cannabis is one of the world's oldest and largest programmes, run by the Israel Medical Cannabis Agency under the Ministry of Health, with a figure of about 130,000 to 140,000 patients and a January 2024 reform that dropped the last resort requirement. None of those figures was verified against a primary source in this pass. [Certain] Re-derived here instead: section 7(c1) of the Ordinance keys its special fine offence expressly to פרטים 1 ו־2 בסימן א' בחלק א', that is to cannabis and cannabis resin and to nothing else among these 88 rows, and sets the fine at NIS 1,000 for a first offence and NIS 2,000 for a second. The Ordinance's own footnote to that subsection states that it came into force on 1.4.2019 and applies for 3 years from that date, which on its face runs to 1.4.2022; the text read here does not record an extension and does not record a lapse, so neither is asserted. Israel has no capital provision for any drug offence.
Dangerous Drugs Ordinance [New Version], 5733-1973, פקודת הסמים המסוכנים [נוסח חדש], התשל"ג-1973, First Schedule and sections 6, 7, 11, 12, 13 to 21, 25 and 31, plus the Second Schedule · consolidated text read on 21 September 2026 from the copy held at research/instruments/israel/israel.txt, 191,538 bytes, which is 138,676 characters and 130,172 once the bidi controls are stripped, sourced from israel2.pdf, whose amendment citation list ends at ק"ת 2746 התשע"ח of 26.7.2018 · the b162 staging attributed the same text to chamber.org.il, carried here and not fetched in this pass. [Certain] The Ordinance's own title page reads התשל"ג-1973 and התשל"ג is 5733, not 5732. [Certain] The First Schedule read here has two סימנים in חלק א' and three live plus one repealed in חלק ב', which the Schedule's own conditions clause confirms by referring to סימן ב' של חלק א' ובסימנים ב' ו־ג' לחלק ב'. · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Resolución 200 of 26 September 2025, published in Gaceta Oficial Digital 30388-A of 16 October 2025, sets Panama's Listado Oficial under Ley 14 of 19 May 2016 and Decreto Ejecutivo 183 of 8 June 2018. It is a list of substances permitted for medical and scientific use, not a criminal schedule, so absence from it is not lawfulness and presence on it is not a defence. It is not a medicine and there is no prescription or controlled-substance documentation for it. Carry any controlled medicine in its original packaging with the prescription and the dispensing label, and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Documentation
Recreational drug use is illegal in Panama and there is no formal decriminalisation threshold, so Panama should not be treated as a decriminalised country. The exact strings searched for this row were «tobacco, tabaco, Nicotiana tabacum and nicotina». Duty-free allowances and restrictions on smoking in enclosed public places are the rules that actually bear on a traveller here. The live cell attributed the offences to Ley 23 of 1986 read with Law 13 of 1994. Those citations are carried forward here, with the correction that the articles the live cell then quotes are Penal Code articles, and the Penal Code adopted by Ley 14 of 2007 repealed the 1982 Code together with the offences defined elsewhere that it covers. The Penal Code was read in the Texto Único of Ley 14 of 2007 as updated to December 2020 and published by the Órgano Judicial, cross-read against the Procuraduría General de la Nación Texto Único carrying amendments through Ley 70 of 2019; the two agree word for word on articles 312 to 324, whose last amendment was Ley 40 of 4 July 2012. Every law amending the Penal Code that the Órgano Judicial lists after that consolidation was checked and none touches articles 312 to 324. The substance lists were read in Resolución 200 of 2025 as published in Gaceta Oficial Digital 30388-A, in the Green List 36th edition of 2025 and in the Yellow List 64th edition of July 2025. All of it was read as at 21 September 2026. Medicinal cannabis is lawful under Law 242 of 13 October 2021 and hemp under Law 464 of 2025 at a concentration not above 1% by dry weight, and neither route is a general permission for any other substance. Panama has no death penalty for drugs.
Panama, Código Penal, Título IX, Capítulo V, articles 312 to 324, the drug chapter, with article 324 carrying the definition of droga · Texto Único of Ley 14 of 2007 updated to December 2020, published by the Órgano Judicial · organojudicial.gob.pa · cross-read against the Procuraduría General de la Nación Texto Único carrying amendments through Ley 70 of 2019, which agrees word for word on articles 312 to 324 · ministeriopublico.gob.pa · MINSA Resolución 200 of 26 September 2025, the Listado Oficial of substances permitted for medical and scientific use, which repeals Resolutions 410 of 2018, 691 of 2020, 782 of 2020 and 176 of 2021, published in Gaceta Oficial Digital 30388-A of 16 October 2025 · dnfd.minsa.gob.pa · searched in the INCB Green List 36th edition of 2025 and the INCB Yellow List 64th edition of July 2025 and no entry was returned, which is a finding about those lists and not about the dependence limb of article 324 · the penalty figures, the citation of Ley 23 of 1986 with Ley 13 of 1994 and the citation of Decreto 25 of 16 January 2024 are carried forward from the live cell and not re-derived, except where this cell states a correction · every law the Órgano Judicial lists as amending the Penal Code after the December 2020 consolidation was checked and none touches articles 312 to 324 · no identification code is cited for this row because no entry for Tobacco was matched in either convention list, and the national list prints entries without codes · read as at 21 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Not a controlled medicine under this Act. The prescription machinery of sections 9(3), 12 and 13 applies to a narcotic, meaning something in the First Schedule, and this substance is not in it.
Documentation
Section 9(5) is the only traveller allowance the Act contains, and it is not a personal one: a passenger vessel, aircraft or land vehicle may keep, carry, transport, administer and use medicine-grade narcotics in its first aid box under a doctor's control for emergency treatment, in the quantity fixed by the Government by notification in the official Gazette. No such quantity notification was located for this cell, so no figure is stated. There is no personal allowance for a traveller's own supply anywhere in the Act, and the licence, permit and pass of section 13 are issued by the Director General of the Department of Narcotics Control on conditions fixed by rules. Carry any prescribed medicine in its dispensed packaging with the prescription, and note that section 36(4) lets a court divert a person who appears to be an addict and nothing more into treatment, with 6 months to 5 years if they refuse it.
Bangladesh, Narcotics Control Act 2018, Act No. 63 of 2018, assented 14 November 2018 and in force from 27 December 2018 by S.R.O. No. 362-Law/2018 of 10 December 2018, as amended by the Narcotics Control (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 26 of 2020, and the Narcotics Control (Amendment) Act 2026, Act No. 101 of 2026 of 16 July 2026 · First Schedule read in full, all three classes, and section 36 · the Bengali text is the authentic one and section 70(2) gives it priority over any English translation, so this cell was read in Bengali and no translation was relied on · sections read from the consolidated Act at http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-print-1276.html, which does not carry the schedules · the First Schedule read from the Bangladesh Gazette, Extraordinary, 14 November 2018, pages 15051 to 15056, reached through the Department of Narcotics Control's own law page at https://dnc.jhalakathi.gov.bd/pages/law-policy/6978735335ce18e1c0660a39 · read as at 2026-09-17, on which date neither amending Act contained the word তপশিল and the Department's own list of ten instruments carried no schedule amendment, so the First Schedule stands as enacted · Updated September 21, 2026
毒品危害防制條例 (Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act), last amended 4 May 2022, articles 2 and 4, read to establish absence, with 附表一 to 附表四, Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act, articles 16, 17 and 48. The four schedules and the Act text were read as at the national law database's own data cut of 11 September 2026 · the item lists stand as amended by the Executive Yuan announcement of 25 June 2026, in force 27 June 2026. Read 2026-09-17. · law.moj.gov.tw · law.moj.gov.tw · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
Consolidation read: Ley Orgánica de Drogas, sanctioned 18 August 2010, published in Gaceta Oficial 39.510 of 15 September 2010 and reprinted, the reprint read here being the one ordered under article 4 of the Ley de Publicaciones Oficiales to correct Gaceta Oficial 39.535 of 21 October 2010, which was carried in Gaceta Oficial 39.546 of 5 November 2010. The 39.510 scan and the reprint text were compared on articles 131, 149 and 153 and agree on every figure and range. [Certain] that the reprint text read here is the 39.546 one, resolved in this pass against the gazette itself rather than inferred from the reprint order. Gaceta Oficial number 39.546 was read: its masthead is "Numero 39.546" over "Caracas, viernes 5 de noviembre de 2010", its sumario carries the "Aviso Oficial mediante el cual se corrige por error material la Ley Organica de Drogas, sancionada el 18 de agosto de 2010". The issue is a 21 page scan with no text layer and was read through Spanish optical character recognition, so everything below the masthead was matched on recognised text and not on the image. Measured against the reprint text read here, in 24 character blocks: article 153 matches on 22 of 23, article 149 on 20 of 23 and article 134 on 15 of 24, the shortfall in each being optical recognition noise on the scanned side. [Certain as to the masthead and the sumario, which are large print and unambiguous, and therefore as to the issue number and its date and subject.] [Likely as to the per article comparison, which cannot be stronger than the optical recognition it runs on.] Control model, re derived from the statute in this pass. Article 2 applies the Law's control, vigilance and fiscalisation provisions to “el conjunto de sustancias incorporadas en las listas y anexos de los convenios y tratados suscritos y ratificados por la República”, and to further substances determined by the ministries with competence in health and in intermediate industries. Article 3 numeral 12 defines estupefacientes as “cualesquiera de las sustancias, naturales o sintéticas, que figuran en la lista I o la lista II de la Convención Única de 1961, Sobre Estupefacientes, Enmendada por el Protocolo de 1972”, and numeral 29 defines a sustancia psicotrópica as “cualquier sustancia, natural o sintética, o cualquier material natural que figure en las listas I, II, III o IV del Convenio sobre Sustancias Psicotrópicas de 1971”. The Law's own Anexo I, Lista I and Lista II, is a list of controlled chemicals and precursors, not of drugs: it runs from Ácido N-acetilantranilico and Ácido Lisérgico through Efedrina, Ergometrina, Ergotamina, Isosafrol, Piperonal, Safrol and Seudoefedrina to Permanganato de potasio and Anhídrido acético. There is therefore no Venezuelan chemical schedule of drugs to read; the schedule is the Convention schedule. No anchored entry was found for this row. The term list was built from the name columns of the two incorporated INCB lists and from the 2026-09-20 Venezuela dossier's quotation column, matched anchored at the start of the entry name and never as a free substring, and every candidate was read before it was accepted or discarded. Read as at the INCB Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026, for the 1961 Convention schedules and the INCB Green List, 36th edition of 2025, for the 1971 Convention schedules. That does not rule out a later edition, and article 2 of the Law lets the health and intermediate industries ministries determine further substances, so this is an unresolved row and not a proved absence. Method note. The 2026-09-20 Venezuela dossier was used only as the slug list and as a term list source. Its outcome column, its instrument column and its quotation column were not treated as evidence, and no placement in this batch rests on them; every placement is the entry read in the list the statute incorporates. Sibling name traps were checked rather than assumed: desomorphine, ethylmorphine, nicomorphine, nicocodine, norcodeine and dihydrocodeine are separate entries that anchored matching correctly did not return for the morphine or codeine rows, and brolamfetamine is a separate entry that did not return for the amphetamine row. Carried from the live cell and not re derived here: that there is no medical cannabis programme in Venezuela, that CBD and hemp are treated as illegal, and that only limited scientific research licences exist. [Likely], source is the live 2cb cell dated 2026-06-26, none of it is in the Ley Orgánica de Drogas. Correction carried into every cell of this batch: the gram figures are in article 153 and in article 149, not in article 131. The live cells attributed them to article 131, which prints no quantity at all. The ceiling of this Law is thirty years under the final paragraph of article 149, not twenty five. Routes run for the instrument in this pass. The Asamblea Nacional URL cited on every row of the 2026-09-20 dossier returned HTTP 404 and 5,734 bytes of HTML, so that register is not usable. The UNODC SHERLOC copy returned HTTP 200 and a 9.9 MB scan of the Gaceta Oficial of 15 September 2010, which was read with pdftotext. oas.org redirected every juridico path to its unavailable page. A clean digital text of the reprint was obtained from a Venezuelan law firm reproduction and the two were compared on articles 131, 149 and 153, which agree.
Ley Orgánica de Drogas, arts 2, 3, 34, 37, 53, 60, 62, 63, 130, 131, 139, 141, 142, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 to 158 and 163, and Anexo I · sherloc.unodc.org · lablabor.com.ve · Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela arts 43 and 44 · cgr.gob.ve · asambleanacional.gob.ve · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Guatemala's traveller rule is article 3 of Decreto 48-92: "Solamente podrá autorizarse la importación, producción, fabricación, extracción, posesión y uso de las drogas en las cantidades estrictamente necesarias, exclusivamente por personas legalmente facultadas y bajo su estricta responsabilidad, para el tratamiento médico, los análisis toxicológicos y farmacológicos, la investigación científica y la elaboración de medicamentos", and "En los centros de comercialización para particulares, su venta requerirá receta médica". That rule governs the drugs this law reaches. Article 2(a) puts this product outside the law altogether, so no schedule placement and no prescription route under Decreto 48-92 attaches to it.
Documentation
Decreto 48-92 excludes this expressly, and that is a finding from the statute rather than an absence from a list. Article 2, subparagraph (a), having defined drugs and extended the definition to seeds, flowers and plants, ends: "A las bebidas alcohólicas y el tabaco, no les son aplicables las disposiciones de esta ley". Alcoholic drinks and tobacco are therefore outside the whole law, so none of its offence articles reaches them, including article 39. This was read from the gazette scan; the government text at senabed.gob.gt carries the same sentence with an OCR slip, printing "y no le son" where the gazette prints "no les son". Decreto 48-92 annexes no list of substances. Article 1 reaches the drugs "incluidos en los convenios y tratados internacionales al respecto, ratificados por Guatemala y en cualquier otro instrumento jurídico internacional que sobre esta materia se apruebe", and article 2(b) defines "Estupefacientes y sustancias psicotrópicas" as "Cualquier droga natural o sintética, así considerada en tratados o convenios internacionales de observancia obligatoria en la República de Guatemala, el Código de Salud y demás disposiciones que se emitan para determinar las drogas de uso prohibido a que se refiere la presente ley". An anchored search of the whole 57 KB law text returned no substance name at all, which is the measurement behind that reading. The health authority says the same thing in its own words: MSPAS Normativa 22-2001, section 2, states that "Los Estupefacientes y Sicotrópicos son los enumerados en la Convención Unica de 1961 sobre Estupefacientes, en el Convenio sobre Substancias Sicotrópicas de 1971 y en la Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra el Tráfico Ilícito de Estupefacientes y Sustancias Sicotrópicas y otras Sustancias consideradas como tales por las leyes del país y por las disposiciones dictadas por la autoridad de salud". The terms "tobacco" and "tabaco" each return zero across both Convention lists. The 1961 Convention does list plant material by name, cannabis at NC 001, the coca leaf at NC 003 and opium at NO 001, so this row is absent from a list that reaches plants rather than from one that only reaches isolated chemicals. One thing does reach a plant whatever the lists say. Article 36 punishes sowing, cultivating or harvesting "semillas, florescencias, plantas o parte de las mismas, de las cuales naturalmente o por cualquier medio, se pueda obtener drogas que produzcan dependencia física o psíquica", and it is not limited to scheduled plants. Whether this plant answers that description was not established here. Being outside this statute is not a statement that the product is unregulated in Guatemala. Ordinary licensing, tax, age and public-order rules were not examined here and are a separate question from the drug law. The penalty articles of Decreto 48-92, which are set out in full on the rows this law does reach, are deliberately not repeated here: they are not this row's exposure, and the superseded cell carried them on all eighty-eight rows including this one. One figure in the superseded cell is corrected here. It put cultivation or manufacture at up to about twenty to twenty five years. Read from the gazette, article 36 sets five to twenty years and article 37 eight to twenty years, so twenty years is the ceiling on those two conduct articles and twenty five was never in the law [Certain, re-derived this pass]. Twenty years is not the maximum term this statute can impose: article 52 still provides thirty years where a death results, now that the words "muerte o" have gone from it. Carried from the live cell and not re-derived in this pass [Likely]: Guatemala has no medical cannabis, a 2016 bill having been rejected, and extradition to the United States is possible under a 1940 treaty.
Decreto 48-92, Ley contra la Narcoactividad, Diario de Centro América, 8 October 1992, arts 1, 2, 3, 12, 15, 36, 37, 38, 39, 52 · congreso.gob.gt · senabed.gob.gt · MSPAS Normativa 22-2001 secs 2 and 5, https://medicamentos.mspas.gob.gt/index.php/legislacion-vigente/normas-tecnicas?download=79%3Ano-22-2001 · INCB Yellow List 64th edition July 2025, read from the Universal Postal Union mirror at https://www.upu.int/UPU/media/upu/files/postalSolutions/programmesAndServices/postalSupplyChain/customs/listCustomsNarcoticDrugsUnderInternationalControlEn.pdf rather than from incb.org · INCB Green List 35th edition 2024, https://www.incb.org/documents/Psychotropics/forms/greenlist/2025/2412193E.pdf · INCB Red List 23rd edition July 2025, Tables I and II of the 1988 Convention, https://www.incb.org/documents/PRECURSORS/RED_LIST/RED_LIST_E.pdf · Updated September 21, 2026
Romania, Tobacco, read from Portal Legislativ, the official legislation portal of the Ministry of Justice, and the ANMDMR consolidated text · read as in force on 18 September 2026 · searched in Legea 143/2000, tabelele I-III · verificare Legea 194/2011 and no controlling entry for tobacco was found · outcome recorded by the source: NOT APPLICABLE, a completed negative finding · this absence is stated as at the consolidation in force on 18 September 2026 · legislatie.just.ro · legislatie.just.ro · legislatie.just.ro · anm.ro · Updated September 20, 2026
Slovakia, Tobacco, read from Slov-Lex, the official legal information portal of the Slovak Republic · read as in force on 18 September 2026 · searched through every group of Annex 1 to Act No. 139/1998, its extension clauses and its final line, and no matching listed substance was found · aliases searched: tabak · tobacco · Nicotiana · no controlled-substance threshold is given and the section 173(5) life ceiling is not assigned on this record · this absence is stated as at the Act 139 consolidation effective 1 January 2026 and the Criminal Code consolidation effective 18 August 2026 · two of the four links below are the commercial mirror zakonypreludi.sk rather than Slov-Lex · slov-lex.sk · slov-lex.sk · zakonypreludi.sk · zakonypreludi.sk · Updated September 20, 2026
· and the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act, 2019, Act No. 24 of 2019, https://laws.gov.tt/ttdll-web/revision/download/108733?type=amendment, brought into operation on 23 December 2019 by LN 397/2019, https://laws.gov.tt/ttdll-web/revision/download/108756?type=amendment. Searched for tobacco, nicotiana and cigar
· Act No. 24 of 2019, section 4 (the smoke definition) and section 7 (new section 5A), read and not relied on. Read 3 October 2026. Stated as the Schedules stand after Legal Notice No. 293 of 2026, which prints no commencement date of its own
· nothing in this cell turns on the row it adds.
Documentation
Carry tobacco products within the customs allowance, in their retail packaging, with the duty marking intact and receipts available, because on this record the Ukrainian controls are excise, labelling and customs controls rather than narcotics controls. Declare quantities above the allowance rather than waiting to be asked. Confirm the current allowance before travelling, since record UKR-85 establishes only that no narcotics heading was accepted and states no quantity. The narcotics list was read on 20 September 2026.
Ukraine, separate regime finding, record UKR-85: the Ukrainian tobacco control and excise legislation governs this product, and the source names no individual instrument within it. Narcotics cross check, Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України № 770 від 6 травня 2000 року, Перелік, таблиці I to IV, read at https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/770-2000-%D0%BF#Text as at 20 September 2026, no accepted heading. List ownership, стаття 7 of Закон України «Про наркотичні засоби, психотропні речовини і прекурсори», https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/60/95-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. Narcotics ceiling not engaged on this record, Кримінальний кодекс України стаття 307, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. Limitation: the narcotics cross check logged the product name in Latin lower case and capitals against a Cyrillic annex, so its negative is unmeasured. · the article 44, 305, 307 and 309 penalties stated above are carried forward from this site's published Ukraine entry, which cites the Criminal Code articles 305, 307, 309 and 310, the Code of Administrative Offenses article 44 and Ministry of Health Order No. 188. They were not re-derived from the Code in this pass, and the published entry's own hedges, that the thresholds are very low and that trace amounts have triggered article 309, are carried with them · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
The version read for this cell is the annex to Law 15 of 2007 as printed in Official Gazette 2804 of 16 August 2007 at pages 20 to 34, together with the publisher's amendment register for the Law, which on 22 September 2026 listed exactly three amendments and showed a site update of 17 September 2026. The register does not certify that no other instrument exists, so the consolidation is silent on that stronger point. The power that moves these tables is article 4 of the Law, which lets the Council of Ministers add to the attached schedules or change their percentages on the Minister's proposal after a committee of specialists approves, so the list can move without a new Law and all three amendments so far were made that way. The twelve tables reproduce the convention lists: the Group I Schedule 3 heading names Schedule III of the 1961 Convention in its English line and the 1971 Convention in its Arabic line, which is a mismatch inside the Gazette itself, Group II carries the four schedules of the 1971 Convention, and Group III mirrors the two tables of the 1988 Convention down to the note excluding the salts of hydrochloric and sulphuric acid. All twelve tables were read: Group I Schedules 1 to 6, Group II Schedules 1 to 4 and Group III Schedules 1 and 2, ending with the salts clause on the last annex page. The terms searched for this row were tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, shisha, waterpipe. None of them returned an entry, and the annex carries no general analogue clause: the only class entries anywhere are the Synthetic Cannabinoids and Synthetic CATHINONE entries that Decision 39 of 2016 added to Group I Schedule 1. This absence is stated as those schedules stand after Decision 14 of 2020, the last of the three amendments on the publisher's register for this Law, read on 22 September 2026. The group and schedule placement stated here is not printed in the quotation column of the dossier this lane was given: that column carries a bare entry name on its placement rows and a synthesised Arabic search record on its absence rows, and no group marker on any of its 88 rows, so every placement in this batch was read from the Gazette annex page instead. Bahrain's drug law carries capital exposure, and which offences reach it is set out in the street section of this cell rather than recited as a general fact about the country.
lloc.gov.bh · lloc.gov.bh · lloc.gov.bh · lloc.gov.bh · Law 15 of 2007 on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, Official Gazette 2804 of 16 August 2007, annex at pages 20 to 34, read 22 September 2026 · Decision 39 of 2016, Official Gazette 3276 of 25 August 2016 · Decision 11 of 2020, Official Gazette 3480 of 16 July 2020 · Decision 14 of 2020, Official Gazette 3492 of 8 October 2020 · Penal Code, Decree-Law No. 15 of 1976, Articles 49 and 50 · the 2019 drug death sentence and the commutation practice are carried forward from the cell this replaces and were not re-derived · Updated September 21, 2026
Misuse of Drugs Act, Chapter 27 of the Laws of Brunei Darussalam, Revised Edition 2013 (B.L.R.O. 2/2013). The list of controlled drugs sits in the First Schedule to the Act, not in subsidiary legislation, and the empowering section is section 35: "His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan in Council may, by order published in the Gazette, amend the First and Third Schedules". That power reaches the First and Third Schedules only, so the capital thresholds in the Second Schedule cannot be changed by order. The schedules were last amended by S 12/2012 and consolidated into this Revised Edition · the publisher's own page for Chapter 27 lists five amendment orders ending there, and every later gazette notification under the Act concerns approved institutions and appointments rather than any schedule. This cell was recorded as a measured absence across every part of both schedules and the Regulations. Read from the Attorney General's Chambers copy at https://www.agc.gov.bn/brulaw/misuse-of-drugs-act/ together with the Misuse of Drugs Regulations, Chapter 27, Rg 1. For tobacco the reading turned on the searches "Tobacco" and "Nicotine". · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Not a prescribed traveller medicine in this form. Iran’s own entry in the INCB Country Regulations for Travellers, 2025 sheet, admits only original and intact drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, carried with a prescription and in quantities covering the stay, and it says that beyond 6 months you must see a physician in Iran. The contact it gives is ICSA at fda.gov.ir.
Documentation
Tobacco is the second of the two rows placed outside the drug statutes. Iran keeps the death penalty for drug offences and uses it. Article 45, added by the Act of 1396/07/12, which is 4 October 2017, and approved by the Guardian Council on 1396/07/26, which is 18 October 2017, reaches only offences that already carry death or life imprisonment under this Law, and its paragraph (t) sets the quantity limb: «کلیه جرائم موضوع ماده (4) این قانون مشروط بر اینکه بیش از پنجاه کیلوگرم باشد و مواد موضوع ماده (8) این قانون مشروط بر اینکه بیش از دو کیلوگرم باشد و در خصوص سایر جرائم موضوع ماده (8) در صورتیکه بیش از سه کیلوگرم باشد». The quantities are more than 50 kilograms for Article 4 offences, more than 2 kilograms for the Article 8 supply limb, and more than 3 kilograms for the other Article 8 offences of buying, keeping, concealing or transporting, which is how the Head of the Judiciary circular of 1396/10/16, meaning 6 January 2018, reads that paragraph at its own paragraph 7. Below those quantities the older capital wording does not lapse by itself, because Article 45 converts a former death case to grade one imprisonment of up to thirty years and a former life case to grade two imprisonment, with confiscation of drug proceeds in both. The money runs beside that conversion: a grade one fine up to twice its minimum for the former death case and a grade two fine for the former life case. Paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Article 45 carry no quantity floor at all, and reach an offender who drew or carried a weapon, a ringleader, a financial backer or investor, an offender who used a person under eighteen or a person lacking capacity, and an offender with a final prior conviction under this Law for death, life or more than fifteen years. Advisory opinion 7/99/136 applies paragraph (c) to the transport of 80 grams of heroin and to the possession of 200 kilograms of opium, which is why a weight under two kilograms is not a safe limit. At least 503 drug related executions were recorded in 2024 and 471 in 2023, roughly half of all executions and carried out by hanging, which the US Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor reports and Harm Reduction International and Amnesty International corroborate. A second figure of 485 for 2024 also sits in this project’s earlier Iran records, unattributed there, and the two were not reconciled, so both are printed rather than one being chosen. Those figures are set out here because this row is placed outside that regime, so they are recorded as Iran’s published drug penalties and not as this substance’s exposure. Version read for this cell: the Anti-Narcotics Law of 1367/08/03, which is 25 October 1988, as the publisher’s consolidation carries it, with its 1376, 1380, 1389, 1396 and 1399 amendments, meaning 1997, 2001, 2010, 2017 and 2020, and the fine revision of 1403/03/30, which is 19 June 2024, and the four psychotropic schedules as those schedules stand after the Cabinet decision of 1384/09/13, which is 4 December 2005, both read on 22 September 2026, together with the narcotics-list decree of 1338/05/02, which is July 1959, whose Article 5 carries an amendment of 1352/12/28, meaning 19 March 1974, and the Psychotropics Law of 1354/02/08, which is 28 April 1975. Item 419 of the health invalidation law of 1399/08/05, meaning 26 October 2020, names annexes 1 to 4 of the 1354 Psychotropics Law, and Judiciary advisory opinion 7/1400/434 of 1400/09/09, meaning 30 November 2021, reads that as reaching the 1354 Law’s own original annexes, which later Cabinet decisions had already displaced, so the 1384/09/13 schedules stand. Article 1 of the 1354 Psychotropics Law lets the Ministry revise these four schedules on a recommendation of the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs, but only with Cabinet approval, publication and a further fifteen days, so a change to the 1971 Psychotropic Substances Convention does not enter Iranian law by itself, and the 1961 and 1971 Convention schedules are not the Iranian list. Provenance of the placement: the schedule and entry number stated for this row was read in the instrument itself and was not taken from the project dossier, because no quoted extract in that dossier carries a schedule marker for any substance, measured across all 88 of its quotation cells on 22 September 2026. Older bands survive inside the same articles and are what Article 45 converts. Article 4 band 4 reads death and confiscation above 5 kilograms, with a note giving life imprisonment, 74 lashes and confiscation for a first offence of 20 kilograms or less that was not distributed or sold. Article 8 band 6 reads death and confiscation above 30 grams, with a note giving life imprisonment for a first offence of no more than 100 grams that was not distributed or sold. Before the 1396 Act, meaning before 2017, the reported capital thresholds were far lower, at more than 30 grams of heroin or cocaine and more than 5 kilograms of opium or cannabis. The Anti-Narcotics Law itself dates from 1988 and the substances it incorporates by definition come from the narcotics list decree of 1959. Article 41 excludes authorised medical, research and industrial activity: «ساخت، تولید، خرید، فروش، ارسال، نگهداری، ورود، صدور، مصرف و حمل مواد ممنوع حسب مورد برای مصارف پزشکی، تحقیقاتی و صنعتی با مجوز وزارت بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی از شمول این قانون مستثنی است», so a medicinal use or a trade name does not by itself establish that the Ministry of Health permission exists. Carry any controlled medicine in its original packaging with the prescription, and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Comprehensive National Tobacco Control Law of 1385/06/15, amended 1390/04/08, fines revised 1403/03/30 · davoudabadi.ir · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
This Law asks for no document for Tobacco, because it never catches it, so there is nothing to carry or show under the narcotics regime. That is not the whole travel question. Medicines, import, customs and product rules sit outside this Law, they can ask for paperwork of their own, and they were not audited for this cell. Where the rule comes from. The instrument is the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law, State Law and Order Restoration Council Law 1/93, as amended by Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law 6/2018. The substance lists are not in the Law itself. Section 2(a) makes a narcotic drug one the Ministry of Health has declared by notification, section 2(b) does the same for a psychotropic substance, and section 30(b), as substituted in 2018, is the power: the Central Body and the Ministries concerned may issue notifications, orders, directives, and procedures. The live lists are Notification 24/2025 for narcotic drugs and Notification 25/2025 for psychotropic substances. Checked 17 September 2026. Placement for Tobacco: none, and none is expected, because it falls outside the subject matter of both notifications. Tobacco is regulated through other legal regimes, so sections 16, 19, 20 and 26 of this Law are not attached to it here. One limit on this cell is worth stating plainly. A further amending law, NDSC Law 17/2025, is reported to exist, and its text could not be obtained from any of the three routes tried. Nothing here is cited to it, and every section number and every quantity above is quoted from the 1993 Law as amended in 2018.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law, SLORC Law 1/93, sections 2, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26 and 28 · https://www.myanmartradeportal.gov.mm/legal/344 | The Law Amending the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law, Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law 6/2018, items 3, 20, 22, 25 and 27 · https://www.mfiu.gov.mm/sites/default/files/document/files/The%20Law%20Amending%20the%20Narcotic%20Drugs%20and%20Psychotropic%20Substances%20Law%202018.pdf | Notification 24/2025 · https://www.myanmartradeportal.gov.mm/en/legal/503 | Notification 25/2025 · https://www.myanmartradeportal.gov.mm/en/legal/504 | placement for Tobacco: outside the subject matter of both notifications · Updated September 21, 2026
the Law on Combating Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances issued by Royal Decree 67/2026, annex Groups I to IV searched for tobacco, as recorded in the 20 September 2026 dossier · https://qanoon.om/p/2026/rd2026067/ (HTTP 403, a Cloudflare challenge, on 3 October 2026 · read through the 20 September 2026 dossier's verbatim quotations) · Royal Decree 67/2026, decree Articles I to IV, Oman News Agency, 3 September 2026 · omannews.gov.om · Royal Decree 67/2026, Articles I to IV and Gazette reference, Decree.om · decree.om · Royal Decree 17/99, article 4, as superseded, as the live page quoted it · Updated October 3, 2026
Documentation
The наредба has no consolidated text at an official publisher. What was read instead is the official file set: the наредба as adopted by Постановление № 293 of 27 October 2011, then every one of the fourteen amending Постановления in order, each downloaded as the Word file the Council of Ministers legal information system publishes. Приложение № 1 was replaced whole by Постановление № 253 of 2013, so the 2013 text and not the 2011 one is the base for Списък I. No row is relied on for this cell, because none was found. Every one of the three appendices was searched for this substance, in Bulgarian and, where the lists print Latin codes, in Latin. One § of Постановление № 184 of 2023 amends a different instrument, Постановление № 23 of 1998 on the prices of narcotic substances for court proceedings, and its rows were excluded from the search rather than read as schedule entries. The Penal Code figures in the street paragraph are carried forward from the live Bulgaria cell and were not re-derived here, so the Penal Code itself was not read for this row. Carry any controlled medicine with its prescription and confirm requirements with your embassy before travel.
Bulgaria, Наредба за реда за класифициране на растенията и веществата като наркотични, all three списъци searched and no entry found for Tobacco · the наредба as adopted, with its full amendment chain, at https://pris.government.bg/document/65505dc00d92c4be0a95ef8ecc4e8bbd · Закон за контрол върху наркотичните вещества и прекурсорите, чл. 3, ал. 2, чл. 4, ал. 2, чл. 58 and чл. 60, in the consolidated text published by the Ministry of Health at https://www.mh.government.bg/bg/normativni-aktove/zakoni/kontrol-varhu-narkotichni-veshtestva-i-prekursori/ · the Penal Code figures in consequences_street are carried forward from the live Bulgaria cell and were not re-derived in this pass · the live cell's own citation for those figures is Penal Code Arts 354a, 354b and 354c with the Law on Control of Narcotic Substances and Precursors (ZKNVP) · the lists were read as they stand after Постановление № 49 of 8 May 2025 and read on 21 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
Lithuania, Tobacco, read from the official Register of Legal Acts and the Seimas legal acts portal · read as in force on 18 September 2026 · searched in Health Minister Order No. 5, all four schedules, and then in Order V-239, and no entry for tobacco was found · Lithuanian search terms recorded: tabakas · tobacco · Nicotiana · Order V-239 prints no small, large or very large amount for this row · this absence is stated as at the consolidations of Order No. 5 and Order V-239 that begin 18 June 2025 · e-tar.lt · e-tar.lt · e-tar.lt · e-seimas.lrs.lt · Updated September 20, 2026
· stated as in force on 18 September 2026
· the source states that Annex 1 to Minister of Social Affairs Regulation No 73, Lists I to VI, carries no entry for tobacco, and records no search terms for this row
· the governing regime recorded by the source is the Tobacco Act, Tubakaseadus, which is a separate regulatory regime and not the narcotic schedule
· this absence is stated as at the version of Annex 1 in force on 18 September 2026 and the schedule review covers the amendment effective 31 December 2024
· links below are the source compilation's own source map rather than per-row provenance
Slovenia, Uredba o razvrstitvi prepovedanih drog, article 2 and the annex in Groups I, II and III · read at https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=URED7970 with the annex at https://pisrs.si/api/datoteke/integracije/403462486 on 20 September 2026. For this row no entry was found anywhere in the annex, and the alternative regime named is the Restriction on the Use of Tobacco and Related Products Act and excise legislation. The Production of and Trade in Illicit Drugs Act, the ZPPPD, article 33, at https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO1388 · the Criminal Code, the KZ-1, articles 186 and 187, at https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO5050. Annex entry headings are printed in capitals in the original and are re-voiced here in normal case. The fifteen year ceiling at article 186, paragraphs 2 and 3, and the absence of any death penalty, are stated by the dossier read for this cell. The fine band of roughly 42 to 209 euro under article 33, the one to ten and three to fifteen year ranges under article 186 and the six months to twelve years under article 187 are carried forward from the Slovenia entry already published and were not re-derived from the statute text in this pass · they do not contradict the ceiling the dossier states. The register publishes the Uredba, its annex, the Act and the Criminal Code for public reading, which is not an unrestricted licence to republish, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced. No judicial ruling is relied on, and product composition, structural identity, medicinal authorisation and intent all remain fact sensitive. The dossier names no edition or amendment date for the annex, and this does not rule out a later amendment. · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
The dossier carries no prescription information and no traveller rule for Serbia at all, so this cell defers rather than inventing one. The country level question, meaning which Serbian body authorises a controlled medicine carried in, what paperwork it wants, what quantity it allows and how long an authorisation runs, was not established by the source behind this batch and has to be settled with the Serbian authorities before travel. What can be attached to the deferral is the regime. Tobacco is governed in Serbia under «Zakon o duvanu; Zakon o akcizama» as a tobacco and excise regime, not under the Spisak psihoaktivnih kontrolisanih supstanci. No authorisation is needed for personal quantities, and the dossier records no route because the product is not a controlled substance. The dossier establishes the off list position and nothing beyond it, so no route, allowance or exemption is stated here.
Documentation
The checkable fact in this cell is an absence and the instrument that replaces it. The negative search for «duvan» across the Spisak, and the substitution of «Zakon o duvanu; Zakon o akcizama» as the governing instrument in a tobacco and excise regime, were checked on 20 September 2026 against Službeni glasnik RS 12/2026. Personal import allowances are set by customs and duty rules, and exceeding them is a fiscal matter and not a narcotics one. Carry any medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and ask the Serbian authorities before travelling rather than at the border. Treat an off list position as a statement about the narcotics list and not as a statement that the substance is unregulated in Serbia. The citation behind this cell is document level and is the same link for all 88 Serbian substances.
Serbia, negative check in the Spisak psihoaktivnih kontrolisanih supstanci annexed to the Pravilnik o utvrđivanju Spiska psihoaktivnih kontrolisanih supstanci, Službeni glasnik RS 12/2026, Član 2, for the term «duvan», with «Zakon o duvanu · Zakon o akcizama» recorded as the governing instrument in a tobacco and excise regime, regulated through the tobacco and excise instruments rather than as a controlled drug · Criminal Code arts 246 and 246a with art. 246(5) and art. 45(1) carrying the document level 20 year ceiling that is reported but not applied on this row · read at https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/pravilnik-o-utvrdjivanju-spiska-psihoaktivnih-kontrolisanih-supstanci.html for the Spisak and https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/krivicni-zakonik-2019.html for the Criminal Code, a commercial republication in Latin script rather than the Cyrillic text of the Službeni glasnik RS. The dossier holds one link value for all 88 Serbian substances, so this citation is document level and not per substance, and nothing in it should be read as a source pinned to this substance alone. The dossier's own link field ran the two addresses together into one string with no separator between them. Read as at 20 September 2026. · the article 246, 246a and 247 penalties stated above are carried forward from this site's published Serbia entry, which cites the Criminal Code articles 246, 246a and 247 and the Law on Psychoactive Controlled Substances. They were not re-derived from the Code in this pass, and that entry's own statement that small quantity is not numerically defined is carried with them · Updated September 21, 2026
Al-Waqa'i al-Iraqiyya No. 4446 of 8 May 2017, Law No. 50 of 2017 with its annexed schedules: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4446.pdf · Ministry of Health Statement 197 of 2021 adopting updated schedules in replacement, al-Waqa'i al-Iraqiyya No. 4651 of 25 October 2021: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4651.pdf · Statement 33 of 2023, No. 4711 of 13 March 2023: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4711.pdf · Statement 238 of 2023, No. 4737 of 18 September 2023: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4737_331.pdf · Statement 348 of 2024, No. 4804 of 2 December 2024: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4804_compressed_161.pdf · Statement 347 of 2025, No. 4849 of 17 November 2025: https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/1b8a5aada31e000a_4849_compressed.pdf · the 2024 death-sentence count and the 15 year personal-use figure are carried forward from the previous cell and not re-derived, per the US State Department and Iraqi court statements reported by 964media and The New Region · secondary references carried forward from the previous cell and not re-derived: https://sherloc.unodc.org/ · unodc.org · hri.global · travel.state.gov · 2017-2021.state.gov · incb.org · euda.europa.eu · refworld.org · this project's Iraq substance dossier was checked on 20 September 2026 and its post-enactment amendment route is superseded here by the five Official Gazette statements named above · the Washington Institute · Updated September 21, 2026
Jordan, Law No. 23 of 2016, no narcotic or psychotropic schedule entry for tobacco after a search of the attached schedules, with article 2 supplying the Schedules 1 to 4 and Schedules 5 to 9 membership tests, article 19(a)(1) confined to plants producing scheduled substances, and article 14(a) the only limb capable of reaching an unlisted substance · the governing Jordanian regime is the tobacco control provisions of Public Health Law No. 47 of 2008, which were not audited for this row · read at https://www.jfda.jo/ebv4.0/root_storage/ar/eb_list_page/%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AE%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A4%D8%AB%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%82%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%86%D8%A9_2016_%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%87.pdf, the Jordan Food and Drug Administration's own consolidation of the Law, with the official schedules at https://www.jfda.jo/ebv4.0/root_storage/ar/eb_list_page/%D8%AC%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%84_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AE%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A9_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A4%D8%AB%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%82%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%81_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D8%A9_29-12-2025.pdf and the regulator's legislation index at https://jfda.jo/Ar/List/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%86 · Law No. 23 of 2016 was published in Official Gazette No. 5402 on 16 June 2016 and took effect on 15 August 2016, as amended by Law No. 24 of 2021, Gazette No. 5746 of 23 September 2021, in force 23 October 2021 · the amendment horizon is 16 September 2026 and the body of the 16 September 2026 schedules file could not be retrieved, so the last fully searchable official schedule text is the consolidation updated 29 December 2025 · the regulator's copyright page permits viewing and printing for personal and non-commercial use, permits linking, and permits short portions to be republished unchanged with attribution, which is the basis on which the Arabic above is quoted · read as at 17 September 2026 · Updated September 20, 2026
· corroborated by the Advocates for Human Rights, Amnesty International and Harm Reduction International
Albania states one traveller rule and not a route for each substance. Scheduled medicines and other prescription products stay subject to Ligji për barnat dhe shërbimin farmaceutik and to its prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street name is resolved through the proved active ingredient rather than the label on the container. The Albania dossier read for this work carries no prescription column at all, so no medical route particular to this row is stated here and none is invented. The placement that rule attaches to is an absence from the tables annexed to Ligji nr. 7975, datë 26.7.1995, për barnat narkotike, psikotrope dhe të kontrolluara on the national language form «duhan», with Ligji nr. 9636/2006 për mbrojtjen e shëndetit nga produktet e duhanit and Ligji nr. 61/2012 governing instead, in the category the dossier records as tobacco and excise regime.
Documentation
The placement read for this row is an absence from the tables annexed to Ligji nr. 7975, datë 26.7.1995, për barnat narkotike, psikotrope dhe të kontrolluara on the national language form «duhan», with Ligji nr. 9636/2006 për mbrojtjen e shëndetit nga produktet e duhanit and Ligji nr. 61/2012 governing instead, in the category the dossier records as tobacco and excise regime, with the annexed tables read as those tables stand after Ligji nr. 17/2026. Carry any controlled medicine in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription and a doctor's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose and the treatment period, and settle the import question with the Albanian authorities before travelling rather than at the border. Carried forward from the Albania entry already published on this site and not re-derived in this pass: cannabis cultivation is prohibited under Law 88/2016, article 9, except authorised medical cultivation, and the Law 61/2023 medical cannabis and CBD framework is export only. The act, the annexed tables and the amending list instrument were read as at 20 September 2026.
Albania, Ligji nr. 7975, datë 26.7.1995, për barnat narkotike, psikotrope dhe të kontrolluara with its annexed 1961 and 1971 Convention tables, read at https://qbz.gov.al/eli/ligj/1995/07/26/7975 · the list amending instrument is Ligji nr. 17/2026, neni 1 and shtojca nr. 1, Fletorja Zyrtare 41/2026, read at https://qbz.gov.al/share/ALlzohAkQQKSoEJ8lSY6Bw · the offences are in the Criminal Code, Ligji nr. 7895, datë 27.1.1995, articles 283, 283/a and 284, read at https://qbz.gov.al/eli/ligj/1995/01/27/7895 · the governing instrument read for this cell instead of the narcotics tables is Ligji nr. 9636/2006 për mbrojtjen e shëndetit nga produktet e duhanit and Ligji nr. 61/2012, recorded in the category tobacco and excise regime, with the negative search run against duhan · the penalty bands under articles 283, 283/a, 283/b and 284, the Supreme Court decision of 27 March 2008, the observed sentencing practice, the administrative path under the Code of Misdemeanors article 121, and Law 88/2016 and Law 61/2023 are carried forward from the Albania entry already published on this site and were not re-derived from the statute text in this pass. Every hedge the published entry attaches to those figures is carried with them, and none of them is offered as a reading of the statute made here · the tables are taken as those tables stand after Ligji nr. 17/2026 and that does not rule out a later addition · the publisher reserves its rights and no open reuse licence was located, so only the wording verification requires is reproduced · the law and the list were read as at 20 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
The source carries no prescription column, so no per substance medical route is asserted here. The country level rule it does state is that scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to Закон за лековите и медицинските средства and to its prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and that a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. Placement for this row: no row in the classification lists, and the governing instrument recorded instead is Закон за тутун, производи од тутун и сродни производи; Закон за акцизите under the category tobacco and excise regime. Whether tobacco may be carried on a foreign prescription is deferred, because the source states no traveller route for it.
Documentation
Carry the prescription and the original dispensing packaging, and expect the prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements under Закон за лековите и медицинските средства to be the measure, because the source states no separate traveller permit and no import certificate scheme of its own. A brand or street name is resolved through the proved active ingredient, so carry paperwork that names the active ingredient and not only the product name. The placement read for this row, no row in the classification lists at the locator тутун and Закон за тутун, производи од тутун и сродни производи; Закон за акцизите recorded as the governing instrument instead, was read as at 20 September 2026 in the classification list at Службен весник на РСМ бр. 104/2021.
North Macedonia, Листи за класификација на супстанции и растенија, Службен весник на РСМ бр. 104/2021, no substance row · negative check for тутун · governing instrument recorded instead: Закон за тутун, производи од тутун и сродни производи · Закон за акцизите · the lists are made under член 21 став 2 of Закон за контрола на опојни дроги и психотропни супстанции, so the minister of health owns the substance names and the statute does not · penalties at Кривичен законик, Article 215(1) for the ten year ceiling and Article 215(2) for the reduced offence · lists read at https://malmed.gov.mk/wp-content/uploads/Listi_za_klasifikacija-opoji-drogi_i_psihotropni_supstanci-Sl.Vesnik-.br_.104_od_2021.pdf and the consolidated control Act read at https://diz.gov.mk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ZAKON-ZA-KONTROLA-NA-OPOJNI-DROGI-I-PSIHOTROPNI-SUPSTANCII.pdf · the publisher makes these available without granting an unrestricted republication licence, so only what verification requires is reproduced here · read as at 20 September 2026 · carried forward and not sourced in this pass: the three to ten year band at Article 215, the six months to three years band for the lesser-quantity paragraph added in September 2009, the chapter 21 locator, Article 216 for facilitating or enabling use, Article 217 for severe bodily injury or health damage through those offences, the absence of a separate personal-possession offence, and the reported prosecutorial working thresholds of about 2 g of cocaine, 2 g of heroin and 5 g of cannabis are taken from the published 2cb entry for North Macedonia. They were not re-derived from the Кривичен законик or from any statute text in this pass, no web source was consulted, and the thresholds remain reported prosecutorial practice and not statutory. The chapter 21 locator is corroborated by that published entry and is still unverified against the Кривичен законик itself. The dossier read for this pass supports only the ten year ceiling at Article 215(1) and the existence of a reduced offence at Article 215(2) · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
No traveller rule for Bosnia and Herzegovina is stated in the sources read at all, so the medical route is deferred here rather than described: nothing in the material read says what a visitor must hold to bring a controlled medicine in, who authorises it, or whether a foreign prescription counts. What is settled is this substance's placement, and it is this: the term is not in the drug list, so nothing here makes a tobacco product a controlled medicine; excise and tobacco control law govern it and their traveller allowances are not in the material read. Do not read a placement as a medical permission, and do not read the missing rule as the absence of one.
Documentation
Personal import allowances for tobacco are excise rules and they are not in the material read. The reading behind this answer was made on 20 September 2026 against the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, and that date is the whole horizon of the claim: a later amendment is not ruled out. Because the no traveller rule is stated, the documents to carry for any controlled medicine are not listed in the material read and have to be settled with the authorities before travel.
Bosnia and Herzegovina, the list attached to the 2006 Law, as consolidated through Official Gazette 56/26 with the remifentanil move at 58/26, Tables I to III · no entry returned for the identifier tobacco on a scope check of the list · the regime recorded as governing it instead is entity and Brčko District tobacco control and excise legislation, which is named and not read · list read at https://www.sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/Xy4oDjohz4nh78h772k1Q= · separate quantity instrument read at https://sluzbenilist.ba/page/akt/BWhSA8RjiKk=, which returned no entry for this substance · Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, articles 43 and 238, read at https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/fbih/krivicni-zakon-federacije-bosne-i-hercegovine · the article 195 penalty detail, the misdemeanour track and the Brčko fine figures stated above are carried forward from this substance's published 2cb.com entry as it stood at its last_updated of 2026-07-14, with the caveats that entry attached to them, and were not re-derived from statute text in this pass · read as at 20 September 2026, and reading it on that date does not rule out a later amendment · Updated September 21, 2026
· none has been taken from the previous version of this cell or from anywhere else. The dossier's outcome for this row is verified.
Documentation
Carry the ordinary paperwork for the product rather than a narcotics permit, which means the prescription and the dispensing packaging if tobacco reaches you as a medicine and the retail packaging otherwise, and confirm the position with the Armenian Ministry of Health before travelling. The placement carried against is the separate regime at tobacco-control and excise legislation, record ARM-85, with no accepted annex line on the logged search. It was read on 20 September 2026 against the current incorporation of N 1129-Ն read together with amendment N 334-Ն of 26 March 2026, which took effect on 27 March 2026. The paperwork is a customs declaration against the personal import limit, which sits in the excise regime recorded for this row.
Armenia, no accepted annex entry, separate regime record ARM-85 naming tobacco-control and excise legislation · the annex to Government Decision N 1129-Ն of 21 August 2003, controlled lists 1 to 4 · version read is the current incorporation of N 1129-Ն read together with amendment N 334-Ն of 26 March 2026, which took effect on 27 March 2026 · penalties at the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, Article 393(3) for the 12 year ceiling and Article 393(4) to (6) for the significant, large and especially large bands measured from the Government's minimum small amount figure · search set as recorded in the source, «tobacco», all Latin script · official current incorporation of Decision N 1129-Ն at https://www.arlis.am/hy/acts/205965 · official amendment N 334-Ն of 26 March 2026 at https://www.arlis.am/en/acts/222947 · official Criminal Code Article 393 at https://www.arlis.am/hy/acts/153080 · official narcotics law «Թմրամիջոցների և հոգեմետ նյութերի մասին» at https://www.arlis.am/hy/acts/181155 · read as at 20 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Montenegro's traveller rule in this reading is a country level one and not a substance level one: scheduled medicines and other prescription products remain subject to the Zakon o ljekovima and to prescription, packaging, import and customs requirements, and a brand or street label is resolved through proved active ingredients. The placement to attach on this row is not a schedule entry at all: the search for «duvan» returned no Prilog row and the governing instrument recorded is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama. The dossier carries no prescription column at all, which was confirmed by tools/check-dossier.py, so no per substance medical route was established here: no import permit route, no personal quantity ceiling and no certificate requirement was read for this row, and none has been invented for it. The reading behind this row is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.
Documentation
Carry the product in its original packaging with whatever documentation Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama requires, and do not rely on a narcotics exemption argument, because this row rests on the absence of a Prilog entry for «duvan» and on Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama rather than on a printed schedule row. The list was read on 20 September 2026. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The record this advice rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime.
Montenegro, Pravilnik o utvrđivanju spiska droga, psihotropnih supstanci i bilja koje se može koristiti za proizvodnju droga, 56/2012 as amended by 54/2015, Član 1 and Prilog, searched for «duvan» with no row returned, so the placement cited is Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime · Član 4 of the Zakon o sprječavanju zloupotrebe droga is the empowering provision for the list itself, and the criminal ceiling of fifteen years at Article 300 of the Krivični zakonik belongs to the drug offence and is recorded here only because the dossier prints it on every row. The consolidated control Act was read at https://www.gov.me/en/documents/afd3651b-7fdd-43b9-b324-6e1e1a1a36cb and the Ministry schedule at https://www.gov.me/dokumenta/5aa4ae6f-0e4b-4f30-8c5e-75f9e413b019 on 20 September 2026. No express open reuse licence was located on either page, so only the wording needed for verification is reproduced, with attribution and a direct link. The Prilog was read as those tables stand after the 54/2015 amendment, and this does not rule out a later amendment made under Član 4 · the reading this row rests on is the absence of a Prilog row for «duvan» and the placement under Zakon o ograničavanju upotrebe duvanskih proizvoda and Zakon o akcizama, legal category tobacco and excise regime · the Article 300 penalty bands stated in consequences_street are carried forward from this site's published Montenegro entry, which cites the Criminal Code at Official Gazette 70/2003 consolidated through 110/2023, attributes the roughly two to fifteen year figure to the United States State Department narcotics report and records that the Article 300(1) to (5) paragraph ranges are not individually pinned there · they were not re-derived from the Krivični zakonik in this pass · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Because the Resolution does not reach tobacco, it supplies no prescribing rule for it and none is invented here. Kazakhstan runs a separate category of сильнодействующие и ядовитые вещества, potent and poisonous substances, which Criminal Code Article 301 punishes and which is fixed by its own list. That list was not read in this pass, so silence in Resolution No. 470 is not a finding that tobacco is unregulated in Kazakhstan, only that this instrument does not schedule it.
Documentation
Provenance. All three lists approved by Government Resolution of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 470 of 3 July 2019 approving the Список наркотических средств, психотропных веществ и прекурсоров, подлежащих контролю в Республике Казахстан and the Сводная таблица of small, large and particularly large sizes, the Список in its four tables, the Сводная таблица in its four tables, the substituent list and the veterinary medicines list, were read from the consolidated text at https://zakon.uchet.kz/rus/docs/P1900000470 on 2026-09-21, with the tables parsed by column position. The copy read carries the amendment of 24 February 2026 made by Government Resolution No. 111, and the Сводная таблица is wholly in that redaction, so every size quoted here is the 24 February 2026 text. This cell asserts an absence, so it names the version of the list it read and does not rule out a later one adding Tobacco.
Kazakhstan, Government Resolution of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 470 of 3 July 2019 approving the Список наркотических средств, психотропных веществ и прекурсоров, подлежащих контролю в Республике Казахстан and the Сводная таблица of small, large and particularly large sizes, all three approved lists, read at https://zakon.uchet.kz/rus/docs/P1900000470 on 2026-09-21 · the copy states с изменениями на 24.02.2026 and the Сводная таблица is в редакции постановления Правительства РК от 24.02.2026 № 111. Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Code No. 226-V of 3 July 2014, articles 296, 297 and 297-1, read at https://prg.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575252 · the death penalty was removed from that Code by the Law of 29 December 2021 No. 89-VII. · Updated September 21, 2026
· that discrepancy is recorded rather than resolved. Read as at 20 September 2026.
Law 673 gives this row no prescription route because the prescribing and dispensing articles, 80 to 95, are written for the substances listed in Tables 2 and 3. Tobacco is not a medicine within article 2's definition and no prescription question arises under Law 673. Law 673 carries no traveller allowance and no personal importation permit for a patient arriving with medicine: article 57, as amended by Law 193 of 24 May 2000, routes every import and export through a prior authorisation from the Minister of Public Health via the Ministry's Narcotics Department, and no lighter traveller route was found.
Documentation
The version read for this cell is the four tables annexed to Law 673 of 16 March 1998 on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, in two State published consolidations read on 22 September 2026: the Ministry of Public Health file Legislation Nationale, Substances placees sous controle, whose name carries the seventh modification of January 2019 and which the Ministry's narcotics page offers in Arabic as the updated version of the tables annexed to narcotics law 673/98, and the Lebanese University Centre for Legal Informatics note on the annexed tables, which carries the decree by decree amendment history. Article 7 is the power that moves these tables: it makes the four annexes a regulatory instrument that may be changed by adding an entry, striking one out or moving an entry from one table to another, by decree issued on the proposal of the Minister of Health, so the lists can move without a new Law. Article 8 requires an entry to be printed under the substance's international common name, or its scientific name where there is no common one, which is why a brand, a plant or a street name is not itself an entry. Article 5 sets the tiers the penalties follow: Table 1 is the plants and substances of high danger with no medical use, Table 2 is the plants and substances of high danger that do have a medical use, Table 3 is the dangerous plants and substances that have a use in medicine, and article 6 puts the precursors in Table 4. The dossier for this country marked this row verified on an Arabic sentence in its quotation column beginning with the words search record and pointing to tobacco control law. That sentence is printed in no instrument. The outcome reached here is the same, from the annex, and the pointer to the separate regime is carried as a pointer and not as a reading. The two consolidations do not agree and the union of them is the only defensible reading, so this cell names which one printed the entry it relies on. The Ministry file carries entries the University note lacks, among them Ketamine at the end of the Table 2 list of the 1961 Convention Schedule I, Etizolam and Phenazepam at the end of the Table 3 list of the 1971 Convention Schedule IV, Flubromazolam in Table 1, and the mephedrone, methoxetamine, para-methoxymethylamphetamine and 4,4-dimethylaminorex entries in the Table 1 list of the 1971 Convention Schedule I. The University note carries what the Ministry file cannot, because it is six years older: the two decrees of 16 May 2025. The two also disagree on a heading. The Ministry file heads the first block of Table 1 as Schedule I of the 1961 Convention while the University note heads the same block as Schedule IV, and the six opening entries, acetorphine, cannabis and cannabis resin, cetobemidone, desomorphine, etorphine and heroin, are the 1961 Schedule IV set. That mismatch sits inside the State's own texts and is recorded here rather than resolved. Every entry quoted in this cell is quoted from the Latin and French column that the annex itself prints beside the Arabic. The Arabic column of the Ministry file does not extract to reliable text for the older pages, where the embedded font maps to the wrong code points, so no Arabic is quoted from it here and no Arabic was retyped from a rendered page. The serial numbers in that file are unsafe for the same reason, because the Arabic-Indic digits come out transposed, which is why this cell locates an entry by the names printed on either side of it rather than by its number. The placement stated here is not printed in the dossier this lane was given. That dossier's quotation column carries a synthesised search record on 52 of its 88 rows, a sentence of the shape an exact local-language term, Latin name, common synonym, salts and isomers wording and post-enactment amendment route searched for this slug, which is printed in no instrument; on its remaining 36 rows it carries a bare Arabic substance name with no table, no schedule and no article. No row of it names a table: 0 of 88 quotations carry a table or schedule number, and its instrument column says Tables 1-5 on all 88 rows. Its URL column is the publisher's home page with a text fragment appended. Its paragraph 4 states that no single consolidated annex current to 20 September 2026 was located, and the Ministry of Public Health publishes exactly such a consolidation on the narcotics page the dossier itself cites. Its paragraph 3 states that no death sentence was established in Law 673, which is right about the drug offences and wrong as written, because article 140 does carry the death penalty for killing an official enforcing the Law. Every placement in this batch was therefore read in the annex rather than taken from that column. Law 673 has been amended by Law 193 of 24 May 2000, which rewrote articles 15, 17, 29, 34, 44, 57 and 88, by Law 272 of 5 January 2001, which added a paragraph exempting licensed industrial establishments holding an industrial certificate from the Ministry of Industry in respect of Table 4 substances, and by Law 318 of 2001, which repealed article 132. What could not be established for this cell is the text of the two decrees of 16 May 2025 themselves. The University note records them and gives no Official Gazette citation for them, and three routes were tried on 22 September 2026: a search of the Official Gazette index for issue 23 of May 2025, which lists decrees 223, 331, 333 and 334 and not 342 or 343; a query by number and year against the Lebanese University legislation search, which answered HTTP 500 on both numbers; and open search in Arabic and English on the decree numbers and on the substance names, which returned no primary text. The consolidation is also silent on the stronger point, that no decree later than 16 May 2025 has moved these tables.
moph.gov.lb · unodc.org · moph.gov.lb · legallaw.ul.edu.lb · legallaw.ul.edu.lb · Law 673 of 16 March 1998 on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, Official Gazette 14 of 26 March 1998 at pages 975 to 1016, 252 articles, consolidated text of the Lebanese University Centre for Legal Informatics, read 22 September 2026 in the copy that Centre prints and that UNODC hosts at the address above · the tables annexed to that Law as consolidated by the Ministry of Public Health in Legislation Nationale, Substances placees sous controle, the file carrying the seventh modification of January 2019, read 22 September 2026 · the Lebanese University consolidation note on the annexed tables, which records Decree 2432 of 11 February 2000, Decree 6608 of 23 October 2001, Decree 8065 of 20 June 2002, Decree 12137 of 7 March 2004, Decree 1189 of 8 January 2009, Decree 6221 of 27 August 2011, Decree 11051 of 11 January 2014, Decree 3403 of 12 May 2016, Decree 3610 of 2 June 2016, Decree 2591 of 23 March 2018 and Decrees 342 and 343 of 16 May 2025 · Law 193 of 24 May 2000, Official Gazette 23 of 1 June 2000 · Law 272 of 5 January 2001, Official Gazette 3 of 11 January 2001 · Law 318 of 2001, which repealed article 132 · the description of enforcement as uneven, the treatment diversion as only partly implemented and the about 6 months figure are carried forward from the cell this replaces and were not re-derived · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
This row is not printed in Fylgiskjal I, so 5. gr. of reglugerð nr. 1277/2022 um innflutning einstaklinga á lyfjum til eigin nota, which governs medicines containing a Fylgiskjal I substance, does not reach it, and the ordinary rule in 4. gr. applies instead. A traveller arriving from a state inside the European Economic Area may carry a year's supply for personal use at the directions of a doctor or of the marketing authorisation holder, and a traveller arriving from outside it is limited to 100 days. By post or freight the limit is 100 days from inside the European Economic Area, and sending from outside it is not permitted. Where the medicine is prescription only, 3. gr. still requires a doctor's certificate or the prescription with its directions, or the dispensing label, to be shown to customs on arrival.
Documentation
No narcotics document is engaged by this row, because the narcotics instruments do not reach it. If it is a prescription medicine, 3. gr. of reglugerð nr. 1277/2022 still requires a doctor's certificate or the prescription with its directions, or the dispensing label, to be shown to customs on arrival, and the ordinary quantity ceilings in 4. gr. apply. The legislation outside the narcotics instruments that governs it was not read for this cell, so this is not advice that nothing else applies.
Iceland, reglugerð nr. 233/2001 um ávana- og fíkniefni og önnur eftirlitsskyld efni, Fylgiskjal I and Fylgiskjal II with articles 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 10 · lög nr. 65/1974 um ávana- og fíkniefni, articles 2, 2 a, 3, 4, 5 and 6 · almenn hegningarlög nr. 19/1940, article 173 a · lög nr. 32/2001, article 1 · reglugerð nr. 879/2025 · reglugerð nr. 1036/2025 · reglugerð nr. 1277/2022, articles 3, 4, 5 and 7 · island.is · Updated October 2, 2026
Malta, Tobacco, read from Legislation Malta, the consolidated English text published by the Office of the State Advocate, which is the official publisher · read as at 18 September 2026 · outside the two ordinance scheduled drug classification · amendment horizon 18 September 2026, Chapter 31 through Legal Notice 46 of 2026, Chapter 101 through Legal Notice 97 of 2025, Chapter 537 through Acts VII and XII of 2025, Chapter 628 through Act XII of 2025 · legislation.mt · legislation.mt · Updated September 20, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Tobacco is sold as an ordinary consumer or industrial product rather than dispensed on a prescription, so there is no prescription document to carry for it and the name a Salvadoran record would use is tabaco. The special prescription machinery in Article 37 of the Reglamento is built for narcotics, psychotropics and agregados and has nothing to say about a product outside those three categories.
Documentation
The instrument read for this cell is the Ley Reguladora de las Actividades Relativas a las Drogas, Decreto Legislativo 153 of 2 October 2003, published in Diario Oficial 208, Tomo 361, of 7 November 2003, in the consolidated text published by the Asamblea Legislativa. That text carries its own reform schedule: five reforms, the last of them Decreto Legislativo 78 of 25 July 2018 in Diario Oficial 156, Tomo 420, of 24 August 2018, so the consolidation read here is current to that reform. The same reform schedule was confirmed against a second publisher, the transparency portal of the Fiscalia General de la Republica, which prints the identical list of five. The text also carries four rulings of the Sala de lo Constitucional, three of which strike the fine in Articles 31, 33 and 34 and the fourth of which struck the rule in Article 52 that equated preparatory acts with completed offences before that article was reformed in 2018. The substance list read for this cell is the Listado de sustancias estupefacientes, psicotropicos, precursores y agregados 2026, approved by Acuerdo SI.2026.03.20-01 of the Superintendencia de Regulacion Sanitaria. That document states its own currency in its Disposiciones generales: it was approved by that acuerdo and is «vigente hasta el 31 de marzo de 2027, o hasta que se emita un nuevo listado por parte de la Superintendencia de Regulacion Sanitaria». It was read as at 21 September 2026, and the 2025 edition of the same list was fetched first and set aside once the 2026 edition was found on the regulator's own page. The list is the one Article 13 of the Ley requires, «una lista de drogas y de todas las preparaciones y especialidades farmaceuticas que las contengan de acuerdo a las categorias establecidas en la presente Ley», which Article 13 also requires to be sent to the Corte Suprema de Justicia, the Fiscalia General de la Republica and the Policia Nacional Civil so that judges and prosecutors know it. Article 13 names the Consejo Superior de Salud Publica as the body that makes it; the 2013 Reglamento names the Direccion Nacional de Medicamentos as the governing authority, and the Ley de la Superintendencia de Regulacion Sanitaria dissolved that Direccion and moved its functions to the Superintendencia with effect from August 2024. That succession is stated from the Reglamento and from reporting of the Superintendencia law, whose own gazette text was not read for this cell. Article 2 defines droga in its own words: «Art. 2.- Para los efectos de esta Ley se consideran drogas las sustancias especificadas como tales en los Convenios Internacionales ratificados por El Salvador, las que se mencionan en el Código de Salud y demás leyes del país; y en general, las que indistintamente de su grado de pureza, actúan sobre el sistema nervioso central y tienen la capacidad de producir transformaciones, bien sea aumentando o disminuyendo su funcionamiento o modificando los estados de conciencia y que su uso indebido puede causar dependencia o sujeción física y psicológica.» Article 3 then prohibits activity relating to five named categories and, in letter f, «f) Cualquier otra sustancia que sea considerada droga tan nociva que amerite ser prohibida por el Consejo Superior de Salud Pública o por los convenios internacionales ratificados por el país.» The names searched across the list, in Spanish and in English, were tabaco, Nicotiana tabacum. No entry was returned for any of them, and none of them produced an occurrence of any kind in the list. Three routes were tried for the instrument and all three returned a document: the Asamblea Legislativa decree file, which returned the consolidated text; the transparency portal of the Fiscalia General de la Republica, which returned the same consolidation; and the regulator's own listado page, which returned the 2026 list. Two routes returned nothing usable: the Asamblea decree index and law search paths both returned a not found page, and a fetch of the Asamblea search page failed on certificate verification. Carry any controlled medicine in its dispensing packaging with the prescription, and confirm the position with the Salvadoran embassy or consulate before you travel.
Ley Reguladora de las Actividades Relativas a las Drogas, Decreto Legislativo 153 of 2 October 2003, Articles 2, 3, 13, 31, 32, 33, 34, 54 and 55, consolidated text published by the Asamblea Legislativa, Diario Oficial 208, Tomo 361, of 7 November 2003 · Consolidation: current to Decreto Legislativo 78 of 25 July 2018, Diario Oficial 156, Tomo 420, of 24 August 2018, the last of the five reforms the text's own schedule prints, confirmed against the Fiscalia General de la Republica transparency copy · Unconstitutionality of the fine: Article 34 by the accumulated 2006 judgments, Diario Oficial 196, Tomo 377, of 22 October 2007, Article 33 by the 92-2007 judgments, Diario Oficial 152, Tomo 384, of 19 August 2009, and Article 31 by judgment 45-2010, Diario Oficial 197, Tomo 401, of 23 October 2013 · Listado de sustancias estupefacientes, psicotropicos, precursores y agregados 2026, approved by Acuerdo SI.2026.03.20-01 of the Superintendencia de Regulacion Sanitaria, read as at 21 September 2026, the document stating its own currency to 31 March 2027 or until a new listado is issued · Reglamento de Estupefacientes, Sicotropicos, Precursores, Sustancias y Productos Quimicos y Agregados, Decreto Ejecutivo 20, Diario Oficial of 13 February 2013, Articles 5, 26, 36, 37 and 40 · Placement: reserved to leyes especiales by the third paragraph of Article 2 · no entry returned in the listado · Penalty figures for the 2 gram line and the year bands in Articles 31, 33 and 34 carried forward from the live cell and not re-derived from a new source, then re-read against the Asamblea text. The Article 34 graver offence proviso, Articles 54 and 55 and the three unconstitutionality rulings are read from that text and are new to this cell · asamblea.gob.sv · srs.gob.sv · portaldetransparencia.fgr.gob.sv · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
It is a plant product sold under tobacco law rather than dispensed. Article 12 of Decreto 126/89 governs medicines that contain a controlled substance, and this row is not one of them.
Documentation
The instrument read for this cell is the consolidated text of the Ley sobre el Uso Indebido y Tráfico Ilícito de Drogas y Sustancias Psicotrópicas, Decreto 126/89, published by the Tribunal Superior de Cuentas, which carries its own footnote to La Gaceta 25992 of 23 November 1989 and to the Decreto 86-93 reform in La Gaceta 27162 of 1 October 1993, together with the Código Penal, Decreto 130-2017, as printed in La Gaceta 34,940 of 10 May 2019. Articles 16 to 30 and 41 of Decreto 126/89 were repealed by Article 632 of that Code, so the 1989 law now supplies definitions and administrative prohibitions and the Code supplies every offence. The live cell dated the Code to 10 November 2019, which is the date Article 635 as enacted would have produced from a publication of 10 May 2019; commencement was postponed twice and the Code took effect on 25 June 2020. That last date is carried from the reported amendment of Article 635 published in La Gaceta 35,247 of 9 May 2020, which was not read at the gazette for this cell. The schedules Article 321 adopts were read in the International Narcotics Control Board Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026, the Green List, 36th edition of 2025, and the Red List, 23rd edition of July 2025, on 21 September 2026. The names searched across the three lists and across the Honduran text were tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, tabaco and nicotine. No entry was returned for any of them, and none of them returned an occurrence of any kind. Article 11 of Decreto 126/89 survives and still reads «Se prohíbe a toda persona mantener en su poder ya sea en sus ropas o valijas, en su domicilio, lugar de trabajo, automóvil o cualquier otro lugar bajo su orden y responsabilidad, sin autorización legal, cantidad alguna de estupefacientes y sustancias controladas», and Article 6 still routes the definitions through the conventions and the Reglamento de Control de Estupefacientes y otras Drogas Peligrosas, but the article that carried the penalty for breaching them is repealed, so that prohibition now stands without a sanction of its own. Carry any controlled medicine in its dispensing packaging with the prescription, and confirm the position with the Honduran consulate before you travel.
Ley sobre el Uso Indebido y Tráfico Ilícito de Drogas y Sustancias Psicotrópicas, Decreto 126/89, consolidated text published by the Tribunal Superior de Cuentas, carrying its own footnotes to La Gaceta 25992 of 23 November 1989 and to the Decreto 86-93 reform in La Gaceta 27162 of 1 October 1993 · Código Penal, Decreto 130-2017, Arts 311/312, with Arts 313, 314, 321 and 632, as published in La Gaceta 34,940 of 10 May 2019 · Commencement: Art. 635 as enacted set six months from that publication, and the move to 25 June 2020 is carried from the reported amendment of Art. 635 in La Gaceta 35,247 of 9 May 2020, which was not read at the gazette · Penalty figures for Art. 311, Art. 312 and Art. 26 carried forward from the live cell and not re-derived in this pass. The Art. 311 fine, the lesser gravity terms, Art. 313 and the Art. 321 quantities are read from that Gaceta text · Placement: no entry found in the 1961, 1971 or 1988 lists for tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, tabaco, nicotine · Lists read in the International Narcotics Control Board Yellow List, 65th edition of July 2026, the Green List, 36th edition of 2025, and the Red List, 23rd edition of July 2025, on 21 September 2026 · tsc.gob.hn · tsc.gob.hn · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
Carry the paperwork the tobacco-control and excise legislation route requires rather than narcotics paperwork, in the original packaging, and be able to show what the product is and on what basis you hold it. The narcotics cross check that puts this row outside the республиканский перечень was run against № 19/2015 with the official 2025 and 10 March 2026 amendments on 20 September 2026, record BEL-85. A later amendment can add an entry that moves a substance from that regime onto the annexes, so recheck before travel. What matters at a border is the excise allowance rather than any medical paperwork.
Belarus, Постановление Министерства здравоохранения № 19 от 11 февраля 2015 г. республиканский перечень, приложение, списки 1 to 4, record BEL-85 · outside the narcotics annexes, under tobacco-control and excise legislation · Criminal Code Article 328 supplies the offence and the ceiling, Article 328(5) · version read: № 19/2015 with the official 2025 and 10 March 2026 amendments · read as at 20 September 2026 · pravo.by · pravo.by · pravo.by · national legal portal https://pravo.by/ · Updated September 21, 2026
· Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 818 of 27 September 2019, annex 1 list of potent substances, wording of Resolution No. 632 of 4 October 2024, read on 3 October 2026
Carry the paperwork the separate regime asks for rather than narcotics paperwork, because record MOL-85 places this row under tobacco control and excise legislation and not on the lists. For a medicinal product that means the prescription and the original dispensing packaging; for a product controlled by excise, labelling or product safety rules it means quantity and declaration limits that this repair did not audit. Confirm with the Moldovan authority for that regime before you travel. Provenance follows. The controlling text is Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 79/2006, read in the official consolidated record on 20 September 2026 through the legislation portal legis.md, with the first and final annex headings and the final available amendment page checked. The searched terms for this row were "tobacco", "TOBACCO", and the record describes the reaching regime as tobacco product controls. There is no medicine paperwork to carry, and the practical limits are the excise and duty allowances, which this repair did not measure.
Moldova, Tobacco, from the 20 September 2026 repair dossier record MOL-85, search set "tobacco", "TOBACCO" · framework statute Legea nr. 382/1999 cu privire la circulaţia substanţelor stupefiante, psihotrope şi a precursorilor · offences and ceiling at Codul penal, Article 217 and Article 217¹, with the ceiling at Article 217¹(4) · searched in the lists approved by Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 79/2006 with no list row accepted, and placed under tobacco control and excise legislation, the record describing the reaching controls as tobacco product controls · outcome recorded by the source: verified as a separate regime finding · read as in force on 20 September 2026 on the official Moldovan legislation portal · legis.md · legis.md · https://www.legis.md/ The sentence band in this cell is carried forward from the entry published before this batch and was not re-derived from the statute in this pass · it is tagged [Likely] where it appears. · Updated September 21, 2026
Ley No. 735 consolidated text, articles 1 and 101, published in La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 32 of 20 February 2024 under the Digesto Juridico of Ley No. 1159 · Ley No. 1220, reforming article 1, La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 171 of 13 September 2024 · Ley No. 641 Codigo Penal, Titulo XIV, articles 348 to 362, in that same consolidated text · Ley No. 1216, reforming article 358 and adding articles 362 bis and 362 ter, La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 166 of 6 September 2024 · lists and tables annexed to Ley No. 285, La Gaceta Diario Oficial No. 70 of 16 April 1999, incorporated by article 101 of Ley No. 735 · pgr.gob.ni · pgr.gob.ni · uaf.gob.ni · Penalty, quantity and fine figures in this cell were re-derived from the articles named above and were NOT carried forward from the entry this replaces. The figures in that entry traced to the 1994 text of Ley No. 177, which article 101 of Ley No. 735 derogates, and they are displaced rather than preserved. · Updated September 21, 2026
· Resolution No. 87 of 2 March 2023, opening text and amendment date
· Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan, Law No. 574 of 21 May 1998, articles 200, 201 and 206, prg.kz consolidation dated 17 June 2026, read on 3 October 2026
· carried from the previous version of this cell: Government Resolution No. 121 of 27 February 2020, National List, as the dossier read it on 18 September 2026
· Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan, Appendix 1, Table 1 and arts 200 to 204, cited by the dossier row with no URL of its own
Documentation
There is nothing to carry for this row on the strength of the volume read, because the volume neither names the substance nor rules it out. If you are travelling with a prescribed medicine, carry it in the pharmacy's original labelled packaging with the prescription and a prescriber's letter naming the patient, the active ingredient, the dose, the quantity and the treatment period; that evidences a therapeutic purpose and nothing more. What was actually checked for this row: Tobacco and Nicotiana returned nothing in either file. There is no near entry, and there would not be one. The volume was read on 22 September 2026.
Belize, Misuse of Drugs Act Chapter 103, the Subsidiary Laws volume, Revised Edition 2020, showing the subsidiary laws as at 31 December 2020, searched in full across the Misuse of Drugs Regulations and their Schedules I to V, the Cannabis Violation Tickets Regulations and the Industrial Hemp Regulations · agm.gov.bz · the Misuse of Drugs Act 1990, Act 22 of 1990, as UNODC holds it, https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/the-misuse-of-drugs-act-1990_html/The_Misuse_of_Drugs_Act_1990.pdf · that Act text runs from section 1 to partway through section 28 and carries none of its First, Second or Third Schedules, so the list that decides control was not read · read as at 22 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
Illicit Drugs Control Act (as amended 2020 and 2021) (Tonga)
State of Palestine, applicable penal law (Gaza Strip military orders · West Bank PA framework) · loc.gov · unodc.org · Updated July 14, 2026
Documentation
Antigua and Barbuda is not in the Schengen area, so a Schengen certificate is not the relevant document, and no local traveller certificate was established from Cap. 283. Carry a prescribed medicine in its original pharmacy packaging with the prescribing document.
Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap. 283, Laws of Antigua and Barbuda, Revised Edition, First Schedule Parts I to IV and Second Schedule, with sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 25 and 26 · laws.gov.ag · consulted 22 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026
Documentation
There is no controlled drug documentation to carry for this one under this Act, and the useful precaution is a different one: carry whatever shows what the substance actually is, because every route that could bite here starts with identification rather than with paperwork. If it is a prescribed medicine, carry it in its original dispensing packaging with the prescription anyway, since Barbados medicines and pharmacy law was not read for this cell and this cell does not speak to it. The three botanical entries in Part I were read against this plant and none matches, and Part II was read end to end for a botanical name and carries none at all. Read on 20 September 2026 from the PDF of the Act itself. The edition read is the L.R.O. 1991 consolidation served by the Barbados law courts statute portal. No amending order or later revision was located on that portal, so anything made after that revision has not been read and is not asserted here.
Barbados, Drug Abuse (Prevention and Control) Act, Cap. 131, Act 1990-14, L.R.O. 1991 revised edition · the passage relied on for this cell is Parts I, II and III of the First Schedule read end to end, against the three botanical entries in Part I which are the Schedule's whole list of controlled plant material, with section 3 for the definition of a controlled drug, the Second Schedule for trafficable quantities and the Fourth Schedule for the punishments. This source is document level and not per substance. The Act has no per substance landing page and the whole cell rests on one PDF of the consolidated Act, read at https://www.barbadoslawcourts.gov.bb/assets/content/pdfs/statutes/DrugAbuse(PreventionandControl)CAP131.pdf, which is a primary Barbados government source served by the Barbados law courts statute portal and returned 200 with 1,881,169 bytes of application/pdf on 20 September 2026. The dossier this cell was built against carried a different filename for the same document, without the parentheses, and that address returns 404, so the working address is given here instead. The PDF is a scan of the printed revised edition and is reproduced here only so far as verification requires · where a headword is damaged in the scan this cell says so rather than repairing it. Read as at 20 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026
If prescribed / medical
Section 7(1) makes it unlawful to have a controlled drug in your possession except as allowed by Regulations made under the Act, and the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Regulations printed as subsidiary legislation to this Chapter carry the general authority to possess in regulation 5 and the prescription rules in regulations 14 and 15. That machinery is keyed to the Third Schedule, so it reaches this row only so far as a constituent is placed there. Nothing in this Act places this substance, so it supplies no prescription route for it and none is implied.
Documentation
Ask the Ministry of Health or the nearest Dominican mission before you travel rather than on arrival, and ask specifically whether an Order under section 4(3) has amended the Third Schedule since the revision note the Schedule pages carry, and whether any instrument outside this Act bears on this row. This Act is not the whole of Dominican law on this substance and nothing here should be read as though it were. The instrument was read on 22 September 2026.
Dominica, the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, Act 20 of 1988 as amended by Act 15 of 1989 and Act 15 of 1990, revised edition Chapter 40:07, sections 4, 7, 27 and 29 and the Third and Fourth Schedules · read from the 64 page scanned chapter held in this repository at research/instruments/dominica/dm-drugs-prevention-of-misuse-1988.pdf, sha256 30ca6c954678725f8bd4ea81de7b081e5b3ef5ef9015d05e357de1992c62ab30, with its text layer at dm-drugs-prevention-of-misuse-1988.txt, sha256 d47a9b795cabe1a1250ebd6ec3e13e4ccb6367708b69fded78a8eb22b7ab1465. The complete Part I, Part II and Part III lists on printed pages 30, 31 and 32 were read as page images rendered from the scan and not by searching the text layer, which drops the «Part II» and «Part III» headings and one numbered paragraph in each of those Parts. Those pages carry the footer «L.R.O. 1/1991». This citation is document level and not per substance: the compilation's links column for this row holds the constructed text «tobacco national source» rather than an address. The compilation recorded «TABACO» as the printed entry for this row. That string does not appear anywhere in this Act · the Act is written in English and that record's quotation column is largely in another language, which is a property of the record rather than of the instrument, so it is reported here and is not offered as a quotation from the Act. The Part and Class placement stated for this row is not printed in the quotation column of the compilation read alongside the Act: measured across that compilation, not one of its 88 rows carries a Part, a Class or a Schedule marker of any kind, and its instrument column says only that there is a controlled-drug schedule without naming which of the four Schedules that is. Every division named in this cell is therefore taken from the printed Third Schedule pages of the Act itself. Second instrument relied on: Dominica, the Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) (Amendment) Act 2020, Act No. 16 of 2020, assented to and gazetted 30 October 2020 and passed in the House of Assembly on 26 October 2020, a four page Act read in full from the Government of Dominica laws site at https://dominica.gov.dm/laws/2020/Drug%20Prevention%20(Amendment)%20Act%202020.pdf, sha256 c5f6a5b47cee1ffce3f88993d72163a1f0ba6a1f3cf68c31f8bfed89e1c5af01. It amends section 7(4), inserts sections 7A and 7B, amends section 8 and makes no amendment to the Third Schedule. Read as at 22 September 2026. · Updated September 21, 2026
Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, Cap. 3.02 of the Laws of Saint Lucia, Acts 22 of 1988, 8 of 1993, 5 of 2004 and 13 of 2021, Revised Edition showing the law as at 31 December 2021, sections 2, 4 and 49 and Schedule 2 Parts I to IV · read from the revised edition PDF at https://www.oas.org/ext/Portals/33/adam/Content/8SZdQwarRkKsfviRCd7ESA/Text/20250114-12%20-%20Drugs%20(Prevention%20of%20Misuse)%20Act%20-%20Cap.3.02-1.pdf, sha256 009563514ada6fee394268dc7700ac696c858273e183dde5c1e6883b1d1635ba, which is the Organization of American States portal copy and not the Saint Lucia gazette · the 31 December 2008 revised edition from ILO NATLEX at https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/natlex2/files/download/111582/LCA111582.pdf, sha256 fc9f7fe8a5aa48678bb3fdbad1b79d0b236059754716128c8b817f24324e9fb8, was read as a second witness and lacks sections 8A, 14A and 27A · the three attorneygeneralchambers.com schedule pages the dossier cites return 404 · the Part and Schedule named in this cell are read from the act itself and are not printed in the quoted dossier extract, which cites the drug list only as Second Schedule, Parts I to IV, a name the act does not use for it · consulted 22 September 2026 · Updated September 21, 2026